An ObserVatIonal STudy of the Effectiveness of AdaLimumab on Health and Disability Outcomes in New Zealand Patients With Immune-Mediated InflammaTorY Diseases (VITALITY) (VITALITY)
2019年3月19日 更新者：AbbVie
For public health purposes disability is becoming increasingly important as an outcome measure. Despite this, there are few data on the effectiveness of adalimumab on disability outcomes in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), particularly in the Phase IV setting. There are even less data available in New Zealand, which did not have the opportunity to participate to a major extent in large, multinational, Phase III pivotal studies of adalimumab in IMIDs.
The World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 is a simple, validated, free and easy-to-use generic assessment instrument for health and disability. It is applicable across cultures, in all adult populations. It is a responsive measure that can show what difference a treatment makes.
Results from study of effect of adalimumab on WHODAS scores and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of work activity and well-being will be of interest to a variety of stakeholders in the healthcare system including patients, healthcare practitioners and payers.
調査の概要
研究の種類
観察的
入学 (実際)
168
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
18年～75年 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
受講資格のある性別
全て
サンプリング方法
確率サンプル
調査対象母集団
Subjects will be males and/or females who are attending a routine clinical visit and meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria.
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease or psoriasis who have made a decision with their physician to commence treatment with adalimumab in accordance with routine medical practice and with the approved adalimumab New Zealand Datasheet.
- Patients who have been evaluated for tuberculosis risk factors/exposure for active/latent tuberculosis infection (per local requirements and according to the approved adalimumab New Zealand Datasheet).
- Adult subjects, 18-75 years old, who have voluntarily signed and dated an informed consent form prior to any study-specific procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous treatment with adalimumab.
- Previous treatment with any biologic.
- Severe infection including sepsis, active tuberculosis or opportunistic infection.
- Moderate to severe heart failure (New York Heart Association Class II/III).
- Concurrent administration with anakinra.
- Hypersensitivity to adalimumab or its excipients.
- Any condition that in the opinion of the investigator would compromise the subject's well-being or ability to perform the study requirements.
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 観測モデル：コホート
- 時間の展望：見込みのある
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
|---|
|
Crohn's Disease
Participants with Crohn's disease.
All participants will receive at least 3 months of treatment with adalimumab.
Adalimumab was prescribed by the physician under usual and customary practice and according to the approved adalimumab New Zealand Datasheet.
|
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis.
All participants will receive at least 3 months of treatment with adalimumab.
Adalimumab was prescribed by the physician under usual and customary practice and according to the approved adalimumab New Zealand Datasheet.
|
|
Psoriasis
Participants with psoriasis.
All participants will receive at least 3 months of treatment with adalimumab.
Adalimumab was prescribed by the physician under usual and customary practice and according to the approved adalimumab New Zealand Datasheet.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WHODAS 2.0 Response Score at Month 6 Across All Indications
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
WHODAS 2.0 is a measures health and disability across cultures in all adult populations by assessing the same individual before and after the intervention across 12 items, covering the following 6 domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities and participation.
Scores assigned to each of the items (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3, and extreme=4) are summed.
Scores can range from 0 to 48.
Persons scoring 10 to 48 are likely to have clinically significant disability.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WHODAS 2.0 Response Score at Month 2 Across All Indications
時間枠：Baseline, Month 2
|
WHODAS 2.0 is a measures health and disability across cultures in all adult populations by assessing the same individual before and after the intervention across 12 items, covering the following 6 domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities and participation.
Scores assigned to each of the items (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3, and extreme=4) are summed.
Scores can range from 0 to 48.
Persons scoring 10 to 48 are likely to have clinically significant disability.
|
Baseline, Month 2
|
|
Change From Baseline in WHODAS 2.0 Response Score at Month 4 Across All Indications
時間枠：Baseline, Month 4
|
WHODAS 2.0 is a measures health and disability across cultures in all adult populations by assessing the same individual before and after the intervention across 12 items, covering the following 6 domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities and participation.
Scores assigned to each of the items (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3, and extreme=4) are summed.
Scores can range from 0 to 48.
Persons scoring 10 to 48 are likely to have clinically significant disability.
|
Baseline, Month 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in WHODAS 2.0 Response Score at Month 6 in Participants With Crohn's Disease
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
WHODAS 2.0 is a measures health and disability across cultures in all adult populations by assessing the same individual before and after the intervention across 12 items, covering the following 6 domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities and participation.
Scores assigned to each of the items (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3, and extreme=4) are summed.
Scores can range from 0 to 48.
Persons scoring 10 to 48 are likely to have clinically significant disability.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in WHODAS 2.0 Response Score at Month 6 In Participants With Psoriasis
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
WHODAS 2.0 is a measures health and disability across cultures in all adult populations by assessing the same individual before and after the intervention across 12 items, covering the following 6 domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities and participation.
Scores assigned to each of the items (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3, and extreme=4) are summed.
Scores can range from 0 to 48.
Persons scoring 10 to 48 are likely to have clinically significant disability.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in WHODAS 2.0 Response Score at Month 6 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
WHODAS 2.0 is a measures health and disability across cultures in all adult populations by assessing the same individual before and after the intervention across 12 items, covering the following 6 domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities and participation.
Scores assigned to each of the items (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3, and extreme=4) are summed.
Scores can range from 0 to 48.
Persons scoring 10 to 48 are likely to have clinically significant disability.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in WPAI:GH V2.0 Score at Month 6 Across All Indications: Absenteeism
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
WPAI:GH is a 6-item questionnaire looks at the effect of health problems on ability to work and perform regular activities.
The WPAI yields 4 types of scores: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment.
WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes.
The questionnaire specifies responses for the previous 7 days.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in WPAI:GH V2.0 Score at Month 6 Across All Indications: Presenteeism
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
WPAI:GH is a 6-item questionnaire looks at the effect of health problems on ability to work and perform regular activities.
The WPAI yields 4 types of scores: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment.
WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes.
The questionnaire specifies responses for the previous 7 days.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in WPAI:GH 2.0 Score at Month 6 Across All Indications: Work Productivity Loss
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
WPAI:GH is a 6-item questionnaire looks at the effect of health problems on ability to work and perform regular activities.
The WPAI yields 4 types of scores: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment.
WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes.
The questionnaire specifies responses for the previous 7 days.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in WPAI:GH V2.0 Score at Month 6 Across All Indications: Activity Impairment
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
WPAI:GH is a 6-item questionnaire looks at the effect of health problems on ability to work and perform regular activities.
The WPAI yields 4 types of scores: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment.
WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes.
The questionnaire specifies responses for the previous 7 days.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in K10 at Month 6 Across All Indications
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
The K10 is intended to yield a global measure of distress based on a questionnaire about anxiety and depressive symptoms that a person has experienced in the most recent 4 week period.
The K10 scale involves 10 questions about emotional states each with a 5-level response scale.
Each item is scored from 1=none of the time to 5=all of the time.
Scores of the 10 items are then summed, yielding a minimum score of 10 and a maximum score of 50.
Low scores indicate low levels of psychological distress and high scores indicate high levels of psychological distress.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Flourishing Scale at Month 6 Across All Indications
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
The Flourishing Scale is a brief 8-item summary measure of the respondent's self-perceived success in important areas such as relationships, self-esteem, purpose, and optimism.
The scale provides a single psychological well-being score.
Participants are asked to respond to 8 statements using a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree) for each item.
The possible range of scores is from 8 (lowest possible) to 56 (highest possible), with higher scores representing more psychological resources and strengths.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subjective Vitality Scale at Month 6 Across All Indications
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
The Subjective Vitality Scale assesses the state of feeling alive and alert to having energy available to the self.
Patients respond to eight prompts, with a response ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree.
The sum of the scores is calculated with a higher score indicating a better condition.
The total score ranges from 8 to 56 with a higher score indicating a better condition.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Month 6 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
HAQ-DI measures functional status in rheumatic diseases.
It has 20 items, and asks patients to report the degree of difficulty faced in several areas of their life including: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, activities based on the previous week on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (cannot be done at all).
It also asks the participant to rate their pain and health in the previous week.
Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe, high-dependency disability).
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in SIBDQ Score at Month 6 in Participants With Crohn's Disease
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
The SIBDQ is a simple validated, 10-item questionnaire designed to find out how the patient has been feeling in the previous 2 weeks.
QoL is measured in 4 domains: bowel symptoms, emotional health, systemic systems and social function.
Participants respond to questions ranging from 1=all of the time to 7=none of the time.
Scores are added together, with higher scores indicating a better health-related QoL.
Total scores range from 10 (poor QoL) to 70 (good QoL).
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Month 6 in Participants With Psoriasis
時間枠：Baseline, Month 6
|
The DLQI measures 10 items covering the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment, to determine how much the patients skin problem affected their life in the past week.
Participants respond to the questions with 'very much,' 'a lot,' 'a little,' or 'not at all.'
The scores are added together, and the impact on QoL is banded as follows: 0-1=no effect on participant's life; 2-5=small effect; 6-10=moderate effect; 11-20=very large effect; 21-30=extremely large effect.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Number of Participants Remaining on Treatment at Month 6
時間枠：Month 6
|
The number of participants at 6 months who remained on adalimumab, having satisfied the requirements for application for renewal of subsidy by special authority.
|
Month 6
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
便利なリンク
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2015年7月6日
一次修了 (実際)
2017年12月5日
研究の完了 (実際)
2017年12月5日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2015年5月20日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2015年5月20日
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
2015年5月22日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2019年6月19日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2019年3月19日
最終確認日
2018年1月1日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。