A Comparative Study Between Simulation-based and Problem-based Learning in Difficult Airway Management Workshop
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
Abstract Background and Goal of study Teaching and learning in airway management are essential in anesthetic field. Though simulation-based and problem-based learning are sophisticated learning tool, neither of them manifests the superior benefit. We would like to compare the teachers' and students' attitudes on these two learning methods.
Material and Methods After IRB approval No. 369/2558(EC3). A prospective, questionnaires-based study was performed amongst volunteered, consent-signed, 10 anesthesiologists and 40 nurse anesthetist students. After stratified randomization, ten students simultaneously attended either SBL or PBL course one at a time. Six weeks later, a crossover technique was applied for both groups. At the end of project, teachers and students had to response to Likert's scale questionnaires.
The teachers' questionnaire based on table of specification of the learning contents, consisted of 4 parts: airway evaluation, patient preparation, strategic planning and follow up care. The students' questionnaire comprised 3 parts: learning content, process and evaluation.
The validation of the questionnaire was determined by three board-certified anesthesiologists. The index of item objective congruence was 0.80 and 0.82 with Cronbach's Alpha of 0.97 and 0.92 respectively.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Introduction Currently, teachers have emphasized the instructional strategies and enthusiasm in critical thinking to students to understand the educational course1. As coaching mentors, they search for innovative teaching models to reach the learning target 2. In anesthesia, a training program of nurse students involves several teaching methods such as seminars, journal clubs as well as topic, didactic, simulation and problem-based learning 13, 14.
Simulation-based learning in medicine utilizes aides such as manikins or actors to replicate clinical scenarios. It yields the acquisition of skills through deliberate practice rather than an apprentice style of learning 22. However, problem-based learning is a small group discussions where students are active, learner-centered, or self-directed learning to the topic assignments. Teachers play role as moderators or facilitators 21.
Teaching and learning in airway management are essential in anesthetic field. The personnel need to be keen both basic and advance knowledge owing to its applications to the benefits of patients' life. At present, the diversity of learning techniques (PBL and SBL) allows sophisticated devices as an interactive learning tool to cope with all difficulties in details.
Nevertheless, neither PBL nor SBL manifests the superior benefit of instructional process and learning content xx. Chin KL, et al. (2014) concluded that simulation was superior to case-based learning in teaching diabetic ketoacidosis and thyroid storm to the final-year, undergraduate pharmacy students. Randolph H, et al. (2006) revealed that students who learned critical assessment and management skills using full-scale, high- fidelity simulation, performed better than students who acquired similar skills in an interactive problem-based learning format.
As either PBL or SBL on difficult airway management is based upon the same table of specifications and experienced instructors. We would like to compare the teachers' and students' attitudes on these two learning methods.
Objectives To compare between PBL and SBL in terms of learning content, instructional and evaluation methods
Material and Methods After IRB approval No. 369/2558(EC3). A prospective, questionnaires-based study was performed amongst 40 volunteered, consent-signed nurse anesthetist students. The inclusion criteria for teachers were anesthesiologists who have involved in SBL and PBL with more than 3 years of experience in teaching. The inclusion criteria for students were nurse anesthetist students in the academic years of 2015. The exclusion criteria of both groups were ones who did not fit all qualifications.
After stratified randomization, ten nurse anesthetist students attended either SBL or PBL course one at a time. The one-day workshops were performed simultaneously. Six weeks later, a crossover technique was applied for both groups. At the end of project, teachers and students had to response to Likert's scale questionnaires: 4 = very suitable, 3 = suitable, 2 = unsuitable, 1 = very unsuitable.
The teachers' questionnaire based on table of specification of the learning contents, consisted of 4 parts: airway evaluation (history taking and physical examination), patient preparation (equipments and experienced helpers), 5 strategic planning (facemask ventilation, supraglottic airway device, laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation and failed intubation) and follow up care (documentation and informative advice).
On the other hand, the students' questionnaires comprised 3 parts: learning content, process and evaluation.
The correctness and appropriateness of the questionnaires (content validity) were determined by three board-certified anesthesiologists who had at least ten year experiences in anesthesia and were not involved in the project. The tryout was performed by ten novice nurse anesthetists and five anesthesiologists on students' and teachers' matters respectively. The index of item objective congruence was 0.80 and 0.82 with Cronbach's Alpha of 0.97 and 0.92 respectively. We used percentage, mean, standard deviation and student t-Test for data analysis at the significant level of 0.05 with 95% confident interval.
研究の種類
入学 (予想される)
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
- 名前:Mrs.Parichad Apidechakul, MPA. B.Ns.
- 電話番号:897942082
- メール:dao_pari@yahoo.com
研究連絡先のバックアップ
- 名前:Phongthara Vichitvejpaisal, MD.PhD.
- 電話番号:818384393
- メール:phongthara@gmail.com
研究場所
-
-
-
Nonthaburi、タイ、10700
- 募集
- Parichad Apidechakul
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
anesthesiologists who have involved in SBL and PBL with more than 3 years of experience in teaching.
nurse anesthetist students
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- anesthesiologists who have involved in SBL and PBL with more than 3 years of experience in teaching.
- nurse anesthetist students in the academic years of 2015.
Exclusion Criteria:
- ones who did not fit all qualifications.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 時間の展望:断面図
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
介入・治療 |
---|---|
Teachers
Anesthesiologists who have involved in SBL and PBL with more than 3 years of experience in teaching
|
The teachers' questionnaire based on table of specification of the learning contents, consisted of 4 parts: airway evaluation, patient preparation, strategic planning and follow up care.
|
Students
Students were nurse anesthetist students in the academic years of 2015
|
The students' questionnaire comprised 3 parts: learning content, process and evaluation.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
---|---|---|
Student's point of view
時間枠:1 year
|
Likert's scale questionnaires 4 = very suitable, 3 = suitable, 2 = unsuitable, 1 = very unsuitable.
|
1 year
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
---|---|---|
Teacher's point of view
時間枠:1 year
|
Likert's scale questionnaires 4 = very suitable, 3 = suitable, 2 = unsuitable, 1 = very unsuitable.
|
1 year
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Mrs.Parichad Apidechakul, MPA. B.Ns.、Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Reilly A, Spratt C. The perceptions of undergraduate student nurses of high-fidelity simulation-based learning: a case report from the University of Tasmania. Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Aug;27(6):542-50. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.015. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
- Rowan CJ, McCourt C, Beake S. Problem based learning in midwifery--the students' perspective. Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Jan;28(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2007.02.014. Epub 2007 May 11.
- Lorello GR, Cook DA, Johnson RL, Brydges R. Simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;112(2):231-45. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet414. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
- Chilkoti G, Mohta M, Wadhwa R, Saxena AK. Problem-based learning research in anesthesia teaching: current status and future perspective. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:263948. doi: 10.1155/2014/263948. Epub 2014 May 29.
- Al-Elq AH. Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. J Family Community Med. 2010 Jan;17(1):35-40. doi: 10.4103/1319-1683.68787.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (予想される)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 369/2558(EC3)
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。