Lung Cancer Screening: A Multilevel Intervention (LungCARE)
2020年10月21日 更新者：University of California, San Francisco
The study will develop and test the feasibility of the Lung Cancer Assessment of Risk and Education (LungCARE) intervention to increase discussions about lung cancer screening between patients and physicians.
This intervention will be designed to reach primary care patients and will be implemented at three levels of the healthcare structure: patient, physician, and system.
The patient component includes a short lung cancer screening video and questions regarding screening preferences.
Patients will receive immediate feedback in a report (patient report) that summarizes their lung cancer screening preferences and a handout summarizing the educational video.
At the physician level, primary care physicians (PCPs) will receive a similar report (physician report), which will be delivered to them prior to the patient visit.
The report contains additional information about documenting discussion related to risk, screening, and referrals in the electronic health record (EHR) system (system component).
The investigators will develop the LungCARE intervention and have a comparison group that will receive usual care.
Preliminary testing of LungCARE will occur via a randomized controlled trial (RCT) at the University of California, San Francisco, General Internal Medicine and Women's Health Primary Care clinics.
The RCT will evaluate LungCARE among 50 PCPs and 120 high-risk current and former smoker patients.
The investigators will determine whether the intervention is accepted by patients and physicians and whether patients who received LungCARE are more likely to discuss lung cancer screening with their physicians when compared to patients and physicians in the comparison group.
The investigators will also determine whether the intervention affects knowledge of lung cancer and low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, perception of risk, and worry about lung cancer in patients when compared to patients in the comparison group.
The investigators expect their research to provide specific recommendations that will facilitate patient-physician discussions about LDCT screening and promote shared decision-making among patients and physicians.
調査の概要
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
66
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
California
-
San Francisco、California、アメリカ、94143
- University of California, San Francisco
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
55年～80年 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- age 55-80
- smoked at least 30 pack-years in lifetime
- if former smoker, quit smoking within the last 15 years
- English speaker
- no prior history of lung cancer
- did not have a lung cancer screening test within the last year
- PCP does not object to patient's participation
- have a scheduled visit at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) internal medicine clinics.
Exclusion Criteria:
- speaking a language other than English
- has a history of lung cancer
- had a lung cancer screening test within the last year
- PCP objects to patient's participation.
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：ふるい分け
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：LungCARE Group
The intervention group will receive the LungCARE intervention
|
The LungCARE intervention involves patient and PCP components. The patient component consists of watching a short, educational video, answering questions about lung cancer screening preferences, and receiving a patient report and handout. The PCP component consists of receiving a similar report (physician report) prior to the patient visit. This report is based on the patient's risk factors and lung cancer screening preferences. It contains additional information about documenting discussions related to risk, screening, and referrals in the electronic medical record system. |
|
介入なし：Comparison Group
The comparison group will receive usual care.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Discussion of lung cancer risk and LDCT screening with PCP
時間枠：Over 3 months
|
Outcome 1 will be assessed in the follow-up survey, administered within one week following the clinic visit. All patients will answer the following yes/no questions: "During your PCP visit, did you discuss...your personal risk of getting lung cancer/the risks and benefits of screening/how often people should be screened/whether you should be screened?", "Did you discuss smoking cigarettes?", "Did you talk about smoking and the risk of lung cancer?", and "Did your doctor refer you to or order a test for lung cancer screening?" Each question will be looked at individually and summed into a single score (0-7). Higher scores indicate an increased discussion of lung cancer risk and LDCT screening. Three months following the clinic visit, the investigators will review the electronic health records for all patients who signed HIPAA forms. Investigators will gather information about discussion of lung cancer risk and documentation, referrals, counseling, and receipt of LDCT screening. |
Over 3 months
|
|
Knowledge of lung cancer screening
時間枠：Over one week
|
Outcome 2 will be assessed in the follow-up survey, administered within one week following the clinic visit.
All patients will answer true/false questions addressing various screening topics (e.g. annual lung cancer screening, false negative scans, false positive scans, who should be screened, and radiation exposure).
Correct answers will be given a score of 1 and incorrect answers will be given a score of 0. Responses for each question will be added up to a single score, ranging between 0 and 10.
Lower scores indicate lower knowledge and higher scores indicate higher knowledge.
|
Over one week
|
|
Perception of lung cancer risk
時間枠：Over one week
|
Outcome 3 will be measured using an adapted Lerman Cancer Worry Scale.
The following question will be asked over the course of one week, both prior to and following the clinic visit: "In your opinion, compared to most people of your same age, sex, and race, what are you chances of getting lung cancer someday?" Participants will use a five-point Likert scale ("much higher" [1], "higher" [2], "about the same" [3], "lower" [4], "much lower" [5]) to answer the questions.
A higher score indicates a lower perception of lung cancer risk.
Responses will be compared between the baseline and follow-up surveys.
|
Over one week
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Worry about lung cancer
時間枠：Over one week
|
Outcome 4 will be measured using an adapted Lerman Cancer Worry Scale.
The following questions will be asked over the course of one week, both prior to and following the clinic visit: "How worried are you about getting lung cancer someday?", "During the past month, how much has your worry about lung cancer affected your mood?", "During the past month, how much has your worry about lung cancer affected your ability to perform your daily activities?", and "During the past month, how often have you thought about your chances of getting lung cancer?"
Patients will use a 5-point Likert scale ("a lot" [1], "somewhat" [2], "a little" [3], "not at all" [4]) to answer the first 3 questions and a 4-point Likert scale ("almost all the time" [1], "often" [2], "sometimes" [3], "not at all or rarely" [4]) to answer the last question.
Higher scores indicate a lower perception of risk.
Each question will be examined individually.
Responses will be compared between the baseline and follow-up surveys.
|
Over one week
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Celia Kaplan, DrPH、University of California, San Francisco
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
- Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, Azzoli CG, Berry DA, Brawley OW, Byers T, Colditz GA, Gould MK, Jett JR, Sabichi AL, Smith-Bindman R, Wood DE, Qaseem A, Detterbeck FC. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2418-29. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5521. Erratum In: JAMA. 2012 Oct 3;308(13):1324. JAMA. 2013 Jun 5;309(21):2212.
- McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM. Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2003 Apr;18(2):156-70. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.156.
- National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
- Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3.
- Henderson S, DeGroff A, Richards TB, Kish-Doto J, Soloe C, Heminger C, Rohan E. A qualitative analysis of lung cancer screening practices by primary care physicians. J Community Health. 2011 Dec;36(6):949-56. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9394-2.
- Poghosyan H, Kennedy Sheldon L, Cooley ME. The impact of computed tomography screening for lung cancer on smoking behaviors: a teachable moment? Cancer Nurs. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(6):446-75. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182406297.
便利なリンク
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. USPTF Bulletin: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Issues Draft Recommendation Statement on Screening for Lung Cancer. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 2013.
- Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Decision memo for screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT).
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2019年3月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2020年3月30日
研究の完了 (実際)
2020年3月30日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2019年3月1日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2019年3月1日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2019年3月5日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2020年10月23日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2020年10月21日
最終確認日
2020年10月1日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。
肺癌の臨床試験
-
Taichung Veterans General Hospital完了心毒性 | 非小細胞肺癌（MeSH用語：Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung） | 薬物関連の副作用および有害反応（MeSH用語） | EGFRチロシンキナーゼ阻害剤台湾
-
Novartis Pharmaceuticals終了しましたメラノーマ | 高度なEGFR変異体非小さな細胞肺cancer（NSCLC） | KRAS G12変異NSCLC | 食道扁平上皮がん（SCC） | ヘッド/ネックSCC | 進行した胃腸間質腫瘍（GIST） | 進行したNRAS/BRAFT WT皮膚黒色腫アメリカ, 台湾, オランダ, カナダ, スペイン, シンガポール, イタリア, 日本, 韓国
-
Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia募集乳がん | 卵巣がん | 結腸直腸がん | 黒色腫 (皮膚がん) | 非小細胞肺癌（MeSH用語：Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung）イタリア
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Highlight Therapeutics積極的、募集していない平滑筋肉腫 | 悪性末梢神経鞘腫瘍 | 滑膜肉腫 | 未分化多形肉腫 | 骨の未分化高悪性度多形肉腫 | 粘液線維肉腫 | II期の体幹および四肢の軟部肉腫 AJCC v8 | III期の体幹および四肢の軟部肉腫 AJCC v8 | IIIA 期の体幹および四肢の軟部肉腫 AJCC v8 | IIIB 期の体幹および四肢の軟部肉腫 AJCC v8 | 切除可能な軟部肉腫 | 多形性横紋筋肉腫 | 切除可能な脱分化型脂肪肉腫 | 切除可能な未分化多形肉腫 | 軟部組織線維肉腫 | 紡錘細胞肉腫 | ステージ I 後腹膜肉腫 AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) v8 | 体幹および四肢の I 期軟部肉腫 AJCC v8 | ステージ... およびその他の条件アメリカ
LungCAREの臨床試験
-
University of California, San FranciscoTobacco Related Disease Research Program; Alere San Diego募集