このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of SM03 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate

2019年12月8日 更新者:SinoMab BioScience Ltd

A Randomized,Placebo Controlled, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SM03, Compared to Placebo, in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of SM03 compared to placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis(RA) receiving methotrexate

調査の概要

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

156

段階

  • フェーズ2

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

      • Beijing、中国、100032
        • Peking Union Medical College Hostipal

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年~75年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients 18-75 years of age.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for ≥ 12 months, diagnosed according to the revised 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Moderate to severe active RA with swollen joint count (SJC) ≥ 8 (66 joint count), and tender joint count (TJC) ≥ 8 (68 joint count) at screening and baseline.
  • At screening, either C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 0.6 mg/dL (6 mg/L), or Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥ 28 mm/hour, or Morning stiffness of joint for ≥ 45 minutes
  • Inadequate response to methotrexate, having received and tolerated at a dose of 7.5-20 mg/week for ≥ 12 weeks, at a stable dose over the past 4 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA.
  • Use of any biological DMARDs for RA within past 6 months.
  • Concurrent treatment with any Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) other than methotrexate
  • Active infection, or history of serious or chronic infection

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:4倍

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:SM03 600 mg*2
SM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, and week 12,14; placebo: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 4 and16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
SM03: 600 mg 静脈内 (IV)
プラセボ: 600 mg 静脈内 (IV)
methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/week oral
実験的:SM03 600 mg*3
SM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, 4, and week 12,14,16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
SM03: 600 mg 静脈内 (IV)
methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/week oral
プラセボコンパレーター:placebo*3
placebo: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, 4, and week 12,14,16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
プラセボ: 600 mg 静脈内 (IV)
methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/week oral

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
時間枠:Week 24

To achieve an ACR20 required at least a 20% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 20% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 24

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 4,8,12, 16
時間枠:Week 4,8,12,16

To achieve an ACR20 required at least a 20% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 20% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 4,8,12,16
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24
時間枠:Week 24

To achieve an ACR50 required at least a 50% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 50% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24
時間枠:Week 24

To achieve an ACR70 required at least a 70% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 70% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR) at Week 24
時間枠:Baseline and Week 24

The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables:

  • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count;
  • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale.

The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6.

Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 24
時間枠:Week 24

A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS28 score. The DAS28 score ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity.

A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2.

A Moderate Response is defined as either:

an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.

No Response is defined as either an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of less than or equal to 0.6, or an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 of more than 5.1.

Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
時間枠:Week 0 to 24
Percentage of participants who reported an AE or SAE, a drug-related AE, who had an acute infusion reaction, an AE leading to study drug discontinuation, with an infection or serious infection, or who died.
Week 0 to 24

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2014年12月31日

一次修了 (実際)

2016年2月3日

研究の完了 (実際)

2016年2月3日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2019年12月5日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2019年12月8日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2019年12月10日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2019年12月10日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2019年12月8日

最終確認日

2019年12月1日

詳しくは

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する