Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of SM03 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate

8. december 2019 opdateret af: SinoMab BioScience Ltd

A Randomized,Placebo Controlled, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SM03, Compared to Placebo, in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of SM03 compared to placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis(RA) receiving methotrexate

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

156

Fase

  • Fase 2

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Kina
      • Beijing, Kina, 100032
        • Peking Union Medical College Hostipal

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 75 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients 18-75 years of age.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for ≥ 12 months, diagnosed according to the revised 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Moderate to severe active RA with swollen joint count (SJC) ≥ 8 (66 joint count), and tender joint count (TJC) ≥ 8 (68 joint count) at screening and baseline.
  • At screening, either C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 0.6 mg/dL (6 mg/L), or Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥ 28 mm/hour, or Morning stiffness of joint for ≥ 45 minutes
  • Inadequate response to methotrexate, having received and tolerated at a dose of 7.5-20 mg/week for ≥ 12 weeks, at a stable dose over the past 4 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA.
  • Use of any biological DMARDs for RA within past 6 months.
  • Concurrent treatment with any Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) other than methotrexate
  • Active infection, or history of serious or chronic infection

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Firedobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: SM03 600 mg*2
SM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, and week 12,14; placebo: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 4 and16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
Medicin: SM03
SM03: 600 mg intravenøst ​​(IV)
Medicin: Placebo
Placebo: 600 mg intravenøst ​​(IV)
Medicin: Methotrexate
methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/week oral
Eksperimentel: SM03 600 mg*3
SM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, 4, and week 12,14,16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
Medicin: SM03
SM03: 600 mg intravenøst ​​(IV)
Medicin: Methotrexate
methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/week oral
Placebo komparator: placebo*3
placebo: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, 4, and week 12,14,16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
Medicin: Placebo
Placebo: 600 mg intravenøst ​​(IV)
Medicin: Methotrexate
methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/week oral

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
Tidsramme: Week 24

To achieve an ACR20 required at least a 20% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 20% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 24

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 4,8,12, 16
Tidsramme: Week 4,8,12,16

To achieve an ACR20 required at least a 20% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 20% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 4,8,12,16
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24
Tidsramme: Week 24

To achieve an ACR50 required at least a 50% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 50% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24
Tidsramme: Week 24

To achieve an ACR70 required at least a 70% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 70% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR) at Week 24
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 24

The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables:

  • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count;
  • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale.

The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6.
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 24
Tidsramme: Week 24

A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS28 score. The DAS28 score ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity.

A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2.

A Moderate Response is defined as either:

an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.

No Response is defined as either an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of less than or equal to 0.6, or an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 of more than 5.1.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
Tidsramme: Week 0 to 24
Percentage of participants who reported an AE or SAE, a drug-related AE, who had an acute infusion reaction, an AE leading to study drug discontinuation, with an infection or serious infection, or who died.
Week 0 to 24

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

SinoMab BioScience Ltd

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

31. december 2014

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

3. februar 2016

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

3. februar 2016

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

5. december 2019

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

8. december 2019

Først opslået (Faktiske)

10. december 2019

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

10. december 2019

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

8. december 2019

Sidst verificeret

1. december 2019

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • SM03-RA-II-V3.3

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner