Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of SM03 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate

8 de diciembre de 2019 actualizado por: SinoMab BioScience Ltd

A Randomized,Placebo Controlled, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SM03, Compared to Placebo, in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of SM03 compared to placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis(RA) receiving methotrexate

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

156

Fase

  • Fase 2

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Beijing, Porcelana, 100032
        • Peking Union Medical College Hostipal

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 75 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients 18-75 years of age.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for ≥ 12 months, diagnosed according to the revised 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Moderate to severe active RA with swollen joint count (SJC) ≥ 8 (66 joint count), and tender joint count (TJC) ≥ 8 (68 joint count) at screening and baseline.
  • At screening, either C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 0.6 mg/dL (6 mg/L), or Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥ 28 mm/hour, or Morning stiffness of joint for ≥ 45 minutes
  • Inadequate response to methotrexate, having received and tolerated at a dose of 7.5-20 mg/week for ≥ 12 weeks, at a stable dose over the past 4 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA.
  • Use of any biological DMARDs for RA within past 6 months.
  • Concurrent treatment with any Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) other than methotrexate
  • Active infection, or history of serious or chronic infection

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Cuadruplicar

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: SM03 600 mg*2
SM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, and week 12,14; placebo: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 4 and16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
SM03: 600 mg intravenosos (IV)
Placebo: 600 mg intravenoso (IV)
methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/week oral
Experimental: SM03 600 mg*3
SM03: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, 4, and week 12,14,16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
SM03: 600 mg intravenosos (IV)
methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/week oral
Comparador de placebos: placebo*3
placebo: 600 mg intravenous (IV) on week 0,2, 4, and week 12,14,16; Methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/wk oral.
Placebo: 600 mg intravenoso (IV)
methotrexate: 7.5-20 mg/week oral

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
Periodo de tiempo: Week 24

To achieve an ACR20 required at least a 20% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 20% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 24

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 4,8,12, 16
Periodo de tiempo: Week 4,8,12,16

To achieve an ACR20 required at least a 20% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 20% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 4,8,12,16
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24
Periodo de tiempo: Week 24

To achieve an ACR50 required at least a 50% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 50% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24
Periodo de tiempo: Week 24

To achieve an ACR70 required at least a 70% improvement compared with Baseline in both tender joint counts (68 joints assessed for tenderness) and swollen joint counts (66 joints assessed for swelling), as well as a 70% improvement in three of the following five additional measurements:

  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Patient's assessment of pain (assessed using a 10 cm VAS);
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ; a patient completed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions, scored from 0-3);
  • Acute phase reactant: C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR) at Week 24
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and Week 24

The DAS28 is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables:

  • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count;
  • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale.

The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 less than or equal to 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6.

Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 24
Periodo de tiempo: Week 24

A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS28 score. The DAS28 score ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity.

A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 3.2.

A Moderate Response is defined as either:

an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.

No Response is defined as either an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of less than or equal to 0.6, or an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 of more than 5.1.

Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
Periodo de tiempo: Week 0 to 24
Percentage of participants who reported an AE or SAE, a drug-related AE, who had an acute infusion reaction, an AE leading to study drug discontinuation, with an infection or serious infection, or who died.
Week 0 to 24

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

31 de diciembre de 2014

Finalización primaria (Actual)

3 de febrero de 2016

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

3 de febrero de 2016

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

5 de diciembre de 2019

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

8 de diciembre de 2019

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

10 de diciembre de 2019

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

10 de diciembre de 2019

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

8 de diciembre de 2019

Última verificación

1 de diciembre de 2019

Más información

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir