このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study

2022年6月16日 更新者:Opti'Mouv

Comparison of the Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace on Pain, Heart Rate, Work Performance and Physical Capacities Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study

Background:

Physical activity programs at the workplace have shown positive results on physical capacities and pain for several years. Due to the duration of the training session, the need of instructor, and the need of a place to practice, these programs are commonly complex to implement. For this reason, many of companies, especially companies in manual sectors are turning to another solution, i.e warm-up intervention before work shift. These interventions present on paper numerous advantages such as short duration, no need to specifically allocate a place in companies and the possibility to perform exercises in working clothes… Surprisingly, while positive effects of warm-up interventions on pain, performance physical and psychological capacities, are expansively reported in sport context, effects of workplace warm-up intervention are lacking. Therefore, the aims of this study are (1) to implement such intervention among vineyard-workers, workers highly exposed to heavy physical workload and pain and (2) to assess their effects on physical (pain, strength, flexibility) and psychological (workload) functions and also on work-related outcomes (work performance, readiness to work)

Methods:

A cluster randomized study will be implemented among French vineyard workers. Four groups of 30 participants will be constituted; corresponding to four different conditions: (1) hybrid warm-up intervention (HWU); (2) dynamic warm-up intervention (DWU); (3) stretching warm-up intervention (SWU); (4) no warm-up intervention (NWU). A total of 120 vineyard-workers will be recruited to participate in the study.

Discussion:

The results will provide more evidence about the short-term effects of warm-up interventions at the workplace, and will provide more evidence on which warm-up modality is the most effective on pain, performance, physical and psychological capacities among vineyard workers.

調査の概要

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

120

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Gironde
      • Pauillac、Gironde、フランス、33250
        • OptiMouv

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年~60年 (大人)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • working full time
  • having at least 1 year of employment in the company

Exclusion Criteria:

- not to present previous surgery in the low back region in the last 12 months

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:防止
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Hybrid warm-up intervention
Dynamic + stretching exercises
実験的:Dynamic warm-up intervention
Dynamic exercises
実験的:Stretching warm-up intervention
Stretching exercises
介入なし:No warm-up intervention

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated for the last 3 months
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated for the last 3 months
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated after the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated at the beginning of the working activity (Time 2)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated at the beginning of the working activity (Time 2)
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated after the first hour of work (Time 3)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the first hour of work (Time 3)
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated after the second hour of work (Time 4)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the second hour of work (Time 4)
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated after three hour of work (Time 5)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after three hour of work (Time 5)
Work performance
時間枠:After one hour of work (Time 3)
number of grapevine pruned
After one hour of work (Time 3)
Work performance
時間枠:After two hours of work (Time 4)
number of grapevine pruned
After two hours of work (Time 4)
Work performance
時間枠:After three hours of work (Time 5)
number of grapevine pruned
After three hours of work (Time 5)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Handgrip Strength
時間枠:Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Handgrip Strength
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Handgrip Strength
時間枠:After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Handgrip Strength
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Handgrip Strength
時間枠:After three hour of work (Time 5)
Handgrip Strength
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility
時間枠:Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility
時間枠:After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility
時間枠:After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility
時間枠:Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility
時間枠:After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility
時間枠:After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 0
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 0
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 1
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 1
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 2
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 2
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 3
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 3
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 4
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 4
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 5
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 5
Readiness to work
時間枠:Time 1
Readiness to work was rated subjectively using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 was used to indicate "not at all ready" and 10 "perfectly ready to work"
Time 1
Readiness to work
時間枠:Time 2
Readiness to work was rated subjectively using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 was used to indicate "not at all ready" and 10 "perfectly ready to work"
Time 2
Work quality
時間枠:Time 5
Work quality will be assessed by the workers supervisors, with the same 0-10 scale in every company, developed by the research team and a vineyard growing specialist.
Time 5
Workload
時間枠:Time 5
NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX) is a multi-dimensional scale used to estimate workload from a worker.
Time 5
Visuomotor reaction time
時間枠:Time 0
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 0
Visuomotor reaction time
時間枠:Time 1
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 1
Visuomotor reaction time
時間枠:Time 5
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 5

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • スタディディレクター:Nicolas Vuillerme, Phd、UniversitéGrenobleAlpes

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2021年11月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2022年5月31日

研究の完了 (実際)

2022年5月31日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2022年6月13日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2022年6月16日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2022年6月21日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2022年6月21日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2022年6月16日

最終確認日

2022年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • IRB00012476-2021-06-12-137

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する