Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study
Comparison of the Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace on Pain, Heart Rate, Work Performance and Physical Capacities Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study
Background:
Physical activity programs at the workplace have shown positive results on physical capacities and pain for several years. Due to the duration of the training session, the need of instructor, and the need of a place to practice, these programs are commonly complex to implement. For this reason, many of companies, especially companies in manual sectors are turning to another solution, i.e warm-up intervention before work shift. These interventions present on paper numerous advantages such as short duration, no need to specifically allocate a place in companies and the possibility to perform exercises in working clothes… Surprisingly, while positive effects of warm-up interventions on pain, performance physical and psychological capacities, are expansively reported in sport context, effects of workplace warm-up intervention are lacking. Therefore, the aims of this study are (1) to implement such intervention among vineyard-workers, workers highly exposed to heavy physical workload and pain and (2) to assess their effects on physical (pain, strength, flexibility) and psychological (workload) functions and also on work-related outcomes (work performance, readiness to work)
Methods:
A cluster randomized study will be implemented among French vineyard workers. Four groups of 30 participants will be constituted; corresponding to four different conditions: (1) hybrid warm-up intervention (HWU); (2) dynamic warm-up intervention (DWU); (3) stretching warm-up intervention (SWU); (4) no warm-up intervention (NWU). A total of 120 vineyard-workers will be recruited to participate in the study.
Discussion:
The results will provide more evidence about the short-term effects of warm-up interventions at the workplace, and will provide more evidence on which warm-up modality is the most effective on pain, performance, physical and psychological capacities among vineyard workers.
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Gironde
-
Pauillac、Gironde、フランス、33250
- OptiMouv
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- working full time
- having at least 1 year of employment in the company
Exclusion Criteria:
- not to present previous surgery in the low back region in the last 12 months
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:防止
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:ダブル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Hybrid warm-up intervention
|
Dynamic + stretching exercises
|
|
実験的:Dynamic warm-up intervention
|
Dynamic exercises
|
|
実験的:Stretching warm-up intervention
|
Stretching exercises
|
|
介入なし:No warm-up intervention
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated for the last 3 months
|
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
|
Pain intensity will be rated for the last 3 months
|
|
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
|
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
|
Pain intensity will be rated before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
|
|
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated after the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
|
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
|
Pain intensity will be rated after the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
|
|
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated at the beginning of the working activity (Time 2)
|
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
|
Pain intensity will be rated at the beginning of the working activity (Time 2)
|
|
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated after the first hour of work (Time 3)
|
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
|
Pain intensity will be rated after the first hour of work (Time 3)
|
|
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated after the second hour of work (Time 4)
|
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
|
Pain intensity will be rated after the second hour of work (Time 4)
|
|
Perceived pain intensity
時間枠:Pain intensity will be rated after three hour of work (Time 5)
|
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
|
Pain intensity will be rated after three hour of work (Time 5)
|
|
Work performance
時間枠:After one hour of work (Time 3)
|
number of grapevine pruned
|
After one hour of work (Time 3)
|
|
Work performance
時間枠:After two hours of work (Time 4)
|
number of grapevine pruned
|
After two hours of work (Time 4)
|
|
Work performance
時間枠:After three hours of work (Time 5)
|
number of grapevine pruned
|
After three hours of work (Time 5)
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Handgrip Strength
時間枠:Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
|
Handgrip Strength
|
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
|
|
Handgrip Strength
時間枠:After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
|
Handgrip Strength
|
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
|
|
Handgrip Strength
時間枠:After three hour of work (Time 5)
|
Handgrip Strength
|
After three hour of work (Time 5)
|
|
Flexibility
時間枠:Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
|
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
|
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
|
|
Flexibility
時間枠:After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
|
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
|
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
|
|
Flexibility
時間枠:After three hour of work (Time 5)
|
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
|
After three hour of work (Time 5)
|
|
Flexibility
時間枠:Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
|
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
|
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
|
|
Flexibility
時間枠:After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
|
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
|
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
|
|
Flexibility
時間枠:After three hour of work (Time 5)
|
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
|
After three hour of work (Time 5)
|
|
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 0
|
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
|
Time 0
|
|
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 1
|
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
|
Time 1
|
|
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 2
|
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
|
Time 2
|
|
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 3
|
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
|
Time 3
|
|
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 4
|
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
|
Time 4
|
|
Heart rate
時間枠:Time 5
|
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
|
Time 5
|
|
Readiness to work
時間枠:Time 1
|
Readiness to work was rated subjectively using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 was used to indicate "not at all ready" and 10 "perfectly ready to work"
|
Time 1
|
|
Readiness to work
時間枠:Time 2
|
Readiness to work was rated subjectively using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 was used to indicate "not at all ready" and 10 "perfectly ready to work"
|
Time 2
|
|
Work quality
時間枠:Time 5
|
Work quality will be assessed by the workers supervisors, with the same 0-10 scale in every company, developed by the research team and a vineyard growing specialist.
|
Time 5
|
|
Workload
時間枠:Time 5
|
NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX) is a multi-dimensional scale used to estimate workload from a worker.
|
Time 5
|
|
Visuomotor reaction time
時間枠:Time 0
|
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
|
Time 0
|
|
Visuomotor reaction time
時間枠:Time 1
|
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
|
Time 1
|
|
Visuomotor reaction time
時間枠:Time 5
|
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
|
Time 5
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- スタディディレクター:Nicolas Vuillerme, Phd、UniversitéGrenobleAlpes
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- IRB00012476-2021-06-12-137
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。