Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study

16. juni 2022 oppdatert av: Opti'Mouv

Comparison of the Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace on Pain, Heart Rate, Work Performance and Physical Capacities Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study

Background:

Physical activity programs at the workplace have shown positive results on physical capacities and pain for several years. Due to the duration of the training session, the need of instructor, and the need of a place to practice, these programs are commonly complex to implement. For this reason, many of companies, especially companies in manual sectors are turning to another solution, i.e warm-up intervention before work shift. These interventions present on paper numerous advantages such as short duration, no need to specifically allocate a place in companies and the possibility to perform exercises in working clothes… Surprisingly, while positive effects of warm-up interventions on pain, performance physical and psychological capacities, are expansively reported in sport context, effects of workplace warm-up intervention are lacking. Therefore, the aims of this study are (1) to implement such intervention among vineyard-workers, workers highly exposed to heavy physical workload and pain and (2) to assess their effects on physical (pain, strength, flexibility) and psychological (workload) functions and also on work-related outcomes (work performance, readiness to work)

Methods:

A cluster randomized study will be implemented among French vineyard workers. Four groups of 30 participants will be constituted; corresponding to four different conditions: (1) hybrid warm-up intervention (HWU); (2) dynamic warm-up intervention (DWU); (3) stretching warm-up intervention (SWU); (4) no warm-up intervention (NWU). A total of 120 vineyard-workers will be recruited to participate in the study.

Discussion:

The results will provide more evidence about the short-term effects of warm-up interventions at the workplace, and will provide more evidence on which warm-up modality is the most effective on pain, performance, physical and psychological capacities among vineyard workers.

Studieoversikt

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

120

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Gironde
      • Pauillac, Gironde, Frankrike, 33250
        • OptiMouv

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år til 60 år (Voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • working full time
  • having at least 1 year of employment in the company

Exclusion Criteria:

- not to present previous surgery in the low back region in the last 12 months

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Forebygging
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Dobbelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Hybrid warm-up intervention
Dynamic + stretching exercises
Eksperimentell: Dynamic warm-up intervention
Dynamic exercises
Eksperimentell: Stretching warm-up intervention
Stretching exercises
Ingen inngripen: No warm-up intervention

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Perceived pain intensity
Tidsramme: Pain intensity will be rated for the last 3 months
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated for the last 3 months
Perceived pain intensity
Tidsramme: Pain intensity will be rated before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Perceived pain intensity
Tidsramme: Pain intensity will be rated after the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Perceived pain intensity
Tidsramme: Pain intensity will be rated at the beginning of the working activity (Time 2)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated at the beginning of the working activity (Time 2)
Perceived pain intensity
Tidsramme: Pain intensity will be rated after the first hour of work (Time 3)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the first hour of work (Time 3)
Perceived pain intensity
Tidsramme: Pain intensity will be rated after the second hour of work (Time 4)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the second hour of work (Time 4)
Perceived pain intensity
Tidsramme: Pain intensity will be rated after three hour of work (Time 5)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after three hour of work (Time 5)
Work performance
Tidsramme: After one hour of work (Time 3)
number of grapevine pruned
After one hour of work (Time 3)
Work performance
Tidsramme: After two hours of work (Time 4)
number of grapevine pruned
After two hours of work (Time 4)
Work performance
Tidsramme: After three hours of work (Time 5)
number of grapevine pruned
After three hours of work (Time 5)

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Handgrip Strength
Tidsramme: Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Handgrip Strength
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Handgrip Strength
Tidsramme: After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Handgrip Strength
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Handgrip Strength
Tidsramme: After three hour of work (Time 5)
Handgrip Strength
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility
Tidsramme: Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility
Tidsramme: After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility
Tidsramme: After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility
Tidsramme: Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility
Tidsramme: After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility
Tidsramme: After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Heart rate
Tidsramme: Time 0
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 0
Heart rate
Tidsramme: Time 1
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 1
Heart rate
Tidsramme: Time 2
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 2
Heart rate
Tidsramme: Time 3
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 3
Heart rate
Tidsramme: Time 4
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 4
Heart rate
Tidsramme: Time 5
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 5
Readiness to work
Tidsramme: Time 1
Readiness to work was rated subjectively using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 was used to indicate "not at all ready" and 10 "perfectly ready to work"
Time 1
Readiness to work
Tidsramme: Time 2
Readiness to work was rated subjectively using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 was used to indicate "not at all ready" and 10 "perfectly ready to work"
Time 2
Work quality
Tidsramme: Time 5
Work quality will be assessed by the workers supervisors, with the same 0-10 scale in every company, developed by the research team and a vineyard growing specialist.
Time 5
Workload
Tidsramme: Time 5
NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX) is a multi-dimensional scale used to estimate workload from a worker.
Time 5
Visuomotor reaction time
Tidsramme: Time 0
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 0
Visuomotor reaction time
Tidsramme: Time 1
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 1
Visuomotor reaction time
Tidsramme: Time 5
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 5

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

Samarbeidspartnere

Etterforskere

  • Studieleder: Nicolas Vuillerme, Phd, UniversitéGrenobleAlpes

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. november 2021

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

31. mai 2022

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

31. mai 2022

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

13. juni 2022

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

16. juni 2022

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

21. juni 2022

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

21. juni 2022

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

16. juni 2022

Sist bekreftet

1. juni 2022

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • IRB00012476-2021-06-12-137

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere