Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study

16. Juni 2022 aktualisiert von: Opti'Mouv

Comparison of the Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace on Pain, Heart Rate, Work Performance and Physical Capacities Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study

Background:

Physical activity programs at the workplace have shown positive results on physical capacities and pain for several years. Due to the duration of the training session, the need of instructor, and the need of a place to practice, these programs are commonly complex to implement. For this reason, many of companies, especially companies in manual sectors are turning to another solution, i.e warm-up intervention before work shift. These interventions present on paper numerous advantages such as short duration, no need to specifically allocate a place in companies and the possibility to perform exercises in working clothes… Surprisingly, while positive effects of warm-up interventions on pain, performance physical and psychological capacities, are expansively reported in sport context, effects of workplace warm-up intervention are lacking. Therefore, the aims of this study are (1) to implement such intervention among vineyard-workers, workers highly exposed to heavy physical workload and pain and (2) to assess their effects on physical (pain, strength, flexibility) and psychological (workload) functions and also on work-related outcomes (work performance, readiness to work)

Methods:

A cluster randomized study will be implemented among French vineyard workers. Four groups of 30 participants will be constituted; corresponding to four different conditions: (1) hybrid warm-up intervention (HWU); (2) dynamic warm-up intervention (DWU); (3) stretching warm-up intervention (SWU); (4) no warm-up intervention (NWU). A total of 120 vineyard-workers will be recruited to participate in the study.

Discussion:

The results will provide more evidence about the short-term effects of warm-up interventions at the workplace, and will provide more evidence on which warm-up modality is the most effective on pain, performance, physical and psychological capacities among vineyard workers.

Studienübersicht

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

120

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Gironde
      • Pauillac, Gironde, Frankreich, 33250
        • OptiMouv

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 60 Jahre (Erwachsene)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • working full time
  • having at least 1 year of employment in the company

Exclusion Criteria:

- not to present previous surgery in the low back region in the last 12 months

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Verhütung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Hybrid warm-up intervention
Dynamic + stretching exercises
Experimental: Dynamic warm-up intervention
Dynamic exercises
Experimental: Stretching warm-up intervention
Stretching exercises
Kein Eingriff: No warm-up intervention

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Perceived pain intensity
Zeitfenster: Pain intensity will be rated for the last 3 months
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated for the last 3 months
Perceived pain intensity
Zeitfenster: Pain intensity will be rated before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Perceived pain intensity
Zeitfenster: Pain intensity will be rated after the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Perceived pain intensity
Zeitfenster: Pain intensity will be rated at the beginning of the working activity (Time 2)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated at the beginning of the working activity (Time 2)
Perceived pain intensity
Zeitfenster: Pain intensity will be rated after the first hour of work (Time 3)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the first hour of work (Time 3)
Perceived pain intensity
Zeitfenster: Pain intensity will be rated after the second hour of work (Time 4)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the second hour of work (Time 4)
Perceived pain intensity
Zeitfenster: Pain intensity will be rated after three hour of work (Time 5)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after three hour of work (Time 5)
Work performance
Zeitfenster: After one hour of work (Time 3)
number of grapevine pruned
After one hour of work (Time 3)
Work performance
Zeitfenster: After two hours of work (Time 4)
number of grapevine pruned
After two hours of work (Time 4)
Work performance
Zeitfenster: After three hours of work (Time 5)
number of grapevine pruned
After three hours of work (Time 5)

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Handgrip Strength
Zeitfenster: Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Handgrip Strength
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Handgrip Strength
Zeitfenster: After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Handgrip Strength
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Handgrip Strength
Zeitfenster: After three hour of work (Time 5)
Handgrip Strength
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility
Zeitfenster: Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility
Zeitfenster: After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility
Zeitfenster: After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility
Zeitfenster: Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility
Zeitfenster: After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility
Zeitfenster: After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Heart rate
Zeitfenster: Time 0
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 0
Heart rate
Zeitfenster: Time 1
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 1
Heart rate
Zeitfenster: Time 2
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 2
Heart rate
Zeitfenster: Time 3
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 3
Heart rate
Zeitfenster: Time 4
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 4
Heart rate
Zeitfenster: Time 5
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 5
Readiness to work
Zeitfenster: Time 1
Readiness to work was rated subjectively using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 was used to indicate "not at all ready" and 10 "perfectly ready to work"
Time 1
Readiness to work
Zeitfenster: Time 2
Readiness to work was rated subjectively using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 was used to indicate "not at all ready" and 10 "perfectly ready to work"
Time 2
Work quality
Zeitfenster: Time 5
Work quality will be assessed by the workers supervisors, with the same 0-10 scale in every company, developed by the research team and a vineyard growing specialist.
Time 5
Workload
Zeitfenster: Time 5
NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX) is a multi-dimensional scale used to estimate workload from a worker.
Time 5
Visuomotor reaction time
Zeitfenster: Time 0
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 0
Visuomotor reaction time
Zeitfenster: Time 1
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 1
Visuomotor reaction time
Zeitfenster: Time 5
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 5

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Ermittler

  • Studienleiter: Nicolas Vuillerme, Phd, UniversitéGrenobleAlpes

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. November 2021

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

31. Mai 2022

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

31. Mai 2022

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

13. Juni 2022

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

16. Juni 2022

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

21. Juni 2022

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

21. Juni 2022

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

16. Juni 2022

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2022

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • IRB00012476-2021-06-12-137

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Schmerzen

Klinische Studien zur Hybrid Warm-up

Abonnieren