此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study

2022年6月16日 更新者:Opti'Mouv

Comparison of the Effects of Three Warm-up Interventions at the Workplace on Pain, Heart Rate, Work Performance and Physical Capacities Among Vineyard Workers - a Protocol Study

Background:

Physical activity programs at the workplace have shown positive results on physical capacities and pain for several years. Due to the duration of the training session, the need of instructor, and the need of a place to practice, these programs are commonly complex to implement. For this reason, many of companies, especially companies in manual sectors are turning to another solution, i.e warm-up intervention before work shift. These interventions present on paper numerous advantages such as short duration, no need to specifically allocate a place in companies and the possibility to perform exercises in working clothes… Surprisingly, while positive effects of warm-up interventions on pain, performance physical and psychological capacities, are expansively reported in sport context, effects of workplace warm-up intervention are lacking. Therefore, the aims of this study are (1) to implement such intervention among vineyard-workers, workers highly exposed to heavy physical workload and pain and (2) to assess their effects on physical (pain, strength, flexibility) and psychological (workload) functions and also on work-related outcomes (work performance, readiness to work)

Methods:

A cluster randomized study will be implemented among French vineyard workers. Four groups of 30 participants will be constituted; corresponding to four different conditions: (1) hybrid warm-up intervention (HWU); (2) dynamic warm-up intervention (DWU); (3) stretching warm-up intervention (SWU); (4) no warm-up intervention (NWU). A total of 120 vineyard-workers will be recruited to participate in the study.

Discussion:

The results will provide more evidence about the short-term effects of warm-up interventions at the workplace, and will provide more evidence on which warm-up modality is the most effective on pain, performance, physical and psychological capacities among vineyard workers.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

120

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Gironde
      • Pauillac、Gironde、法国、33250
        • OptiMouv

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 60年 (成人)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • working full time
  • having at least 1 year of employment in the company

Exclusion Criteria:

- not to present previous surgery in the low back region in the last 12 months

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:预防
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Hybrid warm-up intervention
Dynamic + stretching exercises
实验性的:Dynamic warm-up intervention
Dynamic exercises
实验性的:Stretching warm-up intervention
Stretching exercises
无干预:No warm-up intervention

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Perceived pain intensity
大体时间:Pain intensity will be rated for the last 3 months
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated for the last 3 months
Perceived pain intensity
大体时间:Pain intensity will be rated before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Perceived pain intensity
大体时间:Pain intensity will be rated after the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Perceived pain intensity
大体时间:Pain intensity will be rated at the beginning of the working activity (Time 2)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated at the beginning of the working activity (Time 2)
Perceived pain intensity
大体时间:Pain intensity will be rated after the first hour of work (Time 3)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the first hour of work (Time 3)
Perceived pain intensity
大体时间:Pain intensity will be rated after the second hour of work (Time 4)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after the second hour of work (Time 4)
Perceived pain intensity
大体时间:Pain intensity will be rated after three hour of work (Time 5)
Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity over 15 anatomical locations using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 is used to indicate "no pain" while 10 indicate the "worst possible pain".
Pain intensity will be rated after three hour of work (Time 5)
Work performance
大体时间:After one hour of work (Time 3)
number of grapevine pruned
After one hour of work (Time 3)
Work performance
大体时间:After two hours of work (Time 4)
number of grapevine pruned
After two hours of work (Time 4)
Work performance
大体时间:After three hours of work (Time 5)
number of grapevine pruned
After three hours of work (Time 5)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Handgrip Strength
大体时间:Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Handgrip Strength
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Handgrip Strength
大体时间:After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Handgrip Strength
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Handgrip Strength
大体时间:After three hour of work (Time 5)
Handgrip Strength
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility
大体时间:Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility
大体时间:After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility
大体时间:After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility of the trunk and the hamstrings - Finger to floor test
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility
大体时间:Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
Before the warm-up intervention (Time 0)
Flexibility
大体时间:After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
After the warm-up intervention (Time 1)
Flexibility
大体时间:After three hour of work (Time 5)
Flexibility of the shoulders - Back scratch test
After three hour of work (Time 5)
Heart rate
大体时间:Time 0
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 0
Heart rate
大体时间:Time 1
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 1
Heart rate
大体时间:Time 2
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 2
Heart rate
大体时间:Time 3
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 3
Heart rate
大体时间:Time 4
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 4
Heart rate
大体时间:Time 5
Heart rate with a heart rate monitor placed on the wrist
Time 5
Readiness to work
大体时间:Time 1
Readiness to work was rated subjectively using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 was used to indicate "not at all ready" and 10 "perfectly ready to work"
Time 1
Readiness to work
大体时间:Time 2
Readiness to work was rated subjectively using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, where 0 was used to indicate "not at all ready" and 10 "perfectly ready to work"
Time 2
Work quality
大体时间:Time 5
Work quality will be assessed by the workers supervisors, with the same 0-10 scale in every company, developed by the research team and a vineyard growing specialist.
Time 5
Workload
大体时间:Time 5
NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX) is a multi-dimensional scale used to estimate workload from a worker.
Time 5
Visuomotor reaction time
大体时间:Time 0
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 0
Visuomotor reaction time
大体时间:Time 1
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 1
Visuomotor reaction time
大体时间:Time 5
The FITLIGHT Trainer (FITLIGHT Sports Corp., Ontario, Canada) will be used to measure the visuomotor reaction time (VMRT).
Time 5

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

调查人员

  • 研究主任:Nicolas Vuillerme, Phd、UniversitéGrenobleAlpes

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2021年11月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2022年5月31日

研究完成 (实际的)

2022年5月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2022年6月13日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2022年6月16日

首次发布 (实际的)

2022年6月21日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2022年6月21日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2022年6月16日

最后验证

2022年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • IRB00012476-2021-06-12-137

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

Hybrid Warm-up的临床试验

3
订阅