Virtual reality applications to assist pregnant women: a scoping review

Sadrieh Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Fatemeh Sarpourian, Elaheh Shafiei, Sadrieh Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Fatemeh Sarpourian, Elaheh Shafiei

Abstract

Background: Virtual reality (VR) is a computer technology that simulates the real world to allow users to communicate with a similar but artificial environment. VR technologies can be used in pregnancy to help mothers gain a better understanding of this significant yet stressful event. The aim of this study was to find and summarize VR applications to help pregnant women during their pregnancy and delivery.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched on November 11th, 2020 to access relevant studies. The following data were extracted from the collected studies: first author's name, year of publication, country, type of study, sample size, study objective, VR components (hardware and software), data gathering method, and study outcomes. Through a descriptive summary and analysis, the results eventually presented.

Results: Nine studies were included in this study. Four studies (44.5%) had used VR technology to reduce the anxiety of pregnant women, four studies (44.5%) had applied VR for decreasing delivery pain, and one study (11%) used VR for exercise trainings. Five studies (56%) used VR headsets and three studies (33.5%) used VR glasses. Most studies showed that VR was a useful method to be used for different purposes in both pregnancy and delivery (n = 8, 89%).

Conclusion: The use of VR technology for pregnancy has been increasing in recent years. This technology has different applications in pregnancy, from reducing anxiety and pain to exercise training. However, more studies are required to reach a general common understanding about the efficacy of VR during pregnancy and delivery.

Keywords: Delivery; Labor; Pregnancy; Virtual reality.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declared that there is no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The PRISMA flowchart used in finding relevant studies

References

    1. Weiss PL, Jessel AS. Virtual reality applications to work. Work (Reading, Mass) 1998;11(3):277–293.
    1. Onyesolu MO, Eze FU. Understanding virtual reality technology: advances and applications. Adv Comput Sci Eng. 2011:53–70.
    1. Virtual Reality Society . Applications Of Virtual Reality. 2017.
    1. Knaust T, Felnhofer A, Kothgassner OD, Höllmer H, Gorzka RJ, Schulz H. Virtual trauma interventions for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorders: a scoping review. Front Psychol. 2020;11:562506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562506.
    1. Smith V, Warty RR, Sursas JA, Payne O, Nair A, Krishnan S, da Silva Costa F, Wallace EM, Vollenhoven B. The effectiveness of virtual reality in managing acute pain and anxiety for medical inpatients: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(11):e17980. doi: 10.2196/17980.
    1. Lungu AJ, Swinkels W, Claesen L, Tu P, Egger J, Chen X. A review on the applications of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in surgical simulation: an extension to different kinds of surgery. Expert Rev Med Dev. 2020;18(1):47–62.
    1. Baeza-Barragán MR, Labajos Manzanares MT, Ruiz Vergara C, Casuso-Holgado MJ, Martín-Valero R. The use of virtual reality Technologies in the Treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020;8(12):e21576. doi: 10.2196/21576.
    1. Woon APN, Mok WQ, Chieng YJS, Zhang HM, Ramos P, Mustadi HB, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality training in improving knowledge among nursing students: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;98:104655.
    1. Frudiger A, Mulders AG, Rousian M, Plasschaert SC, Koning AH, Willemsen SP, et al. Evaluation of embryonic posture using four-dimensional ultrasound and virtual reality. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;47(1):397–406.
    1. Burden C, Preshaw J, White P, Draycott TJ, Grant S, Fox R. Validation of virtual reality simulation for obstetric ultrasonography: a prospective cross-sectional study. Simul Healthc. 2012;7(5):269–273. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182611844.
    1. Aggarwal R, Tully A, Grantcharov T, Larsen C, Miskry T, Farthing A, Darzi A. Virtual reality simulation training can improve technical skills during laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;113(12):1382–1387. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01148.x.
    1. Cowles S, Norton TJ, Hannaford KE, Foley M. Virtual reality for pain control during labor: patient preferences [14S] Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):206S. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000559466.63150.51.
    1. Frey DP, Bauer ME, Bell CL, Low LK, Hassett AL, Cassidy RB, Boyer KD, Sharar SR. Virtual reality analgesia in labor: the VRAIL pilot study-a preliminary randomized controlled trial suggesting benefit of immersive virtual reality analgesia in Unmedicated laboring women. Anesth Analg. 2019;128(6):e93–ee6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003649.
    1. Noben L, Goossens S, Truijens SEM, van Berckel MMG, Perquin CW, Slooter GD, et al. A virtual reality video to improve information provision and reduce anxiety before cesarean delivery: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2019;6(12):e15872. doi: 10.2196/15872.
    1. Carvalho B, Zheng M, Aiono-Le TL. A prospective observational study evaluating the ability of prelabor psychological tests to predict labor pain, epidural analgesic consumption, and maternal satisfaction. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(3):632–640. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000357.
    1. Koyyalamudi V, Sidhu G, Cornett EM, Nguyen V, Labrie-Brown C, Fox CJ, Kaye AD. New labor pain treatment options. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2016;20(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11916-016-0543-2.
    1. Aromataris EMZE. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis JBI. 2020.
    1. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S, Akl EA, Chang C, McGowan J, Stewart L, Hartling L, Aldcroft A, Wilson MG, Garritty C, Lewin S, Godfrey CM, Macdonald MT, Langlois EV, Soares-Weiser K, Moriarty J, Clifford T, Tunçalp Ö, Straus SE. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850.
    1. Sridhar A, Shiliang Z, Woodson R, Kwan L. Non-pharmacological anxiety reduction with immersive virtual reality for first-trimester dilation and curettage: a pilot study. Eur J Contraception Reprod Health Care. 2020;25(6):480–483. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1836146.
    1. Wong MS, Spiegel BM, Gregory KD. Virtual reality reduces pain in laboring women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol. 2020. 10.1055/s-0040-1708851.
    1. VÁZQUEZ JLM, LARA DM, VACA VL, WIEDERHOLD BK, RIVAS IMH, WIEDERHOLD MD. Virtual reality pain mitigation during elective cesarean surgical delivery. Annu Rev Cyberther Telemed. 2019;2019:105.
    1. Setiawan A, Agiwahyuanto F, Arsiwi P. A virtual reality teaching simulation for exercise during pregnancy. Int J Emerg Technol Learn (iJET) 2019;14(1):34–48. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v14i01.8944.
    1. Shourab NJ, Zagami SE, Golmakhani N, Mazlom SR, Nahvi A, Pabarja F, Talebi M, Rizi SM. Virtual reality and anxiety in primiparous women during episiotomy repair. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2016;21(5):521–526. doi: 10.4103/1735-9066.193417.
    1. JahaniShoorab N, Ebrahimzadeh Zagami S, Nahvi A, Mazluom SR, Golmakani N, Talebi M, Pabarja F. The effect of virtual reality on pain in Primiparity women during episiotomy repair: a randomize clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2015;40(3):219–224.
    1. Severi FM, Prattichizzo D, Casarosa E, Barbagli F, Ferretti C, Altomare A, et al. Virtual fetal touch through a haptic interface decreases maternal anxiety and salivary cortisol. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2005;12(1):37–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsgi.2004.07.006.
    1. Shahhosseini Z, Pourasghar M, Khalilian A, Salehi F. A review of the effects of anxiety during pregnancy on Children's health. Mater Sociomed. 2015;27(3):200–202. doi: 10.5455/msm.2015.27.200-202.
    1. Bayrampour H, Salmon C, Vinturache A, Tough S. Effect of depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy on risk of obstetric interventions. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(7):1040–1048. doi: 10.1111/jog.12683.
    1. Arfaie K, Nahidi F, Simbar M, Bakhtiari M. The role of fear of childbirth in pregnancy related anxiety in Iranian women: a qualitative research. Electron Physician. 2017;9(2):3733–3740. doi: 10.19082/3733.
    1. Hinman SK, Smith KB, Quillen DM, Smith MS. Exercise in pregnancy: a clinical review. Sports Health. 2015;7(6):527–531. doi: 10.1177/1941738115599358.
    1. Hajesmaeel Gohari S, Gozali E, Niakan Kalhori SR. Virtual reality applications for chronic conditions management: A review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019;33:67.
    1. Yan Y, Chen K, Xie Y, Yiming S, Liu Y. The Effects of Weight on Comfort of Virtual Reality Devices. 2019. pp. 239–248.
    1. Bourdel N, Alves J, Pickering G, Ramilo I, Roman H, Canis M. Systematic review of endometriosis pain assessment: how to choose a scale? Hum Reprod Update. 2014;21(1):136–152. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu046.
    1. Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17–S24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x.
    1. Spielberger C, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
    1. Tcha-Tokey K, Christmann O, Loup-Escande E, Richir S. Proposition and validation of a questionnaire to measure the user experience in immersive virtual environments. 2016.
    1. Statista . Augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) forecast spending worldwide in 2020, by country. 2020.
    1. Birckhead B, Khalil C, Liu X, Conovitz S, Rizzo A, Danovitch I, Bullock K, Spiegel B. Recommendations for methodology of virtual reality clinical trials in health care by an international working group: iterative study. JMIR Ment Health. 2019;6(1):e11973. doi: 10.2196/11973.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する