Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 "long Covid" patients and draft quality principles for services

Emma Ladds, Alex Rushforth, Sietse Wieringa, Sharon Taylor, Clare Rayner, Laiba Husain, Trisha Greenhalgh, Emma Ladds, Alex Rushforth, Sietse Wieringa, Sharon Taylor, Clare Rayner, Laiba Husain, Trisha Greenhalgh

Abstract

Background: Approximately 10% of patients with Covid-19 experience symptoms beyond 3-4 weeks. Patients call this "long Covid". We sought to document such patients' lived experience, including accessing and receiving healthcare and ideas for improving services.

Methods: We held 55 individual interviews and 8 focus groups (n = 59) with people recruited from UK-based long Covid patient support groups, social media and snowballing. We restricted some focus groups to health professionals since they had already self-organised into online communities. Participants were invited to tell their stories and comment on others' stories. Data were audiotaped, transcribed, anonymised and coded using NVIVO. Analysis incorporated sociological theories of illness, healing, peer support, clinical relationships, access, and service redesign.

Results: Of 114 participants aged 27-73 years, 80 were female. Eighty-four were White British, 13 Asian, 8 White Other, 5 Black, and 4 mixed ethnicity. Thirty-two were doctors and 19 other health professionals. Thirty-one had attended hospital, of whom 8 had been admitted. Analysis revealed a confusing illness with many, varied and often relapsing-remitting symptoms and uncertain prognosis; a heavy sense of loss and stigma; difficulty accessing and navigating services; difficulty being taken seriously and achieving a diagnosis; disjointed and siloed care (including inability to access specialist services); variation in standards (e.g. inconsistent criteria for seeing, investigating and referring patients); variable quality of the therapeutic relationship (some participants felt well supported while others felt "fobbed off"); and possible critical events (e.g. deterioration after being unable to access services). Emotionally significant aspects of participants' experiences informed ideas for improving services.

Conclusion: Suggested quality principles for a long Covid service include ensuring access to care, reducing burden of illness, taking clinical responsibility and providing continuity of care, multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, evidence-based investigation and management, and further development of the knowledge base and clinical services.

Trial registration: NCT04435041.

Keywords: Chronic Covid-19; Long Covid; Post-acute Covid-19; Qualitative study; Quality standards.

Conflict of interest statement

TG is currently sitting on the oversight group for the long Covid guideline at the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. TG and EL provided evidence to the House of Lords Select Committee on long Covid. CR and ST are members of a long Covid patient support group. Other authors have no relevant interests to declare.

References

    1. Perego E, Callard F, Stras L, Melville-JÛhannesson B, Pope R, Alwan N. Why the Patient-Made Term ‘Long Covid’ is needed [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5(224).
    1. Greenhalgh T, Knight M, Buxton M, Husain L. Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care. Bmj. 2020;370:m3026. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3026.
    1. COVID Symptom Study. How long does COVID-19 last? (blog). London: Kings College London. . Accessed 1 Oct 2020.
    1. Assaf G, Davis H, McCorkell L, Wel H, O’Neil B, A’krami A, Low R, Mercier J, Adetutu A, (on behalf of the COVID-19 Body Politic Slack Group). An Analysis of the Prolonged COVID-19 Symptoms Survey by Patient-Led Research Team. Patient Led Res. 2020. .
    1. Alwan NA. Surveillance is underestimating the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2020;396(10252):e24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31823-7.
    1. Carfi A, Bernabei R, Landi F, Gemelli Against C-P-ACSG. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324(6):603–605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12603.
    1. Halpin SJ, McIvor C, Whyatt G, Adams A, Harvey O, McLean L, Walshaw C, Kemp S, Corrado J, Singh R. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol. 2020;30.
    1. Tenforde M, Kim S, Lindsell C, et al. Symptom Duration and Risk Factors for Delayed Return to Usual Health Among Outpatients with COVID-19 in a Multistate Health Care Systems Network — United States, March–June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020, ePub: 24 July 2020. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6930e1external.
    1. Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324:603–605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12603.
    1. Arnold DT, Hamilton FW, Milne A, Morley A, Viner J, Attwood M, Noel A, Gunning S, Hatrick J, Hamilton S. Patient outcomes after hospitalisation with COVID-19 and implications for follow-up; results from a prospective UK cohort. medRxiv. 2020.
    1. Goërtz YM, Van Herck M, Delbressine JM, Vaes AW, Meys R, Machado FV, Houben-Wilke S, Burtin C, Posthuma R, Franssen FM. Persistent symptoms 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 infection: the post-COVID-19 syndrome? ERJ Open Res. 2020;6:00542–02020. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00542-2020.
    1. Vaes AW, Machado FV, Meys R, Delbressine JM, Goertz YM, Van Herck M, Houben-Wilke S, Franssen FM, Vijlbrief H, Spies Y. Care dependency in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):2946. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092946.
    1. Dhont S, Derom E, Van Braeckel E, Depuydt P, Lambrecht BN. The pathophysiology of ‘happy’ hypoxemia in COVID-19. Respir Res. 2020;21(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01462-5.
    1. Tay MZ, Poh CM, Rénia L, MacAry PA, Ng LF. The trinity of COVID-19: immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:363–74.
    1. Libby P, Lüscher T. COVID-19 is, in the end, an endothelial disease. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(32):3038–3044. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa623.
    1. British Society for Immunology . Long-term immunological health consequences of COVID-19. London: BSI; 2020.
    1. Puntmann VO, Carerj ML, Wieters I, Fahim M, Arendt C, Hoffmann J, Shchendrygina A, Escher F, Vasa-Nicotera M, Zeiher AM, et al. Outcomes of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients recently recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;26:e203557.
    1. Mitrani RD, Dabas N, Goldberger JJ. COVID-19 cardiac injury: implications for long-term surveillance and outcomes in survivors. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(11):1984–90.
    1. NHS England . After-care needs of inpatients recovering from COVID-19 (CO388) London: NHS England; 2020.
    1. Royal College of Occupational Therapists . How to conserve your energy: Practical advice for people during and after having COVID-19. London: RCOP; 2020.
    1. Phillips M, Turner-Stokes L, Wade D, Walton K. Rehabilitation in the wake of Covid-19-A phoenix from the ashes: British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine; 2020. . Accessed 24 Jul 2020.
    1. British Thoracic Society . COVID-19: information for the respiratory community. London: BTS; 2020.
    1. Barker-Davies RM, O'Sullivan O, Senaratne KPP, Baker P, Cranley M, Dharm-Datta S, Ellis H, Goodall D, Gough M, Lewis S. The Stanford hall consensus statement for post-COVID-19 rehabilitation. Br J Sports Med. 2020. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102596.
    1. NHS England . NHS to offer ‘long covid’ sufferers help at specialist centres. London: NHS England; 2020.
    1. Greenhalgh T, Hurwitz B. Narrative based medicine: why study narrative? BMJ. 1999;318(7175):48–50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.48.
    1. Bruner JS. Acts of meaning, vol. 3. Cambridge: Harvard university press; 1990.
    1. Frank AW. The wounded storyteller: body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2013.
    1. Strauss AL. Chronic illness and the quality of life. St Louis: Mosby; 1975.
    1. Bury M. The sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects. Sociol Health Illn. 1991;13:451–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.1991.tb00522.x.
    1. Scambler G. Health-related stigma. Sociol Health Illn. 2009;31(3):441–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01161.x.
    1. May CR, Eton DT, Boehmer K, Gallacher K, Hunt K, MacDonald S, Mair FS, May CM, Montori VM, Richardson A. Rethinking the patient: using burden of treatment theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):281. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-281.
    1. Schei E. Doctoring as leadership: the power to heal. Perspect Biol Med. 2006;49(3):393–406. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2006.0048.
    1. Frank AW. Just listening: narrative and deep illness. Fam Syst Health. 1998;16(3):197. doi: 10.1037/h0089849.
    1. Heath I. Narrative Based Medicine: dialogue and discourse in clinical practice. London: BMJ Books; 1998. Following the story: continuity of care in general practice; pp. 83–92.
    1. Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, Hsu R, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35.
    1. Mackenzie M, Conway E, Hastings A, Munro M, O'Donnell C. Is ‘candidacy’ a useful concept for understanding journeys through public services? A critical interpretive literature synthesis. Soc Policy Admin. 2013;47(7):806–825. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2012.00864.x.
    1. Levesque J-F, Harris MF, Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12(1):18. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18.
    1. Anthony KE, Reif-Stice CE, Iverson JO, Venette SJ. Belonging in practice: using communities of practice theory to understand support groups. Handbook Appl Commun Res. 2020:765–79.
    1. Brown P, Zavestoski S, McCormick S, Mayer B, Morello-Frosch R, Gasior Altman R. Embodied health movements: new approaches to social movements in health. Sociol Health Illn. 2004;26(1):50–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00378.x.
    1. Bate P, Robert G. Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: the concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing; 2007.
    1. Chase SE. Narrative inquiry: toward theoretical and methodological maturity. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Sage handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage; 2018.
    1. Kamberelis G, Dimitriadis G, Welker A. Focus group research and/in figured worlds. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage; 2018. pp. 692–716.
    1. Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12:436–445. doi: 10.2307/798843.
    1. Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):120–124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092.
    1. Office of National Statistics . Population Estiomates by Ethnic Group and Religion 2019. London: ONS; 2020.
    1. Wilkerson RG, Adler JD, Shah NG, Brown R. Silent hypoxia: a harbinger of clinical deterioration in patients with COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(10):2243.e5-2243.e6.
    1. Anonymous: Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Geneva: World Health Organisation. . Accessed 10 Oct 2020.
    1. NHS England . Advice on how to establish a remote ‘total triage’ model in general practice using online consultations. London: NHS England; 2020.
    1. Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. BMJ Qual Saf. 2006;15(5):307–310. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016527.
    1. Kingstone T, Taylor AK, O'Donnell CA, Atherton H, Blane DN, Chew-Graham CA. Finding the ‘'right’ GP: a qualitative study of the experiences of people with long-COVID. BJGP Open. 2020:bjgpopen20X101143.
    1. General Medical Council . Duties of a Doctor. London: GMC; 2020.
    1. Nguyen LH, Drew DA, Graham MS, Joshi AD, Guo C-G, Ma W, Mehta RS, Warner ET, Sikavi DR, Lo C-H. Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(9):e475–e483. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30164-X.
    1. Pallett SJ, Rayment M, Patel A, Fitzgerald-Smith SA, Denny SJ, Charani E, Mai AL, Gilmour KC, Hatcher J, Scott C. Point-of-care serological assays for delayed SARS-CoV-2 case identification among health-care workers in the UK: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(9):885–894. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30315-5.
    1. Callard F. Very, very mild: Covid-19 symptoms and illness classification. Somatosphere. 2020; . Accessed 14 May 2020.
    1. Alwan NA: What exactly is mild covid-19? . BMJ (Opinion) 2020: . Accessed 5 Oct 2020.
    1. Garner P: Covid-19 at 14 weeks—phantom speed cameras, unknown limits, and harsh penalties. BMJ (blog) 2020, Covid-19 at . Accessed 26 June 2020.
    1. Alwan NA, Attree E, Blair JM, Bogaert D, Bowen M-A, Boyle J, Bradman M, Briggs TA, Burns S, Campion D, et al. From doctors as patients: a manifesto for tackling persisting symptoms of covid-19. BMJ. 2020;370:m3565. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3565.
    1. Garrigues E, Janvier P, Kherabi Y, Le Bot A, Hamon A, Gouze H, Doucet L, Berkani S, Oliosi E, Mallart E. Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;81(6): e4–e6.
    1. Kingod N, Cleal B, Wahlberg A, Husted GR. Online peer-to-peer communities in the daily lives of people with chronic illness: a qualitative systematic review. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(1):89–99. doi: 10.1177/1049732316680203.
    1. Jones J, Pradhan M, Hosseini M, Kulanthaivel A, Hosseini M. Novel approach to cluster patient-generated data into actionable topics: case study of a web-based breast cancer forum. JMIR Med Inform. 2018;6(4):e45. doi: 10.2196/medinform.9162.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する