Below-elbow or above-elbow cast for conservative treatment of extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal displacement: a prospective randomized trial

Gaetano Caruso, Francesco Tonon, Alessandro Gildone, Mattia Andreotti, Roberto Altavilla, Alessandra Valentini, Giorgia Valpiani, Leo Massari, Gaetano Caruso, Francesco Tonon, Alessandro Gildone, Mattia Andreotti, Roberto Altavilla, Alessandra Valentini, Giorgia Valpiani, Leo Massari

Abstract

Background: Distal radial fractures are common traumatic injuries, but their management remains controversial also in case of conservative treatment regarding the type of immobilisation. Hence, we conducted a two-arm, parallel-group, prospective randomised trial to compare the capacity of long casts (above-elbow) and short casts (below-elbow) to maintain the reduction of extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal displacement (AO/OTA classification: 2R3A2.2).

Methods: Seventy-four eligible patients with AO/OTA 2R3A2.2 fractures treated with closed reduction and cast immobilisation were randomised to the long cast group (n°= 37) or to the short cast group (n°= 37). Baseline radiological parameters, radial inclination (RI), radial height (RH), ulnar variance (UV) and palmar tilt (PT) were taken, and compared with clinical (DASH, Mayo Wrist and Mayo Elbow) and radiological scores taken at 7-10 days, 4 weeks and 12 weeks. Furthermore, to evaluate correlations between radiological parameters and functional outcomes, patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not their radiological parameters at Follow-ups 2 and 3 were acceptable, i.e. within the range 11-12 mm for RH, 16°-28° for RI, - 4-+ 2 mm for UV and 0°-22° for PT.

Results: Patient demographic and baseline radiological parameters were similar between groups. At follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between the two types of cast in terms of RI, RH, UV or PT, or Mayo wrist or DASH scores. Short cast group patients displayed better Mayo elbow score at follow-up 2 (4 weeks), but this difference was no longer statistically significant at follow-up 3 (12 weeks). No statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between patients who presented acceptable radiographic parameters at follow-up and those who did not.

Conclusion: As there were no significant differences between short casts and long casts in terms of fracture reduction maintenance or clinical outcomes, short casts are an effective method of post-reduction immobilisation in AO/OTA 2R3A2.2 fracture of the radius. Radiological parameters outside the range conventionally considered acceptable do not preclude a satisfactory clinical outcome.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov PRS, NCT04062110. Registred 20 August 2019.

Keywords: Above-elbow cast; Below-elbow cast; Conservative management; Extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal displacement.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Postero-anterior and lateral view radiographs showing extra-articular fractures of the distal radial epiphysis with dorsal displacement (type 2R3A2.2 according to the AO/OTA classification)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standard (postero-anterior and lateral view) radiographs showing normal measurements of the distal radius. Palmar tilt (PT) of the radius can be measured by obtaining the angle of intersection between a line drawn tangentially across the most distal points of the radial articular surface and a perpendicular to the midshaft of the radius. Radial inclination (RI) is the angle of the distal radial surface with respect to a line perpendicular to the shaft. Radial height (RH) is the distance between two parallel lines drawn perpendicular to the long axis of the radial shaft, one from the tip of the radial styloid and the other from the ulnar corner of the lunate fossa. Ulnar variance (UV) refers to the relative lengths of the distal articular surfaces of the radius and ulna.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flow chart describing the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study

References

    1. Andreotti M, Tonon F, Caruso G, et al. The “Chauffeur Fracture”: historical origins of an often-forgotten eponym. Hand (N Y). 2018:1558944718792650.
    1. Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2012;28(2):113–125. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.02.001.
    1. Porrino JA, Jr, Maloney E, Scherer K, et al. Fracture of the distal radius: epidemiology and premanagement radiographic characterization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(3):551–559. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12140.
    1. Jupiter J. Future treatment and research directions in distal radius fracture. Hand Clin. 2012;28(2):245–248. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.02.006.
    1. Chen CW, Huang TL, Su LT, et al. Incidence of subsequent hip fractures is significantly increased within the first month after distal radius fracture in patients older than 60 years. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(1):317–321. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824bb325.
    1. Belloti JC, Santos JB, Atallah AN, et al. Fractures of the distal radius (Colles’ fracture) Sao Paulo Med J. 2007;125(3):132–138. doi: 10.1590/S1516-31802007000300002.
    1. Mauck BM, Swigler CW. Evidence-based review of distal radius fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2018;49(2):211–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2017.12.001.
    1. Sarmiento A, Pratt GW, Berry NC, et al. Colles’ fractures. Functional bracing in supination. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57(3):311–317. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197557030-00004.
    1. Bünger C, Sølund K, Rasmussen P. Early results after Colles’ fracture: functional bracing in supination vs dorsal plaster immobilization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984;103(4):251–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00387330.
    1. Pool C. Colles’s fracture. A prospective study of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1973;55(3):540–544. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.55B3.540.
    1. Tumia N, Wardlaw D, Hallett J, et al. Aberdeen Colles’ fracture brace as a treatment for Colles’ fracture. A multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(1):78–82. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.85B1.12468.
    1. Park MJ, Kim JP, Lee HI, et al. Is a short arm cast appropriate for stable distal radius fractures in patients older than 55 years? A randomized prospective multicentre study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017;42(5):487–492. doi: 10.1177/1753193417690464.
    1. Kellam JF, Meinberg EG, Agel J, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium–2018: International Comprehensive Classification of Fractures and Dislocations Committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(Supplement 1):S1–S170.
    1. Mann FA, Wilson AJ, Gilula LA. Radiographic evaluation of the wrist: what does the hand surgeon want to know? Radiology. 1992;184(1):15–24. doi: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1609073.
    1. Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Yin H, et al. Variations in the use of internal fixation for distal radial fracture in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(23):2154–2162. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.012802.
    1. Lambrinudi C. Injuries to the Wrist. Guy’s Hospital. Gazette. 1938;52:107.
    1. Sarmiento A. The brachioradialis as a deforming force in Colles’ fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1965;38:86–92.
    1. Wahlström O. Treatment of Colles’ fracture. A prospective comparison of three different positions of immobilization. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53(2):225–228. doi: 10.3109/17453678208992206.
    1. Fernandez DL. Closed manipulation and casting of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2005;21(3):307–316. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2005.02.004.
    1. Stewart HD, Innes AR, Burke FD. Functional cast-bracing for Colles’ fractures. A comparison between cast-bracing and conventional plaster casts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66(5):749–753. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.66B5.6389558.
    1. Bong MR, Egol KA, Leibman M, et al. A comparison of immediate postreduction splinting constructs for controlling initial displacement of fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomized study of long-arm versus short-arm splinting. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(5):766–770. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.01.016.
    1. Gamba C, Fernandez FAM, Llavall MC, et al. Which immobilization is better for distal radius fracture? A prospective randomized trial. Int Orthop. 2017;41(9):1723–1727. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3518-y.
    1. Maluta T, Dib G, Cengarle M, et al. Below- vs above-elbow cast for distal radius fractures: is elbow immobilization really effective for reduction maintenance? Int Orthop. 2019;43(10):2391–2397. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4197-z.
    1. Jaremko JL, Lambert RG, Rowe BH, et al. Do radiographic indices of distal radius fracture reduction predict outcomes in older adults receiving conservative treatment? Clin Radiol. 2007;62(1):65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.08.013.
    1. Young BT, Rayan GM. Outcome following nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in low-demand patients older than 60 years. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(1):19–28. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu025a0019.
    1. Beumer A, McQueen MM. Fractures of the distal radius in low-demand elderly patients: closed reduction of no value in 53 of 60 wrists. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(1):98–100. doi: 10.1080/00016470310013743.
    1. Anzarut A, Johnson JA, Rowe BH, et al. Radiologic and patient-reported functional outcomes in an elderly cohort with conservatively treated distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29(6):1121–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.07.002.
    1. Egol KA, Walsh M, Romo-Cardoso S, et al. Distal radial fractures in the elderly: operative compared with non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1851–1857. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00968.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する