Whole-body computed tomography for multiple traumas using a triphasic injection protocol

Christos Loupatatzis, Sebastian Schindera, Jan Gralla, Hanno Hoppe, Jan Bittner, Ralph Schröder, Sudesh Srivastav, Harald Marcel Bonel, Christos Loupatatzis, Sebastian Schindera, Jan Gralla, Hanno Hoppe, Jan Bittner, Ralph Schröder, Sudesh Srivastav, Harald Marcel Bonel

Abstract

To evaluate a triphasic injection protocol for whole-body multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with multiple trauma. Fifty consecutive patients (41 men) were examined. Contrast medium (300 mg/mL iodine) was injected starting with 70 mL at 3 mL/s, followed by 0.1 mL/s for 8 s, and by another bolus of 75 mL at 4 mL/s. CT data acquisition started 50 s after the beginning of the first injection. Two experienced, blinded readers independently measured the density in all major arteries, veins, and parenchymatous organs. Image quality was assessed using a five-point ordinal rating scale and compared to standard injection protocols [n = 25 each for late arterial chest, portovenous abdomen, and MDCT angiography (CTA)]. With the exception of the infrarenal inferior caval vein, all blood vessels were depicted with diagnostic image quality using the multiple-trauma protocol. Arterial luminal density was slightly but significantly smaller compared to CTA (P < 0.01). Veins and parenchymatous organs were opacified significantly better compared to all other protocols (P < 0.01). Arm artifacts reduced the density of spleen and liver parenchyma significantly (P < 0.01). Similarly high image quality is achieved for arteries using the multiple-trauma protocol compared to CTA, and parenchymatous organs are depicted with better image quality compared to specialized protocols. Arm artifacts should be avoided.

References

    1. Rofo. 2001 Oct;173(10):938-41
    1. Eur Radiol. 2003 May;13(5):1072-9
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002 Jan-Feb;26(1):113-8
    1. Emerg Radiol. 2006 Dec;13(3):123-8
    1. Emerg Radiol. 2007 Mar;13(6):349-51; author reply 353
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006 Mar-Apr;30(2):182-8
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jul;185(1):232-8
    1. Eur J Radiol. 2004 Oct;52(1):56-66
    1. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(4):580-4
    1. Eur Radiol. 2002 Jul;12(7):1728-40
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Sep;185(3):647-54
    1. Radiology. 2003 Oct;229(1):91-8
    1. Radiat Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;22(5):303-9
    1. Radiology. 2007 Feb;242(2):582-9
    1. Rofo. 2004 Jul;176(7):1039-44
    1. Eur Radiol. 2004 Nov;14(11):2099-104
    1. J Trauma. 1999 Nov;47(5):964-9
    1. Radiology. 2000 Sep;216(3):872-80
    1. Radiology. 2005 Apr;235(1):133-41
    1. Biometrics. 1977 Jun;33(2):363-74
    1. Rofo. 1998 Mar;168(3):306

Source: PubMed

3
購読する