The Parsortix™ Cell Separation System-A versatile liquid biopsy platform

M Craig Miller, Peggy S Robinson, Christopher Wagner, Daniel J O'Shannessy, M Craig Miller, Peggy S Robinson, Christopher Wagner, Daniel J O'Shannessy

Abstract

Cancer cells from solid tumors can enter the circulatory system and survive to subsequently form distant metastases. The CellSearch® system (Menarini-Silicon Biosystems, Huntingdon Valley, PA) was the first, FDA-cleared system that provided a reliable tool for the investigation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which have been shown to be strongly associated with poor survival and therapy failure. Since that time, a number of new technologies have been introduced to improve CTC detection and/or isolation for further characterization. The continued and growing interest in the "liquid biopsy" field has spurred the development of numerous different CTC technologies. However, selecting the most appropriate CTC platform for individual applications can be challenging. No consensus has yet been reached in the community regarding which liquid biopsy technology is optimal. Here, we introduce the Parsortix™ Cell Separation System (ANGLE North America, Inc., King of Prussia, PA), a microfluidic based technology that captures rare cells based on size and deformability, offers reproducibly high capture efficiency, and produces highly enriched, viable (viability dependent on preservative used) CTCs that are amenable to a multitude of downstream analyses, including the isolation and interrogation of single cells. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Keywords: circulating tumor cell; liquid biopsy; microfluidics; rare cell isolation.

Conflict of interest statement

M. Craig Miller, Peggy S. Robinson, Christopher Wagner, and Daniel J. O'Shannessy are paid employees of ANGLE North America, Inc. M. Craig Miller, Peggy S. Robinson, and Christopher Wagner are stock holders in ANGLE plc. Peggy S. Robinson is a corporate officer of ANGLE North America, Inc.

© 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Parsortix™ PR1 Cell Separation System.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Image and diagram of a Parsortix GEN3 Cell Separation Cassette showing how the blood flows into the cassette, over the step structures and through the critical gap. (B) Example images of nucleated blood cells and CTCs harvested from prostate cancer patients (7.5 ml EDTA blood samples processed within 4 h after collection) and immunofluorescently stained with DAPI (blue), CD45 (red), cytokeratin (green), and vimentin (yellow). (C) Example image of CTCs harvested from breast cancer patient (4 ml CellSave blood sample processed

Figure 3

5‐Day linearity study on Parsortix…

Figure 3

5‐Day linearity study on Parsortix System using live, fluorescently labeled SKBR3 cells spiked…

Figure 3
5‐Day linearity study on Parsortix System using live, fluorescently labeled SKBR3 cells spiked into 5 ml EDTA blood drawn from healthy volunteers. (A) Plot of the actual number of SKBR3 cells spiked vs. the number of SKBR3 cells captured in the separation cassette. (B) Plot of the number of SKBR3 cells captured in the separation cassette vs. the number of SKBR3 cells harvested out of the separation cassette. (C) Plot of the actual number of SKBR3 cells spiked vs. the number of SKBR3 cells harvested out of the separation cassette.
Figure 3
Figure 3
5‐Day linearity study on Parsortix System using live, fluorescently labeled SKBR3 cells spiked into 5 ml EDTA blood drawn from healthy volunteers. (A) Plot of the actual number of SKBR3 cells spiked vs. the number of SKBR3 cells captured in the separation cassette. (B) Plot of the number of SKBR3 cells captured in the separation cassette vs. the number of SKBR3 cells harvested out of the separation cassette. (C) Plot of the actual number of SKBR3 cells spiked vs. the number of SKBR3 cells harvested out of the separation cassette.

References

    1. Xu L, Mao X, Imrali A, Syed F, Mutsvangwa K, Berney D, Cathcart P, Hines J, Shamash J, Lu YJ. Optimization and evaluation of a novel size based circulating tumor cell isolation system. PLoS One 2015;10(9):e0138032.
    1. Hvichia GE, Parveen Z, Wagner C, Janning M, Quidde J, Stein A, Müller V, Loges S, Neves RP, Stoecklein NH, et al. A novel microfluidic platform for size and deformability based separation and the subsequent molecular characterization of viable circulating tumor cells. Int J Cancer 2016;138(12):2894–2904.
    1. Chudziak J, Burt DJ, Mohan S, Rothwell DG, Mesquita B, Antonello J, Dalby S, Ayub M, Priest L, Carter L, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel microfluidic device for epitope‐independent enrichment of circulating tumour cells in patients with small cell lung cancer. Analyst 2016;141(2):669–678.
    1. Gorges TM, Kuske A, Röck K, Mauermann O, Müller V, Peine S, Verpoort K, Novosadova V, Kubista M, Riethdorf S, et al. Accession of tumor heterogeneity by multiplex transcriptome profiling of single circulating tumor cells. Clin Chem 2016;62(11):1504–1515.
    1. Xu L, Mao X, Guo T, Chan PY, Shaw G, Hines J, Stankiewicz E, Wang Y, Oliver RTD, Ahmad AS, et al. The novel association of circulating tumor cells and circulating megakaryocytes with prostate cancer prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(17):5112–5122.
    1. Lampignano R, Yang L, Neumann MHD, Franken A, Fehm T, Niederacher D, Neubauer H. A novel workflow to enrich and isolate patient‐matched EpCAMhigh and EpCAMlow/negative CTCs enables the comparative characterization of the PIK3CA status in metastatic breast cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18(1885):1–17.
    1. Maertens Y, Humberg V, Erlmeier F, Steffens S, Steinestel J, Bögemann M, Schrader AJ, Bernemann C. Comparison of isolation platforms for detection of circulating renal cell carcinoma cells. Oncotarget 2017;8(50):87710–87717.
    1. Obermayr E, Maritschnegg E, Agreiter C, Pecha N, Speiser P, Helmy‐Bader S, Danzinger S, Krainer M, Singer C, Zeillinger R. Efficient leukocyte depletion by a novel microfluidic platform enables the molecular detection and characterization of circulating tumor cells. Oncotarget 2017;9(1):812–823.
    1. Mayall FG, Bodger I, Pepperell J, Stevanato L, Hustler A, Mumford KM. The precious cell block. J Clin Pathol 2018;71(7):659–660.
    1. El‐Heliebi A, Hille C, Laxman N, Svedlund J, Haudum C, Ercan E, Kroneis T, Chen S, Smolle M, Rossmann C, et al. In situ detection and quantification of AR‐V7, AR‐FL, PSA, and KRAS point mutations in circulating tumor cells. Clin Chem 2018;64(3):536–546.
    1. Kitz J, Lowes LE, Goodale D, Allan AL. Circulating tumor cell analysis in preclinical mouse models of metastasis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2018;8(2); pii:E30.
    1. Porras TB, Kaur P, Ring A, Schechter N, Lang JE. Challenges in using liquid biopsies for gene expression profiling. Oncotarget 2018;9(6):7036–7053.
    1. Coumans FAW, van Dalum G, Beck M, Terstappen LWMM. Filter characteristics influencing circulating tumor cell enrichment from whole blood. PLoS One 2013;8(4):e61770.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する