Carbon dioxide insufflation is associated with increased serrated polyp detection rate when compared to room air insufflation during screening colonoscopy

Michael Riverso, Yaseen B Perbtani, Jonathan J D Shuster, Joydeep Chakraborty, Tony S Brar, Mitali Agarwal, Han Zhang, Anand Gupte, Shailendra S Chauhan, Christopher E Forsmark, Peter V Draganov, Dennis Yang, Michael Riverso, Yaseen B Perbtani, Jonathan J D Shuster, Joydeep Chakraborty, Tony S Brar, Mitali Agarwal, Han Zhang, Anand Gupte, Shailendra S Chauhan, Christopher E Forsmark, Peter V Draganov, Dennis Yang

Abstract

Background and study aims: Sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSA) have been increasingly recognized as precursors of colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of carbon dioxide insufflation (CO 2 I) vs. room air insufflation (AI) on serrated polyp detection rate (SPDR) and to identify factors associated with SPDR.

Patients and methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study of 2083 screening colonoscopies performed with AI (November 2011 through January 2013) or CO 2 I (February 2013 to June 2015). Data on demographics, procedure characteristics and histology results were obtained from a prospectively maintained endoscopy database and chart review. SPDR was defined as proportion of colonoscopies in which ≥ 1 SSA, TSA or hyperplastic polyp (HP) ≥ 10 mm in the right colon was detected. Multi-variate analysis (MVA) was performed to identify predictors of SPDR.

Results: A total of 131 histologically confirmed serrated polyps (129 SSA, 2 TSA and 0 HP ≥ 10 mm) were detected. SPDR was higher with CO 2 I vs. AI (4.8 % vs. 1.4 %; P < 0.0001). On MVA, CO 2 I was associated with higher SPDR when compared to AI (OR: 9.52; 95 % CI: 3.05 - 30.3). Both higher body mass index (OR 1.05; 95 % CI:1.02 - 1.09) and longer colonoscope withdrawal time (OR 1.11; 95 % CI: 1.07 - 1.16) were also associated with higher SPDR.

Conclusion: CO 2 I is associated with higher SPDR when compared to AI during screening colonoscopy. While the mechanism remains unknown, we speculate that the favorable gas characteristics of CO 2 compared to room air results in improved polyp detection by optimizing bowel insufflation. These findings suggest an additional reason to prefer the use of CO 2 I over AI during colonoscopy.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Detection rates between patients undergoing screening colonoscopy with AI vs. CO 2 I.

References

    1. Zauber A G, Winawer S J, O’Brien M J et al.Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–696.
    1. Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:104–117.
    1. Pohl H, Robertson D J. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:858–864.
    1. Snover D C, Jass J R, Fenoglio-Preiser C et al.Serrated polyps of the large intestine: a morphologic and molecular review of an evolving concept. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;124:380–391.
    1. Barret M, Chaussade S, Coriat R. Detection rate of proximal serrated lesions: A new quality indicator for colonoscopy? Dig Liver Dis. 2015;47:441–442.
    1. Bettington M, Walker N, Clouston A et al.The serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma: current concepts and challenges. Histopathology. 2013;62:367–386.
    1. Erichsen R, Baron J A, Hamilton-Dutoit S J et al.Increased risk of colorectal cancer development among patient with serrated polyps. Gastroenterology. 2016;4:895–902.
    1. Torlakovic E, Skovlund E, Snover D C et al.Morophologic reappraisal of serrated colorectal polyps. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:65–81.
    1. Okamoto K, Kitamura S, Kimura T et al.Clinicopathological characteristics of serrated polyps as precursors to colorectal cancer: current status and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32(02):358–367.
    1. Rex D K, Ahnen D J, Baron J Aet al.Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel Am J Gastroenterol 20121071315–1329.; quiz 1314, 1330
    1. Bressler B, Paszat L F, Chen Z et al.Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:96–102.
    1. Arain M A, Sawhney M, Sheikh S et al.CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1189–1195.
    1. Leggett B, Whitehall V. Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2088–2100.
    1. Kahi C J, Hewett D G, Norton D L et al.Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:42–46.
    1. Hetzel J T, Huang C S, Coukos J A et al.Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2656–2664.
    1. De Wijkerslooth T R, Stoop E M, Bossuyt P M et al.Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:617–623.
    1. Liang J, Kalady M F, Appau K et al.Serrated polyp detection rate during screening colonoscopy. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:1323–1327.
    1. Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:128–136.
    1. Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C et al.Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017;49:270–297.
    1. Bassan M S, Holt B, Moss A et al.Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces number of postprocedure admissions after endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions: a prospective cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:90–95.
    1. Aronchick C A, Lipshutz W H, Wright S H et al.A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparison with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:346–352.
    1. Schlemper R J. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut. 2000;47:251–255.
    1. Snover D C, Ahnen D J, Burt R W . Lyon: World Health Organization; 2010. Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated polyposis; pp. 160–165.
    1. Cotton P B, Eisen G M, Aabakken L et al.A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.
    1. Yamano H O, Yoshikawa K, Kimura T et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation for colonoscopy: evaluation of gas volume, abdominal pain, examination time and transcutaneous partial CO 2 pressure . J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1235–1240.
    1. Dellon E S, Hawk J S, Grim I S et al.The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:843–849.
    1. Geyer M, Guller U, Beglinger C. Carbon dioxide insufflation in routine colonoscopy is safe and more comfortable: results of a randomized controlled double-blinded trial. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2011;2011:378906.
    1. Payne S R, Church T R, Wandell M et al.Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1119–1126.
    1. Brandt L I, Boley S J, Sammartano R. Carbon dioxide and room air insufflation of the colon. Effects on colonic blood flow and intraluminal pressure in the dog. Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;32:324–329.
    1. Hussein A M. Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1984;30:68–70.
    1. Butterly L, Robinson C M, Anderson J C et al.Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: Results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:417–426.
    1. Feakins R M. Obesity and metabolic syndrome: pathological effects on the gastrointestinal tract. Histopathology. 2016;68:630–640.
    1. Platz E A, Willett W C, Colditz G A et al.Proportion of colon cancer risk that might be preventable in a cohort of middle-aged US men. Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:579–588.
    1. Bailie L, Loughrey M B, Coleman H G. Lifestyle risk factors for serrated colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2016;152:92–104.
    1. Burke C A, Choure A G, Sanaka M R et al.A comparison of high-definition versus conventional colonoscopes for polyp detection. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:1716–1720.
    1. Tribonias G, Theodoropoulou A, Konstantinidis K et al.Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 2010;Oct 12:e260–266.
    1. East J E, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S et al.A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:768–776.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する