Ertugliflozin Compared with Glimepiride in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled on Metformin: The VERTIS SU Randomized Study

Priscilla Hollander, Jie Liu, Julie Hill, Jeremy Johnson, Zhi Wei Jiang, Gregory Golm, Susan Huyck, Steven G Terra, James P Mancuso, Samuel S Engel, Brett Lauring, Priscilla Hollander, Jie Liu, Julie Hill, Jeremy Johnson, Zhi Wei Jiang, Gregory Golm, Susan Huyck, Steven G Terra, James P Mancuso, Samuel S Engel, Brett Lauring

Abstract

Introduction: This study assessed the safety and efficacy of ertugliflozin (an oral sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor) vs. glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on metformin.

Methods: This phase III, double-blind, non-inferiority study (NCT01999218) randomized patients with HbA1c ≥ 7.0% and ≤ 9.0% on stable metformin ≥ 1500 mg/day 1:1:1 to ertugliflozin 15 or 5 mg once-daily (QD), or glimepiride (titrated from 1 mg QD). The primary hypothesis was that ertugliflozin 15 mg was non-inferior to glimepiride on HbA1c (non-inferiority criterion: upper bound of the 95% confidence interval [CI] about the treatment difference < 0.3%).

Results: Mean baseline HbA1c of randomized patients (N = 1326) was 7.8%. Mean and median doses of glimepiride were 3.0 mg/day throughout the study. At week 52, the least squares mean change (95% CI) from baseline in HbA1c was - 0.6% (- 0.7, - 0.5), - 0.6% (- 0.6, - 0.5), and - 0.7% (- 0.8, - 0.7) in the ertugliflozin 15 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and glimepiride groups, respectively. The between-group difference for ertugliflozin 15 mg and glimepiride of 0.1% (- 0.0, 0.2) met the pre-specified non-inferiority criterion. Relative to glimepiride, greater body weight and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reductions were observed with ertugliflozin. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar across groups. The incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia and genital mycotic infection (GMI) were, respectively, lower and higher with ertugliflozin relative to glimepiride. The incidences of urinary tract infection and hypovolemia AEs were not meaningfully different among the groups.

Conclusions: Ertugliflozin 15 mg was non-inferior to glimepiride in reducing HbA1c when added to metformin in patients with T2DM. Ertugliflozin had an acceptable safety profile and resulted in less hypoglycemia and more GMIs than glimepiride.

Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01999218.

Keywords: Ertugliflozin; Glycemic control; Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; Sulfonylurea; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition. a The most common reasons for screen failure were not meeting the inclusion criteria for HbA1c at screening and/or having exclusionary laboratory values
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Change over time in a HbA1c, b body weight, c systolic blood pressure (SBP), d fasting plasma glucose (FPG), e diastolic blood pressure (DBP). LS least squares, SE standard error
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean change from baseline in eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) through week 52. eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, SE standard error

References

    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:S1–S135. doi: 10.2337/dc17-S001.
    1. Belsey J, Krishnarajah G. Glycaemic control and adverse events in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin + sulphonylurea: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008;10(Suppl 1):1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00884.x.
    1. Andersen SE, Christensen M. Hypoglycaemia when adding sulphonylurea to metformin: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82:1291–1302. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13059.
    1. González-Ortiz M, Guerrero-Romero J, Violante-Ortiz R, et al. Efficacy of glimepiride/metformin combination versus glibenclamide/metformin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complicat. 2009;23:376–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.09.002.
    1. Paneni F, Luscher TF. Cardiovascular protection in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a review of clinical trial results across drug classes. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120:S17–S27. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.015.
    1. Terra SG, Focht K, Davies M, et al. Phase III, efficacy and safety study of ertugliflozin monotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:721–728. doi: 10.1111/dom.12888.
    1. Rosenstock J, Frias J, Pall D, et al. Effect of ertugliflozin on glucose control, body weight, blood pressure and bone density in type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy (VERTIS MET). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017. 10.1111/dom.13103.
    1. Dagogo-Jack S, Liu J, Eldor R, et al. Efficacy and safety of the addition of ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin and sitagliptin: the VERTIS SITA2 placebo-controlled randomized study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017. 10.1111/dom.13116.
    1. Nauck MA. Update on developments with SGLT2 inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014;8:1335–1380. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S50773.
    1. Grunberger G, Camp S, Johnson J, et al. Ertugliflozin in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: the VERTIS RENAL randomized study. Diabetes Ther. 2017. 10.1007/s13300-017-0337-5.
    1. University of Oxford. HOMA calculator, 2004. . Accessed Oct 16, 2017.
    1. Liang K-Y, Zeger S. Longitudinal data analysis of continuous and discrete responses for pre-post designs. Sankhya Ser B. 2000;62:134–148.
    1. Miettinen O, Nurminen M. Comparative analysis of two rates. Stat Med. 1985;4:213–226. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780040211.
    1. Goldberg RB, Holvey SM, Schneider J. A dose-response study of glimepiride in patients with NIDDM who have previously received sulfonylurea agents. The Glimepiride Protocol #201 Study Group. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:849–856. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.8.849.
    1. Cefalu WT, Leiter LA, Yoon KH, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (CANTATA-SU): 52 week results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013;382:941–950. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60683-2.
    1. Ridderstrale M, Andersen KR, Zeller C, Kim G, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC. Comparison of empagliflozin and glimepiride as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 104-week randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:691–700. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70120-2.
    1. Nauck M, del Prato S, Meier JJ, et al. Dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control with metformin. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013;138(Suppl 1):S6–S15.
    1. Kalra S, Singh V, Nagrale D. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition and the glomerulus: a review. Adv Therapy. 2016;33:1502–1518. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0379-5.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する