Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma: Results of the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group MTS 2008 Study and Pooled Analysis With the Concurrent BERNIE Study

Reineke A Schoot, Julia C Chisholm, Michela Casanova, Veronique Minard-Colin, Birgit Geoerger, Alison L Cameron, Beatrice Coppadoro, Ilaria Zanetti, Daniel Orbach, Anna Kelsey, Timothy Rogers, Cecile Guizani, Markus Elze, Myriam Ben-Arush, Kieran McHugh, Rick R van Rijn, Sima Ferman, Soledad Gallego, Andrea Ferrari, Meriel Jenney, Gianni Bisogno, Johannes H M Merks, Reineke A Schoot, Julia C Chisholm, Michela Casanova, Veronique Minard-Colin, Birgit Geoerger, Alison L Cameron, Beatrice Coppadoro, Ilaria Zanetti, Daniel Orbach, Anna Kelsey, Timothy Rogers, Cecile Guizani, Markus Elze, Myriam Ben-Arush, Kieran McHugh, Rick R van Rijn, Sima Ferman, Soledad Gallego, Andrea Ferrari, Meriel Jenney, Gianni Bisogno, Johannes H M Merks

Abstract

Purpose: Outcome for patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is poor. This study presents the results of the MTS 2008 study with a pooled analysis including patients from the concurrent BERNIE study.

Patients and methods: In MTS 2008, patients with metastatic RMS received four cycles of ifosfamide, vincristine, and actinomycin D (IVA) plus doxorubicin, five cycles of IVA, and 12 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy (low-dose cyclophosphamide and vinorelbine). The BERNIE study randomly assigned patients to the addition or not of bevacizumab to the same chemotherapy. Local therapy (surgery/radiotherapy) was given to the primary tumor and all metastatic sites when feasible.

Results: MTS 2008 included 270 patients (median age, 9.6 years; range, 0.07-20.8 years). With a median follow-up of 50.3 months, 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 34.9% (95% CI, 29.1 to 40.8) and 47.9% (95% CI, 41.6 to 53.9), respectively. In pooled analyses on 372 patients with a median follow-up of 55.2 months, 3-year EFS and OS were 35.5% (95% CI, 30.4 to 40.6) and 49.3% (95% CI, 43.9 to 54.5), respectively. Patients with ≤ 2 Oberlin risk factors (ORFs) had better outcome than those with ≥ 3 ORFs: 3-year EFS was 46.1% versus 12.5% (P < .0001) and 3-year OS 60.0% versus 26.0% (P < .0001). Induction chemotherapy and maintenance appeared tolerable; however, about two third of patients needed dose adjustments during maintenance.

Conclusion: Outcome remains poor for patients with metastatic RMS and multiple ORFs. Because of the design of the studies, it was not possible to determine whether the intensive induction regimen and/or the addition of maintenance treatment resulted in apparent improvement of outcome compared with historical cohorts. Further studies, with novel treatment approaches are urgently needed, to improve outcome for the group of patients with adverse prognostic factors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00379457 NCT00643565.

Conflict of interest statement

Johannes H.M. Merks

Consulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
EFS and OS of patients in MTS 2008. EFS, event-free survival; OS; overall survival.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
OS by treatment cohort. Beva, bevacizumab; chemo, chemotherapy; OS, overall survival.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
(A) EFS by ORFs for pooled MTS 2008 and BERNIE cohorts. (B) OS by ORFs for pooled MTS 2008 and BERNIE cohorts. EFS, event-free survival; ORF, Oberlin risk factor; OS, overall survival.

References

    1. Bisogno G, Jenney M, Bergeron C, et al. : Addition of dose-intensified doxorubicin to standard chemotherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma (EpSSG RMS 2005): A multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 19:1061-1071, 2018
    1. Bisogno G, De Salvo GL, Bergeron C, et al. : Vinorelbine and continuous low-dose cyclophosphamide as maintenance chemotherapy in patients with high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS 2005): A multicentre, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:1566-1575, 2019
    1. Oberlin O, Rey A, Lyden E, et al. : Prognostic factors in metastatic rhabdomyosarcomas: Results of a pooled analysis from United States and European Cooperative Groups. J Clin Oncol 26:2384-2389, 2008
    1. Weigel BJ, Lyden E, Anderson JR, et al. : Intensive multiagent therapy, including dose-compressed cycles of ifosfamide/etoposide and vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, irinotecan, and radiation, in patients with high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 34:117-122, 2016
    1. Admiraal R, van der Paardt M, Kobes J, et al. : High-dose chemotherapy for children and young adults with stage IV rhabdomyosarcoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD006669, 2010
    1. Bisogno G, Ferrari A, Prete A, et al. : Sequential high-dose chemotherapy for children with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Eur J Cancer 45:3035-3041, 2009
    1. Carli M, Colombatti R, Oberlin O, et al. : European Intergroup Studies (MMT4-89 and MMT4-91) on childhood metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: Final results and analysis of prognostic factors. J Clin Oncol 22:4787-4794, 2004
    1. McDowell HP, Foot ABM, Ellershaw C, et al. : Outcomes in paediatric metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: Results of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) study MMT-98. Eur J Cancer 46:1588-1595, 2010
    1. Chisholm JC, Merks JHM, Casanova M, et al. : Open-label, multicentre, randomized, phase II study of the EpSSG and the ITCC evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in childhood and adolescent patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (the BERNIE study). Eur J Cancer 83:177-184, 2017
    1. Bisogno G, Ferrari A, Tagarelli A, et al. : Integrating irinotecan in standard chemotherapy: A novel dose-density combination for high-risk pediatric sarcomas. Pediatr Blood Cancer 68:e28951, 2021
    1. Schoot RA, McHugh K, van Rijn RR, et al. : Response assessment in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: Can response evaluation criteria in solid tumors replace three-dimensional volume assessments? Radiology 269:870-878, 2013
    1. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. : New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205-216, 2000
    1. Bertolini F, Paul S, Mancuso P, et al. : Maximum tolerable dose and low-dose metronomic chemotherapy have opposite effects on the mobilization and viability of circulating endothelial progenitor cells. Cancer Res 63:4342-4346, 2003
    1. Malempati S, Weigel BJ, Chi Y-Y, et al. : The addition of cixutumab or temozolomide to intensive multiagent chemotherapy is feasible but does not improve outcome for patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Cancer 125:290-297, 2019
    1. Bergeron C, Thiesse P, Rey A, et al. : Revisiting the role of doxorubicin in the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma: An up-front window study in newly diagnosed children with high-risk metastatic disease. Eur J Cancer 44:427-431, 2008
    1. Ben Arush M, Minard-Colin V, Mosseri V, et al. : Does aggressive local treatment have an impact on survival in children with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma? Eur J Cancer 51:193-201, 2015
    1. Cameron AL, Elze MC, Casanova M, et al. : The impact of radiation therapy in children and adolescents with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Int J Radiat Onol Biol Phys 111:968-978, 2021
    1. Haeusler J, Ranft A, Boelling T, et al. : The value of local treatment in patients with primary, disseminated, multifocal Ewing sarcoma (PDMES). Cancer 116:443-450, 2010
    1. Defachelles A-S, Bogart E, Casanova M, et al. : Randomized phase II trial of vincristine-irinotecan with or without temozolomide, in children and adults with relapsed or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma: A European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group and Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer trial. J Clin Oncol 39:2979-2990, 2021

Source: PubMed

3
購読する