Pre-operative/Neoadjuvant Therapy and Vascular Debranching Followed by Resection for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (PREVADER): Clinical Feasibility Trial

Ulrich Ronellenfitsch, Christoph W Michalski, Patrick Michl, Sebastian Krug, Joerg Ukkat, Joerg Kleeff, Ulrich Ronellenfitsch, Christoph W Michalski, Patrick Michl, Sebastian Krug, Joerg Ukkat, Joerg Kleeff

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer continues to have a poor outcome. Many patients are diagnosed with advanced disease, and in a considerable proportion, abutment or invasion of visceral arteries is present. Moreover, some patients have anatomical variations or stenosis of major visceral arteries requiring arterial reconstruction upon pancreatic cancer resection to avoid organ ischemia. Simultaneous arterial reconstruction during resection is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. This trial evaluates the approach of visceral debranching, that is, arterial reconstruction, prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and tumor resection in patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods and Analysis: The trial includes patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic pancreatic cancer with arterial abutment or invasion (deemed primarily unresectable), variations in vascular anatomy, or stenosis of visceral arteries. The participants undergo visceral debranching, followed by current standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel, or other) and potential subsequent tumor resection. The primary outcome is feasibility, measured as the proportion of patients who start neoadjuvant therapy within 6 weeks of visceral debranching. The trial has an exact single-stage design. The proportion below which the treatment is considered ineffective is set at 0.7 (H0). The proportion above which the treatment warrants further exploration in a phase III trial is set at 0.9 (H1). With a power (1-beta) of 0.8 and a type 1 mistake (alpha) of 0.05, the required sample size is 28 patients. Feasibility of the approach will be assumed if 24 of the enrolled 28 patients proceed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy within 6 weeks from visceral debranching. Discussion: This trial evaluates a new treatment sequence, that is, visceral debranching followed by chemotherapy and resection, for pancreatic cancer with invasion or abutment of visceral arteries. The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate feasibility. Trial results will allow for estimating treatment effects and calculating the sample size of a randomized controlled trial, in which the approach will be tested if the feasibility endpoint is met. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT04136769.

Keywords: arterial resection; feasibility trial; multimodal treatment approach; pancreatic cancer; preoperative chemotherapy.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Ronellenfitsch, Michalski, Michl, Krug, Ukkat and Kleeff.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the trial sequence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Locally advanced pancreatic corpus adenocarcinoma considered unresectable due to arterial invasion on CT according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network and International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria. The red arrow delineates the tumor, which shows invasion of the superior mesenteric artery and celiac trunk both on sagittal (A) and transversal (B) images.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CT image of an anatomic variation of the visceral arteries with aplasia of the origin of the celiac trunk in the aorta (white arrow) and collateralization of the hepatic artery via a network of pancreatoduodenal collaterals (red arrow).

References

    1. Kleeff J, Korc M, Apte M, La Vecchia C, Johnson CD, Biankin AV, et al. . Pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2016) 2:16022. 10.1038/nrdp.2016.22
    1. Amano R, Kimura K, Nakata B, Yamazoe S, Motomura H, Yamamoto A, et al. . Pancreatectomy with major arterial resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy gemcitabine and S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Surgery. (2015) 158:191–200. 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.016
    1. Isaji S, Mizuno S, Windsor JA, Bassi C, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Hackert T, et al. . International consensus on definition and criteria of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 2017. Pancreatology. (2018) 18:2–11. 10.1016/j.pan.2017.11.011
    1. Giovanardi F, Lai Q, Garofalo M, Arroyo Murillo GA, Choppin de Janvry E, Hassan R, et al. . Collaterals management during pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with celiac axis stenosis: a systematic review of the literature. Pancreatology. (2018) 18:592–600. 10.1016/j.pan.2018.05.003
    1. Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Kulkarni A, Nagarajan G, Fingerhut A. Vascular anomalies encountered during pancreatoduodenectomy: do they influence outcomes? Ann Surg Oncol. (2010) 17:186–93. 10.1245/s10434-009-0757-1
    1. Tee MC, Krajewski AC, Groeschl RT, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML, et al. . Indications and perioperative outcomes for pancreatectomy with arterial resection. J Am Coll Surg. (2018) 227:255–69. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.05.001
    1. Klompmaker S Peters NA van Hilst J Bassi C Boggi U Busch OR . Outcomes and risk score for distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR): an international multicenter analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. (2019) 26:772–81. 10.1245/s10434-018-07101-0
    1. Mollberg N, Rahbari NN, Koch M, Hartwig W, Hoeger Y, Buchler MW, et al. . Arterial resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. (2011) 254:882–93. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823ac299
    1. Du L, Wang-Gillam A. Trends in neoadjuvant approaches in pancreatic cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. (2017) 15:1070–7. 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0134
    1. Ahmad SA, Duong M, Sohal DPS, Gandhi NS, Beg MS, Wang-Gillam A, et al. . Surgical outcome results from SWOG S1505: a randomized clinical trial of mFOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for perioperative treatment of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. (2020) 272:481–6. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004155
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. (2013) 346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. (2004) 240:205–13. 10.1097/
    1. Common, Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version, 5,.0. Available online at: (accessed May 7, 2021).
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. (2009) 45:228–47. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
    1. Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, Imrie C, Milicevic M, Sandberg AA, et al. . Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. (2014) 155:977–88. 10.1016/j.surg.2014.02.001
    1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. (2021). Available online at: (accessed May 7, 2021).
    1. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, et al. . The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. (2017) 161:584–91. 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
    1. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, et al. . Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. (2007) 142:20–5. 10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001
    1. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, et al. . Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. (2007) 142:761–8. 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005
    1. Kim SS, Ko AH, Nakakura EK, Wang ZJ, Corvera CU, Harris HW, et al. . Comparison of tumor regression grading of residual pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation: would fewer tier-stratification be favorable toward standardization? Am J Surg Pathol. (2019) 43:334–40. 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001152
    1. Neoptolemos JP, Kleeff J, Michl P, Costello E, Greenhalf W, Palmer DH. Therapeutic developments in pancreatic cancer: current and future perspectives. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2018) 15:333–48. 10.1038/s41575-018-0005-x

Source: PubMed

3
購読する