The pyrazinamide susceptibility breakpoint above which combination therapy fails

Tawanda Gumbo, Emmanuel Chigutsa, Jotam Pasipanodya, Marianne Visser, Paul D van Helden, Frederick A Sirgel, Helen McIlleron, Tawanda Gumbo, Emmanuel Chigutsa, Jotam Pasipanodya, Marianne Visser, Paul D van Helden, Frederick A Sirgel, Helen McIlleron

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the pyrazinamide MIC above which standard combination therapy fails.

Methods: MICs of pyrazinamide were determined for Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates, cultured from 58 patients in a previous randomized clinical trial in Cape Town, South Africa. The MICs were determined using BACTEC MGIT 960 for isolates that were collected before standard treatment with isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol commenced. Weekly sputum collections were subsequently made for 8 weeks in order to culture M. tuberculosis in Middlebrook broth medium. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was utilized to identify the pyrazinamide MIC predictive of sputum culture results at the end of pyrazinamide therapy. The machine learning-derived susceptibility breakpoints were then confirmed using standard association statistics that took into account confounders of 2 month sputum conversion.

Results: The pyrazinamide MIC range was 12.5 to >100 mg/L for the isolates prior to therapy. The epidemiological 95% cut-off value was >100 mg/L. The 2 month sputum conversion rate in liquid cultures was 26% by stringent criteria and 48% by less stringent criteria. CART analysis identified an MIC breakpoint of 50 mg/L, above which patients had poor sputum conversion rates. The relative risk of poor sputum conversion was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2-1.8) for an MIC >50 mg/L compared with an MIC ≤ 50 mg/L.

Conclusions: We propose a pyrazinamide susceptibility breakpoint of 50 mg/L for clinical decision making and for development of rapid susceptibility assays. This breakpoint is identical to that identified using computer-aided simulations of hollow fibre system output.

Keywords: MICs; anti-tuberculosis drugs; drug susceptibility; pharmacokinetics; sputum culture.

© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pyrazinamide MIC distribution in 58 tuberculosis patients. Distribution of MICs, based on inputting all values >100 mg/L as 200 mg/L. As a result, the range goes up to 400 mg/L, which would have a value of 0% of clinical isolates.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
CART analysis for primary outcome. The primary node, based on the stringent definition of 2 month sputum conversion, shows that the MIC above which therapy fails is 75 mg/L.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
CART analysis for secondary outcome. The MIC above which therapy fails, based on a less stringent definition of 2 month sputum conversion was >37.5 mg/L.

References

    1. Anon. Controlled trial of four thrice-weekly regimens and a daily regimen all given for 6 months for pulmonary tuberculosis. Lancet. 1981;1:171–4.
    1. Pasipanodya JG, McIlleron H, Burger A, et al. Serum drug concentrations predictive of pulmonary tuberculosis outcomes. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:1464–73.
    1. Gumbo T, Siyambalapitiyage Dona CS, Meek C, et al. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of pyrazinamide in a novel in vitro model of tuberculosis for sterilizing effect: a paradigm for faster assessment of new antituberculosis drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:3197–204.
    1. Chigutsa E, Pasipanodya JG, Visser ME, et al. Multivariate adaptive regression splines analysis of the effect of drug concentration and MIC on sterilizing activity in patients on multidrug therapy; Abstracts of the Sixth International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of Tuberculosis Drugs, Denver, CO, 2013. Abstract 14, p. 15.
    1. Conte JE, Jr, Golden JA, Duncan S, et al. Intrapulmonary concentrations of pyrazinamide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1329–33.
    1. Heifets L, Sanchez T. New agar medium for testing susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1498–501.
    1. Werngren J, Sturegard E, Jureen P, et al. Reevaluation of the critical concentration for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis against pyrazinamide using wild-type MIC distributions and pncA gene sequencing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:1253–7.
    1. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardiae and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes: Approved Standard M24-A. Wayne, PA, USA: NCCLS; 2003.
    1. Canetti G, Froman S, Grosset J, et al. Mycobacteria: laboratory methods for testing drug sensitivity and resistance. Bull World Health Organ. 1963;29:565–78.
    1. Gumbo T. New susceptibility breakpoints for first-line antituberculosis drugs based on antimicrobial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic science and population pharmacokinetic variability. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1484–91.
    1. Visser ME, Grewal HM, Swart EC, et al. The effect of vitamin A and zinc supplementation on treatment outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93:93–100.
    1. Visser ME, Stead MC, Walzl G, et al. Baseline predictors of sputum culture conversion in pulmonary tuberculosis: importance of cavities, smoking, time to detection and W-Beijing genotype. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29588.
    1. Chigutsa E, Visser ME, Swart EC, et al. The SLCO1B1 rs4149032 polymorphism is highly prevalent in South Africans and is associated with reduced rifampin concentrations: dosing implications. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:4122–7.
    1. Chigutsa E, McIlleron H, Holford NH. Parallel first order and mixed order elimination of pyrazinamide in South African patients with tuberculosis; Population Approach Group Europe (PAGE) Meeting, Berlin, 2010. . (22 April 2014, date last accessed)
    1. Springer B, Lucke K, Calligaris-Maibach R, et al. Quantitative drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by use of MGIT 960 and EpiCenter instrumentation. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:1773–80.
    1. Diacon AH, Pym A, Grobusch M, et al. The diarylquinoline TMC207 for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2397–405.
    1. Mitchison DA. Assessment of new sterilizing drugs for treating pulmonary tuberculosis by culture at 2 months. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:1062–3.
    1. Wallis RS, Wang C, Meyer D, et al. Month 2 culture status and treatment duration as predictors of tuberculosis relapse risk in a meta-regression model. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71116.
    1. Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, et al. Classification and Regression Trees. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1984.
    1. Chigutsa E, Patel K, Denti P, et al. A time-to-event pharmacodynamic model describing treatment response in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis using days to positivity in automated liquid mycobacterial culture. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:789–95.
    1. Wilkins JJ, Langdon G, McIlleron H, et al. Variability in the population pharmacokinetics of pyrazinamide in South African tuberculosis patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62:727–35.
    1. Zhu M, Starke JR, Burman WJ, et al. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of pyrazinamide in children and adults with tuberculosis. Pharmacotherapy. 2002;22:686–95.
    1. Chang KC, Yew WW, Zhang Y. Pyrazinamide susceptibility testing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:4499–505.
    1. Schmalstieg AM, Srivastava S, Belkaya S, et al. The antibiotic resistance arrow of time: efflux pump induction is a general first step in the evolution of mycobacterial drug resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4806–15.
    1. Zimic M, Loli S, Gilman RH, et al. A new approach for pyrazinamide susceptibility testing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microb Drug Resist. 2012;18:372–5.
    1. Zimic M, Fuentes P, Gilman RH, et al. Pyrazinoic acid efflux rate in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a better proxy of pyrazinamide resistance. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2012;92:84–91.
    1. Arendrup MC, Kahlmeter G, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, et al. Breakpoints for susceptibility testing should not divide wild-type distributions of important target species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:1628–9.
    1. MacKenzie WR, Heilig CM, Bozeman L, et al. Geographic differences in time to culture conversion in liquid media: Tuberculosis Trials Consortium Study 28. Culture conversion is delayed in Africa. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18358.
    1. Jain MK, Pasipanodya JG, Alder L, et al. Pegylated interferon fractal pharmacokinetics: individualized dosing for hepatitis C virus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:1115–20.
    1. Telzak EE, Fazal BA, Pollard CL, et al. Factors influencing time to sputum conversion among patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:666–70.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する