Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study

Semra Aktürk, Arzu Kaya, Derya Çetintaş, Gürkan Akgöl, Arif Gülkesen, Gül Ayden Kal, Tülin Güçer, Semra Aktürk, Arzu Kaya, Derya Çetintaş, Gürkan Akgöl, Arif Gülkesen, Gül Ayden Kal, Tülin Güçer

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to compare effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), ultrasound (US) and sham ESWT in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). [Subjects and Methods] Sixty MPS patients aged 18-60 years were included in the study. The patients were randomized equally into 3 groups. Group 1 received ESWT for 4 session with 3 day-intervals. Group 2 received 4 sessions of sham ESWT. US was applied to Group 3 for 10 sessions. All patients were recommended an exercise program. The patients were evaluated before-post and 6 weeks after treatment. Measurements were made using pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain score (PS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients were evaluated by using SF-36 and HADS (hospital anxiety and depression scale). [Results] A significant posttreatment difference was found in VAS, PPT and SF-36 subparameters in group 1. In group 2, a significant difference was not found in any parameter. In group 3, a significant difference was detected in parameters of VAS and PPT. A significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2 as for subtitles of PPT, VAS, SF-36. [Conclusion] These results suggest that ESWT is as effective as US. ESWT and US are significantly more effective than sham ESWT.

Keywords: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy; Myofascial pain syndrome; Ultrasound.

References

    1. Alvarez DJ, Rockwell PG: Trigger points: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician, 2002, 65: 653–660.
    1. Travell JG, Simons DG: Myofascial pain and dysfunction. The trigger point manual. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1992, pp 5–201.
    1. Borg-Stein J, Simons DG: Focused review: myofascial pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2002, 83: S40–S47, S48–S49.
    1. Lavelle ED, Lavelle W, Smith HS: Myofascial trigger points. Med Clin North Am, 2007, 91: 229–239.
    1. van der Windt DA, van der Heijden GJ, van den Berg SG, et al. : Ultrasound therapy for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Pain, 1999, 81: 257–271.
    1. Ay S, Doğan SK, Evcik D, et al. : Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome. Rheumatol Int, 2011, 31: 1203–1208.
    1. Pan PJ, Chou CL, Chiou HJ, et al. : Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic calcific tendinitis of the shoulders: a functional and sonographic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2003, 84: 988–993.
    1. Perlick L, Schiffmann R, Kraft CN, et al. : [Extracorporal shock wave treatment of the achilles tendinitis: experimental and preliminary clinical results]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 2002, 140: 275–280 (in German).
    1. Krischek O, Rompe JD, Herbsthofer B, et al. : [Symptomatic low-energy shockwave therapy in heel pain and radiologically detected plantar heel spur]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 1998, 136: 169–174 (in German).
    1. Rompe JD, Rumler F, Hopf C, et al. : Extracorporal shock wave therapy for calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995, (321): 196–201.
    1. Gleitz M: Trigger shockwave therapy with radial and focused shockwaves. Current Status Orthop, 2006, 5: 303–312.
    1. Gür A, Koca İ, Karagüllü H, et al. : Comparision of the effectiveness of two different extracorporeal shockwave therapy regimens in the treatment of patients with myofascial pain syndrome. Arch Rheumatol, 2014, 29: 186–193.
    1. Jeon JH, Jung YJ, Lee JY, et al. : The effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on myofascial pain syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med, 2012, 36: 665–674.
    1. Ramon S, Gleitz M, Hernandez L, et al. : Update on the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave treatment for myofascial pain syndrome and fibromyalgia. Int J Surg, 2015, 24: 201–206.
    1. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, et al. : The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain, 1983, 17: 45–56.
    1. Aydemir Ö, Güvenir T, Küey L, et al. : Hastane anksiyete ve depresyon ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği. Turk Psikiyatr Derg, 1977, 8: 280–287.
    1. Koçyigit H, et al. : SF-36’nin Turkce icin guvenilirligi ve geçerliliği. Ege Fiz Ted Reh Derg, 1999, 12: 102–106.
    1. Currier DP, Kramer JF: Sensory nerve conduction: heating effects of ultrasound and infrared. Physiother Can, 1982, 34: 241–246.
    1. Friction JR: Myofascial pain syndrome characteristics and epidemiology. In: James R. Frictionand Essam Awad, eds. Advances in pain research and therapy. Raven Press, 1990, pp 107–125.
    1. Hsieh YL: Effects of ultrasound and diclofenac phonophoresis on inflammatory pain relief: suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in arthritic rats. Phys Ther, 2006, 86: 39–49.
    1. Esenyel M, Caglar N, Aldemir T: Treatment of myofascial pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2000, 79: 48–52.
    1. Draper DO, Mahaffey C, Kaiser D, et al. : Thermal ultrasound decreases tissue stiffness of trigger points in upper trapezius muscles. Physiother Theory Pract, 2010, 26: 167–172.
    1. Müller-Ehrenberg H, Licht G: Medizinisch diagnosis and therapy of myofascial pain syndrome with focused shock waves. Orthop Tech, 2005, 5: 1–6.
    1. Speed CA: Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy in the management of chronic soft-tissue conditions. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2004, 86: 165–171.
    1. Mittermayr R, Hartinger J, Antonic V, et al. : Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) minimizes ischemic tissue necrosis irrespective of application time and promotes tissue revascularization by stimulating angiogenesis. Ann Surg, 2011, 253: 1024–1032.
    1. Wild C, Khene M, Wanke S: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in orthopedics. Assessment of an emerging health technology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2000, 16: 199–209.
    1. Haake M, Böddeker IR, Decker T, et al. : Side-effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of tennis elbow. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2002, 122: 222–228.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する