Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial

Bina Eftekharsadat, Negar Fasaie, Dina Golalizadeh, Arash Babaei-Ghazani, Fatemeh Jahanjou, Yashar Eslampoor, Neda Dolatkhah, Bina Eftekharsadat, Negar Fasaie, Dina Golalizadeh, Arash Babaei-Ghazani, Fatemeh Jahanjou, Yashar Eslampoor, Neda Dolatkhah

Abstract

Background: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of corticosteroid trigger point injection (TPI) versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle.

Methods: In this single-blind randomized clinical trial, 54 low back pain patients with myofascial trigger points on QL muscle were investigated. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups with A and B pockets. Patients in group A underwent radial ESWT and received 5 treatment sessions (1 per week) and actually were not followed-up. However, patients in group B received corticosteroid TPI and received one session of corticosteroid treatment and followed-up for 4 weeks after injection. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), pain pressure threshold (PPT) and short form (36) health survey (SF-36) were measured in both groups before, two weeks after and four weeks after intervention.

Results: The between group comparison indicated that corticosteroid TPI leaded to significant higher improvements of ODI (P-value< 0.01), VAS (P value< 0.001), and PPT (P-value = 0.001) scores compared to the ESWT group at two-week follow-up time-point. ESWT group recorded significant higher improvement of ODI (P-value< 0.01) and SF-36 (P-value< 0.001) compared to the corticosteroid TPI at 4th week post treatment evaluation. At four-week follow-up time-point, the patients in the ESWT group were 1.46 times more likely to achieve 30% reduction in VAS, 2.67 times more likely to achieve 30% reduction in ODI, and 2.30 times more likely to achieve 20% improvement in SF-36 compared to the participants in corticosteroid TPI group. These results refer to large effect size for all study outcomes in ESWT group (d = 4.72, d = 1.58, d = 5.48, and d = 7.47 for ODI, PPT, SF-36, and VAS, respectively).

Conclusion: Corticosteroid TPI was more effective compared to ESWT in short-term controlling of pain and disability caused by myofascial pain syndrome of QL muscle. However, after 4 weeks treatment, ESWT further improved the quality of life and disability and was related with more probability of achievement the minimal clinically important difference concerning pain, disability and quality of life and large effect size for all study outcomes in treated patients compared to corticosteroid TPI.

Trial registration: www.irct.ir , IRCT20100827004641N14 , retrospectively registered 2019-01-19.

Keywords: Corticosteroid; Extracorporeal shockwave therapy; Quadratus Lumborum; Trigger point.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Algometry measurement on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart

References

    1. Omino K, Hayashi Y. Preparation of dynamic posture and occurrence of low back pain. Ergonomics. 1992;35(5–6):693–707. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967847.
    1. Farrell J, Koury M, Taylor C. c. In: Twomey LT, Taylor JR, editors. Physical therapy of the low back pain. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. pp. 327–339.
    1. Hayden JA, Van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(9):776–785. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-9-200505030-00014.
    1. Fryer G, Hodgson L. The effect of manual pressure release on myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2005;9(4):248–255. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2005.02.002.
    1. Rickards LD. The effectiveness of non-invasive treatments for active myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Osteopathic Med. 2006;9(4):120–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2006.07.007.
    1. Huguenin LK. Myofascial trigger points: the current evidence. Phys Ther Sport. 2004;5(1):2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2003.11.002.
    1. Bennett R. Myofascial pain syndromes and their evaluation. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21(3):427–445. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2007.02.014.
    1. de las Peñas CF, Campo MS, Carnero JF, Page JCM. Manual therapies in myofascial trigger point treatment: a systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2005;9(1):27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2003.11.001.
    1. Tabatabaiee A, Ebrahimi I, Ahmadi A, Sarrafzadeh J. Comparison between the effect of pressure release and dry needling on the treatment of latent trigger point of upper trapezius muscle. Phys Treat Spec Phys Ther. 2013;3(3):9–15.
    1. Gupta P, Singh V, Sethi S, Kumar A. A comparative pilot study to evaluate the adjunctive role of Levosulpride with trigger point injection therapy in the Management of Myofascial Pain Syndrome of Orofacial region. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014;13(4):599–602. doi: 10.1007/s12663-013-0548-x.
    1. Garvey TA, Marks MR, Wiesel SW. A prospective, randomized, double-blind evaluation of trigger-point injection therapy for low-back pain. Spine. 1989;14(9):962–964. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198909000-00008.
    1. Borg-Stein J, Iaccarino MA. Myofascial pain syndrome treatments. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25(2):357–374. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.01.012.
    1. Ji HM, Kim HJ, Han SJ. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in myofascial pain syndrome of upper trapezius. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012;36(5):675. doi: 10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.675.
    1. Hong JO, Park JS, Jeon DG, Yoon WH, Park JH. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus trigger point injection in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome in the quadratus lumborum. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(4):582. doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.4.582.
    1. Meucci RD, Fassa AG, Faria NMX. Prevalence of chronic low back pain: systematic review. Revista de saude publica. 2015;49:73. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005874.
    1. Khan TW, Imani F. The management of chronic pain; caught between a rock and a hard place: The Case for a renewed focus on provider, patient,and payer education. Anesthesiol Pain Med. 2017;7(1):e40951.
    1. Hong C-Z. Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. The importance of the local twitch response. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;73(4):256–263. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199407000-00006.
    1. Barbero M, Bertoli P, Cescon C, Macmillan F, Coutts F, Gatti R. Intra-rater reliability of an experienced physiotherapist in locating myofascial trigger points in upper trapezius muscle. J Manual Manipul Ther. 2012;20(4):171–177. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000010.
    1. Mense S. How do muscle lesions such as latent and active trigger points influence central nociceptive neurons? J Musculoskelet Pain. 2010;18(4):348–353. doi: 10.3109/10582452.2010.502621.
    1. Simons D, Travell J, Simons L, Travell J. Travell & Simons’ myofascial pain and dysfunction the trigger point manual. 2. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
    1. Simons D. Myofascial pain syndrome due to trigger paints. In: Goodgold J, editor. Rehabilitation Medicine. St Luis: Mosby Co.; 1988. pp. 686–723.
    1. Unalan H, Majlesi J, Aydin FY, Palamar D. Comparison of high-power pain threshold ultrasound therapy with local injection in the treatment of active myofascial trigger points of the upper trapezius muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(4):657–662. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.030.
    1. Yoon S-H, Rah UW, Sheen SS, Cho KH. Comparison of 3 needle sizes for trigger point injection in myofascial pain syndrome of upper-and middle-trapezius muscle: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(8):1332–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.028.
    1. Rezaei S, Afsharnejad T, Moosavi S, Yousefzadeh S, Soltani R. Validation of the Persian version of pain self-efficacy scale: a psychometric chronic low back pain patients. J Fundamentals Mental Health. 2012;13(4):328–345.
    1. Vela LI, Haladay DE, Denegar C. Clinical assessment of low-back-pain treatment outcomes in athletes. J Sport Rehabil. 2011;20(1):74–88. doi: 10.1123/jsr.20.1.74.
    1. Sciotti VM, Mittak VL, DiMarco L, Ford LM, Plezbert J, Santipadri E, et al. Clinical precision of myofascial trigger point location in the trapezius muscle. Pain. 2001;93(3):259–266. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00325-6.
    1. Fischer A. Documentation of myofascial trigger points. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69(4):286–291.
    1. Asiri F, Tedla J, Alshahrani M, Ahmed I, Reddy R, Gular K. Effects of patient-specific three-dimensional lumbar traction on pain and functional disability in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(4):498–502.
    1. Baradaran A, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Birjandinejad A, Kachooei AR. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability testing of the modified Oswestry disability questionnaire in Persian population with low back pain. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(2):215. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.215.
    1. Motamed N, Ayatollahi A, Zare N, Sadeghi HA. Validity and reliability of the Persian translation of the SF-36 version 2 questionnaire. 2005.
    1. Lauche R, Langhorst J, Dobos GJ, Cramer H. Clinically meaningful differences in pain, disability and quality of life for chronic nonspecific neck pain -a reanalysis of 4 randomized controlled trials of cupping therapy. Complement Ther Med. 2013;21:342–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.04.005.
    1. Lin SF, Chen YJ, Tu HP, Lee CL, Hsieh CL, Wu WL, et al. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with coccydynia: a randomized controlled trial. PloS one. 2015;10(11):e0142475.
    1. Julious SA. Sample sizes for clinical trials. 1st ed. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series, Taylor & Francis; 2009.
    1. Ye T, Yi Y. Sample size calculations in clinical research, by Shein-Chung Chow, Jun Shao, Hansheng Wang, and Yuliya Lokhnygina. New York: Chapman &Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series, Taylor & Francis; 2017. p. 510.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Shipton EA. Physical therapy approaches in the treatment of low back pain. Pain and therapy. 2018;7(2):127–137. doi: 10.1007/s40122-018-0105-x.
    1. Chiarotto A, Terwee CB, Kamper SJ, Boers M, Ostelo RW. Evidence on the measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments is largely missing in patients with low back pain: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;102:23–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.006.
    1. Knezevic NN, Mandalia S, Raasch J, Knezevic I, Candido KD. Treatment of chronic low back pain–new approaches on the horizon. J Pain Res. 2017;10:1111. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S132769.
    1. Dworkin RH, Jensen MP, Gould E, Jones BA, Xiang Q, Galer BS, et al. Treatment satisfaction in osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain: the role of pain, physical and emotional functioning, sleep, and adverse events. J Pain. 2011;12(4):416–424. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.07.009.
    1. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):514–530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367.
    1. Childress MA, Beutler A. Management of chronic tendon injuries. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87(7):486–490.
    1. Dizon JNC, Gonzalez-Suarez C, Zamora MTG, Gambito ED. Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in chronic plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92(7):606–620. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31828cd42b.
    1. Peters J, Luboldt W, Schwarz W, Jacobi V, Herzog C, Vogl TJ. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Skelet Radiol. 2004;33(12):712–718. doi: 10.1007/s00256-004-0849-8.
    1. Akınoğlu B, Köse N. A comparison of the acute effects of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound therapy, and exercise therapy in plantar fasciitis. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018;14(2):306. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836048.024.
    1. Malliaropoulos N, Thompson D, Meke M, Pyne D, Alaseirlis D, Atkinson H, et al. Individualised radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy(rESWT) for symptomatic calcific shoulder tendinopathy: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):513.
    1. Tomska N, Turoń-Skrzypińska A, Szylińska A, Rył A, Lubińska-Gruszka A, Mosiejczuk H, et al. Deep electromagnetic stimulation and radial shock wave therapy in Back pain. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2018;20(3):189–195. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.0943.
    1. Han H, Lee D, Lee S, Jeon C, Kim T. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, and depression of chronic low back pain patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(2):397–399. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.397.
    1. Lee S, Lee D, Park J. Effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on patients with chronic low back pain and their dynamic balance ability. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(1):7–10. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.7.
    1. Lee J-H, Jang S-H, Cho S-H, Kim J-S. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and trigger point injection in terms of their effects on pain and bodily functions of myofascial pain syndrome patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012;24(10):1069–1072. doi: 10.1589/jpts.24.1069.
    1. Celik A, Altan L, Okmen BM. The Effects Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy On Pain, Disability And Life Quality Of Chronic Low BackPain Patients. Altern Ther Health Med. 2019;16(2):54–60.
    1. Walewicz K, Taradaj J, Rajfur K, Ptaszkowski K, Kuszewski MT, Sopel M, et al. The Effectiveness Of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy In Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded Pilot Study. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:1859.
    1. Wang C-J. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-7-11.
    1. Maier M, Dürr H, Köhler S, Staupendahl D, Pfahler M, Refior H. Analgesic effect of low energy extracorporeal shock waves in tendinosis calcarea, epicondylitis humeri radialis and plantar fasciitis. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete. 2000;138(1):34–38. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-10110.
    1. Ludwig J, Lauber S, Lauber H-J, Dreisilker U, Raedel R, Hotzinger HJCO. High-energy shock wave treatment of femoral head necrosis in adults. ClinOrthop Relat Res. 2001;387:119–26.
    1. Hausdorf J, Lemmens M, Heck K, Grolms N, Korr H, Kertschanska S, et al. Selective loss of unmyelinated nerve fibers after extracorporeal shockwave application to the musculoskeletal system. Neuroscience. 2008;155(1):138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.062.
    1. Hausdorf J, Lemmens MA, Kaplan S, Marangoz C, Milz S, Odaci E, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave application to the distal femur of rabbits diminishes the number of neurons immunoreactive for substance P in dorsal root ganglia L5. Brain Res. 2008;1207:96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.02.013.
    1. Notarnicola A, Moretti B. The biological effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (eswt) on tendon tissue. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2012;2(1):33.
    1. Schmitz C, Császár NB, Milz S, Schieker M, Maffulli N, Rompe JD, et al. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for orthopedic conditions: a systematic review on studies listed in the PEDro database. Br Med Bull. 2015;116(1):115–138.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する