Tissue characterisation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention guidance using intravascular ultrasound: rationale and design of the SPECTRUM study

Frederik T W Groenland, Karim D Mahmoud, Tara Neleman, Annemieke C Ziedses des Plantes, Alessandra Scoccia, Jurgen Ligthart, Karen T Witberg, Rutger-Jan Nuis, Wijnand K den Dekker, Jeroen M Wilschut, Roberto Diletti, Felix Zijlstra, Isabella Kardys, Paul Cummins, Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Joost Daemen, Frederik T W Groenland, Karim D Mahmoud, Tara Neleman, Annemieke C Ziedses des Plantes, Alessandra Scoccia, Jurgen Ligthart, Karen T Witberg, Rutger-Jan Nuis, Wijnand K den Dekker, Jeroen M Wilschut, Roberto Diletti, Felix Zijlstra, Isabella Kardys, Paul Cummins, Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Joost Daemen

Abstract

Introduction: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) improves clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but dedicated prospective studies assessing the safety and efficacy of IVUS guidance during primary PCI are lacking.

Methods and analysis: The SPECTRUM study is a prospective investigator-initiated single-centre single-arm observational cohort study aiming to enrol 200 patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarct undergoing IVUS-guided primary PCI. IVUS will be performed at baseline, postintervention and postoptimisation (if applicable), using a 40-60 MHz high-definition (HD) system. Baseline tissue characterisation includes the morphological description of culprit lesion plaque characteristics and thrombus as assessed with HD-IVUS. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure at 12 months (defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and clinically driven target vessel revascularisation). The secondary outcome of interest is IVUS-guided optimisation, defined as IVUS-guided additional balloon dilatation or stent placement. Other endpoints include clinical and procedural outcomes along with post-PCI IVUS findings.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol of this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Written informed consent is obtained from all patients. Study findings will be submitted to international peer-reviewed journals in the field of cardiovascular imaging and interventions and will be presented at international scientific meetings.

Trial registration number: NCT05007535.

Keywords: cardiac catheterization; cardiac imaging techniques; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JD received institutional grant/research support from Abbott Vascular, ACIST Medical, Astra Zeneca, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Microport, Pie Medical and ReCor Medical. Nicolas Van Mieghem received institutional research grant support from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edward Lifesciences, Medtronic, and PulseCath. Roberto Diletti is consultant to ACIST Medical. JL received speaking fees from Boston Scientific, Philips Volcano, ACIST Medical, Abbott Vascular and Pie Medical.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Protocol for IVUS-guided primary PCI, including the recommended optimisation criteria for IVUS-guided optimisation. IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; MLA, minimal lumen area; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Culprit lesion, stented segment and reference segments based on preintervention and postintervention IVUS pullback. The culprit lesion segment on the preintervention pullback is matched based on the stented (or treated) segment on the postintervention IVUS pullback. * Or treated segment if only balloon dilatation is performed. DR, distal reference; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; PR, proximal reference.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Preintervention IVUS findings related to STEMI. Culprit lesion plaque characteristics and thrombus morphology that will be studied with IVUS. (A) Convex calcium (asterisk) that protrudes into the lumen. The arrows indicate the irregular surface. (B) Organised thrombus (asterisk), visualised as an acoustic homogeneous dark appearance with sharp delineation. (C) Minimal lumen area with 360° of subacute thrombus. Subacute thrombus boundaries are less strict and signal attenuation can be appreciated. (D) Plaque rupture (arrow) with blood speckling inside the plaque cavity (asterisk). (E): Soft plaque (arrow) with attenuation (asterisk) in the absence of calcium. IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Post-PCI findings that will be studied with IVUS. (A) Residual focal lesion distal from the stented and distal reference segment. The calcified (arrow) and fibrous plaque (asterisk) cause luminal narrowing. (B) A submedial edge dissection (arrow) with blood speckling and accumulation of blood (asterisks) behind the media, defined as a submedial haematoma that compromises the lumen. (C) Malapposition, shown as lumen (asterisks) between malapposed stent struts (small arrows) and the intimal edge. (D) Small stent area due to underexpansion with thrombus protruding into the lumen (arrows) covering multiple stent struts. (E) Large fibrofatty plaque (asterisk) causing a high plaque burden in the proximal reference segment. DR, distal reference; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PR, proximal reference; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound.

References

    1. Maehara A, Matsumura M, Ali ZA, et al. . IVUS-Guided Versus OCT-Guided Coronary Stent Implantation: A Critical Appraisal. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:1487–503. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.008
    1. Zhang J, Gao X, Kan J, et al. . Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The ULTIMATE Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:3126–37. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.013
    1. Gao X-F, Ge Z, Kong X-Q, et al. . 3-Year Outcomes of the ULTIMATE Trial Comparing Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:247–57. 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.001
    1. Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy AY, et al. . Outcomes with intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:e003700. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003700
    1. Bavishi C, Sardar P, Chatterjee S, et al. . Intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2017;185:26–34. 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.008
    1. Buccheri S, Franchina G, Romano S, et al. . Clinical Outcomes Following Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies and 17,882 Patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:2488–98. 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.051
    1. Kim B-K, Shin D-H, Hong M-K, et al. . Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus Biolimus-Eluting stent implantation: randomized study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e002592. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002592
    1. Hong S-J, Kim B-K, Shin D-H, et al. . Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided everolimus-eluting stent implantation: the IVUS-XPL randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314:2155–63. 10.1001/jama.2015.15454
    1. Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Weisz G, et al. . Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents: the assessment of dual antiplatelet therapy with drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES) study. Circulation 2014;129:463–70. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003942
    1. Singh V, Badheka AO, Arora S, et al. . Comparison of inhospital mortality, length of hospitalization, costs, and vascular complications of percutaneous coronary interventions guided by ultrasound versus angiography. Am J Cardiol 2015;115:1357–66. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.037
    1. Okura H, Saito Y, Soeda T, et al. . Frequency and prognostic impact of intravascular imaging-guided urgent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from J-MINUET. Heart Vessels 2019;34:564–71. 10.1007/s00380-018-1285-3
    1. Kim N, Lee JH, Jang SY, et al. . Intravascular modality-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020;95:696–703. 10.1002/ccd.28359
    1. Ya'qoub L, Gad M, Saad AM, et al. . National trends of utilization and readmission rates with intravascular ultrasound use for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021;98:1–9. 10.1002/ccd.29524
    1. Endo M, Hibi K, Shimizu T, et al. . Impact of ultrasound attenuation and plaque rupture as detected by intravascular ultrasound on the incidence of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:540–9. 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.01.015
    1. Higuma T, Soeda T, Abe N. A combined optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound study on plaque rupture, plaque erosion, and calcified nodule in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: incidence, morphologic characteristics, and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interventions 2015;8:1166–76.
    1. Ohashi H, Ando H, Takashima H, et al. . Diagnostic performance of high-resolution intravascular ultrasound for the detection of plaque rupture in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circ J 2019;83:2505–11. 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0644
    1. Brosh D, Assali AR, Mager A, et al. . Effect of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction on six-month mortality. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:442–5. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.054
    1. Groenland FTW, Ligthart JMR, Witberg KT, et al. . Patterns of intracoronary thrombus by high-definition intravascular ultrasound. EuroIntervention 2022. 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00796. [Epub ahead of print: 04 Jan 2022].
    1. Ligthart CR J, Regar E, de Jaegere P. Encounters With Thrombus and Thrombosis in a Major Academic Center: Cases as ''Pictures at an Exhibition''. In: Topaz O, ed. Cardiovascular thrombus: Elsevier, 2018: 321–36.
    1. Claessen BE, Henriques JPS, Jaffer FA, et al. . Stent thrombosis: a clinical perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:1081–92. 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.016
    1. Torrado J, Buckley L, Durán A, et al. . Restenosis, Stent Thrombosis, and Bleeding Complications: Navigating Between Scylla and Charybdis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:1676–95. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.023
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. . Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2231–64. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038
    1. Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, et al. . Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the academic research Consortium-2 consensus document. Circulation 2018;137:2635–50. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289
    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. . 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018;39:119–77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
    1. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. . American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1478–92. 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01175-5
    1. Wu X, Mintz GS, Xu K, et al. . The relationship between attenuated plaque identified by intravascular ultrasound and no-reflow after stenting in acute myocardial infarction: the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:495–502. 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.12.012
    1. Terada K, Kubo T, Kameyama T, et al. . NIRS-IVUS for differentiating coronary plaque rupture, erosion, and calcified nodule in acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;14:1440–50. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.08.030
    1. Lee J-B, Mintz GS, Lisauskas JB, et al. . Histopathologic validation of the intravascular ultrasound diagnosis of calcified coronary artery nodules. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:1547–51. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.014
    1. Burzotta F, Leone AM, De Maria GL, et al. . Fractional flow reserve or optical coherence tomography guidance to revascularize intermediate coronary stenosis using angioplasty (FORZA) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014;15:140. 10.1186/1745-6215-15-140
    1. Choi IJ, Lim S, Choo EH, et al. . Impact of intravascular ultrasound on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:2431–43. 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.021

Source: PubMed

3
購読する