Enzalutamide in Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Asian Multiregional, Randomized Study

Yeong-Shiau Pu, Hanjong Ahn, Weiqing Han, Shu-Pin Huang, Hsi-Chin Wu, Lulin Ma, Shunsuke Yamada, Kazutaka Suga, Li-Ping Xie, Yeong-Shiau Pu, Hanjong Ahn, Weiqing Han, Shu-Pin Huang, Hsi-Chin Wu, Lulin Ma, Shunsuke Yamada, Kazutaka Suga, Li-Ping Xie

Abstract

Introduction: Enzalutamide significantly improved clinical outcomes compared with placebo in patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with disease progression despite androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the PREVAIL study. However, few patients from Asia were enrolled. Our study (NCT02294461) aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enzalutamide in this disease setting in patients in mainland China, Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong.

Methods: In this double-blind, phase III study, patients with asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer and disease progression despite ADT were randomized to enzalutamide (160 mg/day) or placebo. The primary endpoint was time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, radiographic progression-free survival, time to first skeletal-related event (SRE), time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy, PSA response ≥ 50%, best overall soft-tissue response, and safety. Pre-planned interim analysis was scheduled following approximately 175 PSA-progression events (67% of targeted total of 261 events). An additional 5-year landmark analysis of overall survival, time to antineoplastic therapy, and safety was performed.

Results: The double-blind study period was stopped after interim analysis owing to the benefit of enzalutamide over placebo. Overall, 388 patients were randomized (enzalutamide, n = 198; placebo, n = 190). Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. Enzalutamide significantly reduced risk of PSA progression vs placebo (hazard ratio 0.38; 95% CI 0.27-0.52; P < 0.0001). Median time to PSA progression was 8.31 months with enzalutamide and 2.86 months with placebo. Secondary endpoints, including 5-year overall survival, were significantly improved with enzalutamide, except time to first SRE. Adverse-event incidence was similar between enzalutamide and placebo. Fatigue was the most common drug-related adverse event in both treatment groups.

Conclusion: Enzalutamide significantly reduced risk of PSA progression, improved secondary efficacy endpoints, and was well tolerated in chemotherapy-naïve Asian patients with mCRPC with disease progression despite ADT.

Trial registration: www.

Clinicaltrials: gov NCT02294461.

Keywords: Asia; Castration-resistant prostate cancer; Enzalutamide; Metastasis; Treatment efficacy.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier curves for time to PSA progression at primary analysis (intent-to-treat population). CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, PSA prostate-specific antigen
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier curves for time to radiographic progression at primary analysis (intent-to-treat population). CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier curves for percentage of patients alive at the 5-year analysis (intent-to-treat population). CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660.
    1. Jung JKW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Lee ES. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2016. Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51:417–430. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.138.
    1. Ngan R. Overview of Hong Kong cancer statistics of 2015. Hong Kong Cancer Registry, Hospital Authority. . Last updated October 2017. Accessed 27 Feb 2020.
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115–132. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338.
    1. Chen SL, Wang SC, Ho CJ, et al. Prostate cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios are associated with cancer care disparities in 35 countries. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40003. doi: 10.1038/srep40003.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice guidelines in Oncology Asia Consensus Statement version 2.2013. 2013. Accessed 24 Jan 2018.
    1. Hinotsu S, Namiki M, Ozono S, Akaza H. NCCN Asia Consensus Statement prostate cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018;48:964–965. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy116.
    1. Mohler JL, Kantoff PW, Armstrong AJ, et al. Prostate cancer, version 1.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11:1471–1479. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0174.
    1. Satkunasivam R, Kim AE, Desai M, et al. Radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy vs no local therapy for survival benefit in metastatic prostate cancer: a SEER-Medicare analysis. J Urol. 2015;194:378–385. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.084.
    1. Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf DE, et al. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:424–433. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405095.
    1. Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1187–1197. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207506.
    1. Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, et al. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1148–1159. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4487.
    1. Colloca G, Vitucci P, Venturino A. Trial level analysis of prostate-specific antigen-related versus unrelated endpoints in phase III trials of first-line and second-line medical treatments of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14:389–397. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.03.022.
    1. Armstrong AJ, Lin P, Tombal B, et al. Five-year survival prediction and safety outcomes with enzalutamide in men with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer from the PREVAIL trial. Eur Urol. 2020;78:347–357. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.061.
    1. Kim CS, Choi YD, Lee SE, et al. Post hoc analyses of East Asian patients from the randomized placebo-controlled PREVAIL trial of enzalutamide in patients with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e7223. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007223.
    1. Jung SI, Kim MS, Jeong CW, et al. Enzalutamide in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a retrospective Korean multicenter study in a real-world setting. Investig Clin Urol. 2020;61:19–27. doi: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.1.19.
    1. Poon DMC, Wong KCW, Chan TW, et al. Survival outcomes, prostate-specific antigen response, and tolerance in first and later lines of enzalutamide treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a real-world experience in Hong Kong. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018;16:402-12e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.008.
    1. Ye D, Ahn H, Pu Y-S, et al. Efficacy and safety of enzalutamide (ENZ) vs placebo (PL) in chemotherapy-naïve patients (pts) with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): an Asian multinational study. In: Poster 749P presented at: ESMO Congress, 2016.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する