Safety and immunogenicity of 2-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccination in children and adolescents in Africa: A randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre Phase II clinical trial

Zacchaeus Anywaine, Houreratou Barry, Omu Anzala, Gaudensia Mutua, Sodiomon B Sirima, Serge Eholie, Hannah Kibuuka, Christine Bétard, Laura Richert, Christine Lacabaratz, M Juliana McElrath, Stephen C De Rosa, Kristen W Cohen, Georgi Shukarev, Michael Katwere, Cynthia Robinson, Auguste Gaddah, Dirk Heerwegh, Viki Bockstal, Kerstin Luhn, Maarten Leyssen, Rodolphe Thiébaut, Macaya Douoguih, EBL2002 Study group, Zacchaeus Anywaine, Houreratou Barry, Omu Anzala, Gaudensia Mutua, Sodiomon B Sirima, Serge Eholie, Hannah Kibuuka, Christine Bétard, Laura Richert, Christine Lacabaratz, M Juliana McElrath, Stephen C De Rosa, Kristen W Cohen, Georgi Shukarev, Michael Katwere, Cynthia Robinson, Auguste Gaddah, Dirk Heerwegh, Viki Bockstal, Kerstin Luhn, Maarten Leyssen, Rodolphe Thiébaut, Macaya Douoguih, EBL2002 Study group

Abstract

Background: Reoccurring Ebola outbreaks in West and Central Africa have led to serious illness and death in thousands of adults and children. The objective of this study was to assess safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the heterologous 2-dose Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccination regimen in adolescents and children in Africa.

Methods and findings: In this multicentre, randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II study, 131 adolescents (12 to 17 years old) and 132 children (4 to 11 years old) were enrolled from Eastern and Western Africa and randomised 5:1 to receive study vaccines or placebo. Vaccine groups received intramuscular injections of Ad26.ZEBOV (5 × 1010 viral particles) and MVA-BN-Filo (1 × 108 infectious units) 28 or 56 days apart; placebo recipients received saline. Primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded until 7 days after each vaccination and serious AEs (SAEs) throughout the study. Secondary and exploratory outcomes were humoral immune responses (binding and neutralising Ebola virus [EBOV] glycoprotein [GP]-specific antibodies), up to 1 year after the first dose. Enrolment began on February 26, 2016, and the date of last participant last visit was November 28, 2018. Of the 263 participants enrolled, 217 (109 adolescents, 108 children) received the 2-dose regimen, and 43 (20 adolescents, 23 children) received 2 placebo doses. Median age was 14.0 (range 11 to 17) and 7.0 (range 4 to 11) years for adolescents and children, respectively. Fifty-four percent of the adolescents and 51% of the children were male. All participants were Africans, and, although there was a slight male preponderance overall, the groups were well balanced. No vaccine-related SAEs were reported; solicited AEs were mostly mild/moderate. Twenty-one days post-MVA-BN-Filo vaccination, binding antibody responses against EBOV GP were observed in 100% of vaccinees (106 adolescents, 104 children). Geometric mean concentrations tended to be higher after the 56-day interval (adolescents 13,532 ELISA units [EU]/mL, children 17,388 EU/mL) than the 28-day interval (adolescents 6,993 EU/mL, children 8,007 EU/mL). Humoral responses persisted at least up to Day 365. A limitation of the study is that the follow-up period was limited to 365 days for the majority of the participants, and so it was not possible to determine whether immune responses persisted beyond this time period. Additionally, formal statistical comparisons were not preplanned but were only performed post hoc.

Conclusions: The heterologous 2-dose vaccination was well tolerated in African adolescents and children with no vaccine-related SAEs. All vaccinees displayed anti-EBOV GP antibodies after the 2-dose regimen, with higher responses in the 56-day interval groups. The frequency of pyrexia after vaccine or placebo was higher in children than in adolescents. These data supported the prophylactic indication against EBOV disease in a paediatric population, as licenced in the EU.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02564523.

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: ZA, HB, CB, LR, CL and RT report grants from IMI2-2 [Grant Agreement EBOVAC2 (No.115861) from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking which receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme] during the conduct of the study. SBS reports grants from Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V. during the conduct of the study. MK was a full-time employee of Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson at the time of the study. GS, CR, AG, DH, VB, KL, ML and MD were full-time employees of Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson at the time of the study, and may own shares in Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig 1. Study disposition of adolescents and…
Fig 1. Study disposition of adolescents and children.
Fig 2. Solicited local AEs.
Fig 2. Solicited local AEs.
(A) Solicited systemic AEs (B) and unsolicited AEs (C); full analysis set. Percentages reflect n/N where n is the number of participants with one or more AEs and N is the number of participants with available reactogenicity data after the given dose (solicited AEs) or the number of participants who received the given dose (unsolicited AEs). Only unsolicited AEs reported between the dose 1 vaccination and 28 days post-dose 1, and between dose 2 vaccination and 28 days post-dose 2 are included in this table. Different diaries were used in adolescents (12–17 years) and children (4–11 years) to collect solicited systemic AEs. Solicited systemic AEs collected in adolescents: arthralgia, chills, fatigue, headache, myalgia, nausea, and pyrexia; in children: pyrexia, decreased activity, decreased appetite, irritability, and vomiting. aPer the DMID Toxicity Tables used in this study, erythema was graded based on the diameter data only. bPyrexia mild: 38.0–38.4 °C, moderate: 38.5–38.9 °C, severe: >38.9 °C. cN = 54. dPyrexia mild: 38.0–38.4 °C, moderate: 38.5–40.0 °C, severe: >40.0 °C. Ad26: Ad26.ZEBOV at a dose of 5 × 1010 viral particles; MVA: MVA-BN-Filo at a dose of 1 × 108 Inf.U. Ad26, Ad26.ZEBOV; AE, adverse event; DMID, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; Inf.U, infectious units; MVA, MVA-BN-Filo.
Fig 3. GMCs of EBOV-specific binding antibodies…
Fig 3. GMCs of EBOV-specific binding antibodies (FANG ELISA, 95% CI) in adolescents and children.
Participants administered with Ad26.ZEBOV or placebo on day 1 and MVA-BN-Filo or placebo 28 or 56 days later as indicated. Responses are expressed as GMCs (EU/mL, 95% CI). Responses in placebo groups are shown as open symbols. Grey dotted line represents the LLOQ. The points (symbols) denote GMCs, and error bars denote 95% CIs. Ad26, Ad26.ZEBOV; CI, confidence interval; EBOV, Ebola virus; EU, ELISA units; FANG ELISA, Filovirus Animal Nonclinical Group enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; GMC, geometric mean concentration; LLOQ, lower limit of quantification; MVA, MVA-BN-Filo; Pbo, placebo.

References

    1. Piot P, Spencer J. From 1976 to 2018: reflections on early investigations into the Ebola virus. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018;112(12):527–8. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try088
    1. World Health Organization. Situation Report: Ebola Virus Disease. 2016 Jun 10. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. .
    1. World Health Organization. Ebola virus disease: Democratic Republic of the Congo. External Situation Report 96. 2020 Jun 9. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. .
    1. Henao-Restrepo AM, Camacho A, Longini IM, Watson CH, Edmunds WJ, Egger M, et al.. Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine in preventing Ebola virus disease: final results from the Guinea ring vaccination, open-label, cluster-randomised trial (Ebola Ça Suffit!). Lancet. 2017;389(10068):505–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32621-6
    1. World Health Organization. Preliminary results on the efficacy of rVSV-ZEBOV-GP Ebola vaccine using the ring vaccination strategy in the control of an Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: an example of integration of research into epidemic response. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. .
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. First FDA-approved vaccine for the prevention of Ebola virus disease, marking a critical milestone in public health preparedness and response. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. .
    1. European Medicines Agency. Vaccine against Ebola: EMA human medicines committee grants first-ever market authorisation. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. .
    1. European Commission. Vaccine against Ebola: European Commission grants new market authorizations. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. .
    1. European Medicines Agency. European public assessment report: Zabdeno. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. .
    1. European Medicines Agency. European public assessment report: Mvabea. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. .
    1. Milligan ID, Gibani MM, Sewell R, Clutterbuck EA, Campbell D, Plested E, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of novel Adenovirus type 26- and Modified Vaccinia Ankara-vectored Ebola vaccines: a randomised clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(15):1610–23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4218
    1. Mutua G, Anzala O, Luhn K, Robinson C, Bockstal V, Anumendem D, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of a 2-dose heterologous vaccine regimen with Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccines: 12-month data from a phase 1 randomised clinical trial in Nairobi, Kenya. J Infect Dis. 2019;220(1):57–67. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz071
    1. Anywaine Z, Whitworth H, Kaleebu P, Praygod G, Shukarev G, Manno D, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of a 2-dose heterologous vaccination regimen with Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccines: 12-month data from a phase 1 randomised clinical trial in Uganda and Tanzania. J Infect Dis. 2019;220(1):46–56. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz070
    1. Pollard AJ, Launay O, Lelievre JD, Lacabaratz C, Grande S, Goldstein N, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of a two-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine regimen: a phase 2 randomised clinical study in Europe (EBOVAC2). 2021; 21(4):493–506. Lancet Infect Dis. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30476-X
    1. Goldstein N, Bockstal V, Bart S, Luhn K, Robinson C, Gaddah A, et al.. Safety and Immunogenicity of Heterologous and Homologous 2-Dose Regimens of Adenovirus Serotype 26– and Modified Vaccinia Ankara–Vectored Ebola Vaccines: A Randomised, Controlled Phase 1 Study [published online September 16, 2020]. J Infect Dis. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa586
    1. Barry H, Mutua G, Kibuuka H, Anywaine Z, Sirima SB, Meda N, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of 2-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccination in healthy and HIV-infected adults: A randomised, placebo-controlled Phase II clinical trial in Africa. PLoS Med. 2021;18(10):e1003813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003813
    1. World Health Organization. Weekly epidemiological record. N 22, 2021, 96, 197–216. 2021 Jun 4. [cited 2021 Sept 9].
    1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID) Adult Toxicity Table November 2007 draft. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. .
    1. Logue J, Tuznik K, Follmann D, Grandits G, Marchand J, Reilly C, et al.. Use of the Filovirus Animal Non-Clinical Group (FANG) Ebola virus immuno-assay requires fewer study participants to power a study than the Alpha Diagnostic International assay. J Virol Methods. 2018;255:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.02.018
    1. Horton H, Thomas EP, Stucky JA, Frank I, Moodie Z, Huang Y, et al.. Optimization and validation of an 8-color Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS) assay to quantify antigen-specific T Cells induced by vaccination. J Immunol Methods. 2007;323(1):39–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.03.002
    1. Afolabi MO, Ishola D, Manno D, Keshinro B, Bockstal V, Rogers B, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of the two-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine regimen in children in Sierra Leone: A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022; 22(1):110–22. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00128-6
    1. Ishola D, Manno D, Afolabi MO, Keshinro B, Bockstal V, Rogers B, et al.. Safety and long-term immunogenicity of the two-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine regimen in adults in Sierra Leone: A combined open-label, non-randomised stage 1, and a randomised, double-blind, controlled stage 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022; 22(1):97–109. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00125-0
    1. Pasin C, Balelli I, Van Effelterre T, Bockstal V, Solforosi L, Prague M, et al.. Dynamics of the Humoral Immune Response to a Prime-Boost Ebola Vaccine: Quantification and Sources of Variation. J Virol. 2019;93(18):e00579–19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00579-19
    1. Meyer M, Malherbe DC, Bukreyev A. Can Ebola virus vaccines have universal immune correlates of protection? Trends Microbiol. 2019;27(1):8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.08.008
    1. Corti D, Misasi J, Mulangu S, Stanley DA, Kanekiyo M, Wollen S, et al.. Protective monotherapy against lethal Ebola virus infection by a potently neutralizing antibody. Science. 2016;351(6279):1339–42. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5224
    1. Qiu X, Wong G, Audet J, Bello A, Fernando L, Alimonti JB, et al.. Reversion of advanced Ebola virus disease in nonhuman primates with ZMapp. Nature. 2014;514(7520):47–53. doi: 10.1038/nature13777
    1. van Griensven J, Edwards T, de Lamballerie X, Semple MG, Gallian P, Baize S, et al.. Evaluation of convalescent plasma for Ebola virus disease in Guinea. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(1):33–42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511812
    1. Marzi A, Engelmann F, Feldmann F, Haberthur K, Shupert WL, Brining D, et al.. Antibodies are necessary for rVSV/ZEBOV-GP-mediated protection against lethal Ebola virus challenge in nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(5):1893–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209591110
    1. Roozendaal R, Hendriks J, van Effelterre T, Spiessens B, Dekking L, Solforosi L, et al.. Nonhuman primate to human immunobridging to infer the protective effect of an Ebola virus vaccine candidate. NPJ Vaccines. 2020;5(1):112. doi: 10.1038/s41541-020-00261-9
    1. Callendret B, Vellinga J, Wunderlich K, Rodriguez A, Steigerwald R, Dirmeier U, et al.. A prophylactic multivalent vaccine against different filovirus species is immunogenic and provides protection from lethal infections with Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus species in non-human primates. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(2):e0192312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192312
    1. WHO Ebola Response Team. Ebola virus disease in West Africa: the first 9 months of the epidemic and forward projections. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(16):1481–95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411100
    1. UNICEF Guinea. Humanitarian Situation Report 29 August 2014. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. .
    1. Peacock G, Uyeki TM, Rasmussen SA. Ebola virus disease and children: what pediatric health care professionals need to know. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(12):1087–8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2835

Source: PubMed

3
購読する