Postoperative pain profile in 10-15-year-olds after bilateral extraction of maxillary premolars

H Berlin, T List, K Ridell, T Davidson, D Toft, G Klingberg, H Berlin, T List, K Ridell, T Davidson, D Toft, G Klingberg

Abstract

Purpose: To study pain perception in 10-15-year-olds, during and after uncomplicated extractions of bilateral maxillary premolars. The study investigated pain's natural course and made comparisons between the first and second extractions.

Methods: 31 Swedish children in need of orthodontic treatment were identified and consecutively enrolled. Tooth extractions followed a standardised protocol and the two teeth were extracted with at least 10 days between. The participants rated pain intensity using visual analogue scale (VAS) at 14 different time points from treatment and 7 days forward.

Results: The pain intensity profile followed the same pattern for all patients. Pain intensity peaked 2 h after extractions (mean VASPI 27.3, SD 20.8; median 23.0) when moderate pain intensity (VASPI ≥ 40) was registered for 16 (28%) of 57 cases. After that, there was a rapid decrease in pain intensity notable already at 4 h after extractions. There were no statistically significant differences in any VASPI measurements between the first and second extractions, sexes, or different age groups.

Conclusions: The majority of the participants who undergo uncomplicated bilateral extraction of maxillary premolars experience mild to moderate levels of postoperative pain during a short period of time, with no differences between the first and second extractions. Bilateral tooth extractions is a suitable model for further studies on pain management.

Keywords: Adolescent; Child; Pain; Postoperative; Self-assessment; Tooth extraction; Visual analogue scale.

References

    1. ASDC J Dent Child. 1982 Nov-Dec;49(6):432-6
    1. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14
    1. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Oct;19(5):365-372
    1. Br Dent J. 2007 Mar 10;202(5):E13; discussion 276-7
    1. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994 Aug;52(4):255-6
    1. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1985 Nov;23(11):573-7
    1. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Mar 29;41(2):180-187
    1. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Dec;14(4):289-94
    1. Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):793-7
    1. Anesth Prog. 1986 May-Jun;33(3):147-51
    1. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 08;(8):CD008392
    1. ASDC J Dent Child. 1987 Mar-Apr;54(2):106-9
    1. Anesth Prog. 2009 Summer;56(2):36-41
    1. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;28(2):152-160
    1. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;52(10):e137-40
    1. Lakartidningen. 2014 Oct 1-7;111(40):1709-11
    1. Anesth Prog. 2006 Fall;53(3):98-108; quiz 109-10
    1. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(6):456-463
    1. J Pediatr. 1991 Mar;118(3):460-6
    1. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2003 Apr;42(3):227-34
    1. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Feb;35(1):14-21
    1. Clin J Pain. 2002 Sep-Oct;18(5):310-6
    1. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31
    1. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 May;66(5):911-7
    1. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017 Oct;18(5):323-329
    1. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1996 Summer;20(4):321-3
    1. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007 Nov;17(6):391-406
    1. Pain. 2009 Dec 15;147(1-3):141-6
    1. Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Mar;51(3):239-244

Source: PubMed

3
購読する