Effects of Longer Seated Lunch Time on Food Consumption and Waste in Elementary and Middle School-age Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Xanna Burg, Jessica Jarick Metcalfe, Brenna Ellison, Melissa Pflugh Prescott, Xanna Burg, Jessica Jarick Metcalfe, Brenna Ellison, Melissa Pflugh Prescott

Abstract

Importance: Health experts recommend at least 20 minutes of seated lunch time for children, but no federal policy for lunch period duration exists in the United States. Additional strategies in the National School Lunch Program for mitigating food waste are needed to maintain the viability of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.

Objective: To assess the effect of a longer seated lunch time on food consumption and waste among elementary and middle school-age children.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized within-participant crossover trial was conducted from June 3 to June 28, 2019, for a total of 20 study days. All attendees of a summer camp held at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, were invited to participate in the study. Participants were elementary and middle school-age children and were provided every study day with lunch prepared according to the National School Lunch Program nutrition standards.

Intervention: Five menus were served throughout the study. A 20-minute or 10-minute seated lunch condition was randomly assigned to each day within the 5 menus.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were food consumption, waste, and dietary intake, which were analyzed separately for each meal component (fruit, vegetable, entree [protein plus grain], beverage [both milk and water], and milk alone). Dietary intake was assessed for calories, fat, carbohydrates, fiber, protein, vitamin D, calcium, iron, and potassium. Participant behaviors were observed during the meal, including seated time as well as level of talking and phone use.

Results: A total of 38 children with 241 lunch trays were observed. The 38 children had a mean (SD) age of 11.86 (1.23) years and 23 were female participants (61%); 30 had a non-Hispanic/non-Latino ethnicity (79%) and 23 were White individuals (61%). During 10 minutes of seated lunch time, participants consumed significantly less fruit (-11.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -18.1 to -4.5) and vegetables (-14.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -22.7 to -5.7) compared with 20 minutes of seated lunch time. Entree and beverage consumption and waste did not differ between the 10-minute and 20-minute seated lunch conditions. Participants also consumed significantly more and wasted significantly less calories (-22.03 kcal; 95% CI, -39.47 to -4.61 kcal), carbohydrates (-3.81 g; 95% CI, -6.20 to -1.42 g), dietary fiber (-0.51 g; 95% CI, -0.81 to -0.19 g), protein (-1.11 g; 95% CI, -2.17 to -0.04 g), iron (-0.20 mg; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.02 mg), and potassium (-53.49 mg; 95% CI, -84.67 to -22.32 mg) during the 20-minute seated lunch condition.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that fruit and vegetable consumption increased in school-age children during a 20-minute seated lunch condition. This finding supports policies that require children to receive at least 20 minutes of seated lunch time; such policies could have favorable implications for children's dietary intake and food waste.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04191291.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.. Flow of Participation and the Study…
Figure.. Flow of Participation and the Study Design
aInclusion criteria were attendance in the summer camp and consumption of the prepared lunch. Children were excluded (not counted) if they lacked written parental consent, brought their own lunch, or otherwise refused to eat the lunch at camp. bChildren were counted if they participated in both the 10-minute and 20-minute lunch conditions for the same menu. For the overall category, children had to have at least 1 occurrence of a paired 10-minute and 20-minute lunch for 1 of the 5 menus.

References

    1. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS Data Brief No. 288. October 2017. Accessed July 27, 2020.
    1. US Department of Agriculture. 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines. Accessed July 27, 2020.
    1. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee . Scientific report of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: part D: Chapter 1: current intakes of foods, beverages, and nutrients. Accessed July 30, 2020.
    1. Food and Nutrition Services, USDA. Child nutrition tables. Accessed July 27, 2020.
    1. Taber DR, Chriqui JF, Powell L, Chaloupka FJ. Association between state laws governing school meal nutrition content and student weight status: implications for new USDA school meal standards. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(6):513-519. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.399
    1. Food and Nutrition Services, USDA. Nutrition standards in the national school lunch and school breakfast programs. 7 CFR 210 and 220. Published January 26, 2012. Accessed July 27, 2020.
    1. Cohen JFW, Richardson S, Parker E, Catalano PJ, Rimm EB. Impact of the new U.S. Department of Agriculture school meal standards on food selection, consumption, and waste. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(4):388-394. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.013
    1. Schwartz MB, Henderson KE, Read M, Danna N, Ickovics JR. New school meal regulations increase fruit consumption and do not increase total plate waste. Child Obes. 2015;11(3):242-247. doi:10.1089/chi.2015.0019
    1. Food and Nutrition Services, USDA . Child nutrition programs: flexibilities for milk, whole grains, and sodium requirements: final rule. Fed Regist. 2018;83(238):63775-63791.
    1. Buzby JC, Guthrie JF. Plate waste in school nutrition programs: final report to Congress. Accessed July 27, 2020.
    1. Frieden TR, Jaffe HW, Stephens JW, Thacker SB, Zaza S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . School health guidelines to promote healthy eating and physical activity. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2011;60(RR-5):1-76.
    1. Taras H, Luckenbill D, Duncan P, Robinson J, Wheeler L, Woolley S, eds. Health, Mental Health and Safety Guidelines for Schools. American Academy of Pediatrics; 2004.
    1. Hildebrand D, Millburg Ely C, Betts NM, Gates GE.. Time to eat school lunch affects elementary students’ nutrient consumption. J Child Nutr Manag. 2018;42(2).
    1. Conklin MT, Lambert LG, Anderson JB. How long does it take students to eat lunch? a summary of three studies. J Child Nutr Manag. 2002;26(2).
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services . Results from the School Health Policies and Practices Study 2016. Accessed July 27, 2020.
    1. Cohen JFW, Jahn JL, Richardson S, Cluggish SA, Parker E, Rimm EB. Amount of time to eat lunch is associated with children’s selection and consumption of school meal entrée, fruits, vegetables, and milk. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(1):123-128. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2015.07.019
    1. Bergman EA, Buergel NS, Englund TF, Femrite A. The relationship between the length of the lunch period and nutrient consumption in the elementary school lunch setting. J Child Nutr Manag. 2004;28(2).
    1. Food and Nutrition Service, USDA. Breakfast meal pattern: select all three components for a reimbursable meal. Accessed July 30, 2020.
    1. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
    1. Schakel SF. Maintaining a nutrient database in a changing marketplace: keeping pace with changing food products—a research perspective. J Food Compos Anal. 2001;14(3):315-322. doi:10.1006/jfca.2001.0992
    1. Schakel SF, Buzzard IM, Gebhardt SE. Procedures for estimating nutrient values for food composition databases. J Food Compos Anal. 1997;10(2):102-114. doi:10.1006/jfca.1997.0527
    1. Schakel SF, Sievert YA, Buzzard IM. Sources of data for developing and maintaining a nutrient database. J Am Diet Assoc. 1988;88(10):1268-1271.
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1). doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    1. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff, PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82(13). doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    1. Lenth R, Singmann H, Love J, Buerkner P, Herve M. Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-square means, version 1.6.0. Accessed May 28, 2021.
    1. GNU Operating System . GNU General Public License. Accessed January 11, 2021.
    1. Redden JP, Mann T, Vickers Z, Mykerezi E, Reicks M, Elsbernd S. Serving first in isolation increases vegetable intake among elementary schoolchildren. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0121283. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121283
    1. Zellner DA, Cobuzzi JL. Just dessert: serving fruit as a separate “dessert” course increases vegetable consumption in a school lunch. Food Qual Prefer. 2016;48:195-198. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.09.013
    1. Gaul D, Issartel J. Fine motor skill proficiency in typically developing children: on or off the maturation track? Hum Mov Sci. 2016;46:78-85. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2015.12.011
    1. Black MM, Hurley KM. Helping children develop healthy eating habits. Accessed July 30, 2020.
    1. Lakkakula A, Geaghan J, Zanovec M, Pierce S, Tuuri G. Repeated taste exposure increases liking for vegetables by low-income elementary school children. Appetite. 2010;55(2):226-231. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.003
    1. Harris JE, Raynor HA. Crossover designs in nutrition and dietetics research. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(7):1023-1030. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2017.03.017

Source: PubMed

3
購読する