Prospective Evaluation of Malignancy in 17,708 Patients Randomized to Ezetimibe Versus Placebo: Analysis From IMPROVE-IT

Robert P Giugliano, Baris Gencer, Stephen D Wiviott, Jeong-Gun Park, Charles S Fuchs, Wolfram Goessling, Thomas A Musliner, Andrew M Tershakovec, Michael A Blazing, Robert Califf, Christopher P Cannon, Eugene Braunwald, Robert P Giugliano, Baris Gencer, Stephen D Wiviott, Jeong-Gun Park, Charles S Fuchs, Wolfram Goessling, Thomas A Musliner, Andrew M Tershakovec, Michael A Blazing, Robert Califf, Christopher P Cannon, Eugene Braunwald

Abstract

Background: An increased risk of malignancy was reported with simvastatin/ezetimibe in 1,873 patients in the SEAS (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) trial.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to clarify this unexpected finding in a larger sample size of patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome, we conducted a prospective systematic analysis of malignancy events in IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial).

Methods: Within IMPROVE-IT, 17,708 patients post-acute coronary syndrome were randomized to either ezetimibe 10 mg or matching placebo on a background of simvastatin 40 mg who took ≥1 dose of the study drug. Suspected tumors (benign and malignant) reported by investigators or identified from a review of adverse events were adjudicated by oncologists without knowledge of drug assignment. The primary malignancy endpoint included new, relapsing, or progressive malignancies (excluding nonmelanotic skin malignancies). The secondary endpoint was death due to malignancy.

Results: In this trial, 1,470 patients developed the primary malignancy endpoint during a median 6 years of follow-up. The most common malignancy locations were prostate (18.9%), lung (16.8%), and bladder (8.8%) with no differences by treatment group (p > 0.05 for each location). Kaplan-Meier 7-year rates of malignancies were similar with ezetimibe and placebo (10.2% vs. 10.3%; hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 1.14; p = 0.56), as were the rates for malignancy death (3.8% vs. 3.6%; hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 0.88 to 1.23; p = 0.68).

Conclusions: Among 17,708 patients receiving simvastatin 40 mg daily, those randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg daily had a similar incidence of malignancy and deaths due to malignancy compared with those receiving placebo during a median follow-up of 6 years (96,377 patient-years). (IMPROVE-IT: Examining Outcomes in Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Vytorin [Ezetimibe/Simvastatin] vs Simvastatin [P04103]; NCT00202878).

Keywords: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; KM, Kaplan-Meier; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9; PH, proportional hazard; RR, risk ratio; acute coronary syndromes; cancer; ezetimibe; hs-CRP, high-sensitive C-reactive protein; lipid-lowering therapy; lipids; malignancy; statin.

© 2020 The Authors.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Central Illustration
Central Illustration
Cumulative Incidence Rates for the Primary Malignancy Endpoint by Treatment Arm Simvastatin/ezetimibe (red) and placebo/ezetimibe (blue). The primary malignancy endpoint was defined as new, relapsing, or progressive malignancy (excluding nonmelanotic skin malignancy). The cumulative incidence plots were presented graphically using Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative Incidence Rates for the Secondary Endpoint of Deaths Due to Malignancy by Treatment Arm Simvastatin/ezetimibe (red) and placebo/ezetimibe (blue). The cumulative incidence plots were presented graphically using Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary Malignancy Endpoint by Pre-Specified High-Risk Subgroups The number of events and the 7-year Kaplan-Meier rates are shown. BMI = body mass index; Hs-CRP = high-sensitive C-reactive protein; TC = total cholesterol. Total cholesterol: 25th percentile = 144.0 mg/dl, 50th percentile = 162.4 mg/dl and 75th percentile = 181.0 mg/dl.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Deaths Due to Malignancy Endpoint by Pre-Specified High-Risk Subgroups The number of events and the 7-year Kaplan-Meier rates are shown. Total cholesterol: 25th percentile =144.0 mg/dl, 50th percentile = 162.4 mg/dl and 75th percentile = 181.0 mg/dl. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.

References

    1. Malmborg M., Christiansen C.B., Schmiegelow M.D., Torp-Pedersen C., Gislason G., Schou M. Incidence of new onset cancer in patients with a myocardial infarction - a nationwide cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18:198.
    1. Pfeffer M.A. Cancer in cardiovascular drug trials and vice versa: a personal perspective. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1089–1094.
    1. Messerli F.H., Bangalore S., Torp-Pedersen C., Staessen J.A., Kostis J.B. Cardiovascular drugs and cancer: of competing risk, smallpox, Bernoulli, and d'Alembert. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1095–1098.
    1. Ridker P.M., MacFadyen J.G., Thuren T. Effect of interleukin-1beta inhibition with canakinumab on incident lung cancer in patients with atherosclerosis: exploratory results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390:1833–1842.
    1. Baigent C., Keech A., Kearney P.M. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366:1267–1278.
    1. Sabatine M.S., Wiviott S.D., Im K., Murphy S.A., Giugliano R.P. Efficacy and safety of further lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients starting with very low levels: a meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:823–828.
    1. Taylor A.J., Nissen S.E. Preliminary observations from preliminary trial results: have we finally had enough? Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2008;1:54–57.
    1. Rossebo A.B., Pedersen T.R., Boman K. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1343–1356.
    1. Sudhop T., Lutjohann D., Kodal A. Inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption by ezetimibe in humans. Circulation. 2002;106:1943–1948.
    1. Grundy S.M., Stone N.J., Bailey A.L. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:e285–e350.
    1. Cannon C.P., Blazing M.A., Giugliano R.P. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2387–2397.
    1. Cannon C.P., Giugliano R.P., Blazing M.A. Rationale and design of IMPROVE-IT (IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial): comparison of ezetimbe/simvastatin versus simvastatin monotherapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2008;156:826–832.
    1. Bohula E.A., Morrow D.A., Giugliano R.P. Atherothrombotic risk stratification and ezetimibe for secondary prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:911–921.
    1. Peto R., Gray R., Brantom P., Grasso P. Dose and time relationships for tumor induction in the liver and esophagus of 4080 inbred rats by chronic ingestion of N-nitrosodiethylamine or N-nitrosodimethylamine. Cancer Res. 1991;51:6452–6469.
    1. Peto R., Emberson J., Landray M. Analyses of cancer data from three ezetimibe trials. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1357–1366.
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists C. Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2019;393:407–415.
    1. Bradford P.G., Awad A.B. Phytosterols as anticancer compounds. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007;51:161–170.
    1. Blanco-Vaca F., Cedo L., Julve J. Phytosterols in cancer: from molecular mechanisms to preventive and therapeutic potentials. Curr Med Chem. 2019;26:6735–6749.
    1. Salen G., von Bergmann K., Lutjohann D. Ezetimibe effectively reduces plasma plant sterols in patients with sitosterolemia. Circulation. 2004;109:966–971.
    1. Baigent C., Landray M.J., Reith C. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377:2181–2192.
    1. Dale K.M., Coleman C.I., Henyan N.N., Kluger J., White C.M. Statins and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295:74–80.
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists C., Emberson J.R., Kearney P.M. Lack of effect of lowering LDL cholesterol on cancer: meta-analysis of individual data from 175,000 people in 27 randomised trials of statin therapy. PLoS One. 2012;7
    1. Giugliano R.P., Pedersen T.R., Park J.G. Clinical efficacy and safety of achieving very low LDL-cholesterol concentrations with the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab: a prespecified secondary analysis of the FOURIER trial. Lancet. 2017;390:1962–1971.
    1. Schwartz G.G., Steg P.G., Szarek M. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2097–2107.
    1. Giugliano R.P., Wiviott S.D., Blazing M.A. Long-term safety and efficacy of achieving very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a prespecified analysis of the IMPROVE-IT trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:547–555.
    1. Navar A.M., Roe M.T., White J.A. Medication discontinuation in the IMPROVE-IT trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12

Source: PubMed

3
購読する