Efficacy and Safety of Adding Ezetimibe to Statin Therapy Among Women and Men: Insight From IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial)

Eri Toda Kato, Christopher P Cannon, Michael A Blazing, Erin Bohula, Sema Guneri, Jennifer A White, Sabina A Murphy, Jeong-Gun Park, Eugene Braunwald, Robert P Giugliano, Eri Toda Kato, Christopher P Cannon, Michael A Blazing, Erin Bohula, Sema Guneri, Jennifer A White, Sabina A Murphy, Jeong-Gun Park, Eugene Braunwald, Robert P Giugliano

Abstract

Background: IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial) showed that adding the nonstatin ezetimibe to statin therapy further reduced cardiovascular events in patients after an acute coronary syndrome. In a prespecified analysis, we explore results stratified by sex.

Methods and results: In IMPROVE-IT, patients with acute coronary syndrome and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 50 to 125 mg/dL were randomized to placebo/simvastatin 40 mg or ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg. They were followed up for a median of 6 years for the primary composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization ≥30 days, and stroke. Among 18 144 patients in IMPROVE-IT, 4416 (24%) were women. At 12 months, the addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline compared with simvastatin monotherapy in men and women equally (absolute reduction, 16.7 mg/dL in men and 16.4 mg/dL in women). Women receiving ezetimibe/simvastatin had a 12% risk reduction over those receiving placebo/simvastatin for the primary composite end point (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.99) compared with a 5% reduction for men (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.01; P=0.26 for interaction). When the total number of primary events was considered, women had an 18% reduction with the addition of ezetimibe (relative risk, 95% confidence interval, 0.81; 0.71-0.94) and men had a 6% reduction (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.02; P=0.08 for interaction). The addition of ezetimibe did not increase the rates of safety events in either women or men.

Conclusions: IMPROVE-IT demonstrated that the benefit of adding ezetimibe to statin is present in both women and men, with a good safety profile supporting the use of intensive, combination, lipid-lowering therapy to optimize cardiovascular outcomes.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00202878.

Keywords: cholesterol; chronic ischemic heart disease; coronary artery disease; ezetimibe; lipids and lipoprotein metabolism; secondary prevention; sex; women.

© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Seven year Kaplan‐Meier estimate curves of primary end point by sex. The treatment effects were similar between women and men for the primary end point of cardiovascular death, major coronary event (nonfatal myocardial infarction, rehospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization event occurring at least 30 days after randomization), or nonfatal stroke (P=0.26 for interaction). The Kaplan‐Meier rates at 7 years were 34.0% with placebo/simvastatin and 31.0% with ezetimibe/simvastatin in women and 34.9% with placebo/simvastatin and 33.3% with ezetimibe/simvastatin in men. EZE indicated ezetimibe; HR, hazard ratio; PBO, placebo; Simva, Simvastatin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Efficacy outcomes by sex. Women had a significant 22% reduction of myocardial infarction and a 12% reduction of major adverse cardiac events (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) with ezetimibe compared with placebo. There were no significant treatment interactions by sex for any of the end points. CHD indicates coronary heart disease; CI, confidence interval; Eze, ezetimibe; HR, hazard ratio; KM, Kaplan‐Meier; PBO, placebo; Pint, P value for interaction; Simva, simvastatin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Total primary end point by sex. Adding ezetimibe to simvastatin reduced the total number of primary end points in both men and women (P=0.08 for interaction). RR indicates relative reduction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Risk stratification by sex. Approximately half of the men were categorized as low risk, and fewer men were at high risk compared with women.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke by risk stratification and treatment group in women and men. Each risk indicator (ie, congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, peripheral arterial disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate 2, and current smoking) is assigned 1 point. Low risk, 0 or 1 risk indicator; intermediate risk, 2 risk indicators; and high risk, ≧3 risk indicators. Women categorized as high risk benefitted the most from adding ezetimibe to simvastatin, whereas no benefit was observed in women who were categorized as low risk. Eze indicates ezetimibe; HR, hazard ratio; PBO, placebo; Simva, simvastatin.

References

    1. Gutierrez J, Ramirez G, Rundek T, Sacco RL. Statin therapy in the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events: a sex‐based meta‐analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:909–919.
    1. Truong QA, Murphy SA, McCabe CH, Armani A, Cannon CP; TIMI Study Group . Benefit of intensive statin therapy in women: results from PROVE IT‐TIMI 22. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4:328–336.
    1. Miettinen TA, Pyorala K, Olsson AG, Musliner TA, Cook TJ, Faergeman O, Berg K, Pedersen T, Kjekshus J. Cholesterol‐lowering therapy in women and elderly patients with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris: findings from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Circulation. 1997;96:4211–4218.
    1. Kostis WJ, Cheng JQ, Dobrzynski JM, Cabrera J, Kostis JB. Meta‐analysis of statin effects in women versus men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:572–582.
    1. Lewis SJ, Sacks FM, Mitchell JS, East C, Glasser S, Kell S, Letterer R, Limacher M, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Effect of pravastatin on cardiovascular events in women after myocardial infarction: the cholesterol and recurrent events (CARE) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:140–146.
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration , Fulcher J, O'Connell R, Voysey M, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Mihaylova B, Simes J, Collins R, Kirby A, Colhoun H, Braunwald E, La Rosa J, Pedersen TR, Tonkin A, Davis B, Sleight P, Franzosi MG, Baigent C, Keech A. Efficacy and safety of LDL‐lowering therapy among men and women: meta‐analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385:1397–1405.
    1. Jneid H, Fonarow GC, Cannon CP, Hernandez AF, Palacios IF, Maree AO, Wells Q, Bozkurt B, Labresh KA, Liang L, Hong Y, Newby LK, Fletcher G, Peterson E, Wexler L, Get With the Guidelines Steering C, Investigators . Sex differences in medical care and early death after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;118:2803–2810.
    1. Enriquez JR, Pratap P, Zbilut JP, Calvin JE, Volgman AS. Women tolerate drug therapy for coronary artery disease as well as men do, but are treated less frequently with aspirin, beta‐blockers, or statins. Gend. Med. 2008;5:53–61.
    1. Koopman C, Vaartjes I, Heintjes EM, Spiering W, van Dis I, Herings RM, Bots ML. Persisting gender differences and attenuating age differences in cardiovascular drug use for prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease, 1998–2010. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3198–205.
    1. Poon S, Goodman SG, Yan RT, Bugiardini R, Bierman AS, Eagle KA, Johnston N, Huynh T, Grondin FR, Schenck‐Gustafsson K, Yan AT. Bridging the gender gap: Insights from a contemporary analysis of sex‐related differences in the treatment and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2012;163:66–73.
    1. Blomkalns AL, Chen AY, Hochman JS, Peterson ED, Trynosky K, Diercks DB, Brogan GX Jr, Boden WE, Roe MT, Ohman EM, Gibler WB, Newby LK, Investigators C . Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non‐ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: large‐scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:832–837.
    1. Mehta LS, Beckie TM, DeVon HA, Grines CL, Krumholz HM, Johnson MN, Lindley KJ, Vaccarino V, Wang TY, Watson KE, Wenger NK. American Heart Association Cardiovascular Disease in W , Special Populations Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology CoE , Prevention CoC , Stroke N , Council on Quality of C , Outcomes R . Acute myocardial infarction in women: A Scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133:916–947.
    1. Cannon CP, Giugliano RP, Blazing MA, Harrington RA, Peterson JL, Sisk CM, Strony J, Musliner TA, McCabe CH, Veltri E, Braunwald E, Califf RM; IMPROVE‐IT Investigators . Rationale and design of IMPROVE‐IT (IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial): comparison of ezetimbe/simvastatin versus simvastatin monotherapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2008;156:826–832.
    1. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, Darius H, Lewis BS, Ophuis TO, Jukema JW, De Ferrari GM, Ruzyllo W, De Lucca P, Im K, Bohula EA, Reist C, Wiviott SD, Tershakovec AM, Musliner TA, Braunwald E, Califf RM; IMPROVE‐IT Investigators . Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2387–2397.
    1. Murphy SA, Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, White JA, Lokhnygina Y, Reist C, Im K, Bohula EA, Isaza D, Lopez‐Sendon J, Dellborg M, Kher U, Tershakovec AM, Braunwald E. Reduction in total cardiovascular events with ezetimibe/simvastatin post‐acute coronary syndrome: the IMPROVE‐IT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:353–361.
    1. Bohula EA, Bonaca MP, Braunwald E, Aylward PE, Corbalan R, De Ferrari GM, He P, Lewis BS, Merlini PA, Murphy SA, Sabatine MS, Scirica BM, Morrow DA. Atherothrombotic risk stratification and the efficacy and safety of vorapaxar in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and previous myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2016;134:304–313.
    1. Bohula EA, Morrow DA, Giugliano RP, Blazing MA, He P, Park JG, Murphy SA, White JA, Kesaniemi YA, Pedersen TR, Brady AJ, Mitchel Y, Cannon CP, Braunwald E. Atherothrombotic risk stratification and ezetimibe for secondary prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:911–921.
    1. Ridker PM, Cook NR, Lee IM, Gordon D, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, Hennekens CH, Buring JE. A randomized trial of low‐dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1293–1304.
    1. Anderson GD. Sex and racial differences in pharmacological response: where is the evidence? Pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005;14:19–29.
    1. Bennett S, Sager P, Lipka L, Melani L, Suresh R, Veltri E. Consistency in efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with statins for treatment of hypercholesterolemia in women and men. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004;13:1101–1107.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する