Characteristics, course and outcome of patients receiving physiotherapy in primary health care in Norway: design of a longitudinal observational project

Kari Anne I Evensen, Hilde Stendal Robinson, Ingebrigt Meisingset, Astrid Woodhouse, Marit Thielemann, Wenche S Bjorbækmo, Gard Myhre, Anne E Hansen, Ottar Vasseljen, Nina K Vøllestad, Kari Anne I Evensen, Hilde Stendal Robinson, Ingebrigt Meisingset, Astrid Woodhouse, Marit Thielemann, Wenche S Bjorbækmo, Gard Myhre, Anne E Hansen, Ottar Vasseljen, Nina K Vøllestad

Abstract

Background: Physiotherapists (PTs) in primary health care manage patients with large variation in medical diagnosis, age, functional status, disability and prognosis. Lack of knowledge and systematically collected data from patients treated by PTs in primary health care has prompted this longitudinal observational physiotherapy project. This paper aims to describe a method for developing a database of patients managed by PTs in primary health care, with the main purpose to study patients' characteristics, treatment courses and prognostic factors for favourable outcome.

Methods: This is a longitudinal observational project, following patients through their physiotherapy treatment periods in primary health care in Norway and until one year after inclusion. The project involves both private practitioners and municipally employed PTs working in primary health care in nine municipalities in Norway. The patients are recruited to three different cohorts depending on age and whether they are referred to a private practitioner or a municipally employed PT. All data are recorded electronically, transferred and stored securely. For all patients we have included extensive questionnaires to obtain information about demographics, disability and function, pain-related variables, psychosocial factors, treatments and evaluation of treatment as well as response to clinical tests. The PTs have access to use their own patients' data. We have also prepared for linkage to national patient registers and data collected in population-based studies to be able to gather further important data.

Discussion: This project will have important implications for physiotherapy services in primary health care. The database contains more than 3000 patients, and data collection is ongoing. Data collected so far suggest that the patients included are representative of the larger population of patients treated by private practitioners or municipally employed PTs in Norway. This large scale prospective physiotherapy project will provide knowledge about the patient groups, applied treatments and short- and long-term outcome of the patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03626389 . Registered on August 13th 2018 (retrospectively registered).

Keywords: Cohort; Database; Electronic registration; FYSIOPRIM; Municipality; Physiotherapy; Primary health care services.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project is conducted according to the Helsinki declaration and approved by the Regional committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway (REC no. 2013/2030). Project information and consent form were available in Norwegian and English. All patients have provided written informed consent to participate. Parents gave consent when the children were less than 16 years old.

Consent for publication

Not applicable as the manuscript does not contain individual person’s data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of data collection and data users in FYSIOPRIM FYSIOPRIM Research Program for Physiotherapy in Primary Health Care, TSD Services for Sensitive Data, PT Physiotherapist

References

    1. Swinkels IC, Hart DL, Deutscher D, et al. Comparing patient characteristics and treatment processes in patients receiving physical therapy in the United States, Israel and the Netherlands: cross sectional analyses of data from three clinical databases. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:163. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-163.
    1. Paulsen B. Hva dreier det seg om? En analyse av møtet mellom pasienter og behandlere i kommunale fysioterapitjenester. Rapport 4/89. NIS, Sintef: Trondheim; 1989.
    1. Steiro A, Hauksdottir N. Fysioterapi i Tromsø. Undersøkelse av fysioterapi i Tromsø 1983. Tromsø helseråd: Tromsø; 1987.
    1. Vasseljen O, Hansen AE. Pasienter i privat praksis - hvem er de og hva lider de av? Fysioterapeuten. 2002;5(69):13–18.
    1. Nicholas P, Hefford C, Tumilty S. The use of the patient-specific functional scale to measure rehabilitative progress in a physiotherapy setting. J Man Manip Ther. 2012;20(3):147–152. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000006.
    1. Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, et al. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47(4):258–263. doi: 10.3138/ptc.47.4.258.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する