First-Trimester Sequential Screening for Preeclampsia Using Angiogenic Factors: Study Protocol for a Prospective, Multicenter, Real Clinical Setting Study

Cristina Trilla, Cristina Luna, Silvia De León Socorro, Leire Rodriguez, Aina Ruiz-Romero, Josefina Mora Brugués, Taysa Benítez Delgado, Marta Fabre, Alicia Martin Martínez, Sara Ruiz-Martinez, Elisa Llurba, Daniel Oros, Cristina Trilla, Cristina Luna, Silvia De León Socorro, Leire Rodriguez, Aina Ruiz-Romero, Josefina Mora Brugués, Taysa Benítez Delgado, Marta Fabre, Alicia Martin Martínez, Sara Ruiz-Martinez, Elisa Llurba, Daniel Oros

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of preeclampsia (PE) is about 2-8%, making it one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and maternal mortality in the world. Early prophylactic low dose administration (150 mg) of acetylsalicylic acid is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of early-onset PE, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and neonatal mean stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Universal implementation of a first-trimester screening system including angiogenic and antiangiogenic markers [the Placental Growth Factor (PlGF) and/or soluble fms-like Tyrosine Kinase-1 (sFlt-1)] has shown a prediction rate of 90% for early-onset PE but entails a high financial cost. The aim of this study is to determine the predictive and preventive capacity of a universal PE first-trimester two-step sequential screening model, determining the PlGF only in patients previously classified as intermediate risk by means of a multivariate model based on resources already used in the standard pregnancy control, in a real clinical setting. We hypothesize that this screening model will achieve similar diagnostic performance as the universal determination of PlGF but at a lower economic cost.

Methods and analysis: This is a prospective, multicentric, cohort study in a real-world clinical setting. Every singleton pregnancy will be recruited at the routine first pregnancy visit. In a first step, the first-trimester risk of PE will be calculated using a multivariate Gaussian distribution model, based on medical history, mean blood pressure, Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A (PAPP-A), and Uterine Artery Doppler Pulsatility Index (UTPI). Patients will be classified into three risk groups for PE: (1) risk ≥ 1/50, high-risk with no further testing (blinded PlGF); (2) risk between 1/51 and 1/500, medium-risk requiring further testing; and (3) risk ≤ 1/501, low-risk with no further testing. In a second step, the PlGF will only be determined in those patients classified as intermediate risk after this first step, and then reclassified into high- or low-risk groups. Prophylactic administration of aspirin (150 mg/day) will be prescribed only in high risk patients. As a secondary objective, sFlt-1 values will be blindly determined in patients with high and intermediate risk to assess its potential performance in the screening for PE.

Ethics and dissemination: The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice. This study is approved by the Aragon Research Ethics Committee (CEICA) on 3 July 2020 (15/2020).

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04767438.

Keywords: first trimester; growth restriction; preeclampsia; screening; sequential.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Trilla, Luna, De León Socorro, Rodriguez, Ruiz-Romero, Mora Brugués, Benítez Delgado, Fabre, Martin Martínez, Ruiz-Martinez, Llurba and Oros.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study protocol algorithm.

References

    1. Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. (2009) 33:130–7. 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.010
    1. Melchiorre K, Wormald B, Leslie K, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices in term and preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2008) 32:133–7. 10.1002/uog.5400
    1. Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. (2007) 335:974. 10.1136/
    1. Lisonkova S, Sabr Y, Mayer C, Young C, Skoll A, Joseph KS. Maternal morbidity associated with early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. (2014) 124:771–81. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000472
    1. von Beckerath AK, Kollmann M, Rotky-Fast C, Karpf E, Lang U. Perinatal complications and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2013) 208:130.e1–6. 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.014
    1. Figueras J, Guzman J, Garcia-Munoz F, Garcia P, Diaz C, San Feliciano L, et al. . Análisis de morbi-mortalidad. Informe anual SEN1500. Sociedad Española de Neonatología. (2014). Available onloine at:
    1. Melamed N, Klinger G, Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Herscovici T, Linder N, Hod M, et al. . Short-term neonatal outcome in low-risk, spontaneous, singleton, late preterm deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. (2009) 114:253–60. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181af6931
    1. Escobar GJ, Clark RH, Greene JD. Short term outcomes if infants born at 35 and 36 weeks' gestation: we need to ask more questions. Semin Perinatal. (2006) 30:28–33. 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.01.005
    1. Fisher SJ. The placental problem: linking abnormal cytotrophoblast differentiation to the maternal symptoms of preeclampsia. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. (2004) 2:53. 10.1186/1477-7827-2-53
    1. Flint EJ, Cerdeira AS, Redman CW, Vatish M. The role of angiogenic factors in the management of preeclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. (2019) 98:700–7. 10.1111/aogs.13540
    1. Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, O'Gorman N, Syngelaki A, de Paco Matallana C, et al. . Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. (2017) 77:613–22. 10.1056/NEJMoa1704559
    1. Roberge S, Bujold E, Nicolaides KH. Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2018) 218:287–93.e1. 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.561
    1. Bujold E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y, Bureau M, Audibert F, Marcoux S, et al. . Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a metaanalysis. Obstet Gynecol. (2010) 116:402–14. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e9322a
    1. Roberge S, Villa P, Nicolaides K, Giguere Y, Vainio M, Bakthi A, et al. . Early administration of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther. (2012) 31:141–6. 10.1159/000336662
    1. Wright D, Rolnik DL, Syngelaki A, de Paco Matallana C, Machuca M, de Alvarado M, et al. . Aspirin for evidence-based preeclampsia prevention trial: effect of aspirin on length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2018) 218:612.e1–6. 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.014
    1. American college of obstetricians and gynecologists . Committee opinion No. 638: First trimester risk assessment for early-onset preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. (2015) 126:e25–7. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001049
    1. Rolnik DL, O'Gorman N, Roberge S, Bujold E, Hyett J, Uzan S, et al. . Early screening and prevention of preterm pre-eclampsia with aspirin: time for clinical implementation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2017) 50:551–6. 10.1002/uog.18899
    1. Shmueli A, Meiri H, Gonen R. Economic assessment of screening for pre-eclampsia. Prenat Diagn. (2012) 32:29–38. 10.1002/pd.2871
    1. ACOG committee opinion no. 743 summary: low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. (2018) 132:254–6. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002709
    1. Tan MY, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Cicero S, Janga D et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of early screening for pre-eclampsia by NICE guidelines and a method combining maternal factors and biomarkers: results of SPREE. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2018) 51:743–50. 10.1002/uog.19039
    1. Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Sarquis R, Zvanca M, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of early, intermediate and late pre-eclampsia from maternal factors, biophysical and biochemical markers at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. (2011) 31:66–74. 10.1002/pd.2660
    1. O'Gorman N, Wright D, Poon LC, Rolnik DL, Syngelaki A, Wright A, et al. . Accuracy of competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11- 13 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2017) 49:751–55. 10.1002/uog.17399
    1. Crovetto F, Figueras F, Crispi F, Triunfo S, Pugia M, Lasalvia L, et al. . Forms of circulating luteinizing hormone human chorionic gonadotropin receptor for the prediction of early and late preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther. (2015) 38:94–102. 10.1159/000371516
    1. Scazzocchio E, Figueras F, Crispi F, Meler E, Masoller N, Mula R, et al. . Performance of a first trimester screening of preeclampsia in a routine care low-risk setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2013) 208:203.e1–10. 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.016
    1. Wright A, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Georgantis A, Nicolaides KH. Two-stage screening for preterm preeclampsia at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2019) 220:197.e1–11. 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.092
    1. Wright D, Gallo DM, Gil Pugliese S, Casanova C, Nicolaides KH. Contingent screening for preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2019) 47:554–9. 10.1002/uog.15807
    1. Robinson HP, Fleming JE. A critical evaluation of sonar “crown-rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. (1975) 82:702–10. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x
    1. Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, Karumanchi SA, McCarthy FP, Saito S, et al. . The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis and management recommendations for international practice. International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Pregnancy Hypertens. (2018) 13:291–310. 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.05.004
    1. Figueras F, Meler E, Iraola A, Eixarch E, Coll O, Figueras J, et al. . Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. (2008) 136:20–4. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.12.015
    1. Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou A, Baschat AA, Baker PN, et al. . Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2016) 48:333–9. 10.1002/uog.15884

Source: PubMed

3
購読する