No Consistent Evidence of Decreased Exposure to Varicella-Zoster Virus Among Older Adults in Countries with Universal Varicella Vaccination

Stephane Carryn, Brigitte Cheuvart, Michael Povey, Alemnew F Dagnew, Rafael Harpaz, Robbert van der Most, Giacomo Casabona, Stephane Carryn, Brigitte Cheuvart, Michael Povey, Alemnew F Dagnew, Rafael Harpaz, Robbert van der Most, Giacomo Casabona

Abstract

Background: Universal varicella vaccination might reduce opportunities for varicella-zoster virus (VZV) exposure and protective immunological boosting, thus increasing herpes zoster incidence in latently infected adults. We assessed humoral and cell-mediated immunity (CMI), as markers of VZV exposure, in adults aged ≥50 years.

Methods: We repurposed data from placebo recipients in a large multinational clinical trial (ZOE-50). Countries were clustered based on their varicella vaccination program characteristics, as having high, moderate, or low VZV circulation. Anti-VZV antibody geometric mean concentrations, median frequencies of VZV-specific CD4 T cells, and percentages of individuals with increases in VZV-specific CD4 T-cell frequencies were compared across countries and clusters. Sensitivity analyses using a variable number of time points and different thresholds were performed for CMI data.

Results: VZV-specific humoral immunity from 17 countries (12 high, 2 moderate, 3 low circulation) varied significantly between countries (P < .0001) but not by VZV circulation. No significant differences were identified in VZV-specific CMI between participants from 2 high versus 1 low circulation country. In 3/5 sensitivity analyses, increases in CMI were more frequent in high VZV circulation countries (.03 ≤ P < .05).

Conclusions: We found no consistent evidence of reduced VZV exposure among older adults in countries with universal varicella vaccination.

Clinical trials registration: NCT01165177.

Keywords: boosting; exposure; herpes zoster; varicella vaccine.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Grouping of countries according to their estimated VZV circulation level. Low, low VZV circulation: countries with a well-established 2-dose pediatric universal VV program. Moderate, moderate VZV circulation: countries with a well-established 1-dose pediatric universal VV program. High, high VZV circulation; countries where VV was not included in the national immunization program, the immunization program was immature or has suffered significant interruptions over time. ∗High coverage centers were excluded. Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; VV, varicella vaccination; VZV, varicella-zoster virus.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
VZV-induced humoral responses across time by country (adapted per-protocol cohort for humoral immunity). Results from each participant were treated as a unit. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; N, number of participants; VZV, varicella-zoster virus.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
VZV-induced humoral immune responses by countries clustered according to VZV circulation (adapted per-protocol cohort for humoral immunity). Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; M, month; N, number of participants; VZV, varicella-zoster virus.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Descriptive statistic of the frequencies of VZV-specific CD4IFN-γ+(+) T cells by country and time point (adapted per-protocol cohort for cell-mediated immunity). Abbreviations: IFN-γ, interferon-γ; M, month; N, number of participants with available results; VZV, varicella-zoster virus.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Cell-Mediated Immunity Increase Analysis (Bold) and Sensitivity Analyses in Participants With Results Available for ≥2, First 4, and All 5 Time Points (Adapted Per-Protocol Cohort for Cell-Mediated Immunogenicity). Blue box/dark gray box (print version), high varicella-zoster virus circulation; Green box/light gray box (print version), low varicella-zoster virus circulation. P values were obtained using a 2-sided Fisher exact test; as the cell-mediated immunity increase analysis was descriptive, P values can be regarded as inconclusive. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; n (%), number (%) of patients in a given category; N, number of participants with available results.

References

    1. Seward J, Jumaan A.. VSV: persistence in the population. In: Arvin A, Campadelli-Fiume G, Mocarski E, et al. eds. Human herpesviruses: biology, therapy, and immunoprophylaxis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. . Accessed 19 August 2021.
    1. Yawn BP, Gilden D.. The global epidemiology of herpes zoster. Neurology 2013; 81:928–30.
    1. Harpaz R. Do varicella vaccination programs change the epidemiology of herpes zoster? A comprehensive review, with focus on the United States. Expert Rev Vaccines 2019; 18:793–811.
    1. Harvey M, Prosser LA, Rose AM, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Harpaz R.. Aggregate health and economic burden of herpes zoster in the United States: illustrative example of a pain condition. Pain 2020; 161:361–8.
    1. Hope-Simpson RE. The nature of herpes zoster: a long-term study and a new hypothesis. Proc R Soc Med 1965; 58:9–20.
    1. Brisson M, Gay NJ, Edmunds WJ, Andrews NJ.. Exposure to varicella boosts immunity to herpes-zoster: implications for mass vaccination against chickenpox. Vaccine 2002; 20:2500–7.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO vaccine-preventable diseases: monitoring system. 2019 global summary. . Accessed 21 April 2020.
    1. Varicella and herpes zoster vaccines: WHO position paper, June 2014. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2014; 89:265–87.
    1. Siedler A, Rieck T, Tolksdorf K.. Strong additional effect of a second varicella vaccine dose in children in Germany, 2009–2014. J Pediatr 2016; 173:202–6.e2.
    1. Baxter R, Tran TN, Ray P, et al. . Impact of vaccination on the epidemiology of varicella: 1995-2009. Pediatrics 2014; 134:24–30.
    1. Lal H, Cunningham AL, Godeaux O, et al. ; ZOE-50 Study Group. Efficacy of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:2087–96.
    1. Marra F, Chong M, Najafzadeh M.. Increasing incidence associated with herpes zoster infection in British Columbia, Canada. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16:589.
    1. Siedler A, Hecht J, Rieck T, Tolksdorf K, Hengel H.. Varicella vaccination in Germany. A provisional appraisal in the context of MMR vaccination [in German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2013; 56:1313–20.
    1. Hull B, Hendry A, Dey A, Brotherton J, Macartney K, Beard F.. Annual immunisation coverage report 2017. Comun Dis Intell (2018) 2019; 43: doi: 10.33321/cdi.2019.43.47.
    1. Kelly HA, Grant KA, Gidding H, Carville KS.. Decreased varicella and increased herpes zoster incidence at a sentinel medical deputising service in a setting of increasing varicella vaccine coverage in Victoria, Australia, 1998 to 2012. Euro Surveill 2014; 19:20926.
    1. Lin MR, Kuo CC, Hsieh YC, et al. . Seroepidemiology of varicella among elementary school children in northern Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2017; 50:321–6.
    1. Yoshikawa T, Kawamura Y, Ohashi M.. Universal varicella vaccine immunization in Japan. Vaccine 2016; 34:1965–70.
    1. Lee YH, Choe YJ, Cho SI, et al. . Effectiveness of varicella vaccination program in preventing laboratory-confirmed cases in children in Seoul, Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2016; 31:1897–901.
    1. Sauerbrei A, Schäfler A, Hofmann J, Schacke M, Gruhn B, Wutzler P.. Evaluation of three commercial varicella-zoster virus IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in comparison to the fluorescent-antibody-to-membrane-antigen test. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2012; 19:1261–8.
    1. Moris P, van der Most R, Leroux-Roels I, et al. . H5N1 influenza vaccine formulated with AS03 A induces strong cross-reactive and polyfunctional CD4 T-cell responses. J Clin Immunol 2011; 31:443–54.
    1. Laing KJ, Ouwendijk WJD, Koelle DM, Verjans GMGM.. Immunobiology of varicella-zoster virus infection. J Infect Dis 2018; 218:S68–74.
    1. Arvin AM, Koropchak CM, Wittek AE.. Immunologic evidence of reinfection with varicella-zoster virus. J Infect Dis 1983; 148:200–5.
    1. Vossen MT, Gent MR, Weel JF, de Jong MD, van Lier RA, Kuijpers TW.. Development of virus-specific CD4+ T cells on reexposure to varicella-zoster virus. J Infect Dis 2004; 190:72–82.
    1. Ogunjimi B, Smits E, Hens N, et al. . Exploring the impact of exposure to primary varicella in children on varicella-zoster virus immunity of parents. Viral Immunol 2011; 24:151–7.
    1. Ogunjimi B, Van den Bergh J, Meysman P, et al. . Multidisciplinary study of the secondary immune response in grandparents re-exposed to chickenpox. Sci Rep 2017; 7:1077.
    1. Ogunjimi B, Smits E, Heynderickx S, et al. . Influence of frequent infectious exposures on general and varicella-zoster virus-specific immune responses in pediatricians. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2014; 21:417–26.
    1. Tseng HF, Bruxvoort K, Ackerson B, et al. . The epidemiology of herpes zoster in immunocompetent, unvaccinated adults ≥50 years old: incidence, complications, hospitalization, mortality, and recurrence. J Infect Dis 2020; 222:798–806.
    1. Harpaz R. How little we know herpes zoster. J Infect Dis 2020; 222:708–11.
    1. Leung J, Harpaz R, Molinari NA, Jumaan A, Zhou F.. Herpes zoster incidence among insured persons in the United States, 1993-2006: evaluation of impact of varicella vaccination. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:332–40.
    1. Forbes H, Douglas I, Finn A, et al. . Risk of herpes zoster after exposure to varicella to explore the exogenous boosting hypothesis: self controlled case series study using UK electronic healthcare data. BMJ 2020; 368:l6987.
    1. Harder T, Siedler A.. Systematic review and meta-analysis of chickenpox vaccination and risk of herpes zoster: a quantitative view on the “exogenous boosting hypothesis”. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 69:1329–38.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する