Predictors of postoperative complications after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer

Jingya Wang, Caimiao Wei, Susan L Tucker, Bevan Myles, Matthew Palmer, Wayne L Hofstetter, Stephen G Swisher, Jaffer A Ajani, James D Cox, Ritsuko Komaki, Zhongxing Liao, Steven H Lin, Jingya Wang, Caimiao Wei, Susan L Tucker, Bevan Myles, Matthew Palmer, Wayne L Hofstetter, Stephen G Swisher, Jaffer A Ajani, James D Cox, Ritsuko Komaki, Zhongxing Liao, Steven H Lin

Abstract

Purpose: While trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer has improved patient outcomes, surgical complication rates remain high. The goal of this study was to identify modifiable factors associated with postoperative complications after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Methods and materials: From 1998 to 2011, 444 patients were treated at our institution with surgical resection after chemoradiation. Postoperative (pulmonary, gastrointestinal [GI], cardiac, wound healing) complications were recorded up to 30 days postoperatively. Kruskal-Wallis tests and χ(2) or Fisher exact tests were used to assess associations between continuous and categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression tested the association between perioperative complications and patient or treatment factors that were significant on univariate analysis.

Results: The most frequent postoperative complications after trimodality therapy were pulmonary (25%) and GI (23%). Lung capacity and the type of radiation modality used were independent predictors of pulmonary and GI complications. After adjusting for confounding factors, pulmonary and GI complications were increased in patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) versus intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT; odds ratio [OR], 2.018; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.104-3.688; OR, 1.704; 95% CI, 1.03-2.82, respectively) and for patients treated with 3D-CRT versus proton beam therapy (PBT; OR, 3.154; 95% CI, 1.365-7.289; OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.78-3.08, respectively). Mean lung radiation dose (MLD) was strongly associated with pulmonary complications, and the differences in toxicities seen for the radiation modalities could be fully accounted for by the MLD delivered by each of the modalities.

Conclusions: The radiation modality used can be a strong mitigating factor of postoperative complications after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none.

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percentage of incidence of pulmonary and GI complications.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Impact of mean lung dose and modality on perioperative pulmonary complications. (A) Incidence of pulmonary toxicity (PT) by MLD for the entire cohort with accessible DVH data (n=392). Data points show the observed incidence of PT in each group plotted at the mean value of MLD per group. Horizontal error bars show ±1 SD about the mean MLD per group. Vertical error bars show ±1 SEM of the incidence, computed using binomial statistics. (B) Incidence of PT by MLD, with data plotted separately for each treatment modality.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する