Barriers and Facilitators of Safe Communication in Obstetrics: Results from Qualitative Interviews with Physicians, Midwives and Nurses

Martina Schmiedhofer, Christina Derksen, Franziska Maria Keller, Johanna Elisa Dietl, Freya Häussler, Reinhard Strametz, Ilona Koester-Steinebach, Sonia Lippke, Martina Schmiedhofer, Christina Derksen, Franziska Maria Keller, Johanna Elisa Dietl, Freya Häussler, Reinhard Strametz, Ilona Koester-Steinebach, Sonia Lippke

Abstract

Patient safety is an important objective in health care. Preventable adverse events (pAEs) as the counterpart to patient safety are harmful incidents that fell behind health care standards and have led to temporary or permanent harm or death. As safe communication and mutual understanding are of crucial importance for providing a high quality of care under everyday conditions, we aimed to identify barriers and facilitators that impact safe communication in obstetrics from the subjective perspective of health care workers. A qualitative study with 20 semi-structured interviews at two university hospitals in Germany was conducted to explore everyday perceptions from a subjective perspective (subjective theories). Physicians, midwives, and nurses in a wide span of professional experience and positions were enrolled. We identified a structural area of conflict at the professional interface between midwives and physicians. Mandatory interprofessional meetings, acceptance of subjective mistakes, mutual understanding, and debriefings of conflict situations are reported to improve collaboration. Additionally, emergency trainings, trainings in precise communication, and handovers are proposed to reduce risks for pAEs. Furthermore, the participants reported time-constraints and understaffing as a huge burden that hinders safe communication. Concluding, safety culture and organizational management are closely entwined and strategies should address various levels of which communication trainings are promising.

Keywords: interprofessional communication; interprofessional cooperation; obstetrics; patient safety; preventable adverse events; qualitative health research; safety II.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural levels affecting patient safety.

References

    1. Sherman H., Castro G., Fletcher M., Hatlie M., Hibbert P., Jakob R., Koss R., Lewalle P., Loeb J., Perneger T., et al. Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: The conceptual framework. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2009;21:2–8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn054.
    1. [(accessed on 10 January 2021)]; Available online:
    1. Schrappe M. APS-Weißbuch Patientensicherheit. Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; Berlin, Germany: 2018.
    1. Brennan T.A., Leape L.L., Laird N.M., Hebert L., Localio A.R., Lawthers A.G., Newhouse J.P., Weiler P.C., Hiatt H.H. Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized Patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;324:370–376. doi: 10.1056/nejm199102073240604.
    1. Leonard M., Graham S., Bonacum D. The human factor: The critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual. Saf. Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl. 1):i85–i90. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i85.
    1. Schrappe M., Lessing C., Albers B., Conen D., Gerlach F., Grandt D., Hart D., Jonitz G., Lauterberg J., Loskill H., et al. Agenda Patientensicherheit 2007. [(accessed on 12 January 2021)]; Available online:
    1. Schrappe M. Patientensicherheit—Eine große Herausforderung in der Klinik—Konsequente Sicherheitskultur als Standortvorteil. Der Klin. 2007;36:516–521. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-991562.
    1. National Health Service (N.H.S.) Improvement. Never Events Policy and Framework. [(accessed on 17 January 2021)];2019 Available online: .
    1. Smith A.F., Mahajan R.P. National critical incident reporting: Improving patient safety. Br. J. Anaesth. 2009;103:623–625. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep273.
    1. Iflaifel M., Lim R.H., Ryan K., Crowley C. Resilient Health Care: A systematic review of conceptualisations, study methods and factors that develop resilience. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2020;20 doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05208-3.
    1. Hollnagel E., Lears R.L., Braithwaite J. From Safety-I to Safety-II: A White Paper. [(accessed on 17 January 2021)];2015 Available online: .
    1. Donaldson M.S., Corrigan J.M., Kohn L.T., editors. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academies Press (US); Washington, DC, USA: 2000.
    1. Hegde S., Hettinger A.Z., Fairbanks R.J., Wreathall J., Krevat S.A., Jackson C.D., Bisantz A.M. Qualitative findings from a pilot stage implementation of a novel organizational learning tool toward operationalizing the Safety-II paradigm in health care. Appl. Ergon. 2020;82:102913. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102913.
    1. Lockhart E.M., Hincker A., Klumpner T.T., Hofer J., Cahill A.G., Palanisamy A., Boyle W., Ginosar Y. Consultation, Surveillance, Monitoring, and Intensive Care (COSMIC): A Novel 4-Tier Program to Identify and Monitor High-Risk Obstetric Patients From the Clinic to Critical Care. Anesth. Analg. 2019;128:1354–1360. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004141.
    1. Tanaka K., Eriksson L., Asher R., Obermair A. Incidence of adverse events, preventability and mortality in gynaecological hospital admissions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019;59:195–200. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12937.
    1. Gesetz zur Reform der Hebammenausbildung und zur Änderung des V. Sozialgesetzbuches (Hebammenreformgesetz–HebRefG) [(accessed on 18 January 2021)];2019 Available online: .
    1. Herzberg S., Hansen M., Schoonover A., Skarica B., McNulty J., Harrod T., Snowden J.M., Lambert W., Guise J.-M. Association between measured teamwork and medical errors: An observational study of prehospital care in the USA. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e025314. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025314.
    1. Dingley C., Daugherty K., Derieg M.K., Persing R. Improving Patient Safety Through Provider Communication Strategy Enhancements. In: Henriksen K., Battles J.B., Keyes M.A., Grady M.L., editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); Rockville, MD, USA: 2008.
    1. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. [(accessed on 13 January 2021)]; Available online: .
    1. Braithwaite J., Wears R.L., Hollnagel E. Resilient health care: Turning patient safety on its head. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2015;27:418–420. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv063.
    1. Lippke S., Wienert J., Keller F.M., Derksen C., Welp A., Kotting L., Hofreuter-Gatgens K., Muller H., Louwen F., Weigand M., et al. Communication and patient safety in gynecology and obstetrics—Study protocol of an intervention study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2019;19:908. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4579-y.
    1. Schreier M. Sampling and generalization. In: Flick U., editor. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. SAGE; London, UK: 2018. pp. 84–98.
    1. Schreier M. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. SAGE Publications Ltd.; London, UK: 2012.
    1. Burgener A.M. Enhancing Communication to Improve Patient Safety and to Increase Patient Satisfaction. Health Care Manag. 2017;36:238–243. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000165.
    1. Meffe F., Ng S., Nemoy L., Campbell D., Moscovitch L., Bishop C., Franziska S., Chandrasekaran R.B. Calling all maternity care teams to the table! Exploring the driving forces contributing to interprofessional tensions in intrapartum care. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2020;42:682–683. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.02.069.
    1. Halligan M., Zecevic A. Safety culture in healthcare: A review of concepts, dimensions, measures and progress. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2011;20:338–343. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.040964.
    1. Schwappach D.L., Gehring K. Silence that can be dangerous: A vignette study to assess healthcare professionals’ likelihood of speaking up about safety concerns. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e104720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104720.
    1. Schwappach D., Richard A. Speak up-related climate and its association with healthcare workers’ speaking up and withholding voice behaviours: A cross-sectional survey in Switzerland. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2018;27:827–835. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007388.
    1. Rosenstein A.H., Mudge-Riley M. The impact of stress and burnout on physician satisfaction and behaviors. Phys. Exec. 2010;36:16–18.
    1. D’Amour D., Ferrada-Videla M., San Martin Rodriguez L., Beaulieu M.-D. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. J. Interprof. Care. 2005;19:116–131. doi: 10.1080/13561820500082529.
    1. Kasarda J.D. The Structural Implications of Social System Size: A Three-Level Analysis. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1974;39:19. doi: 10.2307/2094273.
    1. Ansmann L., Baumann W., Gostomzyk J., Gotz K., Hahn U., Pfaff H., Rolker-Denker L., Nost S. DNVF-Memorandum III—Methods For Health Services Research, Part 4—Concept and Methods For Organizational Health Services Research. Chapter 1—Definition and Concept of Organizational Health Services Research. Gesundheitswesen. 2019;81:e64–e71. doi: 10.1055/a-0862-0527.
    1. Durst J., Temming L., Gamboa C., Tuuli M., Macones G., Young O. Improving Interprofessional Communication Utilizing Obstetric Simulation Training. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;130:47S–48S. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000525745.88585.40.
    1. Wu M., Tang J., Etherington N., Walker M., Boet S. Interventions for improving teamwork in intrapartum care: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2020;29:77. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009689.
    1. Okuyama A., Wagner C., Bijnen B. Speaking up for patient safety by hospital-based health care professionals: A literature review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2014;14:61. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-61.
    1. Weller J., Boyd M., Cumin D. Teams, tribes and patient safety: Overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare. Postgrad. Med. J. 2014;90:149–154. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131168.
    1. Pettker C.M., Thung S.F., Norwitz E.R., Buhimschi C.S., Raab C.A., Copel J.A., Kuczynski E., Lockwood C.J., Funai E.F. Impact of a comprehensive patient safety strategy on obstetric adverse events. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009;200:492.e1–492.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.022.
    1. de Vries E.N., Ramrattan M.A., Smorenburg S.M., Gouma D.J., Boermeester M.A. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: A systematic review. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2008;17:216–223. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023622.
    1. Krämer T., Schneider A., Spieß E., Angerer P., Weigl M. Associations between job demands, work-related strain and perceived quality of care: A longitudinal study among hospital physicians. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2016;28:824–829. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw119.
    1. [(accessed on 10 January 2021)]; Available online: .
    1. [(accessed on 18 January 2021)]; Available online: .
    1. Douglas H.E., Raban M.Z., Walter S.R., Westbrook J.I. Improving our understanding of multi-tasking in healthcare: Drawing together the cognitive psychology and healthcare literature. Appl. Ergon. 2017;59:44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.021.
    1. Koch P., Zilezinski M., Schulte K., Strametz R., Nienhaus A., Raspe M. How Perceived Quality of Care and Job Satisfaction Are Associated with Intention to Leave the Profession in Young Nurses and Physicians. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:2714. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082714.
    1. Deutscher Bundestag Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Reform der Hebammenausbildung. [(accessed on 13 January 2021)];2019 Available online: .
    1. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. [(accessed on 12 January 2021)];2019 Available online: .
    1. Vallin E., Nestander H., Wells M.B. A literature review and meta-ethnography of fathers’ psychological health and received social support during unpredictable complicated childbirths. Midwifery. 2019;68:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.10.007.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する