Ambivalence in pregnancy intentions: The effect of quality of care and context among a cohort of women attending family planning clinics in Kenya

Eliud Wekesa, Ian Askew, Timothy Abuya, Eliud Wekesa, Ian Askew, Timothy Abuya

Abstract

Context: Ambivalence in pregnancy intentions is well-documented in sub-Saharan African (SSA) settings and has been associated with inconsistent use of contraception, thereby exposing women using contraception to the possibility of unintended pregnancies. A better understanding of the potential role for client counseling interventions in enabling women to achieve their pregnancy intentions is essential for aiding program efforts to reduce unintended pregnancies.

Objective: To measure ambivalence in pregnancy intentions longitudinally and determine its association with the quality of care received, controlling for demographic, socio-economic and contextual factors among a cohort of family planning (FP) clients in Kenya.

Methods: This paper uses data drawn from a prospective cohort study of FP clients to investigate the relationship between the quality of care received during FP service delivery and the decisiveness of their pregnancy intentions over time. The study tests the hypothesis that higher quality of care enables women to be less ambivalent about their pregnancy intentions. Binary logistic regression with random effects and multinomial logistic regression were used to assess the predictive effect of the quality of care received by a woman on the decisiveness or ambivalence of her pregnancy intentions, and on any shifts in ambivalence over time, controlling for background characteristics. The study recruited 1,957 women aged 15-49 years attending twelve family planning clinics in four counties in Central Kenya; of these, 1,053 women were observed for four rounds of data collection over a period of 24 months and form the sample for analysis.

Findings: A substantial proportion (43%) of women expressed ambivalence about their intentions to become pregnant at some point during the study period, while over half (57%) remained unequivocal throughout the study. Almost one third of women (31%) shifted from being unequivocal to ambivalent and 12% shifted from ambivalence to being unequivocal. Women experiencing higher quality of care have lower odds of ever expressing ambivalence and higher odds of remaining unequivocal over time, net of other factors. Quality of care was not associated with a shift in ambivalence over time.

Conclusion: FP programs offering higher quality of care are likely to support women to be more decisive in their pregnancy intentions. Improving the quality of care can contribute to reduced ambivalence and consequently reduced likelihood of unintended pregnancy among contraceptive users. This study provides further evidence of the benefits gained through providing high quality services.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01694862.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Schwarz EB, Lohr PA, Gold MA, Gerbert B. Prevalence and correlates of ambivalence towards pregnancy among nonpregnant women. Contraception. 2007;75(4):305–10. . doi:
    1. Santelli J, Rochat R, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Gilbert BC, Curtis K, Cabral R, et al. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003;35(2):94–101. .
    1. Casterline J, El-Zeini L. The estimation of Unwanted Fertility. Demography. 2007;44(4):729–45. doi:
    1. Rocca CH, Krishnan S, Barrett G, Wilson M. Measuring pregnancy planning: An assessment of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among urban, south Indian women. Demogr Res. 2010;23:293–334. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3001625.
    1. Agadjanian V. Fraught with Ambivalence: Reproductive Intentions and Contraceptive Choices in a Sub-Saharan Fertility Transition. Population Research and Policy Review. 2005;24(6):617–45. doi:
    1. Higgins JA, RA P, JS S. Pregnancy Ambivalence and Contraceptive Use Among Young Adults in the United States. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2012;44 (4):236–43. doi:
    1. Schwarz E, Lohr P, Gold M, Gerbert B. Prevalence and correlates of ambivalence towards pregnancy among nonpregnant women. Contraception. 2007;75(4):305–10. doi: .
    1. Trussell J, B V, J. S. Are All Contraceptive Failures Unintended Pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Family Planning Perspectives. 1999;31(5):64–72.
    1. Speizer IS. Using Strength of Fertility Motivations to Identify Family Planning Program Strategies. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2006;32(4):185–91. doi:
    1. Speizer I, Irani L, Barden-O'Fallon J, J. L. Inconsistent fertility motivations and contraceptive use behaviors among women in Honduras Reproductive Health. 2009;6(1):19 doi:
    1. Frost JJ, Singh S, LB F. Factors Associated with Contraceptive Use and Nonuse, United States. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2007;39(2):90–9. doi:
    1. Brückner H, Martin A, PS. B. Ambivalence and Pregnancy:Adolescents'Attitudes, Contraceptive Use and Pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2004;36(6):248–57. doi:
    1. UNAIDS. UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2012.
    1. Cooper D, Harries J, Myer L, Orner P, H. B. "Life is still going on": Reproductive intentions among HIV-positive women and men in South Africa. Social Science & Medicine. 2007;65(2):274–83.
    1. Delvaux T, C N. Reproductive Choice for Women and Men Living with HIV: Contraception, Abortion and Fertility. Reproductive Health Matters. 2007;Supplement 1 (29)(15): 46–66.
    1. Lewis JJ, Ronsmans C, Ezeh A, S G. The population impact of HIV on fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS. 2004;18. 00002030-200406002-00005.
    1. Glynn JR, Buvé A, Caraël M, Kahindo M, Macauley I, Musonda RM ea. Decreased Fertility Among HIV-1-Infected Women Attending Antenatal Clinics in Three African Cities. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2000;25(4):345–52.
    1. Chen JL, Phillips KA, Kanouse DE, Collins RL, A. M. Fertility Desires and Intentions of HIV-Positive Men and Women. Family Planning Perspectives. 2001;33(4):144–65.
    1. Wekesa E, Coast E: Fertility Desires among men and women living with HIV/AIDS in Nairobi slums: a mixed methods study. PLOS ONE 2014. 9(8): e106292 doi:
    1. Univesity of Makere, Uganda MoH, Population Council. Improving of Quality of Care for Family Planning Services in Uganda. Population Council; 2003.
    1. Warren C, Mayhew S, Vassall A, Kimani JK, Church K, Obure CD, et al. Study protocol for the Integra Initiative to assess the benefits and costs of integrating sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in Kenya and Swaziland. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):973 doi:
    1. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) and ICF Macro. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2008–09. Calverton, Maryland: KNBS and ICF Macro; 2010.
    1. Bruce L, Wilson Liambila, Mantshi Menziwa, Khoza D. Balanced Counseling Strategy Plus Trainer’s Guide, part of The Balanced Counseling Strategy Plus: A Toolkit for Family Planning Service Providers Working in High STI/HIV Prevalence Settings, Mullick et al., Washington, DC: Population Council; 2008.
    1. MoH. Maternal and Newborn Health Guidelines, April 2011. Division of Reproductive Health, Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation; Nairobi, Kenya: 2011.
    1. Barrett G, Smith SC, K W. Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2004;58(5):426–33. doi:
    1. Morof D, Steinauer J, Haider S, Liu S, Darney P, G B. Evaluation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in a United States Population of Women. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4 e35381). doi:
    1. Miller WB. Fertility desires and intentions: Construct differences and the modelling of fertility outcome From intentions to behaviour: reproductive decision making in a macro-micro perspective. Vienna, Austria:: Vienna Institute of Demography, 2010.
    1. Moreau C, K H, J T, J B. Effect of prospectively measured pregnancy intentions on the consistency of contraceptive use among young women in Michigan. Human Reproduction. 2013;28(3): 642–50. doi:
    1. Miller WB, Severy LJ, DJ P. A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Popul Stud (Camb). 2004;58(2):193–205. doi:
    1. Schünmann C, A G. Measuring pregnancy intention and its relationship with contraceptive use among women undergoing therapeutic abortion. Contraception. 2006;73(5):520–4. . doi:

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する