Evaluation of operating room reverse Trendelenburg positioning and its effect on postoperative hypoxemia, aspiration, and length of stay: a retrospective study of consecutive patients

C Michael Dunham, Barbara M Hileman, Amy E Hutchinson, Tamara Antonaccio, Elisha A Chance, Gregory S Huang, Gregory Szmaj, Kristen Calabro, Cynthia Bishop, Tyson T Schrickel, C Michael Dunham, Barbara M Hileman, Amy E Hutchinson, Tamara Antonaccio, Elisha A Chance, Gregory S Huang, Gregory Szmaj, Kristen Calabro, Cynthia Bishop, Tyson T Schrickel

Abstract

Background: In 2014, this group published an investigation of surgical patients from 2012 who had substantial rates of postoperative hypoxemia (POH) and perioperative pulmonary aspiration (POPA). Therefore, we investigated whether intraoperative reverse Trendelenburg positioning (RTP) decreases POH and POPA rates.

Methods: Consecutive ASA I-IV surgical patients who had preoperative pulmonary stability requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were evaluated. Using pulse oximetry, hypoxemia was documented intraoperatively and during the 48 h following PACU discharge. POPA was the presence of a pulmonary infiltrate with hypoxemia. In early 2015, a multifaceted effort was undertaken to enhance anesthesiologist and operating nurse awareness of RTP to potentially decrease POH and POPA rates. Analyses included (1) combining 2012 and 2015 cohorts to assess risk conditions, (2) comparing post-campaign 2015 (increased RTP) and 2012 cohorts, and (3) comparing 2015 patients with audit-documented RTP during surgery to the other 2015 patients.

Results: Combining the 500 patients in 2012 with the 1000 in 2015 showed that POH had increased mortality (2.3%), compared to no POH (0.2%; p = 0.0004). POH had increased postoperative length of stay (LOS) (4.6 days), compared to no POH (2.0 days; p < 0.0001). POPA had increased mortality (7.7%) and LOS (8.8 days), compared to no POPA (0.4%; p = 0.0004; 2.3 days; p < 0.0001). Open aortic, cranial, laparotomy, and neck procedures had greater POH (41.3%) and LOS (4.0 days), compared to other procedures (16.3%; p < 0.0001; 2.2 days; p < 0.0001). Glycopyrrolate on induction had lower POH (17.4%) and LOS (1.9 days), compared to no glycopyrrolate (21.6%; p = 0.0849; 2.7 days; p < 0.0001). POH was lower (18.1%) in 2015, than in 2012 (25.6%; p = 0.0007). POPA was lower with RTP in 2015 (0.6%), than in 2012 (4.8%; p = 0.0088). For the 2015 patients, LOS was lower with audit-documented RTP (2.2 days), compared to other patients (2.7 days; p = 0.0246).

Conclusions: These findings are only hypothesis-generating. A randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm whether RTP has an inverse association with POH and POPA, and if RTP and glycopyrrolate are associated with improved outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02984657.

Keywords: Aspiration, respiratory; Hypoxemia; Operating rooms; Period, perioperative; Reverse Trendelenburg; Supine position.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ information

CMD has 35 years experience as a trauma surgeon and is a retired board-certified surgical intensivist and general surgeon. BMH and EAC are experienced full-time research assistants for the Trauma and Neurosciences Research Department. AEH is a board-certified anesthesiologist and the chief of anesthesiology. TA is the assistant nurse manager of the operating room nursing staff. GSH is a board-certified general surgeon, a trauma surgeon, and a board-certified surgical intensivist. GS is an experienced and registered nurse anesthetist. KC is a senior general surgical resident. CB is the director of surgical and perioperative services. TTS is the chief of orthopedic trauma surgery.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Mercy Health Institutional Review Board for human investigations (15–023). The need for written informed consent was waived, because of the study’s retrospective nature.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Abdulla S. Pulmonary aspiration in perioperative medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2013;64:1–13.
    1. Adedeji R, Oragui E, Khan W, Maruthainar N. The importance of correct patient positioning in theatres and implications of mal-positioning. J Perioper Pract. 2010;20:143–147.
    1. Blitt CD, Gutman HL, Cohen DD, Weisman H, Dillon JB. "Silent" regurgitation and aspiration during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1970;49:707–713. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197009000-00012.
    1. Cotton BR, Smith G. The lower oesophageal sphincter and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1984;56:37–46. doi: 10.1093/bja/56.1.37.
    1. Drakulovic MB, Torres A, Bauer TT, Nicolas JM, Nogue S, Ferrer M. Supine body position as a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:1851–1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)12251-1.
    1. Dunham CM, Hileman BM, Hutchinson AE, Chance EA, Huang GS. Perioperative hypoxemia is common with horizontal positioning during general anesthesia and is associated with major adverse outcomes: a retrospective study of consecutive patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-43.
    1. Engelhardt T, Webster NR. Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:453–460. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.3.453.
    1. Ewig S, Torres A. Prevention and management of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002;8:58–69. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200202000-00010.
    1. Fernandez-Crehuet R, Diaz-Molina C, de Irala J, Martinez-Concha D, Salcedo-Leal I, Masa-Calles J. Nosocomial infection in an intensive-care unit: identification of risk factors. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997;18:825–830.
    1. Ferrer R, Artigas A. Clinical review: non-antibiotic strategies for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care. 2002;6:45–51. doi: 10.1186/cc1452.
    1. Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. 2012. . Accessed 9 Dec 2013.
    1. Kalinowski CP, Kirsch JR. Strategies for prophylaxis and treatment for aspiration. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2004;18:719–737. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.05.008.
    1. Keenan SP, Heyland DK, Jacka MJ, Cook D, Dodek P. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Crit Care Clin. 2002;18:107–125. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0704(03)00068-X.
    1. Kluger MT, Short TG. Aspiration during anaesthesia: a review of 133 cases from the Australian Anaesthetic Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS) Anaesthesia. 1999;54:19–26. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00642.x.
    1. Koeman M, van der Ven AJ, Ramsay G, Hoepelman IM, Bonten MJ. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: recent issues on pathogenesis, prevention and diagnosis. J Hosp Infect. 2001;49:155–162. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1073.
    1. Kollef MH. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. A multivariate analysis. JAMA. 1993;270:1965–1970. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510160083034.
    1. Kozlow JH, Berenholtz SM, Garrett E, Dorman T, Pronovost PJ. Epidemiology and impact of aspiration pneumonia in patients undergoing surgery in Maryland, 1999-2000. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1930–1937. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000069738.73602.5F.
    1. McEwen DR. Intraoperative positioning of surgical patients. AORN J. 1996;63:1059–1063.
    1. Morgan M. Control of intragastric pH and volume. Br J Anaesth. 1984;56:47–57. doi: 10.1093/bja/56.1.47.
    1. Mulier JP, Dillemans B, Van Cauwenberge S. Impact of the patient's body position on the intraabdominal workspace during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1398–1402. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0785-8.
    1. Ng A, Smith G. Gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration of gastric contents in anesthetic practice. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:494–513.
    1. Petring OU, Adelhoj B, Jensen BN, Pedersen NO, Lomholt N. Prevention of silent aspiration due to leaks around cuffs of endotracheal tubes. Anesth Analg. 1986;65:777–780. doi: 10.1213/00000539-198607000-00013.
    1. Reali-Forster C, Kolobow T, Giacomini M, Hayashi T, Horiba K, Ferrans VJ. New ultrathin-walled endotracheal tube with a novel laryngeal seal design. Long-term evaluation in sheep. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:162–172. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199601000-00019.
    1. Seegobin RD, van Hasselt GL. Aspiration beyond endotracheal cuffs. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1986;33:273–279. doi: 10.1007/BF03010737.
    1. Smith KA. Positioning principles. An anatomical review. AORN J. 1990;52:1196-202, 204, 206-8. doi: 10.1016/S0001-2092(07)69197-2.
    1. Smith G, Ng A. Gastric reflux and pulmonary aspiration in anaesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2003;69:402–406.
    1. Tiret L, Desmonts JM, Hatton F, Vourc'h G. Complications associated with anaesthesia--a prospective survey in France. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1986;33:336–344. doi: 10.1007/BF03010747.
    1. Torres A, Serra-Batlles J, Ros E, Piera C. Puig de la Bellacasa J, Cobos A et al. Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the effect of body position. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:540–543. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-7-540.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する