Enhancement of CURB65 score with proadrenomedullin (CURB65-A) for outcome prediction in lower respiratory tract infections: derivation of a clinical algorithm

Werner C Albrich, Frank Dusemund, Kristina Rüegger, Mirjam Christ-Crain, Werner Zimmerli, Thomas Bregenzer, Sarosh Irani, Ulrich Buergi, Barbara Reutlinger, Beat Mueller, Philipp Schuetz, Werner C Albrich, Frank Dusemund, Kristina Rüegger, Mirjam Christ-Crain, Werner Zimmerli, Thomas Bregenzer, Sarosh Irani, Ulrich Buergi, Barbara Reutlinger, Beat Mueller, Philipp Schuetz

Abstract

Background: Proadrenomedullin (ProADM) confers additional prognostic information to established clinical risk scores in lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). We aimed to derive a practical algorithm combining the CURB65 score with ProADM-levels in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and non-CAP-LRTI.

Methods: We used data of 1359 patients with LRTI enrolled in a multicenter study. We chose two ProADM cut-off values by assessing the association between ProADM levels and the risk of adverse events and mortality. A composite score (CURB65-A) was created combining CURB65 classes with ProADM cut-offs to further risk-stratify patients.

Results: CURB65 and ProADM predicted both adverse events and mortality similarly well in CAP and non-CAP-LRTI. The combined CURB65-A risk score provided better prediction of death and adverse events than the CURB65 score in the entire cohort and in CAP and non-CAP-LRTI patients. Within each CURB65 class, higher ProADM-levels were associated with an increased risk of adverse events and mortality. Overall, risk of adverse events (3.9%) and mortality (0.65%) was low for patients with CURB65 score 0-1 and ProADM ≤0.75 nmol/l (CURB65-A risk class I); intermediate (8.6% and 2.6%, respectively) for patients with CURB65 score of 2 and ProADM ≤1.5 nmol/l or CURB classes 0-1 and ProADM levels between 0.75-1.5 nmol/L (CURB65-A risk class II), and high (21.6% and 9.8%, respectively) for all other patients (CURB65-A risk class III). If outpatient treatment was recommended for CURB65-A risk class I and short hospitalization for CURB65-A risk class II, 17.9% and 40.8% of 1217 hospitalized patients could have received ambulatory treatment or a short hospitalization, respectively.

Conclusions: The new CURB65-A risk score combining CURB65 risk classes with ProADM cut-off values accurately predicts adverse events and mortality in patients with CAP and non-CAP-LRTI. Additional prospective cohort or intervention studies need to validate this score and demonstrate its safety and efficacy for the management of patients with LRTI.

Trial registration: Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy and hospitalisation in patients with lower respiratory tract infections: the prohosp study; isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN: ISRCTN95122877.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimated association between initial ProADM values and the risk of adverse events (A) and death (B). Estimated association between initial ProADM values and the risk of adverse events (upper black line) and death (lower blue line). Estimates are based on generalized additive models and shaded gray regions correspond to (point-wise) 95% confidence intervals. The rugs at the bottom of the plots display the distribution of the biomarker. Solid lines (and confidence intervals) based on imputed data, dashed lines based on complete-case analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Observed and expected adverse events (A) and mortality (B) within CURB65 class 0/1 (low risk patients). Observed and expected adverse events and mortality within CURB65 class 0/1 (low risk patients). A. Calibration of initial ProADM deciles and adverse events. B. Calibration of ProADM deciles and mortality.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Observed and expected adverse events (A) and mortality (B) within CURB65 class 3-5 (high risk patients). Observed and expected adverse events and mortality within CURB65 class 3-5 (high risk patients). A. Calibration of ProADM deciles and adverse events. B. Calibration of initial ProADM deciles and mortality.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Combination of CURB65 risk classes and ProADM tertiles in all LRTI patients. Combination of CURB65 risk classes and initial ProADM tertiles in all LRTI patients. A. Adverse events in CURB65 and ProADM categories. B. Mortality in CURB65 and ProADM categories. Risk class I = green, risk class II = orange, risk class III = red.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Combination of CURB65 risk classes and ProADM tertiles in CAP patients. Combination of CURB65 risk classes and initial ProADM tertiles in CAP patients. A. Adverse events in CURB65 and ProADM categories. B. Mortality in CURB65 and ProADM categories. Risk class I = green, risk class II = orange, risk class III = red.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Risk classification stratified for outpatients (A) and inpatients (B). Risk classification stratified for outpatients (A) and inpatients (B) according to CURB65-A. Risk class I = green, risk class II = orange, risk class III = red.

References

    1. File TM, Marrie TJ. Burden of community-acquired pneumonia in North American adults. Postgraduate medicine. pp. 130–141.
    1. Lim WS, Macfarlane JT, Boswell TC, Harrison TG, Rose D, Leinonen M, Saikku P. Study of community acquired pneumonia aetiology (SCAPA) in adults admitted to hospital: implications for management guidelines. Thorax. 2001;56(4):296–301. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.4.296.
    1. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, Boersma WG, Karalus N, Town GI, Lewis SA, Macfarlane JT. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003;58(5):377–382. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.5.377.
    1. Schuetz P, Koller M, Christ-Crain M, Steyerberg E, Stolz D, Muller C, Bucher HC, Bingisser R, Tamm M, Muller B. Predicting mortality with pneumonia severity scores: importance of model recalibration to local settings. Epidemiology and infection. 2008;136(12):1628–1637. doi: 10.1017/S0950268808000435.
    1. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, Coley CM, Marrie TJ, Kapoor WN. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. The New England journal of medicine. 1997;336(4):243–250. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701233360402.
    1. Chang CL, Sullivan GD, Karalus NC, Mills GD, McLachlan JD, Hancox RJ. Predicting Early Mortality in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease using the CURB65 score. Respirology. 2010.
    1. Howell MD, Donnino MW, Talmor D, Clardy P, Ngo L, Shapiro NI. Performance of severity of illness scoring systems in emergency department patients with infection. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(8):709–714. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb01866.x.
    1. Christ-Crain M, Schuetz P, Muller B. Biomarkers in the management of pneumonia. Expert review of respiratory medicine. 2008;2(5):565–572. doi: 10.1586/17476348.2.5.565.
    1. Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Muller B. Procalcitonin and other biomarkers to improve assessment and antibiotic stewardship in infections--hope for hype? Swiss Med Wkly. 2009;139(23-24):318–326.
    1. Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Morgenthaler NG, Struck J, Bergmann A, Muller B. Circulating precursor levels of endothelin-1 and adrenomedullin, two endothelium-derived, counteracting substances, in sepsis. Endothelium. 2007;14(6):345–351. doi: 10.1080/10623320701678326.
    1. Christ-Crain M, Morgenthaler NG, Struck J, Harbarth S, Bergmann A, Muller B. Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin as a prognostic marker in sepsis: an observational study. Critical care (London, England) 2005;9(6):R816–824. doi: 10.1186/cc3885.
    1. Struck J, Tao C, Morgenthaler NG, Bergmann A. Identification of an Adrenomedullin precursor fragment in plasma of sepsis patients. Peptides. 2004;25(8):1369–1372. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.06.019.
    1. Schuetz P, Wolbers M, Christ-Crain M, Thomann R, Falconier C, Widmer I, Neidert S, Fricker T, Blum C, Schild U, Prohormones for prediction of adverse medical outcome in community-acquired pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infections. Critical care (London, England) p. R106.
    1. Huang DT, Angus DC, Kellum JA, Pugh NA, Weissfeld LA, Struck J, Delude RL, Rosengart MR, Yealy DM. Midregional proadrenomedullin as a prognostic tool in community-acquired pneumonia. Chest. 2009;136(3):823–831. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1981.
    1. Christ-Crain M, Morgenthaler NG, Stolz D, Muller C, Bingisser R, Harbarth S, Tamm M, Struck J, Bergmann A, Muller B. Pro-adrenomedullin to predict severity and outcome in community-acquired pneumonia [ISRCTN04176397] Critical care (London, England) 2006;10(3):R96..
    1. Briel M, Schuetz P, Mueller B, Young J, Schild U, Nusbaumer C, Periat P, Bucher HC, Christ-Crain M. Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use vs a standard approach for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care. Archives of internal medicine. 2008;168(18):2000–2007. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.18.2000. discussion 2007-2008.
    1. Linscheid P, Seboek D, Zulewski H, Keller U, Muller B. Autocrine/paracrine role of inflammation-mediated calcitonin gene-related peptide and adrenomedullin expression in human adipose tissue. Endocrinology. 2005;146(6):2699–2708. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1424.
    1. Muller B, Becker KL, Schachinger H, Rickenbacher PR, Huber PR, Zimmerli W, Ritz R. Calcitonin precursors are reliable markers of sepsis in a medical intensive care unit. Critical care medicine. 2000;28(4):977–983. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200004000-00011.
    1. Becker KL, Nylen ES, White JC, Muller B, Snider RH Jr. Clinical review 167: Procalcitonin and the calcitonin gene family of peptides in inflammation, infection, and sepsis: a journey from calcitonin back to its precursors. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2004;89(4):1512–1525. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021444.
    1. Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Thomann R, Falconnier C, Wolbers M, Widmer I, Neidert S, Fricker T, Blum C, Schild U. et al.Effect of procalcitonin-based guidelines vs standard guidelines on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: the ProHOSP randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;302(10):1059–1066. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1297.
    1. Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Wolbers M, Schild U, Thomann R, Falconnier C, Widmer I, Neidert S, Blum CA, Schonenberger R. et al.Procalcitonin guided antibiotic therapy and hospitalization in patients with lower respiratory tract infections: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. BMC health services research. 2007;7:102. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-102.
    1. Calverley PM, Walker P. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 2003;362(9389):1053–1061. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14416-9.
    1. Gonzales R, Sande MA. Uncomplicated acute bronchitis. Annals of internal medicine. 2000;133(12):981–991.
    1. Niederman MS, Mandell LA, Anzueto A, Bass JB, Broughton WA, Campbell GD, Dean N, File T, Fine MJ, Gross PA. et al.Guidelines for the management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Diagnosis, assessment of severity, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2001;163(7):1730–1754.
    1. Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, Huchon G, Leven M, Ortqvist A, Schaberg T, Torres A, van der Heijden G, Verheij TJ. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(6):1138–1180. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00055705.
    1. Morgenthaler NG, Struck J, Alonso C, Bergmann A. Measurement of midregional proadrenomedullin in plasma with an immunoluminometric assay. Clinical chemistry. 2005;51(10):1823–1829. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.051110.
    1. Ewig S, Ruiz M, Mensa J, Marcos MA, Martinez JA, Arancibia F, Niederman MS, Torres A. Severe community-acquired pneumonia. Assessment of severity criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(4):1102–1108.
    1. Siafakas NM, Vermeire P, Pride NB, Paoletti P, Gibson J, Howard P, Yernault JC, Decramer M, Higenbottam T, Postma DS. et al.Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The European Respiratory Society Task Force. Eur Respir J. 1995;8(8):1398–1420. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08081398.
    1. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM, Musher DM, Niederman MS. et al.Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(Suppl 2):S27–72.
    1. Neill AM, Martin IR, Weir R, Anderson R, Chereshsky A, Epton MJ, Jackson R, Schousboe M, Frampton C, Hutton S. et al.Community acquired pneumonia: aetiology and usefulness of severity criteria on admission. Thorax. 1996;51(10):1010–1016. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.10.1010.
    1. Baehni C, Meier S, Spreiter P, Schild U, Regez K, Bossart R, Thomann R, Falconnier C, Christ-Crain M, De Geest S, Which patients with lower respiratory tract infections need inpatient treatment? Perceptions of physicians, nurses, patients and relatives. BMC pulmonary medicine. p. 12.
    1. Aujesky D, McCausland JB, Whittle J, Obrosky DS, Yealy DM, Fine MJ. Reasons why emergency department providers do not rely on the pneumonia severity index to determine the initial site of treatment for patients with pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(10):e100–108. doi: 10.1086/644741.
    1. Escalante CP, Weiser MA, Manzullo E, Benjamin R, Rivera E, Lam T, Ho V, Valdres R, Lee EL, Badrina N. et al.Outcomes of treatment pathways in outpatient treatment of low risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12(9):657–662.
    1. Leff B, Burton L, Mader SL, Naughton B, Burl J, Inouye SK, Greenough WB, Guido S, Langston C, Frick KD. et al.Hospital at home: feasibility and outcomes of a program to provide hospital-level care at home for acutely ill older patients. Annals of internal medicine. 2005;143(11):798–808.
    1. Coley CM, Li YH, Medsger AR, Marrie TJ, Fine MJ, Kapoor WN, Lave JR, Detsky AS, Weinstein MC, Singer DE. Preferences for home vs hospital care among low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Archives of internal medicine. 1996;156(14):1565–1571. doi: 10.1001/archinte.156.14.1565.
    1. Shepperd S, Doll H, Angus RM, Clarke MJ, Iliffe S, Kalra L, Ricauda NA, Tibaldi V, Wilson AD. Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Cmaj. 2009;180(2):175–182.
    1. Yap FH, Ho PL, Lam KF, Chan PK, Cheng YH, Peiris JS. Excess hospital admissions for pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure during influenza seasons in Hong Kong. Journal of medical virology. 2004;73(4):617–623. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20135.
    1. Aliyu ZY, Aliyu MH, McCormick K. Determinants for hospitalization in " low-risk" community acquired pneumonia. BMC infectious diseases. 2003;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-3-11.
    1. Marrie TJ, Huang JQ. Admission is not always necessary for patients with community-acquired pneumonia in risk classes IV and V diagnosed in the emergency room. Can Respir J. 2007;14(4):212–216.
    1. Marrie TJ. The Pneumonia Severity Index score: time to move to a prospective study of patients with community-acquired pneumonia who are discharged from emergency departments to be managed on an ambulatory basis. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(1):50–52. doi: 10.1086/509333.
    1. Marrie TJ, Lau CY, Wheeler SL, Wong CJ, Vandervoort MK, Feagan BG. A controlled trial of a critical pathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. CAPITAL Study Investigators. Community-Acquired Pneumonia Intervention Trial Assessing Levofloxacin. Jama. 2000;283(6):749–755. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.6.749.
    1. Loeb M, Carusone SC, Goeree R, Walter SD, Brazil K, Krueger P, Simor A, Moss L, Marrie T. Effect of a clinical pathway to reduce hospitalizations in nursing home residents with pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2006;295(21):2503–2510. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2503.
    1. Yealy DM, Auble TE, Stone RA, Lave JR, Meehan TP, Graff LG, Fine JM, Obrosky DS, Mor MK, Whittle J. et al.Effect of increasing the intensity of implementing pneumonia guidelines: a randomized, controlled trial. Annals of internal medicine. 2005;143(12):881–894.
    1. Ross S. Composite outcomes in randomized clinical trials: arguments for and against. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(2):119 e111–116.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する