Interim results of a prospective, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study of the long-term safety and efficacy of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine (the GLADIATOR study)

Jan Lewis Brandes, Suzanne Klise, John H Krege, Michael Case, Rashna Khanna, Raghavendra Vasudeva, Joel Raskin, Eric M Pearlman, David Kudrow, Jan Lewis Brandes, Suzanne Klise, John H Krege, Michael Case, Rashna Khanna, Raghavendra Vasudeva, Joel Raskin, Eric M Pearlman, David Kudrow

Abstract

Objectives: To address the need for long-term lasmiditan data, the GLADIATOR study evaluated the safety (primary) and efficacy (secondary) of lasmiditan for the intermittent, acute treatment of migraine attacks for up to 1 year.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study, patients who had completed either of two single-attack studies were offered the opportunity to be randomized 1:1 to lasmiditan 100 mg or 200 mg. Patients were asked to use lasmiditan as the first treatment for each new migraine attack of at least moderate severity. Assessments occurred at baseline and at prespecified time increments up to 48 hours after each dose of study drug using an electronic diary, and safety was assessed throughout the study. Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) was assessed at each visit.

Results: As of the cut-off date for this interim analysis (6 March 2018), 1978 patients had received ≥ 1 lasmiditan dose and treated 19,058 migraine attacks. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar to those in the single-attack studies and included dizziness (18.6%), somnolence (8.5%), and paresthesia (6.8%). The frequency of TEAEs generally decreased with subsequent attacks. No treatment-related serious adverse events and no cardiovascular TEAEs potentially due to vasoconstriction were observed. For both lasmiditan doses, efficacy measures were generally consistent over study quarters and treated attacks. Overall, across all treated attacks at 2 hours post-dose, pain freedom was observed in 26.9% of the attacks treated with lasmiditan 100 mg and 32.4% of the attacks treated with lasmiditan 200 mg. MIDAS total scores decreased over time.

Conclusions: The interim results of this long-term study showed intermittent lasmiditan (100 mg and 200 mg) to be generally well tolerated and efficacious for the acute treatment of migraine over a 1-year period. Trial registration number: NCT02565186; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02565186.

Keywords: 5-HT1F agonist; Episodic migraine; MIDAS; ditan; serotonin.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
GLADIATOR study design. aLasmiditan 50 mg was included only in the SPARTAN study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Flow of study participants. aIn the safety population, common adverse events leading to discontinuation (>1%) in the lasmiditan 100 mg group included dizziness (26 patients) and somnolence (14 patients) and in the 200 mg group included dizziness (44 patients), paresthesia (19 patients), fatigue (17 patients), nausea (13 patients), and somnolence (11 patients).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (a) by percentage of patients and (b) by percentage of attacks (safety population). AE: adverse event; MedDRA: Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Note: Reported by ≥ 2% of patients in either treatment group. An AE that started or worsened within 48 hours after the last dose (either the first or the second dose) of lasmiditan was considered treatment-emergent. AEs were coded using MedDRA Version 21.0.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Treatment-emergent adverse events by migraine attack in patients who treated ≥ 5 attacks (safety population). TEAE: treatment-emergent adverse event.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Treated migraine attacks achieving (a) pain freedom, (b) most bothersome symptom freedom, and (c) pain relief at 2 hours post-dose overall and by quarter. ITT: intent-to-treat; MBS: most bothersome symptom; mITT: modified intent-to-treat; Q1: quarter 1 (months 0–3); Q2: quarter 2 (months 3–6); Q3: quarter 3 (months 6–9); Q4: quarter 4 (months 9–12). Note: Pain freedom is defined as a reduction in pain severity from mild, moderate, or severe at baseline to none at 2 hours post-dose. MBS freedom is defined as the absence of the associated symptom of migraine (nausea, phonophobia, or photophobia) at 2 hours post-dose that was identified pre-dose as the MBS. Pain relief is defined as experiencing moderate or severe pain at baseline that becomes mild or none at 2 hours post-dose or mild pain at baseline that becomes none at 2 hours post-dose for each treated attack. Patients who recorded that no symptoms were present at baseline were excluded from the MBS analysis. Patients were assumed to not have achieved pain freedom at 2 hours if they did not have an associated pain severity rating at the 2-hour time point, took rescue medication within the first 2 hours, or used alternative medication prior to the study drug to treat the migraine attack. The pain relief analysis was conducted on the ITT population; the pain freedom and MBS freedom analyses were conducted on the mITT population. *p < 0.001, 100 mg versus 200 mg (based on a one-sided test from a logistic regression model with treatment group and background use of medication to reduce the frequency of migraines as covariates).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Patients achieving (a) pain freedom, (b) most bothersome symptom freedom, and (c) pain relief at 2 hours post-dose by migraine attack in patients who treated ≥ 5 attacks (ITT population). ITT: intent-to-treat; MBS: most bothersome symptom. Note: Pain freedom is defined as a reduction in pain severity from mild, moderate, or severe at baseline to none at 2 hours post-dose. MBS freedom is defined as the absence of the associated symptom of migraine (nausea, phonophobia, or photophobia) at 2 hours post-dose that was identified pre-dose as the MBS. Pain relief is defined as experiencing moderate or severe pain at baseline that becomes mild or none at 2 hours post-dose or mild pain at baseline that becomes none at 2 hours post-dose for each treated attack. Patients who recorded that no symptoms were present at baseline were excluded from the MBS analysis. Patients were assumed to not have achieved pain freedom at 2 hours if they did not have an associated pain severity rating at the 2-hour time point, took rescue medication within the first 2 hours, or used alternative medication prior to the study drug to treat the migraine attack.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Change over time in (a) MIDAS total score and (b) days with headache in the past 3 months (MIDAS population). MIDAS: migraine disability assessment. MIDAS total score was calculated as the sum of the answers to the five questions on the MIDAS questionnaire (0–5 = little or no disability; 6–10 = mild disability; 11–20 = moderate disability; ≥ 21 = severe disability). *p < 0.001 vs. baseline (mixed model for repeated measures); no significant differences were observed between the lasmiditan doses.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Lasmiditan-treated migraine attacks by quarter in patients with a maximum of two, three, and four quarters of data available (safety population). L100: lasmiditan 100 mg; L200: lasmiditan 200 mg; Q1: quarter 1 (months 0–3); Q2: quarter 2 (months 3–6); Q3: quarter 3 (months 6–9); Q4: quarter 4 (months 9–12). The figure includes data for patients who had two quarters, three quarters, and four quarters of data available.

References

    1. Lipton RB, Buse DC, Serrano D, et al. Examination of unmet treatment needs among persons with episodic migraine: Results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache 2013; 53: 1300–1311.
    1. Viana M, Genazzani AA, Terrazzino S, et al. Triptan nonresponders: Do they exist and who are they? Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 891–896.
    1. Rubio-Beltran E, Labastida-Ramirez A, Villalon CM, et al. Is selective 5-HT1F receptor agonism an entity apart from that of the triptans in antimigraine therapy? Pharmacol Ther 2018; 186: 88–97.
    1. Negro A, Koverech A, Martelletti P. Serotonin receptor agonists in the acute treatment of migraine: A review on their therapeutic potential. J Pain Res 2018; 11: 515–526.
    1. Reuter U, Israel H, Neeb L. The pharmacological profile and clinical prospects of the oral 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2015; 8: 46–54.
    1. Goadsby PJ. The vascular theory of migraine – a great story wrecked by the facts. Brain 2009; 132: 6–7.
    1. Mitsikostas DD, Tfelt-Hansen P. Targeting to 5-HT1F receptor subtype for migraine treatment: Lessons from the past, implications for the future. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem 2012; 12: 241–249.
    1. Dodick D, Lipton RB, Martin V, et al. Consensus statement: Cardiovascular safety profile of triptans (5-HT agonists) in the acute treatment of migraine. Headache 2004; 44: 414–425.
    1. Tajti J, Majlath Z, Szok D, et al. Drug safety in acute migraine treatment. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2015; 14: 891–909.
    1. Nelson DL, Phebus LA, Johnson KW, et al. Preclinical pharmacological profile of the selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan. Cephalalgia 2010; 30: 1159–1169.
    1. Capi M, de Andres F, Lionetto L, et al. Lasmiditan for the treatment of migraine. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2017; 26: 227–234.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Holland PR, Martins-Oliveira M, et al. Pathophysiology of migraine: A disorder of sensory processing. Physiol Rev 2017; 97: 553–622.
    1. Wietecha LA, Kuca B, Asafu-Adjei J, et al. Phase 3 studies (SAMURAI, SPARTAN) of lasmiditan compared to placebo for acute treatment of migraine. Neurology 2018; 90(Suppl 15): S50.008–S50.008.
    1. Kuca B, Silberstein SD, Wietecha L, et al. Lasmiditan is an effective acute treatment for migraine: A phase 3 randomized study. Neurology 2018; 91: e2222–e2232.
    1. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004; 24: S9–S160.
    1. Goff DC, Jr., Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014; 129: S49–S73.
    1. American Heart Association. Understanding blood pressure readings: Know your numbers, (2017, accessed 5 December 2018).
    1. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001; 285: 2486–2497.
    1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, et al. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology 2001; 56: S20–S28.
    1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner K, et al. Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a population-based sample of headache sufferers. Cephalalgia 1999; 19: 107–114.
    1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner KB, et al. Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain 2000; 88: 41–52.
    1. Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: Third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia 2012; 32: 6–38.
    1. US Census Bureau. Quick facts: United States, (2010, accessed 3 December 2018).
    1. Oswald JC, Schuster NM. Lasmiditan for the treatment of acute migraine: A review and potential role in clinical practice. J Pain Res 2018; 11: 2221–2227.
    1. Connor KM, Aurora SK, Loeys T, et al. Long-term tolerability of telcagepant for acute treatment of migraine in a randomized trial. Headache 2011; 51: 73–84.
    1. The International 311C90 Long-term Study Group. The long-term tolerability and efficacy of oral zolmitriptan (Zomig, 311C90) in the acute treatment of migraine. An international study. Headache 1998; 38: 173–183.
    1. Pascual J, Falk R, Docekal R, et al. Tolerability and efficacy of almotriptan in the long-term treatment of migraine. Eur Neurol 2001; 45: 206–213.
    1. Lipton RB, Lombard L, Ruff DD, et al. Disability improvements over 12 months with lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine: Interim analysis of migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) scale changes in the GLADIATOR study. Cephalalgia 2018; 38(Suppl 1): 141–142.
    1. Brandes J, Kudrow D, Klise S, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine over a one-year period: Interim results of an open-label phase 3 study (GLADIATOR). Neurology 2019; 92(Suppl 15): P1.10–21–P1.10–21.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する