Identification of DNA hypermethylation of SOX9 in association with bladder cancer progression using CpG microarrays

A Aleman, L Adrien, L Lopez-Serra, C Cordon-Cardo, M Esteller, T J Belbin, M Sanchez-Carbayo, A Aleman, L Adrien, L Lopez-Serra, C Cordon-Cardo, M Esteller, T J Belbin, M Sanchez-Carbayo

Abstract

CpG island arrays represent a high-throughput epigenomic discovery platform to identify global disease-specific promoter hypermethylation candidates along bladder cancer progression. DNA obtained from 10 pairs of invasive bladder tumours were profiled vs their respective normal urothelium using differential methylation hybridisation on custom-made CpG arrays (n=12 288 clones). Promoter hypermethylation of 84 clones was simultaneously shown in at least 70% of the tumours. SOX9 was selected for further validation by bisulphite genomic sequencing and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction in bladder cancer cells (n=11) and primary bladder tumours (n=101). Hypermethylation was observed in bladder cancer cells and associated with lack of gene expression, being restored in vitro by a demethylating agent. In primary bladder tumours, SOX9 hypermethylation was present in 56.4% of the cases. Moreover, SOX9 hypermethylation was significantly associated with tumour grade and overall survival. Thus, this high-throughput epigenomic strategy has served to identify novel hypermethylated candidates in bladder cancer. In vitro analyses supported the role of methylation in silencing SOX9 gene. The association of SOX9 hypermethylation with tumour progression and clinical outcome suggests its relevant clinical implications at stratifying patients affected with bladder cancer.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CpG arrays. (A) Quality control: the relative percentage of methylated and unmethylated genes was similar among the pairs of bladder tumours and normal urothelium samples under study. (B) CpG island arrays identify hypermethylated candidates in patients with bladder cancer. (C) Summary of known genes among the 84 clones simultaneously hypermethylated in 7 out of 10 samples under analysis. The number of cases found differentially expressed with a Cy5/Cy3 ratio higher than 2 for these genes are also indicated.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Analysis of CpG island methylation status of the promoter of SOX9 by bisulphite genomic sequencing in bladder human cancer cell lines (n=11; including nonmuscle invasive, invasive, metastatic transitional and squamous cells). The upper part indicates the nucleotide sequences of the CpG island region analysed by bisulphite sequencing, sequencing primers highlighted in yellow and red and the area amplified in the chromatograms in blue. The mid-section shows a schematic depiction of the SOX9 CpG islands around the transcription start sites. CpG dinucleotides are represented in squares. The presence of ‘Cs’ in the dinucleotide CpG reflects methylated cytosines (black squares), while the presence of ‘Ts’ in the dinucleotide CpG reflects unmethylated cytosines (white squares). Cell lines with black squares indicate the presence of methylation confirmed in at least two of the clones that were sequenced for each of the cell lines under analyses. The bottom part displays representative examples of the chromatograms obtained by bisulphite genomic sequencing of human cancer cell lines (a magnified boxed fragment is displayed). Normal lymphocytes (NL) were used as a negative sequencing control.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CpG island methylation is associated with gene silencing of SOX9. The upper part shows methylation-specific PCRs for SOX9 in human bladder cancer cell lines. The presence of a PCR band under the lane M indicates a methylated gene, while the presence of a PCR band under the lane U indicates an unmethylated gene. Normal lymphocytes (NL) and in vitro-methylated DNA (IVD) were used as negative and positive controls for unmethylated and methylated PCRs, respectively. Sequencing information is included as well, highlighting methylated cell lines by genome sequencing in dark grey. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis of SOX9 expression is displayed. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) transcript expression was used as a transcript loading control. Western blot analysis of protein expression is also shown. Tubulin expression was used as a protein loading control. The hypermethylated cell lines show relatively low transcript and protein expression of the coded protein as compared to unmethylated cell lines.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The treatment with the demethylating agent AZA reactivates gene expression of SOX9. The upper part displays the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis of SOX9 expression. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression was used as a transcript loading control. The hypermethylated J82 cell line did not express SOX9, and restored SOX9 transcript expression after AZA exposure. The mid-section shows western blot analysis of protein expression. Tubulin expression was used as a protein loading control. The hypermethylated cell line did not express the coded protein. The treatment with the demethylating agent reactivated SOX9 protein expression. The unmethylated RT4 cell line did not show changes in transcript or protein expression. The bottom part displays immunofluorescence analysis of SOX9 expression after AZA exposure. The methylated cell line did not show any staining for the protein, while the unmethylated ones showed its characteristic staining pattern.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Association between SOX9 hypermethylation with cancer progression and clinical outcome in bladder tumours. (A) Representative pairs of normal urothelium (NB) and primary bladder tumours (T) analysed by MS-PCR for SOX9. The presence of a PCR band under the lane M indicates a methylated gene, while the presence of a PCR band under the lane U indicates an unmethylated gene. Normal lymphocytes (NL) and in vitro-methylated DNA (IVD) are used as negative and positive controls for unmethylated and methylated PCRs, respectively. (B) Summary of the number of unmethylated (U) and methylated (M) cases for SOX9 regarding their tumour stage and tumour grade. (C) Kaplan–Meier curve describing the association of SOX9 hypermethylation with poor overall survival.

References

    1. Adrien LR, Schlecht NF, Kawachi N, Smith RV, Brandwein-Gensler M, Massimi A, Chen S, Prystowsky MB, Childs G, Belbin TJ (2006) Classification of DNA methylation patterns in tumor cell genomes using a CpG island microarray. Cytogenet Genome Res 114: 16–23
    1. Afonja O, Raaka BM, Huang A, Das S, Zhao X, Helmer E, Juste D, Samuels HH (2002) RAR agonists stimulate SOX9 gene expression in breast cancer cell lines: evidence for a role in retinoid-mediated growth inhibition. Oncogene 21: 7850–7860
    1. Catto JW, Azzouzi AR, Rehman I, Feeley KM, Cross SS, Amira N, Fromont G, Sibony M, Cussenot O, Meuth M, Hamdy FC (2005) Promoter hypermethylation is associated with tumor location, stage, and subsequent progression in transitional cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 23: 2903–2910
    1. Chapman EJ, Harnden P, Chambers P, Johnston C, Knowles MA (2005) Comprehensive analysis of CDKN2A status in microdissected urothelial cell carcinoma reveals potential haploinsufficiency, a high frequency of homozygous co-deletion and associations with clinical phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 11: 5740–5747
    1. Cheung VG, Morley M, Aguilar F, Massimi A, Kucherlapati R, Childs G (1999) Making and reading microarrays. Nat Genet 21: 15–19
    1. Ching TT, Maunakea AK, Jun P, Hong C, Zardo G, Pinkel D, Albertson DG, Fridlyand J, Mao JH, Shchors K, Weiss WA, Costello JF (2005) Epigenome analyses using BAC microarrays identify evolutionary conservation of tissue-specific methylation of SHANK3. Nat Genet 37: 645–651
    1. Cordon-Cardo C, Cote RJ, Sauter G (2000) Genetic and molecular markers of urothelial premalignancy and malignancy. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 205: 82–93
    1. Costello JF, Fruhwald MC, Smiraglia DJ (2000) Aberrant CpG-island methylation has non-random and tumour-type-specific patterns. Nat Genet 24: 132–138
    1. Cross SH, Charlton JA, Nan X, Bird AP (1994) Purification of CpG islands using a methylated DNA binding column. Nat Genet 6: 236–244
    1. Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG (1994) Basic & Clinical Biostatistics 2nd edn, Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange
    1. Drivdahl R, Haugk KH, Sprenger CC, Nelson PS, Tennant MK, Plymate SR (2004) Suppression of growth and tumorigenicity in the prostate tumor cell line M12 by overexpression of the transcription factor SOX9. Oncogene 23: 4584–4593
    1. Esteller M (2002) CpG island hypermethylation and tumor suppressor genes: a booming present, a brighter future. Oncogene 21: 5427–5440
    1. Esteller M (2007) Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification maps. Nat Rev Genet 8: 286–298
    1. Esteller M, Corn PG, Baylin SB (2001) A gene hypermethylation profile of human cancer. Cancer Res 61: 3225–3229
    1. Feinberg AP, Ohlsson R, Henikoff S (2006) The epigenetic progenitor origin of human cancer. Nat Rev Genet 7: 21–33
    1. Heisler LE, Torti D, Boutros PC, Watson J, Chan C, Winegarden N, Takahashi M, Yau P, Huang TH, Farnham PJ, Jurisica I, Woodgett JR, Bremner R, Penn LZ, Der SD (2005) CpG island microarray probe sequences derived from a physical library are representative of CpG Islands annotated on the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 2952–2961
    1. Herman JG, Baylin SB (2003) Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation. N Engl J Med 349: 2042–2054
    1. Huang W, Zhou X, Lefebvre V, de Crombrugghe B (2000) Phosphorylation of SOX9 by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A enhances SOX9's ability to transactivate a Col2a1 chondrocyte-specific enhancer. Mol Cell Biol 20: 4149–4158
    1. Jay P, Berta P, Blache P (2005) Expression of the carcinoembryonic antigen gene is inhibited by SOX9 in human colon carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 65: 2193–2198
    1. Jones PA, Baylin SB (2002) The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 3: 415–428
    1. Kim WJ, Kim EJ, Jeong P, Quan C, Kim J, Li QL, Yang JO, Ito Y, Bae SC (2005) RUNX3 inactivation by point mutations and aberrant DNA methylation in bladder tumors. Cancer Res 65: 9347–9354
    1. Lee MG, Kim HY, Byun DS (2001) Frequent epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A in human bladder carcinoma. Cancer Res 61: 6688–6692
    1. Liang G, Gonzales FA, Jones PA, Orntoft TF, Thykjaer T (2002) Analysis of gene induction in human fibroblasts and bladder cancer cells exposed to the methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Cancer Res 62: 961–966
    1. Markl ID, Cheng J, Liang G (2001) Global and gene-specific epigenetic patterns in human bladder cancer genomes are relatively stable in vivo and in vitro over time. Cancer Res 61: 5875–5884
    1. Marsit CJ, Karagas MR, Andrew A, Liu M, Danaee H, Schned AR, Nelson HH, Kelsey KT (2005) Epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes and TP53 alteration act jointly as markers of invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Res 65: 7081–7085
    1. Muto S, Horie S, Takahashi S (2000) Genetic and epigenetic alterations in normal bladder epithelium in patients with metachronous bladder cancer. Cancer Res 60: 4021–4025
    1. Paz MF, Fraga MF, Avila S, Guo M, Pollan M, Herman JG, Esteller M (2003) A systematic profile of DNA methylation in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 63: 1114–1121
    1. Sanchez-Carbayo M, Socci ND, Charytonowicz E, Lu M, Prystowsky M, Childs G, Cordon-Cardo C (2002) Molecular profiling of bladder cancer using cDNA microarrays: defining histogenesis and biological phenotypes. Cancer Res 62: 6973–6980
    1. Sanchez-Carbayo M, Socci ND, Lozano J, Saint F, Cordon-Cardo C (2006) Defining molecular profiles of poor outcome in patients with invasive bladder cancer using oligonucleotide microarrays. J Clin Oncol 24: 778–789
    1. Soderstrom M, Bohling T, Ekfors T, Nelimarkka L, Aro HT, Vuorio E (2002) Molecular profiling of human chondrosarcomas for matrix production and cancer markers. Int J Cancer 100: 144–151
    1. Stoehr R, Wissmann C, Suzuki H, Knuechel R, Krieg RC, Klopocki E, Dahl E, Wild P, Blaszyk H, Sauter G, Simon R, Schmitt R, Zaak D, Hofstaedter F, Rosenthal A, Baylin SB, Pilarsky C, Hartmann A (2004) Deletions of chromosome 8p and loss of sFRP1 expression are progression markers of papillary bladder cancer. Lab Invest 84: 465–478
    1. Urakami S, Shiina H, Enokida H, Kawakami T, Tokizane T, Ogishima T, Tanaka Y, Li LC, Ribeiro-Filho LA, Terashima M, Kikuno N, Adachi H, Yoneda T, Kishi H, Shigeno K, Konety BR, Igawa M, Dahiya R (2006) Epigenetic inactivation of Wnt inhibitory factor-1 plays an important role in bladder cancer through Aberrant Canonical Wnt/ß-Catenin signaling pathway. Clin Cancer Res 12: 383–391
    1. Wehrli BM, Huang W, De Crombrugghe B, Ayala AG, Czerniak B (2003) Sox9, a master regulator of chondrogenesis, distinguishes mesenchymal chondrosarcoma from other small blue round cell tumors. Hum Pathol 34: 263–269
    1. Wolff EM, Liang G, Jones PA (2005) Mechanisms of disease: genetic and epigenetic alterations that drive bladder cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2: 502–510
    1. Yan PS, Perry MR, Laux DE, Asare AL, Caldwell CW, Huang TH (2000) CpG island arrays: an application toward deciphering epigenetic signatures of breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6: 1432–1438
    1. Yan PS, Wei SH, Huang TH (2002) Differential methylation hybridization using CpG island arrays. Methods Mol Biol 200: 87–100

Source: PubMed

3
購読する