Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Examination of Treatment Outcomes

Raj Singh, Joanne Davis, Sanjeev Sharma, Raj Singh, Joanne Davis, Sanjeev Sharma

Abstract

Objectives The purposes of this study are to assess the effectiveness of CyberKnife® stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in providing both initial and sustained pain relief for patients with both forms of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), assess potential prognostic factors, and examine treatment-related toxicities. Methods The RSSearch(®) Patient Registry was screened for TN cases from July 2007 to June 2015. We evaluated initial pain relief achieved by examining changes in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores following SRS. Prognostic factors relating to initial pain relief and the relationship between maximum dose (Dmax) and toxicity incidence were analyzed via univariate logistic regressions. We evaluated prognostic factors relating to sustained pain relief using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Results Our analysis included 125 TN1 patients and 38 TN2 patients with initial VAS scores ≥ 3 treated at 16 community radiotherapy centers. Median Dmax for both cohorts was 75 Gy with a larger range for TN1 cases (67.42 Gy - 110.29 Gy) as compared to TN2 cases (70.00 Gy - 78.48 Gy). At initial follow-up, mean VAS scores after SRS were significantly lower for TN1 and TN2 patients (p < 0.0001). The vast majority of TN1 (87.2%) and TN2 (86.8%) patients experienced initial pain relief. Higher initial VAS scores (p = 0.015) were correlated with a greater likelihood of initial treatment success for TN1 patients. We did not identify any treatment or patient characteristics that had significant effects on initial pain relief for TN2 patients. Of the TN1 cohort, 28 of 125 patients reported follow-ups one year or greater after SRS. Twenty-three of 28 TN1 patients (82%) reported VAS scores of 1 or less at one-year follow-up, and eight of 11 patients (72%) had VAS scores of 1 or less at the two-year follow-up. No potential prognostic factors for long-term pain relief were significant. Roughly 18% and 11% of TN1 and TN2 patients, respectively, experienced acute toxicities (all RTOG Grade 1 or 2), with the most common being sensory neuropathy, generalized pain, and nausea. Dmax > 75 Gy was not a predictor of toxicity incidence in TN1 cases (p = 0.597) but was significant for TN2 patients (p = 0.0009 following Fisher's exact test). Conclusions SRS is an effective treatment option for TN patients in community settings. Initial pain relief following SRS was achieved in a vast majority of TN patients with associated minor toxicities observed in less than 20% of all patients.

Keywords: facial pain; registry; srs; stereotactic radiosurgery; trigeminal neuralgia.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Distribution of changes in VAS…
Figure 1. Distribution of changes in VAS scores among TN1 patients following SRS
Figure 2. Distribution of changes in VAS…
Figure 2. Distribution of changes in VAS scores among TN2 patients following SRS
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier Curve for Sustained Pain…
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier Curve for Sustained Pain Relief Following SRS

References

    1. Trigeminal Neuralgia Fact Sheet. [Oct;2015 ]; 2013
    1. Antiepileptic drugs in the management of cluster headache and trigeminal neuralgia. Rozen TD. Headache. 2001;41:0–32.
    1. Pharmacotherapy of trigeminal neuralgia. Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. Clin J Pain. 2002;18:22–27.
    1. Trigeminal neuralgia: what are the important factors for good operative outcomes with microvascular decompression. Li ST, Pan Q, Liu N, Shen F, Liu Z, Guan Y. . Surg Neurol. 2004;62:400–404.
    1. Studies on the operative outcomes and mechanisms of microvascular decompression in treating typical and atypical trigeminal neuralgia. Li ST, Wang X, Pan Q, Hai J, Liu N, Shen F, Liu Z, Guan Y. Clin J Pain. 2005;21:311–316.
    1. Xia L, Zhong J, Zhu J, Wang YN, Dou NN, Liu MX, Visocchi M, Li ST. J Craniofac Surg. Vol. 25. Jul: 2014. Effectiveness and safety of microvascular decompression surgery for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review; pp. 1413–1417.
    1. Treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of long-term outcome after radiofrequency rhizotomy and microvascular decompression. Tronnier VM, Rasche D, Hamer J, Kienle AL, Kunze S. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:1261–1267.
    1. Glycerol rhizolysis for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Young RF. J Neurosurg. 1988;69:39–45.
    1. Technical difficulties and perioperative complications of retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia. Blomstedt PC, Bergenheim AT. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2002;79:168–181.
    1. The stereotaxic method and radiosurgery of the brain. Leksell L. Acta Chir Scand. 1951;102:316–319.
    1. Effect of various surgical modalities in recurrent or persistent trigeminal neuralgia. Han I, Shin D, Chang J, Kim K, Chang J, Huh R, Chung S. Stereotactic Funct Neurosurg. 2010;88:156–162.
    1. Radiosurgery in trigeminal neuralgia. Lettmaier S. Phys Med. 2014;30:592–595.
    1. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: the initial experience of The Barrow Neurological Institute. Rogers CL, Shetter AG, Fiedler JA, Smith KA, Han PP, Speiser BL. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:1013–1019.
    1. Long-term outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for classic trigeminal neuralgia: implications of treatment and critical review of the literature. Clinical article. Dhople AA, Adams JR, Maggio WW, Naqvi SA, Regine WF, Kwok Y. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:351–358.
    1. Linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Varela-Lema L, Lopez-Garcia M, Maceira-Rozas M, Munoz-Garzon V. . Pain Physician. 2015;18:15–27.
    1. The RSSearch™ Registry: patterns of care and outcomes research on patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy. Davis JN, Medbery C 3rd, Sharma S, Danish A, Mahadevan A. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:275.
    1. Image-guided robotic radiosurgery. Adler JR Jr, Murphy MJ, Chang SD, Hancock SL. . Neurosurgery. 1999;44:1299–1306.
    1. Adult measures of pain: The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale (RAPS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Verbal Descriptive Scale (VDS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and West Haven-Yale Multidisciplinary Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) Burckhardt CS, Jones KD. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:0.
    1. Cost-effectiveness analysis for trigeminal neuralgia: Cyberknife vs microvascular decompression. Tarricone R, Aguzzi G, Musi F, Fariselli L, Casasco A. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2008;4:647–652.
    1. Cyberknife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia treatment: a preliminary multicenter experience. Villavicencio AT, Lim M, Burneikiene S, Romanelli P, Adler JR, McNeely L, Chang SD, Fariselli L, McIntyre M, Bower R, Broggi G, Thramann JJ. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:647–655.
    1. CyberKnife radiosurgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Lim M, Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Chang SD, Romanelli P, McNeely L, McIntyre M, Thramann JJ, Adler JR. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18:0.
    1. Cyberknife radiosurgery in treating trigeminal neuralgia. Lazzara BM, Ortiz O, Bordia R, Witten MR, Haas JA, Katz AJ, Brown JA. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5:81–85.
    1. Outcomes following single-treatment Gamma Knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia with a minimum 3-year follow-up. Riesenburger RI, Hwang SW, Schirmer CM, Zerris V, Wu JK, Mahn K, Klimo P Jr, Mignano J, Thompson CJ, Yao KC. J Neurosurg. 2010;112:766–771.
    1. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a study of predictors of success, efficacy, safety, and outcome at LSUHSC. Shaya M, Jawahar A, Caldito G, Sin A, Willis BK, Nanda A. . Surg Neurol. 2004;61:529–534.
    1. Refractory trigeminal neuralgia treatment outcomes following CyberKnife radiosurgery. Karam SD, Tai A, Snider JW, Bhatia S, Bedrick EJ, Rashid A, Jay A, Kalhorn C, Nair N, Harter KW, Collins SP, Jean W. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:257.
    1. The very long-term outcome of radiosurgery for classical trigeminal neuralgia. Régis J, Tuleasca C, Resseguier N, Carron R, Donnet A, Yomo S, Gaudart J, Levivier M. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2016;94:24–32.
    1. Predictive nomogram for the durability of pain relief from gamma knife radiation surgery in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Lucas JT, Nida AM, Isom S, Marshall K, Bourland JD, Laxton AW, Tatter SB, Chan MD. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89:120–126.
    1. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: results and expectations. Kondziolka D, Perez B, Flickinger JC, Habeck M, Lunsford LD. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:1524–1529.
    1. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: idiopathic and tumor related. Young RF, Vermeulen SS, Grimm P, Blasko J, Posewitz A. Neurology. 1997;48:608–614.
    1. Cyberknife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Romanelli P, Heit G, Chang SD, Martin D, Pham C, Adler J. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2003;81:105–109.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する