Clinical, Ultrasound, and Predictability Outcomes Following Certolizumab Pegol Treatment (with Methotrexate) in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: 52-Week Results from the CZP-SPEED Study

Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini, Emilio Filippucci, Silvano Adami, Pier Luigi Meroni, Alberto Batticciotto, Luca Idolazzi, Orazio De Lucia, Pablo Talavera, Thomas Kumke, Walter Grassi, Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini, Emilio Filippucci, Silvano Adami, Pier Luigi Meroni, Alberto Batticciotto, Luca Idolazzi, Orazio De Lucia, Pablo Talavera, Thomas Kumke, Walter Grassi

Abstract

Introduction: To assess the impact of certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment on clinical, patient-reported, and musculoskeletal ultrasound outcomes and to determine the treatment response time point most predictive of long-term outcomes in Italian patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: CZP-SPEED (NCT01443364) was a 52-week, open-label, prospective, interventional, multicenter study. Biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe active RA, who had failed at least one DMARD treatment, received CZP (400 mg at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then 200 mg every 2 weeks) concomitantly with methotrexate. The primary objective was to identify the time point of clinical response {decrease in 28-joint Disease Activity Score [DAS28(ESR)] ≥ 1.2} most predictive of a clinical response at week 52. Additional clinical and patient-reported outcomes were measured. Power Doppler (PD) ultrasound was used to assess synovial effusion, synovial proliferation, PD signal, cartilage damage, and bone erosion according to international guidelines.

Results: A total of 132 patients were enrolled and received CZP; 91/132 (69%) completed to week 52. Predicted 52-week responses for early responders (week 2 onwards) were between 65% and 70%. Rapid improvements in joint cavity widening and PD signal were observed to week 8 and maintained to week 52. Cartilage damage and bone erosion were stable over 52 weeks. No new safety signals were identified.

Conclusion: In Italian CZP-treated patients with moderate-to-severe RA, week 12 clinical responses may be predictive of long-term response at week 52. Rapid improvements in clinical, patient-reported, and musculoskeletal ultrasound outcomes were maintained to week 52. These data may aid rheumatologists to make earlier treatment decisions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01443364.

Funding: UCB Pharma.

Keywords: Anti-TNF; Certolizumab pegol; Patient-reported outcome; Predictability; Rheumatoid arthritis; Rheumatology; Ultrasound.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram showing patient disposition throughout the SPEED study. aPatients who provided DAS28(ESR) values (observed case). bPatients who provided joint cavity widening and synovial proliferation values (observed case). FAS full analysis set, PDUS Power Doppler ultrasound, SS safety set
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Positive predictive value (PPV): percentage of patients with DAS28(ESR) clinical response at week 52 who also had clinical response at an early time point. Data reported for the full analysis set, n = 131. Missing values were imputed using non-responder imputation (NRI). Clinical response was defined as a reduction of at least 1.2 in DAS28(ESR). DAS28 28-joint disease activity score, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, NRI non-responder imputation, PPV positive predictive value
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Evaluation of a positive predictive values (PPV), b area under the curve (AUC), and c negative predictive values (NPV) of clinical response at time points up to week 12. Data are reported for the full analysis set (RA duration of at most 1 year, n = 29; RA duration greater than 1 year, n = 102). Missing data were imputed using non-responder imputation (NRI). Data are provided for observed cases (OC) and NRI. Clinical responses at week 1 to week 12 were defined as a reduction of at least 1.2 from baseline in DAS28(ESR). AUC and NPV data were unavailable for patients with RA duration of at most 1 year (OC) at week 12. AUC area under the curve, NPV negative predictive value, NRI non-responder imputation, OC observed case, PPV positive predictive value, RA rheumatoid arthritis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
DAS28(ESR) response logistic regression analysis. Data are reported for the full analysis set (n = 131). Data were imputed using non-responder imputation (NRI). [a]Early responders were defined as the response, for each patient, at the visit where the highest area under curve (AUC) was observed. Clinical response at week 52 is defined as a reduction of at least 1.2 from baseline in DAS28(ESR). The odds ratio, CI and p value are from a logistic regression model with early responders as fixed effects and baseline DAS28(ESR) score, gender, age, and duration of RA as factors. An odds ratio greater than 1 indicates a higher response rate in the first category [e.g., DAS28(ESR) ≥ 5.1] compared to the second category [e.g., DAS28(ESR) < 5.1]. CI confidence interval, DAS28 28-joint disease activity score, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, RA rheumatoid arthritis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Improvements in clinical and patient-reported outcomes up to week 52 of the CZP-SPEED study. Data are reported for the full analysis set (n = 131). Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward for continuous variables and non-responder imputation for binary data. Patients rated their level of arthritis pain on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 indicated “no pain” and 100 indicated “most severe pain”. DAS28 28-joint disease activity score, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, HAQ-DI health assessment questionnaire disability index, LOCF last observation carried forward, NRI non-responder imputation, PtAAP patient assessment of arthritis pain, VAS visual analogue scale (0–100 mm)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mean improvement in joint cavity widening (a, c) and PD signal (b, d) measured with PDUS over time in metacarpophalangeal joints (MCPs). Groups are analyzed by MCP joint, n = 66 (a, b) and duration of RA (c, d). Data are reported for the full analysis set in patients eligible for the PDUS subgroup (n = 66). Joint cavity widening scores (0–3 scale; 0 = no effusion/hypertrophy, 1 = minimal effusion/hypertrophy, 2 = moderate effusion/hypertrophy, 3 = extensive effusion/hypertrophy). Power Doppler signal was based on the 4-point scale ranging from 0 (normal/minimal blood flow) to 3 (marked blood flow). Missing values were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). Patients within the PDUS subset had at most 2 years duration of RA and proof of at least two of the following: synovial proliferation, synovial vascularization, or presence of fluid in at least one MCP joint. MCP metacarpophalangeal joints, PD Power Doppler, PDUS Power Doppler ultrasound, RA rheumatoid arthritis

References

    1. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):960–977. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715.
    1. McDonnell T, Ioannou Y, Rahman A. PEGylated drugs in rheumatology—why develop them and do they work? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53(3):391–396. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket278.
    1. Pasut G. Pegylation of biological molecules and potential benefits: pharmacological properties of certolizumab pegol. BioDrugs. 2014;28(1):15–23. doi: 10.1007/s40259-013-0064-z.
    1. Vashisht P, O’Dell J. Not all TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis are created equal: important clinical differences. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2017;17(8):989–999. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2017.1340453.
    1. Fechtenbaum M, Yusof MYM, Emery P. Certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: current update. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2014;14(6):841–850. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2014.900043.
    1. Palframan R, Airey M, Moore A, Vugler A, Nesbitt A. Use of biofluorescence imaging to compare the distribution of certolizumab pegol, adalimumab, and infliximab in the inflamed paws of mice with collagen-induced arthritis. J Immunol Methods. 2009;348(1):36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2009.06.009.
    1. Van Der Heijde D, Keystone EC, Curtis JR, et al. Timing and magnitude of initial change in disease activity score 28 predicts the likelihood of achieving low disease activity at 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol: a post hoc analysis of the RAPID 1 trial. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(7):1326–1333. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111171.
    1. Keystone EC, Curtis JR, Fleischmann RM, et al. Rapid improvement in the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis following certolizumab pegol treatment predicts better longterm outcomes: post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(6):990–996. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100935.
    1. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, et al. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(1):3–15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524.
    1. Bhasin S, Cheung PP. The role of power Doppler ultrasonography as disease activity marker in rheumatoid arthritis. Dis Mark. 2015;2015:9.
    1. Colebatch AN, Edwards CJ, Østergaard M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(6):804–814. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203158.
    1. Døhn UM, Ejbjerg BJ, Hasselquist M, et al. Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(4):R110. doi: 10.1186/ar1995.
    1. Filippucci E, Di Geso L, Grassi W. Progress in imaging in rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10(10):628–634. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.145.
    1. Tămaş M-M, Filippucci E, Becciolini A, et al. Bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: ultrasound findings in the early stage of the disease. Rheumatology. 2014;53(6):1100–1107. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket484.
    1. Vreju F, Filippucci E, Gutierrez M, et al. Subclinical ultrasound synovitis in a particular joint is associated with ultrasound evidence of bone erosions in that same joint in rheumatoid patients in clinical remission. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016;34(4):673–678.
    1. Naredo E, Collado P, Cruz A, et al. Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(1):116–124. doi: 10.1002/art.22461.
    1. Sreerangaiah D, Grayer M, Fisher BA, Ho M, Abraham S, Taylor PC. Quantitative power Doppler ultrasound measures of peripheral joint synovitis in poor prognosis early rheumatoid arthritis predict radiographic progression. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55(1):89–93. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev305.
    1. Ten Cate DF, Luime JJ, Swen N, et al. Role of ultrasonography in diagnosing early rheumatoid arthritis and remission of rheumatoid arthritis—a systematic review of the literature. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(1):R4. doi: 10.1186/ar4132.
    1. Caporali R, Conti F, Alivernini S, et al. Recommendations for the use of biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: update from the Italian Society for Rheumatology I. Efficacy. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29(3 Suppl 66):S7–S14.
    1. UCB Pharma. Cimzia® summary of product characteristics: UCB Pharma; 2018. . Accessed 31 May 2018.
    1. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, et al. American College of Rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(6):727–735. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380602.
    1. van Gestel AM, Haagsma CJ, van Riel PL. Validation of rheumatoid arthritis improvement criteria that include simplified joint counts. Arthritis Rheumatol. 1998;41(10):1845–1850. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199810)41:10<1845::AID-ART17>;2-K.
    1. van der Heijde D. How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(1):261–263.
    1. Sokka T. Radiographic scoring in rheumatoid arthritis. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(2):166–168.
    1. Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Kahler E, et al. A novel ultrasonographic synovitis scoring system suitable for analyzing finger joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(3):733–743. doi: 10.1002/art.20939.
    1. Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(12):2485–2487.
    1. Brown AK, Quinn MA, Karim Z, et al. Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(12):3761–3773. doi: 10.1002/art.22190.
    1. Newman JS, Laing TJ, McCarthy CJ, Adler RS. Power Doppler sonography of synovitis: assessment of therapeutic response—preliminary observations. Radiology. 1996;198(2):582–584. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596870.
    1. Filippucci E, da Luz KR, Di Geso L, et al. Interobserver reliability of ultrasonography in the assessment of cartilage damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(10):1845–1848. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.125179.
    1. Disler DG, Raymond E, May DA, Wayne JS, McCauley TR. Articular cartilage defects: in vitro evaluation of accuracy and interobserver reliability for detection and grading with US. Radiology. 2000;215(3):846–851. doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn20846.
    1. Gutierrez M, Filippucci E, Ruta S, et al. Inter-observer reliability of high-resolution ultrasonography in the assessment of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: experience of an intensive dedicated training programme. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50(2):373–380. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq320.
    1. Curtis JR, Churchill M, Kivitz A, et al. A randomized trial comparing disease activity measures for the assessment and prediction of response in rheumatoid arthritis patients initiating certolizumab pegol. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(12):3104–3112. doi: 10.1002/art.39322.
    1. Weinblatt ME, Fleischmann R, van Vollenhoven RF, et al. Twenty-eight-week results from the REALISTIC phase IIIb randomized trial: efficacy, safety and predictability of response to certolizumab pegol in a diverse rheumatoid arthritis population. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:325. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0841-9.
    1. Mohammed RH, Farahat F, Kewan HH, Bukhari MA. Predictors of European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response, DAS-28 remission and sustained responses to TNF-inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study in refractory disease. SpringerPlus. 2015;4:207. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-0979-6.
    1. Strand V, Mease P, Burmester GR, et al. Rapid and sustained improvements in health-related quality of life, fatigue, and other patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate over 1 year: results from the RAPID 1 randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(6):R170. doi: 10.1186/ar2859.
    1. Smolen J, Landewé RB, Mease P, et al. Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis: the RAPID 2 study. A randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):797–804. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.101659.
    1. Genovese MC, Bathon JM, Martin RW, et al. Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(6):1443–1450. doi: 10.1002/art.10308.
    1. Chatzidionysiou K, Kristensen LE, Eriksson J, van Askling J, Vollenhoven R, ARTIS Group Effectiveness and survival-on-drug of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: results from the national Swedish register. Scand J Rheumatol. 2015;44(6):431–437. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2015.1026840.
    1. Szkudlarek M, Klarlund M, Narvestad E, et al. Ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography and clinical examination. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(2):R52. doi: 10.1186/ar1904.
    1. Walther M, Harms H, Krenn V, Radke S, Faehndrich TP, Gohlke F. Correlation of power Doppler sonography with vascularity of the synovial tissue of the knee joint in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(2):331–338. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200102)44:2<331::AID-ANR50>;2-0.
    1. Naredo E, Moller I, Cruz A, Carmona L, Garrido J. Power Doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(8):2248–2256. doi: 10.1002/art.23682.
    1. Seymour MW, Kelly S, Beals CR, et al. Ultrasound of metacarpophalangeal joints is a sensitive and reliable endpoint for drug therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomized, two-center placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(5):R198. doi: 10.1186/ar4034.
    1. Iagnocco A, Filippucci E, Perella C, et al. Clinical and ultrasonographic monitoring of response to adalimumab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(1):35–40.
    1. Iagnocco A, Perella C, Naredo E, et al. Etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: clinical follow-up over one year by ultrasonography. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27(4):491–496. doi: 10.1007/s10067-007-0738-3.
    1. Filippucci E, Iagnocco A, Salaffi F, Cerioni A, Valesini G, Grassi W. Power Doppler sonography monitoring of synovial perfusion at the wrist joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(11):1433–1437. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.044628.
    1. Taylor PC, Steuer A, Gruber J, et al. Comparison of ultrasonographic assessment of synovitis and joint vascularity with radiographic evaluation in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of infliximab therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(4):1107–1116. doi: 10.1002/art.20123.
    1. Fiocco U, Ferro F, Vezzu M, et al. Rheumatoid and psoriatic knee synovitis: clinical, grey scale, and power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the response to etanercept. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(6):899–905. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.025585.
    1. Epis O, Filippucci E, Delle Sedie A, De Matthaeis A, Bruschi E. Clinical and ultrasound evaluation of the response to tocilizumab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a case series. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(5):737–742. doi: 10.1007/s00296-012-2638-3.
    1. Kawashiri S-Y, Michitsuji T, Kawakami A. Certolizumab pegol was effective for treating residual synovitis after total knee arthroplasty in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis: therapeutic monitoring by ultrasound. J Med Ultrason. 2018;45(2):371–374. doi: 10.1007/s10396-017-0806-5.
    1. S-y Kawashiri, Fujikawa K, Nishino A, et al. Ultrasound-detected bone erosion is a relapse risk factor after discontinuation of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis whose ultrasound power Doppler synovitis activity and clinical disease activity are well controlled. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1320-2.
    1. Manara M, Sinigaglia L. Bone and TNF in rheumatoid arthritis: clinical implications. RMD Open. 2015;1(Suppl 1):e000065. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000065.
    1. den Broeder AA, Joosten LAB, Saxne T, et al. Long term anti-tumour necrosis factor α monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: effect on radiological course and prognostic value of markers of cartilage turnover and endothelial activation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(4):311–318. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.4.311.
    1. Finckh A, Simard JF, Duryea J, et al. The effectiveness of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in preventing progressive radiographic joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(1):54–59. doi: 10.1002/art.21491.
    1. Bykerk VP, Cush J, Winthrop K, et al. Update on the safety profile of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: an integrated analysis from clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(1):96–103. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203660.
    1. Ramiro S, Sepriano A, Chatzidionysiou K, et al. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):1101–1136. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210708.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する