Testing a self-determination theory model of children's physical activity motivation: a cross-sectional study

Simon J Sebire, Russell Jago, Kenneth R Fox, Mark J Edwards, Janice L Thompson, Simon J Sebire, Russell Jago, Kenneth R Fox, Mark J Edwards, Janice L Thompson

Abstract

Background: Understanding children's physical activity motivation, its antecedents and associations with behavior is important and can be advanced by using self-determination theory. However, research among youth is largely restricted to adolescents and studies of motivation within certain contexts (e.g., physical education). There are no measures of self-determination theory constructs (physical activity motivation or psychological need satisfaction) for use among children and no previous studies have tested a self-determination theory-based model of children's physical activity motivation. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of scores derived from scales adapted to measure self-determination theory constructs among children and test a motivational model predicting accelerometer-derived physical activity.

Methods: Cross-sectional data from 462 children aged 7 to 11 years from 20 primary schools in Bristol, UK were analysed. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the construct validity of adapted behavioral regulation and psychological need satisfaction scales. Structural equation modelling was used to test cross-sectional associations between psychological need satisfaction, motivation types and physical activity assessed by accelerometer.

Results: The construct validity and reliability of the motivation and psychological need satisfaction measures were supported. Structural equation modelling provided evidence for a motivational model in which psychological need satisfaction was positively associated with intrinsic and identified motivation types and intrinsic motivation was positively associated with children's minutes in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

Conclusions: The study provides evidence for the psychometric properties of measures of motivation aligned with self-determination theory among children. Children's motivation that is based on enjoyment and inherent satisfaction of physical activity is associated with their objectively-assessed physical activity and such motivation is positively associated with perceptions of psychological need satisfaction. These psychological factors represent potential malleable targets for interventions to increase children's physical activity.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sequential model of motivation predicting moderate-to-vigorous physical activity of primary school children. Note: Parameter estimates are standardized. Solid arrows represent significant estimates (all p <.003) and dashed arrows represent non-significant estimates (p>.05). Values in parentheses are robust standard errors. Co-variances between disturbance terms of theoretically-related motivation variables were: Covintrinsic-identified = .53 (.147) p <.001; Covintrojected-external = .68 (.054) p <.001.

References

    1. OECD. Health at a Glance: Europe 2012. 2012. http//.
    1. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297–322. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100.
    1. Plotnikoff RC, Costigan SA, Karunamuni N, Lubans DR. Social cognitive theories used to explain physical activity behavior in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2013;56:245–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.013.
    1. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11:227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
    1. Teixeira PJ, Carraca EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2012;9:78. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-78.
    1. Standage M, Ryan RM. In: Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. 3. Roberts GC, Treasure DC, editor. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2012. Self-Determination Theory and Exercise Motivation: Facilitating Self-Regulatory Processes to Support and Maintain Health and Well-being; pp. 233–270.
    1. Fortier MS, Duda JL, Guerin E, Teixeira PJ. Promoting physical activity: development and testing of self-determination theory-based interventions. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:20. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-20.
    1. Hagger M, Chatzisarantis NLD, Hein V, Soos I, Karsai I, Lintunen T, Leemans S. Teacher, peer and parent autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: a trans-contextual model of motivation in four nations. Psychol Health. 2009;24:689–711. doi: 10.1080/08870440801956192.
    1. Gillison FB, Standage M, Skevington SM. Motivation and body-related factors as discriminators of change in adolescents' exercise behavior profiles. J Adolesc Health. 2011;48:44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.05.006.
    1. Bagoien TE, Halvari H. Autonomous motivation: involvement in physical activity, and perceived sport competence: structural and mediator models. Percept Mot Skills. 2005;100:3–21. doi: 10.2466/pms.100.1.3-21.
    1. Aelterman N, Vansteenkiste M, Van Keer H, Van den Berghe L, De Meyer J, Haerens L. Students' objectively measured physical activity levels and engagement as a function of between-class and between-student differences in motivation toward physical education. J Sport Exercise Psy. 2012;34:457–480.
    1. Lonsdale C, Sabiston CM, Raedeke TD, Ha ASC, Sum RKW. Self-determined motivation and students' physical activity during structured physical education lessons and free choice periods. Prev Med. 2009;48:69–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.09.013.
    1. Gao Z, Hannon JC, Newton M, Huang C. Effects of curricular activity on students' situational motivation and physical activity levels. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82:536–544. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599786.
    1. Vierling KK, Standage M, Treasure DC. Predicting attitudes and physical activity in an "at-risk" minority youth sample: A test of self-determination theory. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2007;8:795–817. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.12.006.
    1. Standage M, Gillison FB, Ntoumanis N, Treasure DC. Predicting students' physical activity and health-related well-being: a prospective cross-domain investigation of motivation across school physical education and exercise settings. J Sport Exercise Psy. 2012;34:37–60.
    1. Verloigne M, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Tanghe A, D'Hondt E, Theuwis L, Vansteenkiste M, Deforche B. Self-determined motivation towards physical activity in adolescents treated for obesity: an observational study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:97. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-97.
    1. Rosenkranz RR, Lubans DR, Peralta LR, Bennie A, Sanders T, Lonsdale C. A cluster-randomized controlled trial of strategies to increase adolescents' physical activity and motivation during physical education lessons: the Motivating Active Learning in Physical Education (MALP) trial. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:834. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-834.
    1. Owen KB, Astell-Burt T, Lonsdale C. The relationship between self-determined motivation and physical activity in adolescent boys. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53:420–422. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.05.007.
    1. Ingledew DK, Sullivan G. Effects of body mass and body image on exercise motives in adolescence. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2002;3:323–338. doi: 10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00029-2.
    1. Pellegrini AD, Smith PK. Physical activity play: the nature and function of a neglected aspect of playing. Child Dev. 1998;69:577–598.
    1. Dishman RK, Saunders RP, McIver KL, Dowda M, Pate RR. Construct validity of selected measures of physical activity beliefs and motives in fifth and sixth grade boys and girls. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013.
    1. Sebire SJ, Standage M, Vansteenkiste M. Examining intrinsic versus extrinsic exercise goals: cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. J Sport Exercise Psy. 2009;31:189–210.
    1. Vansteenkiste M, Niemiec CP, Soenens B. In: Advances in Motivation and Achievement. Urdan T, Karabenick S, editor. Vol. 16. UK: Emerald Publishing; 2010. The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions; pp. 105–166.
    1. Ntoumanis N. A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education based on self-determination theory. J Educ Psychol. 2005;97:444–453.
    1. Vlachopoulos SP. The role of self-determination theory variables in predicting middle school students' subjective vitality in physical education. Hell J Psychol. 2012;9:179–204.
    1. Barkoukis V, Hagger MS, Lambropoulos G, Tsorbatzoudis H. Extending the trans-contextual model in physical education and leisure-time contexts: examining the role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Br J Educ Psychol. 2010;80:647–670. doi: 10.1348/000709910X487023.
    1. Jago R, Edwards MJ, Cooper AR, Fox KR, Powell J, Sebire SJ, Spears M, Thompson JL, Montgomery AA. Action 3:30: protocol for a randomized feasibility trial of a teaching assistant led extracurricular physical activity intervention. Trials. 2013;14
    1. Jago R, Fox KR, Page AS, Brockman R, Thompson JL. Parent and child physical activity and sedentary time: do active parents foster active children? BMC Public Health. 2010;10 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-1110-1194.
    1. Mullan E, Markland D, Ingledew DK. A graded conceptualisation of self-determination in the regulation of exercise behaviour: Development of a measure using confirmatory factor analysis. Pers Indiv Differ. 1997;23:745–752. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00107-4.
    1. Gillison F, Standage M, Skevington SM. Relationships among adolescents' weight perceptions, exercise goals, exercise motivation, quality of life and leisure-time exercise behaviour: a self-determination theory approach. Health Educ Res. 2006;21:836–847. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl139.
    1. Deci EL, Ryan RM, Williams GC. Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learn Individ Differ. 1996;8:165–183. doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90013-8.
    1. Guay F, Chanal J, Ratelle CF, Marsh HW, Larose S, Boivin M. Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. Br J Educ Psychol. 2010;80:711–735. doi: 10.1348/000709910X499084.
    1. Standage M, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. Brit J Educ Psychol. 2005;75:411–433. doi: 10.1348/000709904X22359.
    1. Wilson PM, Bengoechea EG. The relatedness to others in physical activity scale: evidence for structural and criterion validity. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2010;15:61–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9861.2010.00052.x.
    1. Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008;26:1557–1565. doi: 10.1080/02640410802334196.
    1. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
    1. MacCallum RC. In: Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications. Hoyle RH, editor. CA: Newbury Park Sage; 1995. Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues; pp. 16–36.
    1. Bentler PM, Chou CP. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol Methods Res. 1987;16:78–117. doi: 10.1177/0049124187016001004.
    1. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
    1. Harter S. The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. NY: The Guilford Press; 1999.
    1. Jago R, Sebire SJ. Publishing pilot and feasibility evaluations of behavioural interventions: implications for preventive medicine. Prev Med. 2012;55:548–549. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.07.005.
    1. Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment. Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as sceintific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol. 1995;50:741–749.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する