Validity and reliability of short forms of parental-caregiver perception and family impact scale in a Telugu speaking population of India

Santhosh Kumar, Jeroen Kroon, Ratilal Lalloo, Newell W Johnson, Santhosh Kumar, Jeroen Kroon, Ratilal Lalloo, Newell W Johnson

Abstract

Background: Parental-Caregiver Perception Questionnaire (P-CPQ) and Family Impact Scale (FIS) are commonly used measures to evaluate the parent's perception of the impact of children's oral health on quality of life and family respectively. Recently, shorter forms of P-CPQ and FIS have been developed. No study has sought to validate these short forms in other languages and cultures. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of FIS, 8 and 16-item P-CPQ in a Telugu speaking population of India.

Methods: For this cross-sectional study, a multi-stage random sampling technique was used to recruit 11-13 year-old schoolchildren of Medak district, Telangana, India and their parents (n = 1342). Parents were approached with questionnaires through their children who underwent clinical examinations for dental caries, fluorosis and malocclusion. The translated versions underwent pilot testing (n = 40), test-retest reliability was also assessed (n = 161).

Results: The overall summary scale and subscales of the short forms of P-CPQ and FIS failed to discriminate between the categories of dental caries severity. Also, malocclusion status was not related to the domain or overall scores of both the short forms of P-CPQ. There were significant differences in subscale and overall scores of 16 and 8-item P-CPQ and FIS between the fluorosis categories. Both 16 and 8-item P-CPQ summary scales were significantly related to parent's global rating of oral health (16-item, r = 0.30, p < 0.01; 8-item, r = 0.28, p < 0.01) and overall wellbeing (16-item, r = 0.22, p < 0.01; 8-item, r = 0.22, p < 0.01), thereby exhibiting good construct validity. However, the correlation of emotional and social wellbeing scales of short forms of P-CPQ and FIS with global ratings was of low strength. Cronbach's alphas for FIS, 16-items and 8-items P-CPQ scales were 0.78, 0.83 and 0.71 respectively, while the Intra-Class Correlation coefficients were 0.752, 0.812 and 0.816 respectively. Cronbach's alphas for most of the subscales of short forms of P-CPQ were less than 0.7.

Conclusions: The overall scales of 16 and 8-items P-CPQ scales demonstrated good construct validity while the construct validity of FIS was questionable. Discriminant validity of all the three instruments was good only in relation to fluorosis. Overall scales of all three short forms exhibited acceptable internal consistency and reliability on repeated administrations.

References

    1. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health-related quality of life. J Dent Res. 2002;81:459–63. doi: 10.1177/154405910208100705.
    1. Jokovic A, Locker D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Questionnaire for measuring oral health-related quality of life in eight- to ten-year-old children. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26:512–8.
    1. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Measuring parental perceptions of child oral health-related quality of life. J Public Health Dent. 2003;63:67–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2003.tb03477.x.
    1. Locker D, Jokovic A, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Family impact of child oral and oro-facial conditions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002;30:438–48. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.00015.x.
    1. Goursand D, Ferreira MC, Pordeus IA, Mingoti SA, Veiga RT, Paiva SM. Development of a short form of the Brazilian Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:393–402. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0145-3.
    1. Pahel BT, Rozier RG, Slade GD. Parental perceptions of children’s oral health: the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:6. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-6.
    1. Antunes LA, Luiz RR, Leao AT, Maia LC. Initial assessment of responsiveness of the P-CPQ (Brazilian Version) to describe the changes in quality of life after treatment for traumatic dental injury. Dent Traumatol. 2012;28:256–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01094.x.
    1. Goursand D, Paiva SM, Zarzar PM, Pordeus IA, Grochowski R, Allison PJ. Measuring parental-caregiver perceptions of child oral health-related quality of life: psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the P-CPQ. Braz Dent J. 2009;20:169–74. doi: 10.1590/S0103-64402009000200014.
    1. Vetter TR, Bridgewater CL, McGwin G., Jr An observational study of patient versus parental perceptions of health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with a chronic pain condition: who should the clinician believe? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:85. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-85.
    1. Basgul SS, Uneri OS, Cakin-Memik N. Parents’ perception of the quality of life of children with intellectual disabilities. Turk J Pediatr. 2011;53:541–6.
    1. Gomes MC, Pinto-Sarmento TC, Costa EM, Martins CC, Granville-Garcia AF, Paiva SM. Impact of oral health conditions on the quality of life of preschool children and their families: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:55. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-55.
    1. Barbosa TD, Gaviao MB. Validation of the parental-caregiver perceptions questionnaire: agreement between parental and child reports. J Public Health Dent. 2012;75:255. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2012.00371.x.
    1. Albites U, Abanto J, Bonecker M, Paiva SM, Aguilar-Galvez D, Castillo JL. Parental-caregiver perceptions of child oral health-related quality of life (P-CPQ): Psychometric properties for the peruvian spanish language. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19:e220–4. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19195.
    1. McGrath C, Pang HN, Lo EC, King NM, Hagg U, Samman N. Translation and evaluation of a Chinese version of the child oral health-related quality of life measure. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:267–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00878.x.
    1. Bekes K, John MT, Zyriax R, Schaller HG, Hirsch C. The German version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G11-14): translation process, reliability, and validity in the general population. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:165–71. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0496-5.
    1. Marshman Z, Rodd H, Stem M, Mitchell C, Robinson PG. Evaluation of the Parental Perceptions Questionnaire, a component of the COHQoL, for use in the UK. Community Dent Health. 2007;24:198–204.
    1. Barbosa Tde S, Gaviao MB. Evaluation of the family impact scale for use in Brazil. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17:397–403.
    1. Goursand D, Paiva SM, Zarzar PM, Pordeus IA, Allison PJ. Family Impact Scale (FIS): psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese language version. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2009;10:141–6. doi: 10.1007/BF03262675.
    1. Thomson WM, Foster Page LA, Gaynor WN, Malden PE. Short-form versions of the parental-caregivers perceptions questionnaire and the family impact scale. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41:441–50.
    1. Census of India. Abstract of speakers’ strength of languages and mother tongues – 2000, New Delhi. 2001. . Accessed 21 March 2015.
    1. Klein H, Palmer CE, Knutson JW. Studies on dental caries. I. Dental status and dental needs of elementary school children. Pub Health Rep. 1938;53:751–65. doi: 10.2307/4582532.
    1. Dean TH. Classification of mottled enamel diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc. 1934;21:1421–6.
    1. Organization WH. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 5. France: World Health Organization; 2013.
    1. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dent Cosmos. 1889;41:248–64.
    1. Furman W, Buhrmester D. Parent child relationship questionnaire [PCRQ] parent form. In: Touliatos JPB, Straus MA, editors. Handbook of Family Measurement Techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001. pp. 285–9.
    1. Reitman D, Rhode PC, Hupp SDA, Altobello C. Development and validation of the parental authority questionnaire – revised. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2002;24:119–27. doi: 10.1023/A:1015344909518.
    1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3186–91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
    1. Hemphill JF. Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. Am Psychol. 2003;58:78–9. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.78.
    1. Nunnaly J. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
    1. Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966;19:3–11. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3.
    1. Locker D, Slade G. Association between clinical and subjective indicators of oral health status in an older adult population. Gerodontology. 1994;11:108–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.1994.tb00116.x.
    1. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555.
    1. Wadhwa W. Annual Status of Education Report (Rural) New Delhi: ASER centre; 2014. Government vs Private Schools: Have Things Changed?
    1. ASER-India . Annual Status of Education Report 2014. New Delhi: ASER Centre; 2014.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する