From radical mastectomy to breast-conserving therapy and oncoplastic breast surgery: a narrative review comparing oncological result, cosmetic outcome, quality of life, and health economy

Ahmad Kaviani, Nassim Sodagari, Sara Sheikhbahaei, Vahid Eslami, Nima Hafezi-Nejad, Amin Safavi, Maryam Noparast, Alfred Fitoussi, Ahmad Kaviani, Nassim Sodagari, Sara Sheikhbahaei, Vahid Eslami, Nima Hafezi-Nejad, Amin Safavi, Maryam Noparast, Alfred Fitoussi

Abstract

Surgical management of breast cancer has evolved considerably over the last two decades. There has been a major shift toward less-invasive local treatments, from radical mastectomy to breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS). In order to investigate the efficacy of each of the three abovementioned methods, a literature review was conducted for measurable outcomes including local recurrence, survival, cosmetic outcome, quality of life (QOL), and health economy. From the point of view of oncological result, there is no difference between mastectomy and BCT in local recurrence rate and survival. Long-term results for OBS are not available. The items assessed in the QOL sound a better score for OBS in comparison with mastectomy or BCT. OBS is also associated with a better cosmetic outcome. Although having low income seems to be associated with lower BCT and OBS utilization, prognosis of breast cancer is worse in these women as well. Thus, health economy is the matter that should be studied seriously. OBS is an innovative, progressive, and complicated subspeciality that lacks published randomized clinical trials comparing surgical techniques and objective measures of outcome, especially from oncologic and health economy points of view.

References

    1. Rainsbury RM. Surgery insight: oncoplastic breast-conserving reconstruction—indications, benefits, choices and outcomes. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. 2007;4(11):657–664.
    1. Birido N, Geraghty JG. Quality control in breast cancer surgery. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2005;31(6):577–586.
    1. El-Tamer M. Surgical options as quality of care indicators in breast cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2009;99(7):393–394.
    1. Ohsumi S, Shimozuma K, Morita S, et al. Factors associated with health-related quality-of-life in breast cancer survivors: influence of the type of surgery. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009;39(8):491–496.
    1. Bold RJ. Update: surgical management of breast cancer: today and tomorrow. Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2002;17(1):1–9.
    1. Cothier-Savey I, Rimareix F. Principles of oncoplastic surgery in breast surgery. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthetique. 2008;53(2):102–111.
    1. Pockaj BA, Degnim AC, Boughey JC, et al. Quality of life after breast cancer surgery: what have we learned and where should we go next? Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2009;99(7):447–455.
    1. Sakorafas GH. Breast cancer surgery—historical evolution, current status and future perspectives. Acta Oncologica. 2001;40(1):5–18.
    1. Eggemann H, Ignatov A, Krocker J, et al. Comparative study of surgical margins and cosmetic outcome in lumpectomy versus segmental resection in breast cancer. European Surgical Research. 2011;47(4):231–239.
    1. Exner R, Krois W, Mittlböck M, et al. Objectively measured breast symmetry has no influence on quality of life in breast cancer patients. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2012;38(2):130–136.
    1. von Smitten K. Surgical management of breast cancer in the future. Acta Oncologica. 2000;39(3):437–439.
    1. Fitzal F, Gnant M. Breast conservation: evolution of surgical strategies. The Breast Journal. 2006;12(2):S165–S173.
    1. Haloua MH, Krekel NM, Winters HA, et al. A systematic review of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: current weaknesses and future prospects. Annals of Surgery. 2013;257(4):609–620.
    1. Clough KB, Thomas SS, Fitoussi AD, Couturaud B, Reyal F, Falcou M-C. Reconstruction after conservative treatment for breast cancer: cosmetic sequelae classification revisited. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2004;114(7):1743–1753.
    1. Asgeirsson KS, Rasheed T, McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD. Oncological and cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2005;31(8):817–823.
    1. Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou M-C. Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Annals of Surgery. 2003;237(1):26–34.
    1. Nos C, Fitoussi A, Bourgeois D, Fourquet A, Salmon RJ, Clough KB. Conservative treatment of lower pole breast cancers by bilateral mammoplasty and radiotherapy. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 1998;24(6):508–514.
    1. Papp C, Wechselberger G, Schoeller T. Autologous breast reconstruction after breast-conserving cancer surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1998;102(6):1932–1936.
    1. Masetti R, Pirulli PG, Magno S, Franceschini G, Chiesa F, Antinori A. Oncoplastic techniques in the conservative surgical treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2000;7(4):276–280.
    1. Spear SL, Davison SP. Aesthetic subunits of the breast. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2003;112(2):440–447.
    1. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Wolfe AJ, Tsangaris TN, Pennanen MF. Experience with reduction mammaplasty combined with breast conservation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2003;111(3):1102–1109.
    1. Chang E, Johnson N, Webber B, et al. Bilateral reduction mammoplasty in combination with lumpectomy for treatment of breast cancer in patients with macromastia. American Journal of Surgery. 2004;187(5):647–651.
    1. Petit J-Y, Rietjens M, Garusi C. Breast reconstructive techniques in cancer patients: which ones, when to apply, which immediate and long term risks? Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2001;38(3):231–239.
    1. Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Zanini V, et al. Central small size breast cancer: how to overcome the problem of nipple and areola involvement. European Journal of Cancer A. 1993;29(8):1093–1096.
    1. Losken A, Schaefer TG, Carlson GW, Jones GE, Styblo TM, Bostwick J., III Immediate endoscopic latissimus dorsi flap: risk or benefit in reconstructing partial mastectomy defects. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2004;53(1):1–5.
    1. Newman LA, Kuerer HM, McNeese MD, et al. Reduction mammoplasty improves breast conservation therapy in patients with macromastia. American Journal of Surgery. 2001;181(3):215–220.
    1. Noguchi M, Taniya T, Miyazaki I, Saito Y. Immediate transposition of a latissimus dorsi muscle for correcting a postquadrantectomy breast deformity in Japanese patients. International Surgery. 1990;75(3):166–170.
    1. Dixon JM, Venizelos B, Chan P. Latissimus dorsi mini-flap: a technique for extending breast conservation. The Breast. 2002;11(1):58–65.
    1. Kat CC, Darcy CM, O’Donoghue JM, Taylor AR, Regan PJ. The use of the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap for immediate correction of the deformity resulting from breast conservation surgery. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 1999;52(2):99–103.
    1. Gendy RK, Able JA, Rainsbury RM. Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breast-sparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery. British Journal of Surgery. 2003;90(4):433–439.
    1. Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA. Breast volume replacement using the latissimus dorsi miniflap. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2004;74(3):98–104.
    1. Heneghan HM, Prichard RS, Lyons R, et al. Quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction and skin-sparing mastectomy—a comparison with patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2011;37(11):937–943.
    1. McCready D, Holloway C, Shelley W, et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2005;48(3):185–194.
    1. Giacalone P-L, Roger P, Dubon O, et al. Comparative study of the accuracy of breast resection in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2007;14(2):605–614.
    1. Iwuagwu OC. Additional considerations in the application of oncoplastic approaches. The Lancet Oncology. 2005;6(6):p. 356.
    1. Rew DA. Towards a scientific basis for oncoplastic breast surgery. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2003;29(2):105–106.
    1. Munshi A, Kakkar S, Bhutani R, Jalali R, Budrukkar A, Dinshaw KA. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome in breast conservation. Clinical Oncology. 2009;21(4):285–293.
    1. Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of breast asymmetry after breast-conserving operation for breast cancer. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2008;206(2):274–280.
    1. Preuss J, Lester L, Saunders C. BCCT.core—can a computer program be used for the assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast reconstructive surgery? The Breast. 2012;21(4):597–600.
    1. Berry MG, Fitoussi AD, Curnier A, Couturaud B, Salmon RJ. Oncoplastic breast surgery: a review and systematic approach. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2010;63(8):1233–1243.
    1. Luini A, Gatti G, Zurrida S, et al. The evolution of the conservative approach to breast cancer. The Breast. 2007;16(2):120–129.
    1. Ohsumi S, Shimozuma K, Kuroi K, Ono M, Imai H. Quality of life of breast cancer patients and types of surgery for breast cancer—current status and unresolved issues. Breast Cancer. 2007;14(1):66–73.
    1. Tkachenko GA, Arslanov KS, Iakovlev VA, et al. Long-term impact of plastic reconstruction on quality of life among breast cancer patients. Voprosy Onkologii. 2008;54(6):724–728.
    1. Huguet PR, Morais SS, Osis MJD, Pinto-Neto AM, Gurgel MSC. Quality of life and sexuality of women treated for breast cancer. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. 2009;31(2):61–67.
    1. Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Carter N, Winefield HR. Qualitative assessment of breast reconstruction in a specialist breast unit. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2005;75(6):445–453.
    1. Tsai RJ, Dennis LK, Lynch CF, Snetselaar LG, Zamba GKD, Scott-Conner C. The risk of developing arm lymphedema among breast cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of treatment factors. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2009;16(7):1959–1972.
    1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;347(16):1233–1241.
    1. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1995;332(14):907–911.
    1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;347(16):1227–1232.
    1. Kiebert GM, de Haes JCJM, van de Velde CJH. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1991;9(6):1059–1070.
    1. Irwig L, Bennetts A. Quality of life after breast conservation or mastectomy: a systematic review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 1997;67(11):750–754.
    1. Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H. Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2008;134(12):1311–1318.
    1. M Dorval, E Maunsell, L Deschênes, Brisson J. Type of mastectomy and quality of life for long term breast carcinoma survivors. Cancer. 1998;83(10):2130–2138.
    1. Janni W, Rjosk D, Dimpfl TH, et al. Quality of life influenced by primary surgical treatment for stage I-III breast cancer—long-term follow-up of a matched-pair analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2001;8(6):542–548.
    1. Driul L, Bernardi S, Bertozzi S, Schiavon M, Londero AP, Petri R. New surgical trends in breast cancer treatment: conservative interventions and oncoplastic breast surgery. Minerva Ginecologica. 2013;65(3):289–296.
    1. Pillarisetti RR, della Rovere GQ. Oncoplastic breast surgery. The Indian Journal of Surgery. 2012;74(3):255–263.
    1. Veiga DF, Veiga-Filho J, Ribeiro LM, et al. Quality-of-life and self-esteem outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2010;125(3):811–817.
    1. Maguire PD, Adams A, Nichols MA. Oncoplastic surgery and radiation therapy for breast conservation: early outcomes. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2013
    1. Patel KM, Hannan CM, Gatti ME, Nahabedian MY. A head-to-head comparison of quality of life and aesthetic outcomes following immediate, staged-immediate, and delayed oncoplastic reduction mammaplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2011;127(6):2167–2175.
    1. Anderson RT, Kimmick GG, Camacho F, et al. Health system correlates of receipt of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery: a study of low-income medicaid-enrolled women. American Journal of Managed Care. 2008;14(10):644–652.
    1. Roetzheim RG, Chirikos TN, Wells KJ, et al. Managed care and cancer outcomes for medicare beneficiaries with disabilities. American Journal of Managed Care. 2008;14(5):287–296.
    1. Coburn N, Fulton J, Pearlman DN, Law C, DiPaolo B, Cady B. Treatment variation by insurance status for breast cancer patients. The Breast Journal. 2008;14(2):128–134.
    1. Bailey L. Challenges and economics of private breast cancer surgery practice. The Breast. 2010;19(4):297–302.
    1. Robertson S, Wengström Y, Eriksen C, Sandelin K. Breast surgeons performing immediate breast reconstruction with implants—assessment of resource-use and patient-reported outcome measures. The Breast. 2012;21(4):590–596.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する