Sick-listed workers' experiences with motivational interviewing in the return to work process: a qualitative interview study

Vegard Stolsmo Foldal, Martin Inge Standal, Lene Aasdahl, Roger Hagen, Gunnhild Bagøien, Egil Andreas Fors, Roar Johnsen, Marit Solbjør, Vegard Stolsmo Foldal, Martin Inge Standal, Lene Aasdahl, Roger Hagen, Gunnhild Bagøien, Egil Andreas Fors, Roar Johnsen, Marit Solbjør

Abstract

Background: When returning to work after being on long-term sick leave, individuals may experience varying levels of motivation and self-efficacy. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a counseling style that aims to increase motivation towards change, and it may be useful in the return to work (RTW) process. The aim of this study was to explore sick-listed workers' experiences with MI in the RTW process.

Methods: This qualitative study was part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of MI on the RTW process, and it was administered by caseworkers at the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration. Sixteen sick-listed individuals, aged 33-60, participated in semi-structured interviews. All had a sick leave status of 50-100% for at least 8 weeks when interviewed and all had completed 2 MI sessions. The data was analyzed with systematic text condensation.

Results: Participants' experiences of the MI sessions were categorized into three themes: (1) relationship with the MI caseworker, (2) normalizing sick leave, and (3) adjusting RTW strategies. The MI sessions were experienced as a positive encounter due to the supportive relationship that was built between the MI caseworker and the sick-listed worker. Being sick listed led to feelings of guilt and stigmatization, but acceptance and support from the MI caseworkers helped normalize the situation for the sick-listed workers. Furthermore, MI sessions allowed for personalized feedback and discussions on adjustments to their RTW strategies.

Conclusion: Sick-listed workers experienced MI as positive due to the good relationship that developed with the MI caseworker, how this normalized sick leave, and the help they received with adjusting their RTW strategies. Professionals working with individuals attempting to RTW may benefit from using MI as a method for helping sick-listed workers to RTW.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03212118 (registered July 11, 2017).

Keywords: Motivational interviewing; Professional–patient relationship; Qualitative research; Return to work; Self-efficacy; Sick leave.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Waddell G, Burton K. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: TSO; 2006. p. 246.
    1. OECD . Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2010. p. 165.
    1. Lambeek LC, van Mechelen W, Knol DL, Loisel P, Anema JR. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. BMJ. 2010;340:1–7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1035.
    1. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Faber B, Verbeek JH, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Hees HL, Verhoeven AC, et al. Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD006237.
    1. Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T, Ebrahim S, de Boer WE, Busse JW, Kunz R. Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3:CD011618.
    1. Brouwers EP, Terluin B, Tiemens BG, Verhaak PF. Predicting return to work in employees sick-listed due to minor mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):323–332. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9198-8.
    1. Magnussen L, Strand LI, Skouen JS, Eriksen HR. Motivating disability pensioners with back pain to return to work--a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(1):81–87. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0004.
    1. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Noordik E, van Dijk FJ, van der Klink JJ. Return to work perceptions and actual return to work in workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;23(3):290–299. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9389-6.
    1. Andersen MF, Nielsen KM, Brinkmann S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38:93–104. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3257.
    1. Mussener U, Stahl C, Soderberg E. Does the quality of encounters affect return to work? Lay people describe their experiences of meeting various professionals during their rehabilitation process. Work. 2015;52(2):447–455. doi: 10.3233/wor-152121.
    1. Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Bultmann U, van der Klink JJ, Groothoff JW. A prospective study of return to work across health conditions: perceived work attitude, self-efficacy and perceived social support. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):104–112. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9214-z.
    1. Lagerveld SE, Blonk RWB, Brenninkmeijer V, Schaufeli WB. Return to work among employees with mental health problems: development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire. Work Stress. 2010;24(4):359–375. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2010.532644.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. ix ed. New York: Freeman; 1997. p. 604.
    1. Andersen A, Stahl C, Anderzen I, Kristiansson P, Larsson K. Positive experiences of a vocational rehabilitation intervention for individuals on long-term sick leave, the Dirigo project: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):790. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4804-8.
    1. Page KM, Tchernitskaia I. Use of motivational interviewing to improve return-to-work and work-related outcomes: a review. Aus J Rehabil Couns. 2014;20(1):38–49. doi: 10.1017/jrc.2014.5.
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. 3. New York: Guilford Press; 2013. p. 482.
    1. Bagøien G, Bjørngaard JH, Østensen C, Reitan SK, Romundstad P, Morken G. The effects of motivational interviewing on patients with comorbid substance use admitted to a psychiatric emergency unit - a randomised controlled trial with two year follow-up. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-93.
    1. Lai DT, Cahill K, Qin Y, Tang JL. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;20(1):CD006936.
    1. Lundahl B, Moleni T, Burke BL, Butters R, Tollefson D, Butler C, et al. Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(2):157–168. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012.
    1. Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(513):305–312.
    1. DiClemente CC, Corno CM, Graydon MM, Wiprovnick AE, Knoblach DJ. Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: a review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(8):862–887. doi: 10.1037/adb0000318.
    1. Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service. Veiledningsplattformen i NAV [Pamphlet]. Oslo: Arbeids- og veldferdsdirektoratet; 2016.
    1. Flodgren GM, Berg RC. Motivational interviewing as a method to facilitate return to work: a systematic review. Oslo: National Institute of Public Health; 2017. p. 71.
    1. Gross DP, Park J, Rayani F, Norris CM, Esmail S. Motivational interviewing improves sustainable return to work in injured workers after rehabilitation: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(12):2355–2363. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.003.
    1. Aasdahl L, Foldal VS, Standal MI, Hagen R, Johnsen R, Solbjor M, et al. Motivational interviewing in long-term sickness absence: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial followed by qualitative and economic studies. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):756. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5686-0.
    1. OECD . Mental health and work - Norway. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2013.
    1. Statistics Norway . Sickness absence. Oslo: Statistics Norway; 2019.
    1. Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Available from: . Accessed 29 Jan 2020.
    1. Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Available from: . Accessed 30 Sept 2019.
    1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47(9):1102–1114. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102.
    1. Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444.
    1. Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(8):795–805. doi: 10.1177/1403494812465030.
    1. Lannerstrom L, Wallman T, Holmstrom IK. Losing independence–the lived experience of being long-term sick-listed. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:745. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-745.
    1. Andersen MF, Nielsen K, Brinkmann S. How do workers with common mental disorders experience a multidisciplinary return-to-work intervention? A qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(4):709–724. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9498-5.
    1. Moyers T. The relationship in motivational interviewing. Psychotherapy (Chic) 2014;51(3):358–363. doi: 10.1037/a0036910.
    1. Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Flückiger C, Symonds D. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy. 2011;48(1):9–16. doi: 10.1037/a0022186.
    1. Eftedal M, Kvaal AM, Ree E, Oyeflaten I, Maeland S. How do occupational rehabilitation clinicians approach participants on long-term sick leave in order to facilitate return to work? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2709-y.
    1. Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs . Report No. [33] to the Storting (2015-2016). NAV i en ny tid - for arbeid og aktivitet. Oslo: Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs; 2016. p. 83.
    1. Haugli L, Maeland S, Magnussen LH. What facilitates return to work? Patients’ experiences 3 years after occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(4):573–581. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9304-6.
    1. Ståhl C, Müssener U, Svensson T. Implementation of standardized time limits in sickness insurance and return-to-work: experiences of four actors. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(16):1404–1411. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.641667.
    1. Garthwaite K. Becoming incapacitated? Long-term sickness benefit recipients and the construction of stigma and identity narratives. Sociol Health Illn. 2015;37(1):1–13. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12168.
    1. Joachim G, Acorn S. Stigma of visible and invisible chronic conditions. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(1):243–248. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01466.x.
    1. Park J, Gross DP, Rayani F, Norris CM, Roberts MR, James C, et al. Model of human occupation as a framework for implementation of motivational interviewing in occupational rehabilitation. Work. 2019;62(4):629–641. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192895.
    1. Jansson I, Perseius KI, Gunnarsson AB, Bjorklund A. Work and everyday activities: experiences from two interventions addressing people with common mental disorders. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(4):295–304. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2014.894572.
    1. Norlund S, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Nordin M, Stenlund T, Ahlgren C. Personal resources and support when regaining the ability to work: an interview study with exhaustion disorder patients. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):270–279. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9396-7.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する