Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Vancomycin Treatment in Clostridioides difficile-Colonized Patients

Skye R S Fishbein, Tiffany Hink, Kimberly A Reske, Candice Cass, Emily Struttmann, Zainab Hassan Iqbal, Sondra Seiler, Jennie H Kwon, C A Burnham, Gautam Dantas, Erik R Dubberke, Skye R S Fishbein, Tiffany Hink, Kimberly A Reske, Candice Cass, Emily Struttmann, Zainab Hassan Iqbal, Sondra Seiler, Jennie H Kwon, C A Burnham, Gautam Dantas, Erik R Dubberke

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is most commonly diagnosed using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT); the low positive predictive value of these assays results in patients colonized with C. difficile unnecessarily receiving CDI treatment antibiotics. The risks and benefits of antibiotic treatment in individuals with such cases are unknown. Fecal samples of NAAT-positive, toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-negative patients were collected before, during, and after randomization to vancomycin (n = 8) or placebo (n = 7). C. difficile and antibiotic-resistant organisms (AROs) were selectively cultured from fecal and environmental samples. Shotgun metagenomics and comparative isolate genomics were used to understand the impact of oral vancomycin on the microbiome and environmental contamination. Overall, 80% of placebo patients and 71% of vancomycin patients were colonized with C. difficile posttreatment. One person randomized to placebo subsequently received treatment for CDI. In the vancomycin-treated group, beta-diversity (P = 0.0059) and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin (MLS) resistance genes (P = 0.037) increased after treatment; C. difficile and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) environmental contamination was found in 53% of patients and 26% of patients, respectively. We found that vancomycin alters the gut microbiota, does not permanently clear C. difficile, and is associated with VRE colonization/environmental contamination. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT03388268.)IMPORTANCE A gold standard diagnostic for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) does not exist. An area of controversy is how to manage patients whose stool tests positive by nucleic acid amplification tests but negative by toxin enzyme immunoassay. Existing data suggest most of these patients do not have CDI, but most are treated with oral vancomycin. Potential benefits to treatment include a decreased risk for adverse outcomes if the patient does have CDI and the potential to decrease C. difficile shedding/transmission. However, oral vancomycin perturbs the intestinal microbiota and promotes antibiotic-resistant organism colonization/transmission. We conducted a double-blinded randomized controlled trial to assess the risk-benefit of oral vancomycin treatment in this population. Oral vancomycin did not result in long-term clearance of C. difficile, perturbed the microbiota, and was associated with colonization/shedding of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. This work underscores the need to better understand this population of patients in the context of C. difficile/ARO-related outcomes and transmission.

Keywords: C. difficile; vancomycin; vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Copyright © 2021 Fishbein et al.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Vancomycin effect on C. difficile-colonized patient gut microbiomes. (a) Randomized control trial to test the effect of 10 days of oral vancomycin treatment on health-related outcomes in C. difficile-colonized patients. Patient stool and surfaces were sampled to examine patient microbiomes and environmental contamination of hospital environments. (b) Beta-diversity, as measured by Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, distributions of within-patient comparisons between placebo and vancomycin treatment groups. Dissimilarity was significantly different between treatment groups (**, P = 0.0057) as measured by a Wilcoxon rank sum test. (c) Measurement of alpha-diversity (richness) of microbial species in patient fecal samples over time due to vancomycin treatment. Richness was not significantly affected by vancomycin treatment (P = 0.23), as examined by a two-way analysis of variance. (d) Relative abundance of major antibiotic resistance (AMR) classes before (index) and after (week 8) treatment, averaged across patients. MLS, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Patient shedding of C. difficile associated with environmental contamination. (a) Approximate maximum-likelihood tree of 75 C. difficile genomes isolated from patient stool and their environment. Each node represents an isolate found from a patient-time point, where the number before the dash represents the patient and letter after the dash represents the source of the isolate (S, stool; BR, bedrail; C, commode), followed by the number representing the time point of isolation. Isolates colored green represent those recovered from the environment. Color strips represent the outcome of NAAT testing for C. difficile toxins (tcdAB and cdtAB) and in silico MLST typing. (b) Distribution of pairwise single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) distances for each patient-isolate group. Distances are visually classfied in two ways: by time point, either between time point comparisons (green) or within time point comparisons (blue), and by source, either environmental-only comparisons (●), stool-to-environment comparisons (▲), or stool-only comparisons (■).
FIG 3
FIG 3
E. faecium isolates associated with VRE patient shedding/environmental contamination. (a) Pairwise average nucleotide identity (ANI) clustogram between Enterococcus isolates, where the color of the box indicates ANI between two isolate genomes. (b) Approximate maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of E. faecium isolates. Colored boxes indicate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), where resistance status was determined in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. (c) Pairwise SNP distances derived from the core genome alignment. P values were generated through a Wilcoxon rank sum test. ****, <0.0001; ***, <0.001.

References

    1. Guh AY, Mu Y, Winston LG, Johnston H, Olson D, Farley MM, Wilson LE, Holzbauer SM, Phipps EC, Dumyati GK, Beldavs ZG, Kainer MA, Karlsson M, Gerding DN, McDonald LC, Emerging Infections Program Clostridioides difficile Infection Working Group. 2020. Trends in U.S. burden of Clostridioides difficile infection and outcomes. N Engl J Med 382:1320–1330. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1910215.
    1. Eze P, Balsells E, Kyaw MH, Nair H. 2017. Risk factors for Clostridium difficile infections—an overview of the evidence base and challenges in data synthesis. J Glob Health 7:010417. doi:10.7189/jogh.07.010417.
    1. Sohn KM, Peck KR, Joo EJ, Ha YE, Kang CI, Chung DR, Lee NY, Song JH. 2013. Duration of colonization and risk factors for prolonged carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococci after discharge from the hospital. Int J Infect Dis 17:e240–e246. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.09.019.
    1. Cassone M, Mody L. 2015. Colonization with multi-drug resistant organisms in nursing homes: scope, importance, and management. Curr Geriatr Rep 4:87–95. doi:10.1007/s13670-015-0120-2.
    1. Gerding DN, Muto CA, Owens RC Jr. 2008. Measures to control and prevent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 46(Suppl 1):S43–S49. doi:10.1086/521861.
    1. Martin JS, Monaghan TM, Wilcox MH. 2016. Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, diagnosis and understanding transmission. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:206–216. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2016.25.
    1. Burnham CA, Carroll KC. 2013. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories. Clin Microbiol Rev 26:604–630. doi:10.1128/CMR.00016-13.
    1. Koo HL, Van JN, Zhao M, Ye X, Revell PA, Jiang ZD, Grimes CZ, Koo DC, Lasco T, Kozinetz CA, Garey KW, DuPont HL. 2014. Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization and rising C. difficile-associated disease rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35:667–673. doi:10.1086/676433.
    1. Zou J, Leung V, Champagne S, Hinch M, Wong A, Lloyd-Smith E, Nguyen TT, Romney MG, Sharma A, Payne M, Lowe CF. 2018. Clinical heterogeneity of patients with stool samples testing PCR+/Tox- from a two-step Clostridium difficile diagnostic algorithm. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37:2355–2359. doi:10.1007/s10096-018-3383-7.
    1. Buckel WR, Avdic E, Carroll KC, Gunaseelan V, Hadhazy E, Cosgrove SE. 2015. Gut check: Clostridium difficile testing and treatment in the molecular testing era. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 36:217–221. doi:10.1017/ice.2014.19.
    1. Chiu CY, Sarwal A, Feinstein A, Hennessey K. 2019. Effective dosage of oral vancomycin in treatment for initial episode of Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) 8:173. doi:10.3390/antibiotics8040173.
    1. Sayedy L, Kothari D, Richards RJ. 2010. Toxic megacolon associated Clostridium difficile colitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2:293–297. doi:10.4253/wjge.v2.i8.293.
    1. Johnson S, Homann SR, Bettin KM, Quick JN, Clabots CR, Peterson LR, Gerding DN. 1992. Treatment of asymptomatic Clostridium difficile carriers (fecal excretors) with vancomycin or metronidazole. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 117:297–302. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-4-297.
    1. MacPherson CW, Mathieu O, Tremblay J, Champagne J, Nantel A, Girard SA, Tompkins TA. 2018. Gut bacterial microbiota and its resistome rapidly recover to basal state levels after short-term amoxicillin-clavulanic acid treatment in healthy adults. Sci Rep 8:11192. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29229-5.
    1. Li J, Rettedal EA, van der Helm E, Ellabaan M, Panagiotou G, Sommer MOA. 2019. Antibiotic treatment drives the diversification of the human gut resistome. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 17:39–51. doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2018.12.003.
    1. Yamaguchi T, Konishi H, Aoki K, Ishii Y, Chono K, Tateda K. 2020. The gut microbiome diversity of Clostridioides difficile-inoculated mice treated with vancomycin and fidaxomicin. J Infect Chemother 26:483–491. doi:10.1016/j.jiac.2019.12.020.
    1. Sethi AK, Al-Nassir WN, Nerandzic MM, Donskey CJ. 2009. Skin and environmental contamination with vancomycin-resistant enterococci in patients receiving oral metronidazole or oral vancomycin treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30:13–17. doi:10.1086/592710.
    1. Al-Nassir WN, Sethi AK, Li Y, Pultz MJ, Riggs MM, Donskey CJ. 2008. Both oral metronidazole and oral vancomycin promote persistent overgrowth of vancomycin-resistant enterococci during treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2403–2406. doi:10.1128/AAC.00090-08.
    1. Goorhuis A, Bakker D, Corver J, Debast SB, Harmanus C, Notermans DW, Bergwerff AA, Dekker FW, Kuijper EJ. 2008. Emergence of Clostridium difficile infection due to a new hypervirulent strain, polymerase chain reaction ribotype 078. Clin Infect Dis 47:1162–1170. doi:10.1086/592257.
    1. Nerandzic MM, Mullane K, Miller MA, Babakhani F, Donskey CJ. 2012. Reduced acquisition and overgrowth of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Candida species in patients treated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 55:S121–S126. doi:10.1093/cid/cis440.
    1. McElvania Tekippe E, Shuey S, Winkler DW, Butler MA, Burnham CA. 2013. Optimizing identification of clinically relevant Gram-positive organisms by use of the Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system. J Clin Microbiol 51:1421–1427. doi:10.1128/JCM.02680-12.
    1. Hill CM, Krause KM, Lewis SR, Blais J, Benton BM, Mammen M, Humphrey PP, Kinana A, Janc JW. 2010. Specificity of induction of the vanA and vanB operons in vancomycin-resistant enterococci by telavancin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2814–2818. doi:10.1128/AAC.01737-09.
    1. Cui Y, Dong D, Zhang L, Wang D, Jiang C, Ni Q, Wang C, Mao E, Peng Y. 2019. Risk factors for Clostridioides difficile infection and colonization among patients admitted to an intensive care unit in Shanghai, China. BMC Infect Dis 19:961. doi:10.1186/s12879-019-4603-1.
    1. Pilate T, Verhaegen J, Van Ranst M, Saegeman V. 2016. Binary toxin and its clinical importance in Clostridium difficile infection, Belgium. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35:1741–1747. doi:10.1007/s10096-016-2719-4.
    1. Stewart DB, Berg A, Hegarty J. 2013. Predicting recurrence of C. difficile colitis using bacterial virulence factors: binary toxin is the key. J Gastrointest Surg 17:118–124. doi:10.1007/s11605-012-2056-6.
    1. Knetsch CW, Connor TR, Mutreja A, van Dorp SM, Sanders IM, Browne HP, Harris D, Lipman L, Keessen EC, Corver J, Kuijper EJ, Lawley TD. 2014. Whole genome sequencing reveals potential spread of Clostridium difficile between humans and farm animals in the Netherlands, 2002 to 2011. Euro Surveill 19:20954. doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.45.20954.
    1. Johnson SW, Brown SV, Priest DH. 2019. Effectiveness of oral vancomycin for prevention of healthcare facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infection in targeted patients during systemic antibiotic exposure. Clin Infect Dis 71:1133–1139. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz966.
    1. D'Souza AW, Potter RF, Wallace M, Shupe A, Patel S, Sun X, Gul D, Kwon JH, Andleeb S, Burnham CD, Dantas G. 2019. Spatiotemporal dynamics of multidrug resistant bacteria on intensive care unit surfaces. Nat Commun 10:4569. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12563-1.
    1. Hink T, Burnham CA, Dubberke ER. 2013. A systematic evaluation of methods to optimize culture-based recovery of Clostridium difficile from stool specimens. Anaerobe 19:39–43. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.12.001.
    1. Westblade LF, Chamberland RR, MacCannell D, Collins R, Dubberke ER, Dunne WM Jr, Burnham CA. 2013. Development and evaluation of a novel, semiautomated Clostridium difficile typing platform. J Clin Microbiol 51:621–624. doi:10.1128/JCM.02627-12.
    1. Zhou Y, Burnham CA, Hink T, Chen L, Shaikh N, Wollam A, Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Tarr PI, Dubberke ER. 2014. Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of Clostridium difficile isolates: a single-center study. J Clin Microbiol 52:4260–4266. doi:10.1128/JCM.02115-14.
    1. D’Souza AW, Moodley-Govender E, Berla B, Kelkar T, Wang B, Sun X, Daniels B, Coutsoudis A, Trehan I, Dantas G. 2019. Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis increases resistance gene prevalence and alpha-diversity but decreases beta-diversity in the gut microbiome of HIV-exposed uninfected infants. Clin Infect Dis 13:ciz1186. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz1186.
    1. Segata N, Waldron L, Ballarini A, Narasimhan V, Jousson O, Huttenhower C. 2012. Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes. Nat Methods 9:811–814. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2066.
    1. Kaminski J, Gibson MK, Franzosa EA, Segata N, Dantas G, Huttenhower C. 2015. High-specificity targeted functional profiling in microbial communities with ShortBRED. PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004557. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004557.
    1. McArthur AG, Waglechner N, Nizam F, Yan A, Azad MA, Baylay AJ, Bhullar K, Canova MJ, De Pascale G, Ejim L, Kalan L, King AM, Koteva K, Morar M, Mulvey MR, O'Brien JS, Pawlowski AC, Piddock LJ, Spanogiannopoulos P, Sutherland AD, Tang I, Taylor PL, Thaker M, Wang W, Yan M, Yu T, Wright GD. 2013. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3348–3357. doi:10.1128/AAC.00419-13.
    1. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi:10.1089/cmb.2012.0021.
    1. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086.
    1. Takada K, Ono Y. 1989. Synchronous and sequential activation of latently infected Epstein-Barr virus genomes. J Virol 63:445–449. doi:10.1128/JVI.63.1.445-449.1989.
    1. Asherson GL, Colizzi V, Zembala M, James BB, Watkins MC. 1984. Nonspecific inhibitor of contact sensitivity made by T-acceptor cells: triggering of T cells armed with antigen-specific T-suppressor factor (TsF) requires both occupancy of the major histocompatibility complex recognition site by soluble I-J product and cross-linking of the antigen recognition sites of the TsF. Cell Immunol 83:389–397. doi:10.1016/0008-8749(84)90318-6.
    1. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009490.
    1. Letunic I, Bork P. 2019. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W256–W259. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz239.
    1. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Haft DH, Prasad AB, Slotta DJ, Tolstoy I, Tyson GH, Zhao S, Hsu CH, McDermott PF, Tadesse DA, Morales C, Simmons M, Tillman G, Wasilenko J, Folster JP, Klimke W. 2019. Validating the AMRFinder tool and resistance gene database by using antimicrobial resistance genotype-phenotype correlations in a collection of isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00483-19. doi:10.1128/AAC.00483-19.
    1. Page AJ, Taylor B, Delaney AJ, Soares J, Seemann T, Keane JA, Harris SR. 2016. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb Genom 2:e000056. doi:10.1099/mgen.0.000056.
    1. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する