Randomized Double-Blind Phase II Study of Maintenance Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo After First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

Matthew D Galsky, Amir Mortazavi, Matthew I Milowsky, Saby George, Sumati Gupta, Mark T Fleming, Long H Dang, Daniel M Geynisman, Radhika Walling, Robert S Alter, Mohamad Kassar, Jue Wang, Shilpa Gupta, Nancy Davis, Joel Picus, George Philips, David I Quinn, G Kenneth Haines 3rd, Noah M Hahn, Qianqian Zhao, Menggang Yu, Sumanta K Pal, Matthew D Galsky, Amir Mortazavi, Matthew I Milowsky, Saby George, Sumati Gupta, Mark T Fleming, Long H Dang, Daniel M Geynisman, Radhika Walling, Robert S Alter, Mohamad Kassar, Jue Wang, Shilpa Gupta, Nancy Davis, Joel Picus, George Philips, David I Quinn, G Kenneth Haines 3rd, Noah M Hahn, Qianqian Zhao, Menggang Yu, Sumanta K Pal

Abstract

Purpose: Platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer is typically administered for a fixed duration followed by observation until progression. "Switch maintenance" therapy with PD-1 blockade at the time of chemotherapy cessation may be attractive for mechanistic and pragmatic reasons.

Patients and methods: Patients with metastatic urothelial cancer achieving at least stable disease on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned double-blind 1:1 to switch maintenance pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks versus placebo for up to 24 months. Patients with disease progression on placebo could cross over to pembrolizumab. The primary objective was to determine the progression-free survival. Secondary objectives included determining overall survival as well as treatment outcomes according to PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS).

Results: Between December 2015 and November 2018, 108 patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n = 55) or placebo (n = 53). The objective response rate was 23% with pembrolizumab and 10% with placebo. Treatment-emergent grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 59% receiving pembrolizumab and 38% of patients receiving placebo. Progression-free survival was significantly longer with maintenance pembrolizumab versus placebo (5.4 months [95% CI, 3.1 to 7.3 months] v 3.0 months [95% CI; 2.7 to 5.5 months]; hazard ratio, 0.65; log-rank P = .04; maximum efficiency robust test P = .039). Median overall survival was 22 months (95% CI, 12.9 months to not reached) with pembrolizumab and 18.7 months (95% CI, 11.4 months to not reached) with placebo. There was no significant interaction between PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 and treatment arm for progression-free survival or overall survival.

Conclusion: Switch maintenance pembrolizumab leads to additional objective responses in patients achieving at least stable disease with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and prolongs progression-free survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02500121.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram. (*) One patient randomly assigned to placebo was excluded from the analysis because of inconsistent receipt of pembrolizumab rather than placebo during the initial several cycles of study treatment.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) progression-free survival (PFS), and (B) overall survival (OS) in patients treated with pembrolizumab versus placebo (N = 107). MERT, maximum efficiency robust test.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する