Winnowing DNA for rare sequences: highly specific sequence and methylation based enrichment

Jason D Thompson, Gosuke Shibahara, Sweta Rajan, Joel Pel, Andre Marziali, Jason D Thompson, Gosuke Shibahara, Sweta Rajan, Joel Pel, Andre Marziali

Abstract

Rare mutations in cell populations are known to be hallmarks of many diseases and cancers. Similarly, differential DNA methylation patterns arise in rare cell populations with diagnostic potential such as fetal cells circulating in maternal blood. Unfortunately, the frequency of alleles with diagnostic potential, relative to wild-type background sequence, is often well below the frequency of errors in currently available methods for sequence analysis, including very high throughput DNA sequencing. We demonstrate a DNA preparation and purification method that through non-linear electrophoretic separation in media containing oligonucleotide probes, achieves 10,000 fold enrichment of target DNA with single nucleotide specificity, and 100 fold enrichment of unmodified methylated DNA differing from the background by the methylation of a single cytosine residue.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have the following competing interest: Jason D. Thompson and Andre Marziali are inventors on, and entitled to royalties arising from, a patent application on methods described in this manuscript. Jason D. Thompson and Andre Marziali own shares in Boreal Genomics, a company holding an exclusive license to the technology described in this manuscript, and currently developing a product based on the methods described in this manuscript. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

Figures

Figure 1. Measurement of temperature dependence of…
Figure 1. Measurement of temperature dependence of DNA target mobility through a gel containing immobilized complementary oligonucleotide probes.
The upper limit of these curves were cut off because target DNA had migrated off the end of the gel used for taking these measurements. Both sets of data points were fit to equation (2) using the non-linear least squares fitting tool in the Origin 7.5 software package (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton MA). Mfold calculated values were used for the enthalpy and entropy terms; μ0 and α were determined by the fit. For the mismatch curve μo = 1.34e-9+/−0.05e-9 m2/Vs and α = 1.12e-6+/−0.07e-6. For the perfect complement μ0 = 1.28e-9+/−0.05e-9 m2/Vs and α = 2.01e-7+/−0.13e-7.
Fig ure 2. Time series of ssSCODA…?pub>
Fig<?Pub Caret?>ure 2. Time series of ssSCODA focusing under bias. PC DNA is tagged with 6-FAM (green) and snMM DNA is tagged with Cy5 (red).
Images were taken at 2 min intervals with the first image taken immediately following injection. The camera gain was reduced from 32 to 16 on the green channel after the first image was taken. DNA was injected from a chamber adjacent to the right side of the gel. After injection, focusing plus bias fields are applied. The PC target (green) experiences a convergent drift velocity and focuses to the centre of the gel. The more weakly focusing snMM target (red) is washed completely from the gel by the bias field.
Figure 3. Demonstration of length independent focusing.
Figure 3. Demonstration of length independent focusing.
Left: Focus location under bias for 250 bp (green) and 1000 bp (red) fragments. Right: Image of the gel at the end of the run. Green and red channels have been superimposed.
Figure 4. Rejection ratio of snMM DNA.…
Figure 4. Rejection ratio of snMM DNA. Four different ratios of snMM:PC were injected into a gel and focused under bias to remove excess snMM.
The PC DNA was tagged with 6-FAM and the snMM DNA was tagged with Cy5. Top: fluorescence signal from the final focus spot after excess snMM DNA had been washed from the gel. The fluorescence signals are normalized to the fluorescence measured on an initial calibration run where a 1∶1 ratio of PC-FAM:PC-Cy5 DNA was injected and focused to the centre of the gel. Bottom: rejection ratios calculated by dividing the initial ratio of snMM:PC by the final ratio after washing.
Figure 5. Enrichment of EZH2 Y641N mutation…
Figure 5. Enrichment of EZH2 Y641N mutation from a 1∶1 mixture of wild type (green) and mutant (red) amplicons.
30 ng of each 470 bp target was diluted into a 250 µl solution of 0.9 mM tris, 0.9 mM boric acid and 2 mM NaCl. The sample was placed in a boiling water bath for 5 min to denature the double stranded DNA prior to injection. The targets were injected from a chamber adjacent to the lower right corner of the gel. After injection, focusing and bias fields were applied to simultaneously concentrate the mutant amplicon while washing the wild type amplicon from the gel.
Figure 6. Measurement of mobility versus temperature…
Figure 6. Measurement of mobility versus temperature for methylated and unmethylated targets.
Data points were fit to equation (3). The upper limit of these curves were cut off because target DNA had migrated off the end of the gel used for taking these measurements. Both sets of data points were fit to equation (2) using the non-linear least squares fitting tool in the Origin 7.5 software package (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton MA). For the unmethylated curve Mfold calculated values were used for the enthalpy and entropy terms; μ0 and α were determined by the fit. Using ΔH = 144.4 kcal/mol and ΔS = 0.3988 kcal/mol K the unmethylated curve fit resulted in values of μo = 1.34e-9+/−0.05e-9 m2/Vs and α = 1.12e-6+/−0.07e-6. For the methylated curve, it was assumed that the parameters μ0, α and ΔS were unaffected by the addition of the methyl group and the parameters obtained in the unmethylated fit were used to obtain a value for ΔH = 144.62+/−0.04 kcal/mol. Inset: Separation of methylated (6-FAM, green) and unmethylated (Cy5, red) targets by focusing with an applied DC bias at 69°C.
Figure 7. Washing of unmethylated DNA from…
Figure 7. Washing of unmethylated DNA from the gel.
Top two images were taken after an initial focus but before attempts to wash. The bottom two images were taken after washing the unmethylated target from the gel. All images were taken with the same gain and shutter settings which resulted in sensor saturation and some ghost images from reflections off of lenses in the top left image. Note that the dyes have been swapped compared to the image in Figure 7.
Figure 8. Time series of a demonstration…
Figure 8. Time series of a demonstration of enrichment and extraction of target DNA fragments from a mixture of 20 fmol of 100 nt target (shown in red) and 1 µg of non-target 460 bp dsDNA (shown in green).
The original images in the green and red channels are in gray scale; a–c. The sample mixture is electrophoretically injected from the sample chamber on the bottom left towards to top right. d–g. A focusing field and a time-multiplexed DC bias field is applied to focus the target fragments (red) while washing the background (green) back towards the bottom left. The extraction well in the center is still empty, though condensation on the walls of the well can be observed. h. The extraction well is filled with 12 µl of buffer and only the focusing field is applied. The target fragments enter the buffer in the extraction well. Once focusing is complete, the output buffer can be collected with a pipettor.

References

    1. Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti MA, Romans K, Goodman S, et al. Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nature Medicine. 2008;14:985–990.
    1. Lo YMD, Chiu RWK. Innovation - Prenatal diagnosis: progress through plasma nucleic acids. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2007;8:71–77.
    1. Yang S, Rothman RE. PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2004;4:337–348.
    1. Dohm JC, Lottaz C, Borodina T, Himmelbauer H. Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Research. 2008;36:10.
    1. Shah SP, Morin RD, Khattra J, Prentice L, Pugh T, et al. Mutational evolution in a lobular breast tumour profiled at single nucleotide resolution. Nature. 2009;461:809–U867.
    1. Sun XY, Hung K, Wu L, Sidransky D, Guo BB. Detection of tumor mutations in the presence of excess amounts of normal DNA. Nature Biotechnology. 2002;20:186–189.
    1. Newton CR, Graham A, Heptinstall LE, Powell SJ, Summers C, et al. Analysis Of Any Point Mutation in DNA - The Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS). Nucleic Acids Research. 1989;17:2503–2516.
    1. Dressman D, Yan H, Traverso G, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100:8817–8822.
    1. Li M, Diehl F, Dressman D, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. BEAMing up for detection and quantification of rare sequence variants. Nature Methods. 2006;3:95–97.
    1. Mahony JB, Chong S, Coombes BK, Smieja M, Petrich A. Analytical sensitivity, reproducibility of results, and clinical performance of five PCR assays for detecting Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2000;38:2622–2627.
    1. Smieja M, Mahony JB, Goldsmith CH, Chong S, Petrich A, et al. Replicate PCR testing and probit analysis for detection and quantitation of Chlamydia pneumoniae in clinical specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2001;39:1796–1801.
    1. Jeffreys AJ, May CA. DNA enrichment by allele-specific hybridization (DEASH): A novel method for haplotyping and for detecting low-frequency base substitutional variants and recombinant DNA molecules. Genome Research. 2003;13:2316–2324.
    1. Bau S, Schracke N, Kranzle M, Wu H, Stahler P, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing by specific capture of multiple genomic loci using low-volume microfluidic DNA arrays. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2009;393:171–175.
    1. Monia BP, Johnston JF, Ecker DJ, Zounes MA, Lima WF, et al. Selective-Inhibition of Mutant HA-RAS Messenger-RNA Expression by Antisense Oligonucleotides. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1992;267:19954–19962.
    1. Halperin A, Buhot A, Zhulina EB. Sensitivity, specificity, and the hybridization isotherms of DNA chips. Biophysical Journal. 2004;86:718–730.
    1. Fischer C, Buthe J, Nollau P, Hollerbach S, Schulmann K, et al. Enrichment of mutant KRAS alleles in pancreatic juice by subtractive iterative polymerase chain reaction. Laboratory Investigation. 2001;81:827–831.
    1. Marziali A, Pel J, Bizzotto D, Whitehead LA. Novel electrophoresis mechanism based on synchronous alternating drag perturbation. Electrophoresis. 2005;26:82–90.
    1. Frumin LL, Peltek SE, Zilberstein GV. Nonlinear electrophoresis and focusing of macromolecules. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods. 2001;48:269–282.
    1. Pel J, Broemeling D, Mai L, Poon H-L, Tropini G, et al. Nonlinear electrophoretic response yields a unique parameter for separation of biomolecules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(35):14796–14801.
    1. Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003;31:3406–3415.
    1. Tian JD, Gong H, Sheng NJ, Zhou XC, Gulari E, et al. Accurate multiplex gene synthesis from programmable DNA microchips. Nature. 2004;432:1050–1054.
    1. Morin RD, Johnson NA, Severson TM, Mungall AJ, An JH, et al. Somatic mutations altering EZH2 (Tyr641) in follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of germinal-center origin. Nature Genetics. 2010;42:181–U124.
    1. Freier SM, Altmann KH. The ups and downs of nucleic acid duplex stability: structure-stability studies on chemically-modified DNA:RNA duplexes. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997;25:4429–4443.
    1. Sanghvi YS, Hoke GD, Freier SM, Zounes MC, Gonzalez C, et al. Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides - Synthesis, Biophysical and Biological Evaluation of Oligodeoxynucleotides Containing Modified Pyrimidines. Nucleic Acids Research. 1993;21:3197–3203.
    1. Warmlander S, Sponer JE, Sponer J, Leijon M. The influence of the thymine C5 methyl group on spontaneous base pair breathing in DNA. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277:28491–28497.
    1. Broemeling DJ, Pel J, Gunn DC, Mai L, Thompson JD, et al. An Instrument for Automated Purification of Nucleic Acids from Contaminated Forensic Samples. JALA. 2008;13:40–48.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する