Widespread epigenetic abnormalities suggest a broad DNA methylation erasure defect in abnormal human sperm

Sahar Houshdaran, Victoria K Cortessis, Kimberly Siegmund, Allen Yang, Peter W Laird, Rebecca Z Sokol, Sahar Houshdaran, Victoria K Cortessis, Kimberly Siegmund, Allen Yang, Peter W Laird, Rebecca Z Sokol

Abstract

Background: Male-factor infertility is a common condition, and etiology is unknown for a high proportion of cases. Abnormal epigenetic programming of the germline is proposed as a possible mechanism compromising spermatogenesis of some men currently diagnosed with idiopathic infertility. During germ cell maturation and gametogenesis, cells of the germ line undergo extensive epigenetic reprogramming. This process involves widespread erasure of somatic-like patterns of DNA methylation followed by establishment of sex-specific patterns by de novo DNA methylation. Incomplete reprogramming of the male germ line could, in theory, result in both altered sperm DNA methylation and compromised spermatogenesis.

Methodology/principal finding: We determined concentration, motility and morphology of sperm in semen samples collected by male members of couples attending an infertility clinic. Using MethyLight and Illumina assays we measured methylation of DNA isolated from purified sperm from the same samples. Methylation at numerous sequences was elevated in DNA from poor quality sperm.

Conclusions: This is the first report of a broad epigenetic defect associated with abnormal semen parameters. Our results suggest that the underlying mechanism for these epigenetic changes may be improper erasure of DNA methylation during epigenetic reprogramming of the male germ line.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: P.W.L. is a shareholder, consultant and scientific advisory board member of Epigenomics, AG, which has a commercial interest in DNA methylation markers. This work was not supported by Epigenomics, AG.

Figures

Figure 1. Box plots illustrating associations between…
Figure 1. Box plots illustrating associations between semen parameters and level of methylation (PMR, on the natural-log scale) in DNA isolated from 65 study sperm samples.
DNA methylation was measured by MethyLight. Methylation targets were sequences specific to the genes HRAS, NTF3, MT1A, PAX8, PLAGL1, DIRAS3, MEST and SFN and the repetitive element Satellite 2 (SAT2CHRM1). P-value for trend over category of semen parameter is given for each plot. Rows: DNA methylation targets; columns: semen parameters.
Figure 2. Cluster analysis of 36 MethyLight…
Figure 2. Cluster analysis of 36 MethyLight targets in 65 study sperm DNA samples.
Left: dendrogram defining clusters; rows: 35 methylation targets; columns: 65 study samples ordered left to right on sperm concentration (samples A–G were also included in Illumina analyses (see Figure 3)) with poor to good concentration (blue), motility (purple), and morphology (green) represented by darkest to lightest hue; body of figure: standardized PMR values represented lowest to highest as yellow to red. X = missing.
Figure 3. Results of Illumina analysis of…
Figure 3. Results of Illumina analysis of 1,421 autosomal sequences in DNA isolated from sperm and buffy coat.
Seven study sperm samples (A–G; with values of sperm concentration (106 sperm/ml) A:20, B:56, C:62, D:67, E:75, F:94, G:95), screening sperm sample (S), two buffy coat samples (1–2). Level of DNA methylation scored as β-value. Color: β-value for column sample at row sequence (green: β<0.1; yellow: 0.1≤β≤0.25; orange 0.25<β≤0.5; red: β>0.5). MI and PI: maternally and paternally imprinted genes (black bar). Sequences assigned to tertile of median β-value among buffy coat DNA samples (I, II, III) and sorted within tertile on median β-value among sperm DNA samples. Box 1: sequences with sperm-specific DNA methylation; Box 2: sequences with buffy coat-specific DNA methylation.

References

    1. Abma JC, Chandra A, Mosher WD, Peterson LS, Piccinino LJ. Fertility, family planning, and women's health: new data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat. 1997;23(19):1–114.
    1. Chandra A, Stephen EH. Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982–1995. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30(1):34–42.
    1. Ventura SJ, Mosher WD, Curtin SC, Abma JC, Henshaw S. Highlights of trends in pregnancies and pregnancy rates by outcome: estimates for the United States, 1976–96. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 1999;47(29):1–9.
    1. .
    1. .
    1. Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988-1989). Hum Reprod. 1991;6(6):811–816.
    1. Maduro MR, Lo KC, Chuang WW, Lamb DJ. Genes and male infertility: what can go wrong? J Androl. 2003;24(4):485–493.
    1. McElreavey K, Krausz C, Bishop CE. The human Y chromosome and male infertility. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2000;28:211–232.
    1. Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, Lipshultz LI, Sigman M, et al. Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(5):873–882.
    1. Sokol RZ. male factor in male infertility. In: Lobo R. MD, Paulson R, editors. Infertility, Contraception, and Reproductive Endocrinology. Madden, MA: Blackwell Sciene, Inc; 1997. pp. 547–566.
    1. Rousseaux S, Caron C, Govin J, Lestrat C, Faure AK, et al. Establishment of male-specific epigenetic information. Gene. 2005;345(2):139–153.
    1. Emery BR, Carrell DT. The effect of epigenetic sperm abnormalities on early embryogenesis. Asian J Androl. 2006;8(2):131–142.
    1. Li E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3(9):662–673.
    1. Saitou M, Barton SC, Surani MA. A molecular programme for the specification of germ cell fate in mice. Nature. 2002;418(6895):293–300.
    1. Santos F, Dean W. Epigenetic reprogramming during early development in mammals. Reproduction. 2004;127(6):643–651.
    1. Biermann K, Steger K. Eipgenetics in Male Germ Cells. J Androl 2007
    1. Ariel M, Cedar H, McCarrey J. Developmental changes in methylation of spermatogenesis-specific genes include reprogramming in the epididymis. Nat Genet. 1994;7(1):59–63.
    1. Trasler JM. Origin and roles of genomic methylation patterns in male germ cells. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1998;9(4):467–474.
    1. Oakes CC, La Salle S, Smiraglia DJ, Robaire B, Trasler JM. A unique configuration of genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in the testis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(1):228–233.
    1. Bestor TH, Bourc'his D. Transposon silencing and imprint establishment in mammalian germ cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2004;69:381–387.
    1. Schaefer CB, Ooi SK, Bestor TH, Bourc'his D. Epigenetic decisions in mammalian germ cells. Science. 2007;316(5823):398–399.
    1. Flanagan JM, Popendikyte V, Pozdniakovaite N, Sobolev M, Assadzadeh A, et al. Intra- and interindividual epigenetic variation in human germ cells. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79(1):67–84.
    1. Benchaib M, Braun V, Ressnikof D, Lornage J, Durand P, et al. Influence of global sperm DNA methylation on IVF results. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(3):768–773.
    1. Hartmann S, Bergmann M, Bohle RM, Weidner W, Steger K. Genetic imprinting during impaired spermatogenesis. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006;12(6):407–411.
    1. Marques CJ, Carvalho F, Sousa M, Barros A. Genomic imprinting in disruptive spermatogenesis. Lancet. 2004;363(9422):1700–1702.
    1. Manning M, Lissens W, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A, Weidner W. Imprinting analysis in spermatozoa prepared for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Int J Androl. 2001;24(2):87–94.
    1. Varrault A, Bilanges B, Mackay DJ, Basyuk E, Ahr B, et al. Characterization of the methylation-sensitive promoter of the imprinted ZAC gene supports its role in transient neonatal diabetes mellitus. J Biol Chem. 2001:18653–18656.
    1. Weisenberger DJ, Siegmund KD, Campan M, Young J, Long TI, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 2006;38(7):787–793.
    1. Dale B, Elder K. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1997. In vitro fertilization. p. 187.
    1. Hayashi K, de Sousa Lopes SM, Surani MA. Germ cell specification in mice. Science. 2007;316(5823):394–396.
    1. Yabuta Y, Kurimoto K, Ohinata Y, Seki Y, Saitou M. Gene expression dynamics during germline specification in mice identified by quantitative single-cell gene expression profiling. Biol Reprod. 2006;75(5):705–716.
    1. Surani MA, Hayashi K, Hajkova P. Genetic and epigenetic regulators of pluripotency. Cell. 2007;128(4):747–762.
    1. Hajkova P, Erhardt S, Lane N, Haaf T, El-Maarri O, et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech Dev. 2002;117(1-2):15–23.
    1. Li JY, Lees-Murdock DJ, Xu GL, Walsh CP. Timing of establishment of paternal methylation imprints in the mouse. Genomics. 2004;84(6):952–960.
    1. Szabo PE, Hubner K, Scholer H, Mann JR. Allele-specific expression of imprinted genes in mouse migratory primordial germ cells. Mech Dev. 2002;115(1-2):157–160.
    1. Lane N, Dean W, Erhardt S, Hajkova P, Surani A, et al. Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Genesis. 2003;35(2):88–93.
    1. Lees-Murdock DJ, De Felici M, Walsh CP. Methylation dynamics of repetitive DNA elements in the mouse germ cell lineage. Genomics. 2003;82(2):230–237.
    1. Lee J, Inoue K, Ono R, Ogonuki N, Kohda T, et al. Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells. Development. 2002;129(8):1807–1817.
    1. Yamazaki Y, Mann MR, Lee SS, Marh J, McCarrey JR, et al. Reprogramming of primordial germ cells begins before migration into the genital ridge, making these cells inadequate donors for reproductive cloning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(21):12207–12212.
    1. Trasler JM. Gamete imprinting: setting epigenetic patterns for the next generation. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006;18(1-2):63–69.
    1. Morgan HD, Sutherland HG, Martin DI, Whitelaw E. Epigenetic inheritance at the agouti locus in the mouse. Nat Genet. 1999;23(3):314–318.
    1. Kearns M, Preis J, McDonald M, Morris C, Whitelaw E. Complex patterns of inheritance of an imprinted murine transgene suggest incomplete germline erasure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(17):3301–3309.
    1. Rakyan VK, Chong S, Champ ME, Cuthbert PC, Morgan HD, et al. Transgenerational inheritance of epigenetic states at the murine Axin(Fu) allele occurs after maternal and paternal transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(5):2538–2543.
    1. Kerjean A, Dupont JM, Vasseur C, Le Tessier D, Cuisset L, et al. Establishment of the paternal methylation imprint of the human H19 and MEST/PEG1 genes during spermatogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(14):2183–2187.
    1. Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Suzuki H, Dirks K, Phillips B, et al. Effect of transient embryonic in vivo exposure to the endocrine disruptor methoxychlor on embryonic and postnatal testis development. J Androl. 2003;24(5):736–745.
    1. Chang HS, Anway MD, Rekow SS, Skinner MK. Transgenerational epigenetic imprinting of the male germline by endocrine disruptor exposure during gonadal sex determination. Endocrinology. 2006;147(12):5524–5541.
    1. Acacio BD, Gottfried T, Israel R, Sokol RZ. Evaluation of a large cohort of men presenting for a screening semen analysis. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(3):595–597.
    1. World Health Organization Laboratory Manual for Human Semen and Sperm Cervical Mucus Interaction. 1999
    1. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil CK, Nakajima ST, et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1388–1393.
    1. . 2006.
    1. Laird PW, Zijderveld A, Linders K, Rudnicki MA, Jaenisch R, et al. Simplified mammalian DNA isolation procedure. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(15):4293.
    1. Bibikova M, Lin Z, Zhou L, Chudin E, Garcia EW, et al. High-throughput DNA methylation profiling using universal bead arrays. Genome Res. 2006;16(3):383–393.
    1. . 2007.
    1. . 2007.
    1. Benjamini y, Hochberg y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. R Statist Soc B. 1995;57(1):289–300.
    1. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1990. Finding Groups in Data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics.
    1. . 2006.
    1. Astuti D, Latif F, Wagner K, Gentle D, Cooper WN, et al. Epigenetic alteration at the DLK1-GTL2 imprinted domain in human neoplasia: analysis of neuroblastoma, phaeochromocytoma and Wilms' tumour. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(8):1574–1580.
    1. Bastepe M, Frohlich LF, Hendy GN, Indridason OS, Josse RG, et al. Autosomal dominant pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ib is associated with a heterozygous microdeletion that likely disrupts a putative imprinting control element of GNAS. J Clin Invest. 2003;112(8):1255–1263.
    1. Bastepe M, Frohlich LF, Linglart A, Abu-Zahra HS, Tojo K, et al. Deletion of the NESP55 differentially methylated region causes loss of maternal GNAS imprints and pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ib. Nat Genet. 2005;37(1):25–27.
    1. Bell AC, Felsenfeld G. Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene. Nature. 2000;405(6785):482–485.
    1. de la Puente A, Hall J, Wu YZ, Leone G, Peters J, et al. Structural characterization of Rasgrf1 and a novel linked imprinted locus. Gene. 2002;291(1-2):287–297.
    1. Gaston V, Le Bouc Y, Soupre V, Burglen L, Donadieu J, et al. Analysis of the methylation status of the KCNQ1OT and H19 genes in leukocyte DNA for the diagnosis and prognosis of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9(6):409–418.
    1. Higashimoto K, Soejima H, Saito T, Okumura K, Mukai T. Imprinting disruption of the CDKN1C/KCNQ1OT1 domain: the molecular mechanisms causing Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and cancer. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;113(1–4):306–312.
    1. Jie X, Lang C, Jian Q, Chaoqun L, Dehua Y, et al. Androgen activates PEG10 to promote carcinogenesis in hepatic cancer cells. Oncogene 2007
    1. Liu J, Nealon JG, Weinstein LS. Distinct patterns of abnormal GNAS imprinting in familial and sporadic pseudohypoparathyroidism type IB. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(1):95–102.
    1. Murphy SK, Wylie AA, Jirtle RL. Imprinting of PEG3, the human homologue of a mouse gene involved in nurturing behavior. Genomics. 2001;71(1):110–117.
    1. Runte M, Huttenhofer A, Gross S, Kiefmann M, Horsthemke B, et al. The IC-SNURF-SNRPN transcript serves as a host for multiple small nucleolar RNA species and as an antisense RNA for UBE3A. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(23):2687–2700.
    1. Runte M, Kroisel PM, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Varon R, Horn D, et al. SNURF-SNRPN and UBE3A transcript levels in patients with Angelman syndrome. Hum Genet. 2004;114(6):553–561.
    1. Sutcliffe JS, Nakao M, Christian S, Orstavik KH, Tommerup N, et al. Deletions of a differentially methylated CpG island at the SNRPN gene define a putative imprinting control region. Nat Genet. 1994;8(1):52–58.
    1. Suzuki S, Ono R, Narita T, Pask AJ, Shaw G, et al. Retrotransposon silencing by DNA methylation can drive mammalian genomic imprinting. PLoS Genet. 2007;3(4):e55.
    1. Vu TH, Li T, Nguyen D, Nguyen BT, Yao XM, et al. Symmetric and asymmetric DNA methylation in the human IGF2-H19 imprinted region. Genomics. 2000;64(2):132–143.
    1. Cui H, Onyango P, Brandenburg S, Wu Y, Hsieh CL, et al. Loss of imprinting in colorectal cancer linked to hypomethylation of H19 and IGF2. Cancer Res. 2002;62(22):6442–6446.
    1. Hancock AL, Brown KW, Moorwood K, Moon H, Holmgren C, et al. A CTCF-binding silencer regulates the imprinted genes AWT1 and WT1-AS and exhibits sequential epigenetic defects during Wilms' tumourigenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16(3):343–354.
    1. Kim JD, Hinz AK, Choo JH, Stubbs L, Kim J. YY1 as a controlling factor for the Peg3 and Gnas imprinted domains. Genomics. 2007;89(2):262–269.
    1. Lin SP, Youngson N, Takada S, Seitz H, Reik W, et al. Asymmetric regulation of imprinting on the maternal and paternal chromosomes at the Dlk1-Gtl2 imprinted cluster on mouse chromosome 12. Nat Genet. 2003;35(1):97–102.
    1. Murrell A, Heeson S, Reik W. Interaction between differentially methylated regions partitions the imprinted genes Igf2 and H19 into parent-specific chromatin loops. Nat Genet. 2004;36(8):889–893.
    1. Ono R, Kobayashi S, Wagatsuma H, Aisaka K, Kohda T, et al. A retrotransposon-derived gene, PEG10, is a novel imprinted gene located on human chromosome 7q21. Genomics. 2001;73(2):232–237.
    1. Sullivan MJ, Taniguchi T, Jhee A, Kerr N, Reeve AE. Relaxation of IGF2 imprinting in Wilms tumours associated with specific changes in IGF2 methylation. Oncogene. 1999;18(52):7527–7534.
    1. Yun J, Park CW, Lee YJ, Chung JH. Allele-specific methylation at the promoter-associated CpG island of mouse Copg2. Mamm Genome. 2003;14(6):376–382.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する