Effect of Risankizumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: The UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 Randomized Clinical Trials

Matthias Augustin, Jo Lambert, Carla Zema, Elizabeth H Z Thompson, Min Yang, Eric Q Wu, Viviana Garcia-Horton, Ziqian Geng, Joaquin M Valdes, Avani Joshi, Kenneth B Gordon, Matthias Augustin, Jo Lambert, Carla Zema, Elizabeth H Z Thompson, Min Yang, Eric Q Wu, Viviana Garcia-Horton, Ziqian Geng, Joaquin M Valdes, Avani Joshi, Kenneth B Gordon

Abstract

Importance: Demonstrating the value of therapies from a patient's perspective is increasingly important for patient-centered care.

Objective: To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with risankizumab vs ustekinumab and placebo in psoriasis symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and mental health among patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Design, setting, and participants: The UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 studies were replicate 52-week phase 3, randomized, multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled trials conducted in 139 sites (including hospitals, academic medical centers, clinical research units, and private practices) globally in Asia-Pacific, Japan, Europe, and North America. Adults (≥18 years) with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis with body surface area (BSA) involvement of 10% or more, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores of 12 or higher, and static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) scores of 3 or higher were included.

Interventions: In each trial, patients were randomly assigned (3:1:1) to 150 mg of risankizumab, 45 mg or 90 mg of ustekinumab (weight-based per label) for 52 weeks, or matching placebo for 16 weeks followed by risankizumab.

Main outcomes and measures: Integrated data from 2 trials were used to compare Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) (total score and item scores for pain, redness, itchiness, and burning), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), 5-level EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D-5L), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), at baseline, week 16, and week 52.

Results: A total of 997 patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis were analyzed. Across all arms, the mean age was 47.2 to 47.8 years and 68.3% (136/199 for ustekinumab) to 73.0% (146/200 for placebo) were men. Patients' characteristics and PROs were comparable across all treatment arms at baseline (n = 598, 199, 200 for risankizumab, ustekinumab, and placebo, respectively). At week 16, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with risankizumab than those treated with ustekinumab or placebo achieved PSS = 0, indicating no psoriasis symptoms (30.3% [181/598], 15.1% [30/199], 1.0% [2/200], both P < .001), and DLQI = 0 or 1 indicating no impact on skin-related HRQL (66.2%, 44.7%, 6.0%, P < .001). Significantly greater proportions of patients treated with risankizumab achieved minimally clinically important difference (MCID) than ustekinumab or placebo for DLQI (94.5% [516/546], 85.1% [149/175], 35.6% [64/180]; both P < .001), EQ-5D-5L (41.7% [249/597] vs 31.5% [62/197], P = .01; vs 19.0% [38/200], P < .001), and HADS (anxiety: 69.1% [381/551] vs 57.1% [104/182], P = .004; vs 35.9% [66/184], P < .001; depression: 71.1% [354/598] vs 60.4% [96/159], P = .01; vs 37.1% [59/159], P < .001). At week 52, improvements in patients treated with risankizumab compared with those treated with ustekinumab were sustained for PSS, DLQI, and EQ-5D-5L.

Conclusions and relevance: Risankizumab significantly improved symptoms of moderate to severe psoriasis, improved HRQL, and reduced psychological distress compared with ustekinumab or placebo.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02684370 (UltIMMa-1) and NCT02684357 (UltIMMa-2).

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest Disclosures: Dr Augustin has served as consultant to or paid speaker for clinical trials sponsored by companies that manufacture drugs used for the treatment of psoriasis, including AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Centocor, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Leo, Medac, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Xenoport. Dr Lambert serves as an investigator and/or consultant for AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, and LEO Pharma. Dr Gordon has received honoraria for serving as a consultant and/or grants as an investigator from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Dermira, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Sun, and UCB. Drs Joshi and Geng are employees of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or stock options. Drs Zema, Thompson, and Valdez are former employees of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or stock options. Drs Yang, Wu, and Garcia-Horton are employed by Analysis Group, which received payment from AbbVie to assist with the research process. No other conflicts are reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Total Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS)…
Figure 1.. Total Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) Score Analyses
A, PSS Total score summary.Mean values are shown. The PSS total scores were exploratory outcomes in the trials. The last observation carried forward imputation was adopted for missing data. Risankizumab-treated patients had significantly lower PSS total scores compared with placebo-treated patients at week 4 through week 16 (P < .001) and ustekinumab-treated patients at week 4 through week 52 (P = .01 at week 4, P = .01 at week 8, P = .008 at week 12, and P < .001 at all other time points). B, PSS = 0 Responder Analysis. The nonresponder imputation (NRI) approach was used. PSS = 0 at week 16 was a ranked secondary outcome; all other time points were exploratory outcomes. A significantly greater proportion of risankizumab-treated patients achieved PSS = 0, compared with patients treated with placebo (P = .008 at week 4, P < .001 at all other time points) and those treated with ustekinumab (P = .02 at week 4, P = .03 at week 12, and P < .001 at all other time points). C, PSS = 0/1 responder analysis. NRI approach was used. PSS = 0/1 was an exploratory outcome. From week 12 through week 52, a significantly greater proportion of risankizumab-treated patients achieved PSS = 0/1 compared with ustekinumab-treated patients (P = .01 at week 12 and P < . 001 at week 16 through week 52).
Figure 2.. Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) Items…
Figure 2.. Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) Items Scales Responder Analyses (Exploratory Outcomes)a
A, PSS pain. B, PSS redness. C, PSS itchiness. D, PSS burning. aSignificantly greater proportions of patients treated with risankizumab achieved a score of 0 or 1 on each of the PSS items at week 4 through week 16 compared with placebo. Compared with patients treated with ustekinumab, a significantly greater proportion of those treated with risankizumab achieved PSS pain = 0 (P < .001 from week 22 onward), PSS redness = 0 (P = .01 at week 4, P = .001 at week 8, P = .001 at week 12, and P < .001 at all other time points, PSS itchiness = 0 (P < .001 from week 16 onward), and PSS burning = 0 (P < .001 from week 28 onward).

References

    1. Lebwohl MG, Bachelez H, Barker J, et al. . Patient perspectives in the management of psoriasis: results from the population-based Multinational Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(5):871-881.e871-830.
    1. Parisi R, Symmons DP, Griffiths CE, Ashcroft DM; Identification and Management of Psoriasis and Associated ComorbidiTy (IMPACT) project team . Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of incidence and prevalence. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(2):377-385. doi:10.1038/jid.2012.339
    1. Chandran V, Raychaudhuri SP. Geoepidemiology and environmental factors of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. J Autoimmun. 2010;34(3):J314-J321. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2009.12.001
    1. Krueger GG, Langley RG, Finlay AY, et al. . Patient-reported outcomes of psoriasis improvement with etanercept therapy: results of a randomized phase III trial. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153(6):1192-1199. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06948.x
    1. de Korte J, Sprangers MA, Mombers FM, Bos JD. Quality of life in patients with psoriasis: a systematic literature review. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2004;9(2):140-147. doi:10.1046/j.1087-0024.2003.09110.x
    1. Esposito M, Saraceno R, Giunta A, Maccarone M, Chimenti S. An Italian study on psoriasis and depression. Dermatology. 2006;212(2):123-127. doi:10.1159/000090652
    1. Rapp SR, Feldman SR, Exum ML, Fleischer AB Jr, Reboussin DM. Psoriasis causes as much disability as other major medical diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41(3 Pt 1):401-407. doi:10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70112-X
    1. Choi J, Koo JY. Quality of life issues in psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(2)(suppl):S57-S61. doi:10.1016/S0190-9622(03)01136-8
    1. Møller AH, Erntoft S, Vinding GR, Jemec GBE. A systematic literature review to compare quality of life in psoriasis with other chronic diseases using EQ-5D-derived utility values. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015;6:167-177.
    1. Reich K, Nestle FO, Papp K, et al. . Improvement in quality of life with infliximab induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154(6):1161-1168. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07237.x
    1. Reich K, Segaert S, Van de Kerkhof P, et al. . Once-weekly administration of etanercept 50 mg improves patient-reported outcomes in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Dermatology. 2009;219(3):239-249. doi:10.1159/000237871
    1. Revicki DA, Willian MK, Menter A, et al. . Impact of adalimumab treatment on patient-reported outcomes: results from a Phase III clinical trial in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2007;18(6):341-350. doi:10.1080/09546630701646172
    1. Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Griffiths CE, et al. . Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the continuous treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Results from the phase III, double-blinded, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):405-417. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.041
    1. Langley RG, Elewski BE, Lebwohl M, et al. ; ERASURE Study Group; FIXTURE Study Group . Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis--results of two phase 3 trials. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(4):326-338. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1314258
    1. Gordon KB, Strober B, Lebwohl M, et al. . Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2018;392(10148):650-661. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31713-6
    1. . BI 655066 (Risankizumab) Compared to Placebo and Active Comparator (Ustekinumab) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis. 2017. Accessed October 2018.
    1. . BI 655066 Compared to Placebo & Active Comparator (Ustekinumab) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis. 2018. Accessed October 2018.
    1. Rentz AM, Skalicky AM, Burslem K, et al. . The content validity of the PSS in patients with plaque psoriasis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):4. doi:10.1186/s41687-017-0004-7
    1. Mazzotti E, Barbaranelli C, Picardi A, Abeni D, Pasquini P. Psychometric properties of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in 900 Italian patients with psoriasis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85(5):409-413. doi:10.1080/00015550510032832
    1. EuroQol Research Foundation . EQ-5D-5L. 2018. Accessed October 2018.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361-370. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
    1. Rentz A, Mansukhani S, Esser D, et al. Reliability, Validity, and Ability to Detect Change of the Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) in Patients with Plaque Psoriasis. EADV Congress, Paris, France [P2070]. 2018. Accessed October 2018.
    1. Shikiar R, Willian MK, Okun MM, Thompson CS, Revicki DA. The validity and responsiveness of three quality of life measures in the assessment of psoriasis patients: results of a phase II study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:71. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-71
    1. Devlin NJ, Shah KK, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B. Valuing health-related quality of life: an EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ. 2018;27(1):7-22. doi:10.1002/hec.3564
    1. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69-77. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3
    1. Basra MK, Salek MS, Camilleri L, Sturkey R, Finlay AY. Determining the minimal clinically important difference and responsiveness of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): further data. Dermatology. 2015;230(1):27-33. doi:10.1159/000365390
    1. Chen P, Lin KC, Liing RJ, Wu CY, Chen CL, Chang KC. Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(6):1585-1596. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1196-z
    1. Puhan MA, Frey M, Büchi S, Schünemann HJ. The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6(1):46. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-6-46
    1. FDA. Value and Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Assessing Effects of Medical Devices. 2017. Accessed November 2017.
    1. Ryan C, Puig L, Zema C, et al. Incremental benefits on patient-reported outcomes for achieving PASI90 or PASI100 over PASI75 in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Paper presented at: Presented at the 27th EADV Congress 2018; Paris, France.
    1. Hongbo Y, Thomas CL, Harrison MA, Salek MS, Finlay AY. Translating the science of quality of life into practice: What do dermatology life quality index scores mean? J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125(4):659-664. doi:10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23621.x
    1. Swinburn P, Lloyd A, Boye KS, Edson-Heredia E, Bowman L, Janssen B. Development of a disease-specific version of the EQ-5D-5L for use in patients suffering from psoriasis: lessons learned from a feasibility study in the UK. Jval. 2013;16(8):1156-1162.
    1. Thaçi D, Blauvelt A, Reich K, et al. . Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(3):400-409. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.05.013
    1. Griffiths CE, Reich K, Lebwohl M, et al. ; UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 investigators . Comparison of ixekizumab with etanercept or placebo in moderate to severe psoriasis (UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3): results from two phase 3 randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):541-551. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60125-8
    1. Nakagawa H, Niiro H, Ootaki K; Japanese brodalumab study group . Brodalumab, a human anti-interleukin-17-receptor antibody in the treatment of Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: efficacy and safety results from a phase II randomized controlled study. J Dermatol Sci. 2016;81(1):44-52. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2015.10.009
    1. Lebwohl M, Papp K, Wu J, et al. . Neuropsychiatric adverse events in brodalumab psoriasis studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(6):AB178. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.04.691
    1. Reich K, Pinter A, Lacour JP, et al. ; IXORA-S investigators . Comparison of ixekizumab with ustekinumab in moderate to severe psoriasis: 24-week results from IXORA-S, a phase III study. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(4):1014-1023. doi:10.1111/bjd.15666

Source: PubMed

3
購読する